• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

New Behind The Scenes: Jamie, Bobby and Jimmy take on the board.

I just watched this video on BTS and Loved it! Changed my mind about all of them. Actually, I always thought Jimmy was attractive, I just didn't like his attitude. But then I saw him in the New York Broke Straight Boys events and I grew to like him. I saw that he really is a great down to earth guy. And kudos to Jimmy for taking all the heat.CAn't wait to meet some of these guys in Austin!
Thanks scorpio for this add on. It was great fun to watch.
 
If the truth be known...

Deidra must be a guy, because her avatar is Diesal's armpit.:001_rolleyes:

Jaime and Bobby said I was a chick, or a "Spanish chick," but Jimmy was sure I also HAD to be a guy..............It would have been so much funnier, if Clay would have told Jimmy that we were girls.:001_tt2:

Just a thought.

Agreed Ms. K!

Straight guys love lesbian porn... that makes sense to Jimmy.

If Clay would have said you really are woman and not 'bitter queens', Jimmy still wouldn't believe it. For all I know the guy may not know there's a site Broke Straight Girls...

Check it out Jimmy: http://www.brokestraightgirls.com/girls_first_time_1.php

To the two genuine ladies of the forum mentioned, Ms. Kianna & Ms. Diedra, too bad these genuine straight boys can't recognize genuine ladies when they encounter them on the forum, after all there are more than gay men subscribers to Broke Straight Boys We have our share of straight or bi or gay friendly or gay women on Broke Straight Boys as active members, too.

Dear Robert,

I guess maybe the reason these guys are straight afterall, is that they can't conceive that a dick like the one you posted as your avatar is a thing of beauty, impressive, and desireable to others. I think their lack of appreciation for your tasteful and tasty avatar is nothing more than a textbook example of "quasi-Freudian corndog envy" (penis envy) and nothing more.


To the three panelist,

It is truly enjoyable to hear you guys interact and joke with each other while reviewing the forum postings. But, for Jimmy alone, having an negative attitude that suggests you are disgusted or consider yourself too superior to engage in a h/j, b/j, or even limiting yourself to a one-sided scene with Zach doesn't make you apprear mysterious or entertaining. It only comes off as you being too good to stoop so low to be engaged in the scene on an equal basis with your partner, or put it another way "arrogant".

If longtime members are calling or hoping for you to get drilled in the ass, it isn't out of their fondness for you. Your personality shown in the videos is defiant, uncooperative, maddening, and alienates members who resent your hands-off approach in a scene. It is as if you don't want to get your hands dirty! Yes, you seem to be a fun loving kind of guy at times, such as off in New York where you are being catered to, but in the nitty-gritty of the Broke Straight Boys studio where your attitude really counts, you only show your worst attitude to the paying customers of Broke Straight Boys that are the reason you are hired in the first place.

For a new employee getting a start at a new job, this poor attitude, so many members find deeply offensive, would never fly in any other regular job. You'd be shown the door. Hopefully, you will realize that serious changes in attitude by you are needed badly. You are a nice looking guy I would welcome you otherwise. I just don't understand why you try so hard to turn paying members against you. This isn't Championship Wrestling, just gay porn. No one here wants to hate your participation in a scene on Broke Straight Boys

Respectfully wanting a positive attitude change from you,


Stimpy
 
But, for Jimmy alone, having an negative attitude that suggests you are disgusted or consider yourself too superior to engage in a h/j, b/j, or even limiting yourself to a one-sided scene with Zach doesn't make you apprear mysterious or entertaining. It only comes off as you being too good to stoop so low to be engaged in the scene on an equal basis with your partner, or put it another way "arrogant".

If longtime members are calling or hoping for you to get drilled in the ass, it isn't out of their fondness for you. Your personality shown in the videos is defiant, uncooperative, maddening, and alienates members who resent your hands-off approach in a scene. It is as if you don't want to get your hands dirty!..........but in the nitty-gritty of the Broke Straight Boys studio where your attitude really counts, you only show your worst attitude to the paying customers of Broke Straight Boys that are the reason you are hired in the first place.

For a new employee getting a start at a new job, this poor attitude, so many members find deeply offensive, would never fly in any other regular job. You'd be shown the door...............I just don't understand why you try so hard to turn paying members against you. This isn't Championship Wrestling, just gay porn. No one here wants to hate your participation in a scene on Broke Straight Boys

Respectfully wanting a positive attitude change from you,


Stimpy
Stimpy, once again I respectfully totally disagree with what you are saying about Jimmy. I do not see his attitude as being in any way "negative", or that he is he a bad employee. It appears to me that Clay has employed a variety of types of straight guys to appear in the scenes, and Jimmy like CJ who just appeared in a three way, with Rocco and Brett, also does not touch or suck or certainly anally receive another guy's dick. To me, neither is being "arrogant" or "defiant", or "uncooperative".

Every model here does not have to do everything. I believe that your beef should be with management for hiring "straight guys" like Jimmy and CJ whose roles in these scenes are to receive oral and to provide other models with a good ass fucking. I see them as being excellent employees performing exactly the roles that they were hired to perform.

I also question your comment, "If longtime members are calling or hoping for you to get drilled in the ass, it isn't out of their fondness for you." This seems to be a prison mentality and the image of someone being "drilled in the ass" sounds like rape. I believe that anal sex should be done out of desire and not as a punishment.

Of course Stimpy, you are as entitled to your opinions as I am to mine, however you seem genuinely angered by Clay hiring straight employees whose function is solely to top or receive oral favors, but please keep in mind that there are many viewers of this site who enjoy "one sided" sex with a straight guy. This is not to say that one day Clay may convince Jimmy or CJ to suck dick, or even get fucked, but if he hires them exclusively to top, it doesn't make them bad people, either. It is just not "your cup of tea", but this is a big world with all types of needs and desires, even within the confines of this relatively small niche web site.
 
Jimmy was looking over the edge of that totally awesome bed with his arms crossed, leaning away from the other two boys and with a hurt smile on his face for most of the video, and with good reason.

All he had to say was that he was doing what he'd been contracted to do: roll his eyes and sigh, show resignation and slight disgust, act out the Kinsey Zero reaction to the fuckin' fag stuff he was being forced to undergo. Those first posts, when the complaints started deluging the forum, probably struck Jimmy as pretty ironic. He knew he'd been groomed for total stardom, been given the parameters of his character, had Mark and Clay congratulating each other, but that for whatever reasons (unsubtlety and ham acting?) the scenes had mostly backfired.

I loved this video, like most everyone else. And the three guys are all bright and amusing, each in his own way. I will say that you can tell Li'l Keeper is well aware that he's more adorable than a litter of week old kitties in a basket with a bow. His sailor hat with the upswept curls peeping out were all the proof of that you need. But hey, I agree. He and Rocco are my faves.

Caveat: I really missed Logan, Leon and Tyler, and up to a point Dustin and CJ (mark 1.0.), when Bobby stumbled on "the long words". He did awesome for a kid who didn't graduate high school, and who probably got more out of his academic career, such as it was, than many a Broke Straight Boys with a BA, but it means he and I can't be besties if he doesn't understand what I'm saying.:crying::w00t::001_tt1::lol:
 
We said WONDERFUL things about JAIME and BOBBY!!!!!!!!!!!:001_tt2:

And I still say the best episode in history, will be the one where Jimmy finally puts a dick in his mouth............:ohmy:

Because we ARE nice people Ms.K. haha :biggrin:
 
I do want to clarify something here in regards to Jimmy. Ms.K and I have had alot of fun with the "Forces of Evil" label from the Jimmy and Jamie thread. I do want to clarify though that many of us are only wanting Jimmy to go farther, and a little faster in his progression. Not that any of us here want to see him get bottomed by the biggest dick possible. That's just pure meanness to even suggest that. And none of us have. Few if any of us hate Jimmy. Ms.K and I don't.

I think he's a cute guy with a nice body. I am liking his personality more and more as I see him in BTS videos. Just like with a Hollywood movie actor we are rating his performance in his scenes. Unfortunately his performances for many of us (though not all of us) have been underwhelming.

Here again is my unedited exact quote from the Jimmy and Jamie thread. I'm not embarrassed to put it out there again. If Jimmy reads it that's fine. Because I think it speaks to why many of us have not been more impressed with his scenes that we have been shown thus far. It's not a critique of his body or of him as a human being. It's just a movie review of how his stage persona comes across on screen to his wannabe fans.


"I agree with you [Deeteedub] that I'm starting to like Jimmy a little more. I think that his attitude was much better in this scene than in previous ones. I will go along with you that he has coasted long enough, doing as little as possible to get paid. I'm not saying that he should get fucked right away. Only that he become a more active participant in his scenes.

Just because he may be the straightest model in the room doesn't mean that he's entitled to be completely serviced by other models indefinitely."
 
Straight, Straighter, Straightest

I do want to clarify something here in regards to Jimmy. Ms.K and I have had alot of fun with the "Forces of Evil" label from the Jimmy and Jamie thread. I do want to clarify though that many of us are only wanting Jimmy to go farther, and a little faster in his progression. Not that any of us here want to see him get bottomed by the biggest dick possible. That's just pure meanness to even suggest that. And none of us have. Few if any of us hate Jimmy. Ms.K and I don't.

I think he's a cute guy with a nice body. I am liking his personality more and more as I see him in BTS videos. Just like with a Hollywood movie actor we are rating his performance in his scenes. Unfortunately his performances for many of us (though not all of us) have been underwhelming.

Here again is my unedited exact quote from the Jimmy and Jamie thread. I'm not embarrassed to put it out there again. If Jimmy reads it that's fine. Because I think it speaks to why many of us have not been more impressed with his scenes that we have been shown thus far. It's not a critique of his body or of him as a human being. It's just a movie review of how his stage persona comes across on screen to his wannabe fans.


"I agree with you [Deeteedub] that I'm starting to like Jimmy a little more. I think that his attitude was much better in this scene than in previous ones. I will go along with you that he has coasted long enough, doing as little as possible to get paid. I'm not saying that he should get fucked right away. Only that he become a more active participant in his scenes.

Just because he may be the straightest model in the room doesn't mean that he's entitled to be completely serviced by other models indefinitely.
"

To Whom It May Concern,

Jimmy is fine when viewed at the trade show in New York or even when with the other models reviewing relatively few positive and negative comments from the forum. At least he showed a little sense of humor. I will give him the fact that he is Straight, even all the way up to Straightest. JUST REREAD THE LAST SENTENCE FROM TAMPA24'S QUOTE ONE MORE TIME.

"Just because he may be the straightest model in the room doesn't mean that he's entitled to be completely serviced by other models indefinitely."


Sincerely,


Stimpy
 
Stimpy, once again I respectfully totally disagree with what you are saying about Jimmy. I do not see his attitude as being in any way "negative", or that he is he a bad employee. It appears to me that Clay has employed a variety of types of straight guys to appear in the scenes, and Jimmy like CJ who just appeared in a three way, with Rocco and Brett, also does not touch or suck or certainly anally receive another guy's dick. To me, neither is being "arrogant" or "defiant", or "uncooperative".

Every model here does not have to do everything.

I have to agree. I also seem to recall that certain Broke Straight Boys models in the prior incarnation also did not bottom or at least did so only when they were absolutely forced to do so. Diesal comes to mind as does Mike Robbins. I do not expect every model here to bottom. However I would love to see Jimmy bottom if he was ever so inclined to do so. Who knows he might discover he likes it.

Jimmy has been hired to play a role and he does so quite well. Now that role obviously is not the cup of tea of a very vocal group of individuals whop post here. But equally true is that he has his fans. I am one of them. He could do more and I would like to see him do so. But so far he has not done anything to upset me. Not to mention watching the footage from New York added a whole new depth of character to him that made me feel a lot more affinity towards him. I know guys like that and mentored some homeless kids with that same type of attitude. I certainly prefer him to some closeted little queen being passed off as straight as some web sites try to do.
 
This is a great addition to Broke Straight Boys It feels like they are coming back to what we enjoyed and expected at Broke Straight Boys As much as I enjoyed this interview I still await the posting of the individual interviews they used to advertise the new site.
I know some members can not resist their personal, ignorant attacks " Bobby stumbled on the long words" but I hope Bobby takes it with a grain of salt and IGNORES it. Most of the members appreciate his efforts and hope personal attacks do not put a stop this new feature. We hope to hear from him and the other models in the future.
Mark - great addition.
 
Jimmy could still be a very successful model here and never bottom.

Dustin/Andrew didn't. MHRIP Diesal didn't bottom (for one time only) until he had been here for a couple years.

And both of those models built up very strong fan bases on the site.
 
Damn! Damn! Damn!

If I'd known Bobby was going to read my post in this episode, I would've included my phone number! So close ... ;)

(Great episode).
 
This may have been said about Jimmy (I used to waltz into the forum knowing everything that had been posted on all the threads except Help I'm Bored, but it takes me so long to see the videos that time constraints have become a real issue) and I'm pretty sure it's a general observation that I've made before, nonetheless:

it's not whether he, or the other KinseyZero guys, actually get fucked or suck dick that's important to me. As one of the first people to say on the forum that it's the guys' evolution, or progression, that interests me, I'd like to say that an evolution of Attitude is a lot more important to a gay audience than a progression of gay sex acts. Lots of people are defending Jimmy's disdain on the basis of his heterosexuality. I want him to stay heterosexual but to evolve in subtler ways than touch, jack, suck, kiss, bottom. Just a glance of complicity or affection toward the guy who's providing his pleasure, or a compliment or a nuzzle, or a spontaneous reach around for the other guy's dick, to show solidarity. I find that stuff much hotter than I would seeing Jimmy's grimaces of pain and disgust if he ever found himself flaccid and unhappy in the unspeakable act of bottoming. Depending on who topped him, I would skip a scene in which he got fucked just because I'd know how uncomfortable and unsexy it would be.
 
It took teamwork: somebody came up with the idea, the video had to be shot, put on the site and announced… it worked for me! We want more...

Next time why not a video with Clay in front of the camera this time. It would give him the chance to introduce himself. Clay could select some post he feels like answering.

PS: Clay are you reading this? Eyes, smile, a gentle touch, intelligence, great personality... are the things I watch for in your video's!
 
Last edited:
That goes double for me

It took teamwork: somebody came up with the idea, the video had to be shot, put on the site and announced… it worked for me! We want more...

Next time why not a video with Clay in front of the camera this time. It would give him the chance to introduce himself. Clay could select some post he feels like answering.

PS: Clay are you reading this? Eyes, smile, a gentle touch, intelligence, great personality... are the things I watch for in your video's!

Dear Robert,

You have so inspired me that I agree to what ever you say, only double!:dancingpenis::dancingpenis: Clay needs to give us a window to his soles, so we can figure out what shoes you wear to avoid being filmed. Even more, we would like a window to his soul, too! The camera doesn't bite.

Sincerely,


Stimpy, the Double Penetrator all-in-one
:dancingpenis::dancingpenis:
 
Hi Stimpy, all-in-one Double Penetrator, the mighty Tarzan 'de Luxe' amongst vibrators.

Clay might be the man that rises to a challenge, or, aims to pleasure... how would you say that in the US?
 
I think my friend that the expression you are trying for is: Aims to please.

"Rises to a challenge" is perfect English. :wink:
 
I sincerely hope this comment won’t get me in trouble and that I won’t regret it but here goes. I have watched the BHS video and absolutely loved it; I think that scene will do more to improve the image of Broke Straight Boys 2.0 then all the actual scenes thus far lumped together. If we were to take a poll right now I bet the site popularity has gone up 20 points. The reason, which is very simple, involves how close we are allowed to become with the models. To hear them read our comments and react to what they read makes them seem more like real people and friends instead of some street hooker. My bet is after that one report Bobby will easily become the new Tyler. And if Jimmy were allowed to post on the forum as long as he kept an open mind and a civil tongue in his mouth my bet is he would soon be the new diesel or Mike Robins. And as for Clay the best thing he could have done when they mentioned his name would have been to step out from behind the camera and introduce himself. If he had done that simple gesture I bet he would never again receive a bad comment about himself. Now I am not saying we should become personal friends with any one of the guys but it means a great deal to see them on human terms. I sincerely think that has always been what separates Broke Straight Boys from the other porn sites. Look at it this way on the other sites like CF you see some very nice looking guys having sex and that’s about it. You don’t know who they are or what they are doing there. Where the film is being shot and probably not any hint of who is doing the shooting. In the case of Broke Straight Boys we knew who David was and even his partner. We knew where the studio was located and several members even got to see it. We got to know the models and even talk to some of them on line. So I am curious does anyone else think these are the things that kept us coming back to the old Broke Straight Boys?
 
I sincerely hope this comment won’t get me in trouble and that I won’t regret it but here goes. I have watched the BHS video and absolutely loved it; I think that scene will do more to improve the image of Broke Straight Boys 2.0 then all the actual scenes thus far lumped together. If we were to take a poll right now I bet the site popularity has gone up 20 points.
I don't see how your comments could get you into any "trouble", Denny. I think that this scene was a stroke of genius and it humanizes the models and Clay.

I recall that Scorpio told us as soon as the new scenes wee released that they have many changes and surprises in store for us, but they wanted to bring out the changes slowly. That is a good idea, as we are all accustomed to things being as they were, and change can be a bit of a shock to the system.

But I certainly hope that they continue to feature the models and "the voice", Clay in more BTS and hopefully posting on the board too. The personal human aspect of seeing that Jimmy, Jamie, Bobby and Clay hanging out, joking and laughing and actually interacting with us makes them seem like a cool bunch of guys, and not just actors on a porn set. Kudos to all involved!!!
 
Last edited:
Denny and Mike I couldn't agree with you more. The fact that we get introduced to the more popular models in areas of the site like BTS helps humanize them in the eyes of us members. It's just one more thing that sets Broke Straight Boys apart from other sites.

For instance the BTS vid of MikeR only helped improve the standing of an already popular model. He came across as such a nice young man that many of us would not have minded just meeting him for a cup of coffee. With no sexual motives at all. Now we have videos like that of fine young men for posterity. Rest in Peace dear Mike.

I agree with Denny that for Clay to stand or sit in front of the camera would improve his standing just as it has for other models who have talked openly on BTS. Not that we don't already like him of course. I'm sure though that it is not a question of if, but when he will do it. I will not force the issue though. When Clay decides that he is ready and willing to do that, we will thank him for the gesture.

The idea of doing this interview was pure brilliance. It came at just the right time. It also reinforced everything Mark was trying to tell us. For one that Clay reads all the threads related to his scenes. And secondly but perhaps most importantly...Mark has told us repeatedly when the posts have gone very negative towards models on a personal level...that it's quite possible the models themselves are reading those posts. So here he made sure that we saw the models doing just that.

Obviously there are plenty of models who will read reviews of their work here in the forum with no prodding whatsoever from Mark or Clay to do so. They are given free memberships to the site so they can see how the finished product of their scenes turned out. So it only makes sense that some of them would be curious to see what the viewers themselves thought of their scenes.

Don't think for a minute that in addition to Mark wanting to give us the pleasure of being introduced to them in a non porn setting...that he had another motive as well. I'm sure he took some small pleasure in knowing that some members would be squirming in their seats. lol A not so subtle reminder that when we say negative things about models (or staff) that we are talking about real human beings.
 
Last edited:
Top