• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

New Format

I don't like the new site. The old site had very good style, the new moderator is boring, the guys are average, which is ok, most guys are. I have a three month membership, but have been on the site for years. Miss David, Tyler and the whole old group which would introduce new guys as the plot developed. I really don't think this new site, however it developed, is any good at all. Will give it my three month membership and if things don't improve will sign off. I think the old saying "if it works don't fix it applies here". David had a way of picking potential good actors and developing them, if it didn't work out they didn't come back. Think most of these guys shoot for the cash and split.

No, they fixed what WAS broken. The site became basically a repeat over and over of gay men having the same boring sex with the same boring models. There was no longer any plot to the stories and not even an attempt to have gay men. Anytime there is a major change to a site's content, there will be complainers, but the changes will also bring back new people like myself who used to be members of Broke Straight Boys but got tired of the repetitive non-sense every week with models who were not attractive, not believably straight, and doing the same old things.
 
Clearly all those guys mentioned in the response here aren't gay...and anyway...ALL A MUTE POINT NOW...Vinnie and Zach, assuming Zach guy with blond hair...hard to believe that he's straight the way he sucks cock, SO NEW SITE IS ALREADY OLD SITE!

Well you can say they aren't, but it won't make it true. Even David has said some of them are so you are in denial. They are noticably gay. The new site isn't' the old site thank goodness. The scene with Vinnie and Zach is one scene and I'm not concerned if one person in a scene is gay.. I was concerned with the old site where everyone was obviously gay and they broke back the same people (i.e. Mike Robbins) over and over and over whose 15 minutes were long over.
 
I don't think there was anything wrong with the orignial site: it had development, new people, different scenarios: as I said in the 1st post: if it ain't broke, why fix it? I'm not naive however...I'm having fun with these posts. This is an industry, a business...these guys, straight/gay, whatever are in the porn business. They're here to turn a quick buck. To my knowlege, two have died already to drug related causes. That's the reality -but like most entertainment, it's distracting to get lost in the fantasy.
 
Sorry guys but as a long time member of the site and someone in his early 20's (just turned 21), I have to say that the new stuff is fantastic!
I like the interviews and that they are not being told how exactly to do everything etc. I have to say that I don't care much for tattoos but that is what you see on all the guys my age, believe me living in a dorm you get to see the so called "artwork" that some guys have paid to put on their bodies.
I liked the old stuff but was beginning to grow bored with the site, every scene was so predictable. David was great, I like him a lot but it was definitely time to for a fresh approach.
In general people are tropophobic so I can understand why some of you are complaining but let's give it a chance before we start calling out the lynch mob.
I would only like to make one, I would like the interviewer ask some more questions, like when did they first masterbate, how did they learn, have they ever been caught and by whom etc.
But remember that is just my opinion.
 
I'm a fan of David's work although neither he nor anyone else is perfect. So far I feel the new director hasn't yet found his footing. Except for Slink I haven't been too thrilled with the models, but that's my taste.

What I'm beginning to think is that a true solution to this site is not relying on just one director, but having several could be the answer. Maybe 3 or 4. With their varying styles members wouldn't get bored so easily.

I don't know how feasible it is, but it could be interesting.
 
Sorry guys but as a long time member of the site and someone in his early 20's (just turned 21), I have to say that the new stuff is fantastic!
I like the interviews and that they are not being told how exactly to do everything etc. I have to say that I don't care much for tattoos but that is what you see on all the guys my age, believe me living in a dorm you get to see the so called "artwork" that some guys have paid to put on their bodies.
I liked the old stuff but was beginning to grow bored with the site, every scene was so predictable. David was great, I like him a lot but it was definitely time to for a fresh approach.
In general people are tropophobic so I can understand why some of you are complaining but let's give it a chance before we start calling out the lynch mob.
I would only like to make one, I would like the interviewer ask some more questions, like when did they first masterbate, how did they learn, have they ever been caught and by whom etc.
But remember that is just my opinion.

A very well written post lpdude. Thank you. I like the questions you came up with for the models. :)
 
Doesn't work like you say

"I don't blame Jimmy for being scared. (...) I'm not impressed as it took almost 8 minutes to do off his shorts!"

When somebody is so nervous as Jimmy, it's good he didn't had to drop his shorts immediately.

If things went to slow for you, why not use the menu bar and skip the video forward till the point of your liking?

We watched only a few episodes yet. The episode Vinny & Zach got a very high rating. Maybe you'll be pleasantly be surprised in the episodes to come.

I'm the one that posted your quote. You CAN NOT USE the menu bar to fast forward as it is buffering & if I go beyond the point it is buffering-it goes back to the beginning. So what you suggest obviously you haven't tried as I've already tried to do that. If you are going to suggest something that is impossible like they say it is better to keep it to yourself. I've watched every episode & Rocco & Slink out of the 3some is the only barely good point on this new version. The camera work is still bad & the voice is too creepy to exact any eroticism for me. I think they should go to a Defiant Productions type of scene where the models do their own thing without any outside interference. Are you listening Mark? Please change your concept as you have it quickly or go back to the old way as I disagree with one poster here as everything was not the same: Ashton is not Mikey is not Diesal is not Austin is not Zakk. Everyone had their own exciting interesting personality which is more than these "NEW" models have.:tongue_smilie:
 
Last edited:
Hi Warren,

Sure I tried it out. Works fine at my place when playing back High Quality wmv, or HD Quality wmv.

Grtz,
Robert
 
It does have to finish buffering first before you can fast forward through a scene. But once it's done buffering, it will work. One option is to pick the quality of download you want and then let it start running. Minimize the video page while it downloads. Do something else online. Peruse the forum for 10 minutes or so maybe. Then go back to the fully downloaded or "buffered" vid. At that point you should be able to fast forward through any parts that don't hold your interest.

If you put it on pause when it first starts then it will still download/buffer but it will be still start at the beginning when you come back to it. If you let it run and come back to it in the middle of the scene then you can still back it up to the beginning and fast forward at will.

Hope that helps.
 
True Tampa, if you play the WMV file, and skip forward, it needs buffering. At my place that takes about 5 seconds. With a slower internet connection it could take a few extra seconds.
 
I don't think there was anything wrong with the orignial site: it had development, new people, different scenarios: as I said in the 1st post: if it ain't broke, why fix it? I'm not naive however...I'm having fun with these posts. This is an industry, a business...these guys, straight/gay, whatever are in the porn business. They're here to turn a quick buck. To my knowlege, two have died already to drug related causes. That's the reality -but like most entertainment, it's distracting to get lost in the fantasy.

Please tell exactly what was "developing" about David doing the same tired "I'm going to pay you to have sex" bit with the same gay men over and over? There was never any different scenarios.. they rarely even left the "studio". In the beginning, yes, the site was good. The problem is it had becoming so predictable and wasn't innovative at all in the past few years.
 
Top