Why It Is Better To Be With A Guy Versus A Girl?!

[Beth]

Okay, I know I'm a girl, but I agree, guys are better than girls, and yes, I've been with both. I like guys better because: they are finite; when it's done, it's done, no clinging on. Also guys are "in it to win it;" guys look at each fuck as a challenge. Even Steve, my husband on 25 years, looks at tapping me like, "a challenge." I love that; guys take each fuck as though it may be their last. Girls, I say, are like monkeys and they see guys like trees. A girl does not let go of "a tree" without another tree in hand, or at least in sight. That's why I like guys better..."one and done!."

 

[Beth]

So, who is gay or bi and has tried a girl? sure we may noit be as tight, but do we satisfy?

 

[joninliverton]

Beth - most guys are at least gay on here so come on give us some respect. You really should post before the sixth bottle of wine lol

 

[Beth]

Beth - most guys are at least gay on here so come on give us some respect. You really should post before the sixth bottle of wine lol

Hey, I only had one bottle of wine and two glasses of Fireball; I really want to know; have you ever been with a girl? And, is a boy better?

 

[joninliverton]

Hey, I only had one bottle of wine and two glasses of Fireball; I really want to know; have you ever been with a girl? And, is a boy better?

My first sexual one and one experience was with a girl and it was my last. But when I was 10 a bunch of my friends and I jerked off in one of my friends garage as we were bored and it was raining outside.

I've always been attracted to boys so I guess my excursion with Jan - that was her name - was kinda proving to me that I really was gay.

 

[cumrag27]

Beth - most guys are at least gay on here so come on give us some respect. You really should post before the sixth bottle of wine lol

May I butt in, Please! Besides, it is more fun when replacing perfectly maintained painted toenails with guy's toenails that haven't been clipped since last May, much less having a fresh coat of nail polish needing to blow dry.


Sincerely,


Stimpy

 

[mikeyank]

I've always been attracted to boys so I guess my excursion with Jan - that was her name - was kinda proving to me that I really was gay.

Jon, I too was always attracted to guys, since I was a young boy, and I never needed to go through what you did to prove to myself who I am.

To quote the "great song" from one of my favorite TV shows from my youth:

"I am what I am and that's all that I am. I'm Popeye the Sailor Man. I'm strong to the finish when I eat my

....................., I'm Popeye the Sailor Man" toot toot!

 

[peterh6308]

In my teens and early twentys I had a few woman, although I'm gay I had to experiment to see if I'm really missing something. I prefer guys both physically and mentally (no offense girls). I remember in my early days going to gay bars and the one thing I loved about being attracted to guys is, when you met someone you both were thinking the same thing "not I hope I get some but when are we getting out of here".

 

[keylow365]

I am hi and while I like girls it is too much of a hassle I love the chase but once I get them I don't want it anymore. Guys are just get to the point without beating around the bush. I can't really compare the two some girls are great in bed but the guys are into it no faking.

 

[joninliverton]

Jon, I too was always attracted to guys, since I was a young boy, and I never needed to go through what you did to prove to myself who I am.

To quote the "great song" from one of my favorite TV shows from my youth:

"I am what I am and that's all that I am. I'm Popeye the Sailor Man. I'm strong to the finish when I eat my

....................., I'm Popeye the Sailor Man" toot toot!

Indeed Mike - 100 per cent.

 

[tangogent]

I want to say that I believe we're all inherently bi, but when you're
at the 1&/99% point (like MikeYank, amongst others), it's a purely
academic point. By contrast, people who approach the 50$/50%
mark (ie, being attracted to both sexes with almost similar intensity)
may struggle with this issue for much of their lives.

It's so much easier to create a relationship with a woman--because
of the same reasons Beth is talking about negatively above--that I
have had relationships with women that were both sexual and
emotional and have often had to set limits with women friends.

However, the relative depth of attraction both emotionally and
physically I feel towards men is much greater. It satisfies my
soul, which physical-emotional intimacy with women never does.

x

 

[Beth]

I want to say that I believe we're all inherently bi, but when you're
at the 1&/99% point (like MikeYank, amongst others), it's a purely
academic point. By contrast, people who approach the 50$/50%
mark (ie, being attracted to both sexes with almost similar intensity)
may struggle with this issue for much of their lives.

It's so much easier to create a relationship with a woman--because
of the same reasons Beth is talking about negatively above--that I
have had relationships with women that were both sexual and
emotional and have often had to set limits with women friends.

However, the relative depth of attraction both emotionally and
physically I feel towards men is much greater. It satisfies my
soul, which physical-emotional intimacy with women never does.

x

Damn it! You figured us women out; give us an inch and we want a foot!

 

[JLipps4u]

Okay, I know I'm a girl, but I agree, guys are better than girls, and yes, I've been with both. I like guys better because: they are finite; when it's done, it's done, no clinging on. Also guys are "in it to win it;" guys look at each fuck as a challenge. Even Steve, my husband on 25 years, looks at tapping me like, "a challenge." I love that; guys take each fuck as though it may be their last. Girls, I say, are like monkeys and they see guys like trees. A girl does not let go of "a tree" without another tree in hand, or at least in sight. That's why I like guys better..."one and done!."

Beth,
It is about so much more than that! Maybe one day I will write about it. Suffice it to say, I have had both, and did till I was in my 20s. ITs been a long time since i was with a woman. But for many years now, it became a matter of, "who's got a dick?" And so , as wonderful as you girls may be, it's all about the "dick".

 

[joninliverton]

Beth,
it's all about the "dick".

And what comes out of it... he he

 

[Ambivalent]

Hi, Beth:

I am 100 per cent gay. I have never even hugged a girl (except for my Mother and my Grandmother and my sisters; once apiece - Scottish family, not very demonstrative); and have certainly never dated (much less slept with) a woman. (Even though, over the course of my lifetime, six women have asked to marry me - honestly!) But anytime a girl asked to go out on a date with me, I refused, because I knew it wouldn't have been fair, or honest.

When it comes to your question, I think the question of "Who is better, a guy or a girl, in bed?" is totally in the eye (and heart, and mind, and hormones) of the beholder. The human form is beautiful (as a quick twirl around the Louvre will show!) in both its male and female aspects, and - - - if you are a straight guy, or a lesbian, nothing about male sexual capacity, or tendency, is going to interest you, much. However beautiful the man in question might be. (One of the things that amuses me the most about sites like Broke Straight Boys, incidentally, is the implicit conceit that straight guys might be "turned", if only the quality of the experience, and the sexual technique, is superlative.)

Likewise, if you are a 100 per cent straight woman (though, for the record, I honestly believe that there are more women who have a slightly more 'fluid' experience of their sexuality, than men), or a 100 per cent gay guy, like me, the most beautiful woman isn't going to turn your head. . . much less interest you in her sexual technique. (Though I know of a lot of women who, because of their emotional 'attunedness', are INCREDIBLE performers in bed - just as much as guys. Or even much MORE so.)

Re: the last clause (and in full disclosure) I do, on occasion, really enjoy the new genre of straight videos made just for GAY eyes. . . that is, where the guy is really cute/hot, and the camera focusses on him, and HIS reactions. (This being "Broke Straight Boys", I'd be kind of surprised if there were NO other gay members here, who felt likewise!) The reason being, if a guy is totally beautiful, and worthy of worship, it's much, MUCH hotter seeing him REALLY getting off on something (and someone) he LIKES, than struggling along with someone he DOESN'T. . . . (I just close one eye ;-)

And, in the course of seeing numbers of those videos, I've encountered a number of straight girls about whom I thought, "Wow, if I were straight - I wouldn't mind being with HER!!!" (The difference being, of course, that that particular appreciation is KIND OF LIKE touring the Louvre - it's a distant aesthetic; rather than the kind of wild personal passion I feel when JASON, PAUL, or BLAKE are on-screen. . . ;-)

It's very interesting, however, Beth: a number of things that you mentioned that you find appealing about the way guys have sex (stereotypically) are PRECISELY the things I DON'T like, in a male partner. I MUCH prefer a guy who is tender, romantic, likes to caress and spoon and cuddle, and loves lots and lots of affection. . . even to the point of being moderately on the 'clingy' side ;-)))) Whilst still being very strong and masculine.

That's a TALL ORDER, I know - and likely that's why it's taken me THREE DECADES to find a boyfriend to my liking. (I'm very, very, fussy, in that regard ;-))) But, Mr. K. from St. Louis is all that and a dish of caviar, so. . . . all's well, that ends well. LOL!

Just my thoughts, for your amusement!
"A" XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO

P.S. As to the general thrust of your question (LOL!) I really think Mr. JASON is onto something, with his ideas about pan-sexuality. In broad terms, I think a person's sexiness has much less to do with his or her sex or gender (or shape, or size) than with his or her intrisic qualities. When it comes to RESPONSE, that has more to do with one's OWN predilections and preferences, than anything else, I believe.

P.P.S. Interesting question, Beth - TY!!!

 

[mikeyank]

I've always found the term "sexual preference" to be misleading or a total lie. While there are many people, including many on this forum who are various stages along the Kinsey scale, having an attraction to both sexes, I've always since I was a little boy known that other boys and men turned me on, and it's not a preference for me, it is who I am.

 

[rrhill]

"Why It Is Better To Be With A Guy Versus A Girl?!"

Because guys have this little thingy between their legs...

 

[Beth]

Hi, Beth:

I am 100 per cent gay. I have never even hugged a girl (except for my Mother and my Grandmother and my sisters; once apiece - Scottish family, not very demonstrative); and have certainly never dated (much less slept with) a woman. (Even though, over the course of my lifetime, six women have asked to marry me - honestly!) But anytime a girl asked to go out on a date with me, I refused, because I knew it wouldn't have been fair, or honest.

When it comes to your question, I think the question of "Who is better, a guy or a girl, in bed?" is totally in the eye (and heart, and mind, and hormones) of the beholder. The human form is beautiful (as a quick twirl around the Louvre will show!) in both its male and female aspects, and - - - if you are a straight guy, or a lesbian, nothing about male sexual capacity, or tendency, is going to interest you, much. However beautiful the man in question might be. (One of the things that amuses me the most about sites like Broke Straight Boys, incidentally, is the implicit conceit that straight guys might be "turned", if only the quality of the experience, and the sexual technique, is superlative.)

Likewise, if you are a 100 per cent straight woman (though, for the record, I honestly believe that there are more women who have a slightly more 'fluid' experience of their sexuality, than men), or a 100 per cent gay guy, like me, the most beautiful woman isn't going to turn your head. . . much less interest you in her sexual technique. (Though I know of a lot of women who, because of their emotional 'attunedness', are INCREDIBLE performers in bed - just as much as guys. Or even much MORE so.)

Re: the last clause (and in full disclosure) I do, on occasion, really enjoy the new genre of straight videos made just for GAY eyes. . . that is, where the guy is really cute/hot, and the camera focusses on him, and HIS reactions. (This being "Broke Straight Boys", I'd be kind of surprised if there were NO other gay members here, who felt likewise!) The reason being, if a guy is totally beautiful, and worthy of worship, it's much, MUCH hotter seeing him REALLY getting off on something (and someone) he LIKES, than struggling along with someone he DOESN'T. . . . (I just close one eye ;-)

And, in the course of seeing numbers of those videos, I've encountered a number of straight girls about whom I thought, "Wow, if I were straight - I wouldn't mind being with HER!!!" (The difference being, of course, that that particular appreciation is KIND OF LIKE touring the Louvre - it's a distant aesthetic; rather than the kind of wild personal passion I feel when JASON, PAUL, or BLAKE are on-screen. . . ;-)

It's very interesting, however, Beth: a number of things that you mentioned that you find appealing about the way guys have sex (stereotypically) are PRECISELY the things I DON'T like, in a male partner. I MUCH prefer a guy who is tender, romantic, likes to caress and spoon and cuddle, and loves lots and lots of affection. . . even to the point of being moderately on the 'clingy' side ;-)))) Whilst still being very strong and masculine.

That's a TALL ORDER, I know - and likely that's why it's taken me THREE DECADES to find a boyfriend to my liking. (I'm very, very, fussy, in that regard ;-))) But, Mr. K. from St. Louis is all that and a dish of caviar, so. . . . all's well, that ends well. LOL!

Just my thoughts, for your amusement!
"A" XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO

P.S. As to the general thrust of your question (LOL!) I really think Mr. JASON is onto something, with his ideas about pan-sexuality. In broad terms, I think a person's sexiness has much less to do with his or her sex or gender (or shape, or size) than with his or her intrisic qualities. When it comes to RESPONSE, that has more to do with one's OWN predilections and preferences, than anything else, I believe.

P.P.S. Interesting question, Beth - TY!!!

As I have said long ago, "Ambivalent," should not be your avatar! You are SO filled with passion, Mr. K is a lucky guy!

 

[Beth]

"Why It Is Better To Be With A Guy Versus A Girl?!"

Because guys have this little thingy between their legs...

Oh Rob, we know you prefer, "a little more than a 'little thingy!'"

 

[Damien Kyle]

I want to say that I believe we're all inherently bi, but when you're
at the 1&/99% point (like MikeYank, amongst others), it's a purely
academic point. By contrast, people who approach the 50$/50%
mark (ie, being attracted to both sexes with almost similar intensity)
may struggle with this issue for much of their lives.

It's so much easier to create a relationship with a woman--because
of the same reasons Beth is talking about negatively above--that I
have had relationships with women that were both sexual and
emotional and have often had to set limits with women friends.

However, the relative depth of attraction both emotionally and
physically I feel towards men is much greater. It satisfies my
soul, which physical-emotional intimacy with women never does.

x

Amen! I've said this before!