cumrag27
BSB Addict
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2010
- Posts
- 2,776
- Reaction score
- 1
And the beat goes on...
Dear Stowe1,
I chose those specific adjectives "carefully" because in my mind they were called for. I was horrified that BLAKE was relegated such to be his "intro" to man-on-man sex. How very tragic.
Perhaps what I am saying here is that I took Ty's assignment to Blake personally and I felt deeply that BLAKE deserved someone that was at least still covered by the manufacturer's warranty. Ty looked far from pristine or anything remotely similar to that. It was like..."he was ridden hard and put up wet", something that was more typical of "horse and buggy days" which, by the way, predates me or anyone I know of on the forum by some 50 years or more.
This episode was the very first thing I watched this morning and, were it not for our sexy newbie BLAKE, Ty's participation really got my day started on the wrong foot. Those of you who really know me know this is not characteristic of me usually. Ty just rubbed me totally WRONG to the FULLEST EXTENT POSSIBLE and as they say really "Got on my last nerve". I thought BLAKE deserved so much better!
I guess if any apology is due anyone, it was the unfortunate statement I made about recommending Jimmy over Ty to do this episode. Therefore, if Jimmy is listening, I personally apologize having used your name meant as a put Jimmy down but only one step above Ty. That was uncalled for, Jimmy, and I was wrong in doing that to you.
Very Displeased with Ty,
Stimpy
My dearest Stimpy:
It is rare that I disagree with you, but I have to go with Ms. K on this one. She didn't say nor do I that your opinions are not valid. Because they are yours not anyone else's there is no objective standard to which to compare them for validity. You say you don't plan to apologize for your views. Ms. K didn't ask you to nor do I. She simply said that some of the adjectives you used were to her somewhat harsh. And I have to agree. You registered your disagreement with the use of Ty strongly and those words really added nothing to your argument.
Having viewed alot of porn from back in the day, I just can't see Ty as a reference point to the porn of the 60's, 70's, et al. But porn like beauty is in the eye of the beholder and your eyes saw what they saw and others saw what theirs saw.
And that's the beauty of the forum. We can all share with each other our own view of actors and scenes.
Together in our appreciation of quality porn, I am,
Your friend,
stowe1
__________________
Dear Stowe1,
I chose those specific adjectives "carefully" because in my mind they were called for. I was horrified that BLAKE was relegated such to be his "intro" to man-on-man sex. How very tragic.
Perhaps what I am saying here is that I took Ty's assignment to Blake personally and I felt deeply that BLAKE deserved someone that was at least still covered by the manufacturer's warranty. Ty looked far from pristine or anything remotely similar to that. It was like..."he was ridden hard and put up wet", something that was more typical of "horse and buggy days" which, by the way, predates me or anyone I know of on the forum by some 50 years or more.
This episode was the very first thing I watched this morning and, were it not for our sexy newbie BLAKE, Ty's participation really got my day started on the wrong foot. Those of you who really know me know this is not characteristic of me usually. Ty just rubbed me totally WRONG to the FULLEST EXTENT POSSIBLE and as they say really "Got on my last nerve". I thought BLAKE deserved so much better!
I guess if any apology is due anyone, it was the unfortunate statement I made about recommending Jimmy over Ty to do this episode. Therefore, if Jimmy is listening, I personally apologize having used your name meant as a put Jimmy down but only one step above Ty. That was uncalled for, Jimmy, and I was wrong in doing that to you.
Very Displeased with Ty,
Stimpy