Jimmy and Bradley

[TonyTony]

I think you are the delusional one if you ever think I have ever slept with a model.

well, I would if I were you...but it WOULD NOT BE JIMMY!!!

but either way, Jimmy fucking you was not my main point, could you please address WHY we are served such a steady dull diet of Jimmy and more Jimmy?!?

 

[bi45251]

It was a cure for insomnia though. What a snoozer

 

[colsbear]

3 pages of almost negative comments

I'm just voicing my opinion just like everyone else can't I do that? The message board was created to get your feedback so yes there is 3 page of almost negative comments so that does say a lot. I think if the scene hadn't had Jimmy in it there would be better feedback but his last two scenes got really high ratings. I guess I'm not sure what you guys want at this point.

Btw I haven't changed anything with College Dudes I've only made it better, improved the streaming and guys on there. I haven't heard much negative feedback on that site and I'm not changing much on it.

Mark

Mark

Yo Mark, If Jimmy performed as well with his other scenes as with Bobby, all of his scenes would be hot! If he were as caring about his sex parnter as he cared about Bobby, he'd be less bor[ng.

Jimmy reminds me of a typical redneck, "You're queer? Suck my dick?" It's offensive. ((hey Jimmy, remember your reference to P. Manning? The team would be no where if Peyton didn't try to work hard to please the fans and coach (By putting forth effort!). At least he's trying, you just continue to be boring (It's a shame you're one of the best looking guys on the site))

Mark please direct him to fondle more! kiss more! If he were man enough to suck a dick, he'd be hotter than ever. I haven't rated this one, if I did....zero.

 

[larkster]

Except for MikeYank, Scorpio and Mark, there aren't many Jimmy fans weighing in on this. Even Ms K is fed up. I'll put in a word for Jimmy. I think Jimmy was fed a dream by his fans and the administration. "You're hot and you don't have to do anything you don't want to do twice and if it really bothers you not even once. You've got IT, kid. Like Gypsy Rose, you don't even have to take it all off." Well, in show biz, you become yesterday's news when you stop surprising. Why do you think all these celebs are constantly trying to get in the news? The terrible lie is Jimmy was fed a lot of bull. If he has IT, he hasn't been willing to share IT with the majority. I feel sorry he has been put in this position. He let it all go to his head and now it is all crashing down on him instead of the people who put him on a shakey pedestal.

 

[stowe1]

Weird I enjoyed the scene in the car and them picking up the model at the airport. Yeah Jimmy talked to the model a lot but I liked it because it was real and you got to know the personality of the new model right away. Thanks for your comments.

Mark

The problem with it was it was difficult to hear what they were saying because of the loud background noise. I had my volume up all the way but to little avail. I thought the concept was great but the execution left something to be desired. When there are BTS scenes and they are in the car, there's not nearly the backgound noise (it seemed as if the windows were open when they should have been closed.) and I can hear what the guys are saying. I wouldn't take the criticism of that part of the episode as that of concept but rather execution.

 

[stowe1]

I'm Just Sayin'!

I am into my seventh month as a member of Broke Straight Boys and sixth month as a forumite. And there has been some real nasty posts during that time. Thus, my campaign that we disagree agreeably. Well this thread shows that many people don't want to do that. Of all the posts on all the threads I have read during my time here, none has sickened me as much as this one. The vitriol has reached an all time high (and I'm including all the Jimmy threads). But the worse is making negative implications about the intergrity and morality of Mark, Steve, Clay, etc. That is beyond the pale!

In the real world, if you are buying a product or service but over time for whatever the reason(s) that product or service becomes unsatisfactory to you, then you stop purchasing that product or service and buy another similar product or service in its place. (Now, admittedly, that doesn't work if there is no substitute available.) So here we are in porn world and it seems that many of you who have posted on this thread are not only unhappy with this episode, but also the direction in which this site has been going for a while now. But here in porn world there are more than a plethora of sites which are available to be purchased. So my question is :WHY DO YOU CONTINUE ON THIS SITE AND KEEP AGGRAVATING YOURSELVES? You seem to be so unahppy with this site I just don't understand why you would continue to spend your money on something that doesn't satisfy you? I know I wouldn't.

I just don't understand why you remain and do nothing more than bitch, moan, and complain on the forum which is your right. You will never be satisfied until Mark, Clay, etc. tell you what you want to hear from them.

Mark owns the site. He can do whatever he wants with it. We subscribe to the site, using our money to do so. And I don't know about any of you, but my funds are extremely limited and Broke Straight Boys and cdudes are luxuries for me. If I were as unhappy as many of you seem to be with Broke Straight Boys, then I can tell you that I would use that money for something other that purchasing a product with which I am dissatisfied.

I'm just sayin'!!

 

[mikeyank]

I am into my seventh month as a member of Broke Straight Boys and sixth month as a forumite. And there has been some real nasty posts during that time. Thus, my campaign that we disagree agreeably. Well this thread shows that many people don't want to do that. Of all the posts on all the threads I have read during my time here, none has sickened me as much as this one. The vitriol has reached an all time high (and I'm including all the Jimmy threads). But the worse is making negative implications about the intergrity and morality of Mark, Steve, Clay, etc. That is beyond the pale!

In the real world, if you are buying a product or service but over time for whatever the reason(s) that product or service becomes unsatisfactory to you, then you stop purchasing that product or service and buy another similar product or service in its place. (Now, admittedly, that doesn't work if there is no substitute available.) So here we are in porn world and it seems that many of you who have posted on this thread are not only unhappy with this episode, but also the direction in which this site has been going for a while now. But here in porn world there are more than a plethora of sites which are available to be purchased. So my question is :WHY DO YOU CONTINUE ON THIS SITE AND KEEP AGGRAVATING YOURSELVES? You seem to be so unahppy with this site I just don't understand why you would continue to spend your money on something that doesn't satisfy you? I know I wouldn't.

I just don't understand why you remain and do nothing more than bitch, moan, and complain on the forum which is your right. You will never be satisfied until Mark, Clay, etc. tell you what you want to hear from them.

Mark owns the site. He can do whatever he wants with it. We subscribe to the site, using our money to do so. And I don't know about any of you, but my funds are extremely limited and Broke Straight Boys and cdudes are luxuries for me. If I were as unhappy as many of you seem to be with Broke Straight Boys, then I can tell you that I would use that money for something other that purchasing a product with which I am dissatisfied.

I'm just sayin'!!

Amen Stowe! I ask myself the same questions, and agree 100% with every word of your post.

 

[another1]

just ditto! to stowe and mike.
like sitting behind homeplate all season just so you can yell at the homerun hitter, you are going to strike out.
season seats and homerun kings usually hold the record for strikeouts.
some fans find good things and some folks just like complain.
as long as they buy a ticket. i guess.

 

[Ms. Kianna]

You are right Larkster, about me being fed up.........IF by being fed up, you mean that I find Jimmy boring in sex scenes, and don't even watch him..........

Except for MikeYank, Scorpio and Mark, there aren't many Jimmy fans weighing in on this. Even Ms K is fed up. I'll put in a word for Jimmy. I think Jimmy was fed a dream by his fans and the administration. "You're hot and you don't have to do anything you don't want to do twice and if it really bothers you not even once. You've got IT, kid. Like Gypsy Rose, you don't even have to take it all off." Well, in show biz, you become yesterday's news when you stop surprising. Why do you think all these celebs are constantly trying to get in the news? The terrible lie is Jimmy was fed a lot of bull. If he has IT, he hasn't been willing to share IT with the majority. I feel sorry he has been put in this position. He let it all go to his head and now it is all crashing down on him instead of the people who put him on a shakey pedestal.

But, I am also fed up with posts like the one below. I am not often shocked or appalled, but to hear someone making these accusations, achieved shocked and appalled. Personal attacks are so unattractive.

But I have been accused of being an emotional girl.

Mark, you are delusional, what is your DEAL WITH JIMMY??? Is he fucking you? or what?
the SINGULAR reason he got any higher ratings was thanks ONLY to his partner; Bobby in particular, we were clamoring for Bobby and you gave us Bobby (finally) but you STUCK us with JIMMY again- all those high ratings were for BOBBY not Jimmy!!! WHAT IS THE DEAL??? is it Clay or is it you who Jimmy is fucking? It makes no sense. He is hated. Why do you insist on putting him in so many scenes. You have bad camera work, sometimes there seems to be two cameras but they are never utilized in a creative way....no art direction, those rooms are disgusting and dirty, the bed creaks, you don't have a sound guy at all apparently, if you had someone that knew something about editing that car scene could have worked a little; its called EDITING for a reason. All these things are forgivable in a way but JIMMY is NOT!!!

 

[JLipps4u]

Can I have an Amen? You said it exactly stowe. I said as much in another post, only i used the car dealer angle, lol. Go figure, guess these folks can afford to buy a product that does not satisfy their needs.

 

[larkster]

Amen Stowe! I ask myself the same questions, and agree 100% with every word of your post.

What if, by chance, the things these subcribers are complaining about happen to be the majority opinion? To suggest Mark not listen to them could be financial suicide. Is it just possible that your opinion is in the minority? I think it is prudent to listen to an outcry like the one on this thread. It is not, as Stowe1 has pointed out, the first thread that has brought up these concerns. There has been an increasing intensity in recent threads and the best that the naysayers has come up with is "agree to disagree." The anger is from not being listened to. I am not angry, I am more perplexed by the stubborness of the membership not to see this is a legitimate outcry and I would venture it is from the majority.

 

[Key-West]

I think I'm more amazed how LONG some of these threads are. I don't know if having a message board is normal but it creates a small connection with the models that talk with us. After reading some of the messages, I hope the models/owners don't read half of them. The members have a lot of different things they like from feet to tatoos. There are models who some like more then others. STILL... Be Nice. Owners should try new things and push model limits. WE are not going to like everything. I know there are more porn sites and they don't care if you liked a scene. The level of frustration must be really high. You can NEVER make everyone happy. I feel lucky that I like Jimmy. Do I want him to do more....YES. If he doesn't, I expect more people will become board with him. In short, enjoy the fantasy and being ugly doesn't help.

 

[stowe1]

What if, by chance, the things these subcribers are complaining about happen to be the majority opinion? To suggest Mark not listen to them could be financial suicide. Is it just possible that your opinion is in the minority? I think it is prudent to listen to an outcry like the one on this thread. It is not, as Stowe1 has pointed out, the first thread that has brought up these concerns. There has been an increasing intensity in recent threads and the best that the naysayers has come up with is "agree to disagree." The anger is from not being listened to. I am not angry, I am more perplexed by the stubborness of the membership not to see this is a legitimate outcry and I would venture it is from the majority.

It is basically the same small group of people complaining about the same thing (Jimmy) on every thread dealing with Jimmy either directly or remotely. That group does not even represent a majority of forum members. And I don't know for sure but I can make a reasonably confident guess that forum members do not make up a majority of subscribers to Broke Straight Boys

For some reason, larkster, you have a problem with disagreeing agreeably, i.e. my awkward synonym for civility. Is it your contention that vitriolic language and attacking people's integrity and morality are the only ways to express frustration and perplexity? Just as you are preplexed by what you perceive as the stubborness of the membership not to see this is a legitimate outcry, I am, to reiterate, just as perplexed by people who are dissatisfied with the site and don't feel they are being listened to, not to take their money and find something else that will bring them satisfaction.

 

[dracythis]

It is basically the same small group of people complaining about the same thing (Jimmy) on every thread dealing with Jimmy either directly or remotely. That group does not even represent a majority of forum members. And I don't know for sure but I can make a reasonably confident guess that forum members do not make up a majority of subscribers to Broke Straight Boys

I feel bad that started this thread with negative karma. But as I said in my initial post, I have nothing but respect for Jimmy and hope to see him in many scenes still to come.... However I feel that my "Constructive Criticism" was presented in a sarcastic way. So let me try again.....

I think the scene had great potential, it had a gorgeous newcomer Bradley and seasoned model Jimmy to show him the ropes. I commend Broke Straight Boys for attempting something new with shooting an interview in the car on the way to the studio (albeit, the sound quality was rough, but I'm sure management will work to fix it for future attempts)

I found the potential in Bradley's first sex scene very hot. Especially when Bradley was bent over the couch, polishing Jimmy's knob and the form of Bradley's gorgeous ass in those black shorts just waiting to be revealed. The scene progresses with much slurping on Bradley's part and Jimmy holding his head. Finally in the later part of the scene Jimmy says to Bradley, "Hey why don't you pull your ass out and show the people what you are working with?" That was the verbal mark that I expected Clay to pan the camera around and give the camera a good view of Bradley's ass. When Clay didn't I was annoyed that he missed the mark. But it's no use crying over spilled milk, the scene is done and I'm sure Bradley will be back to show us what he is working with.

But I do want to offer this post up as constructive criticism that maybe able to be used in the future to improve on, at least in my opinion of what this viewer wants.........

 

[larkster]

It is basically the same small group of people complaining about the same thing (Jimmy) on every thread dealing with Jimmy either directly or remotely. That group does not even represent a majority of forum members. And I don't know for sure but I can make a reasonably confident guess that forum members do not make up a majority of subscribers to Broke Straight Boys

For some reason, larkster, you have a problem with disagreeing agreeably, i.e. my awkward synonym for civility. Is it your contention that vitriolic language and attacking people's integrity and morality are the only ways to express frustration and perplexity? Just as you are preplexed by what you perceive as the stubborness of the membership not to see this is a legitimate outcry, I am, to reiterate, just as perplexed by people who are dissatisfied with the site and don't feel they are being listened to, not to take their money and find something else that will bring them satisfaction.

I count at least 10 new people on here speaking out. You are so sure you are in the majority on this. Yet, very few of the "Jimmy fans" have come to his defense. I will be interested to see how this outcry develops. By the way, it isn't about me having a problem agreeing to disagreeing. Why are you focusing on my comments and not addressing others? Probably because I have been using logic and not emotion. I haven't been vitriolic and I have not attacked anyone's integrity, and those that are may be doing so out of frustration. You seem to think this site is perfect the way it is. I've seen a steady decline since I've been here. Though, I reiterate, I did not join this site and I feel a little tricked that the site I joined is almost dormant. So, I probably will be leaving, but this site is in trouble, and the more the administration puts blinders on the faster it will decline. The Jimmy controversy is a symptom, not the problem.

 

[stowe1]

I feel bad that started this thread with negative karma. But as I said in my initial post, I have nothing but respect for Jimmy and hope to see him in many scenes still to come.... However I feel that my "Constructive Criticism" was presented in a sarcastic way. So let me try again.....

I think the scene had great potential, it had a gorgeous newcomer Bradley and seasoned model Jimmy to show him the ropes. I commend Broke Straight Boys for attempting something new with shooting an interview in the car on the way to the studio (albeit, the sound quality was rough, but I'm sure management will work to fix it for future attempts)

I found the potential in Bradley's first sex scene very hot. Especially when Bradley was bent over the couch, polishing Jimmy's knob and the form of Bradley's gorgeous ass in those black shorts just waiting to be revealed. The scene progresses with much slurping on Bradley's part and Jimmy holding his head. Finally in the later part of the scene Jimmy says to Bradley, "Hey why don't you pull your ass out and show the people what you are working with?" That was the verbal mark that I expected Clay to pan the camera around and give the camera a good view of Bradley's ass. When Clay didn't I was annoyed that he missed the mark. But it's no use crying over spilled milk, the scene is done and I'm sure Bradley will be back to show us what he is working with.

But I do want to offer this post up as constructive criticism that maybe able to be used in the future to improve on, at least in my opinion of what this viewer wants.........

Dear dracythis - I went back to read your post starting this thread and I don't see much sarcasm but rather constructive criticism. And you'll note in my post right after yours I agreed with your critique of the cinematography.
The nastiness on this thread developed later. And I agree with your comments cited here. What you point out was a missed opportunity and I hope your pointing it out will make the chances of such an oversight happening in the future minimal.

 

[stowe1]

I count at least 10 new people on here speaking out. You are so sure you are in the majority on this. Yet, very few of the "Jimmy fans" have come to his defense.

I didn't say I was in the majority. My guess is neither side of this discussion is in the majority because most members aren't even posting.


By the way, it isn't about me having a problem agreeing to disagreeing. Why are you focusing on my comments and not addressing others? Probably because I have been using logic and not emotion.

You keep saying agree to disagree. What I've said is that we should "disagree agreeably". Surely your power of logic enables you to see the difference. One can agree to disagree and do so in a nasty, vile, and "ad hominem" manner; whereas if one disagrees agreeably that would preclude nastiness, vileness, and use of "ad hominem" attacks. I focused on this because you said it. I did address comments of others when I took them to task for not only using vitriolic language, but also for questioning Mark's, et.al.'s integrity and morality.



I haven't been vitriolic and I have not attacked anyone's integrity, and those that are may be doing so out of frustration.

You haven't and I never said you did. I just commented that such things occurred. Neither frustration nor anything else justifies, in my eyes, some of the vile things writtten about Mark, and by implication the Broke Straight Boys staff.



You seem to think this site is perfect the way it is.

Never said it was or is and don't think it was or is. In fact at the beginning of this thread I agreed with dracythis' critique of the cinematography in this episode. I don't believe any site can ever be perfect because if it is perfect for me then a helluva lot of other people are going to be unhappy.


Though, I reiterate, I did not join this site and I feel a little tricked that the site I joined is almost dormant.

I presume you meant to write that you did join the site. If not, then I don't understand what this means.



So, I probably will be leaving, but this site is in trouble, and the more the administration puts blinders on the faster it will decline. The Jimmy controversy is a symptom, not the problem.


Obviously that is a decision which you and you along have to make. But as I said here previously I am perplexed by people who spend their money to belong to a site about which they are unhappy..

....

 

[larkster]

....

First of all, the agreeing to disagree is a statement you have made more than once. You dismissed several posts with this quote on other threads. You may have not accused me of being vitriolic, but it was in answer to my post that you said it. I joined College Boy Physicals and there was no notice that it was going to be an unfunctioning site. When I joined, it wasn't. I was interested enough in Broke Straight Boys to stay on, but it has declined in quality whether you think so or not. It will eventually become evident to you. Clay has gotten either lazy or overwhelmed, but he has not been functioning on all cylinders. And Mark has not overseen the work or if he liked this last scene, has lost his perspective. Either way, his plaint that it is difficult to get straight boys on the site, is troubling for a site that depends on it. I'm just making observations, take them for what you think they are worth. I would like to add, my participation on this thread was started with a simple critique and everything else has been in response to others posting me. So, it's been fun, but I've got better things to do than go round and round in circles on this.

 

[elyot1]

Jimmy

Jimmy is to porn as Tim Tebow is to football. First Round Draft pick out of his element.

 

[stowe1]

First of all, the agreeing to disagree is a statement you have made more than once. You dismissed several posts with this quote on other threads. You may have not accused me of being vitriolic, but it was in answer to my post that you said it. I joined College Boy Physicals and there was no notice that it was going to be an unfunctioning site. When I joined, it wasn't. I was interested enough in Broke Straight Boys to stay on, but it has declined in quality whether you think so or not. It will eventually become evident to you. Clay has gotten either lazy or overwhelmed, but he has not been functioning on all cylinders. And Mark has not overseen the work or if he liked this last scene, has lost his perspective. Either way, his plaint that it is difficult to get straight boys on the site, is troubling for a site that depends on it. I'm just making observations, take them for what you think they are worth. I would like to add, my participation on this thread was started with a simple critique and everything else has been in response to others posting me. So, it's been fun, but I've got better things to do than go round and round in circles on this.

I have always said we should disagree agreeably. I have never been dismissive of others opinion; I, like you, just may not agree with them. Thank you for clarifying the joining thing. You state that the site has declined in quality - that is your opinion not a fact. You might have better things to do than go round and round in circles on this, but you are so good at it as demonstrated on this and other threads. So if you are done here, see you around on another thread!!