• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Jimmy and Bradley

Bradley and Jimmy

I have to agree with most part of all the comments myself I think Clay has a man crush on Jimmy because it always Jimmy Jimmy and more Jimmy. Bradley was even allowed to get naked had to jump in to sucking Jimmy cock. This was the most depressing video ever . Hey Clay how about giving someone else air time rather then jimmy or is that allowed with you. I think that Mark may need to intervene in this mess to figure out what the hell is going on with Clay and Jimmy this is a sham.:cursing::thumbdown:
 
Mark,

On a side note in the scene at the airport, who is the guy in the passenger side of the car holding the camera? I saw his reflection in the side mirror and he is cute!

Dracythis
 
I thought I should speak my mind seeing as how everyone else has. This scene was terrible I felt sorry for the new guy. Jimmy just sat there and made him do everything. That's so unfair. Jimmy doesn't kiss suck rim or even help the other guy out anymore. No wonder he keeps doing scenes. If I got paid to fuck guys and never half to do anything else I wound not leave either. And Broke Straight Boys gives him money to do that. Why can't we get a chad scene or mick scene every week like clockwork.
 
Mark, you are delusional, what is your DEAL WITH JIMMY??? Is he fucking you? or what?
the SINGULAR reason he got any higher ratings was thanks ONLY to his partner; Bobby in particular, we were clamoring for Bobby and you gave us Bobby (finally) but you STUCK us with JIMMY again- all those high ratings were for BOBBY not Jimmy!!! WHAT IS THE DEAL??? is it Clay or is it you who Jimmy is fucking? It makes no sense. He is hated. Why do you insist on putting him in so many scenes. You have bad camera work, sometimes there seems to be two cameras but they are never utilized in a creative way....no art direction, those rooms are disgusting and dirty, the bed creaks, you don't have a sound guy at all apparently, if you had someone that knew something about editing that car scene could have worked a little; its called EDITING for a reason. All these things are forgivable in a way but JIMMY is NOT!!!
 
I don't understand how at this point in the game, that Mark can actually throw out naive protestations like, "I don't know what you guys want." How many pages of the same complaints ad infinitem do you have to page through and read before you clue in to the central problem about Jimmy?

I'm not going to go on (again) and separate his personality from his on-screen performance, we've all heard the arguments ad nauseum about how he's really a nice guy in person (as if so many of us have actually met him) ... the bottom line (once again) is this: yes, he's good looking; yes, he has a big dick; BUT HE DOESN'T DO ANYTHING! Sitting around on the couch, episode after episode and getting your dick sucked while you do absolutely no reciprocation of any kind AND get paid for it is not just insulting to the paid members, BUT IT'S BORING!

Here's a final bit of two pence worth that is also not rocket science: cute guys with big dicks in the gay porn business are a dime a dozen. You can't swing a dead cat around South Florida or any other major city in the U.S. without hitting a bunch of straight guys who would take the money offered AND PERFORM for it. At this point, I would bet that most of the members of this site wouldn't even bother to watch Jimmy IF he finally decided to bottom and even if it was a gang bang scene. We're tired of him!

Tick tock --- you're 15 minutes were up hours ago!
 
Jimmy doesn't reciprocate and he doesn't really give himself to a scene, he just makes fun of the guy sucking his dick and makes wisecracks at the camera. I think his attitude - and that of the owner of this site - is insulting to the members. If Jimmy doesn't want to kiss, suck, rim, get fucked or even pretend like he's interested in what's happening -even when it's just getting his dick sucked - why have him on the site? Isn't the whole point of this site to have straight guys do "non-straight" things for money? Is Jimmy somehow exempt? Watching him getting his dick sucked week after week has become uninteresting and irritating. Especially with him acting like he doesn't need to "put out" for us.
I've had to deal with enough contempt from straight guys in my life. I don't want to have to deal with it on a site for gay men. I mean, I'M PAYING MONEY FOR THIS!! I am a customer; don't treat me like an asshole.
This episode was just one too many. I feel demeaned by Jimmy and by Broke Straight Boys I've canceled my membership in both Broke Straight Boys and College Dudes. Enough.
 
Mark, you are delusional, what is your DEAL WITH JIMMY??? Is he fucking you? or what?
the SINGULAR reason he got any higher ratings was thanks ONLY to his partner; Bobby in particular, we were clamoring for Bobby and you gave us Bobby (finally) but you STUCK us with JIMMY again- all those high ratings were for BOBBY not Jimmy!!! WHAT IS THE DEAL??? is it Clay or is it you who Jimmy is fucking? It makes no sense. He is hated. Why do you insist on putting him in so many scenes. You have bad camera work, sometimes there seems to be two cameras but they are never utilized in a creative way....no art direction, those rooms are disgusting and dirty, the bed creaks, you don't have a sound guy at all apparently, if you had someone that knew something about editing that car scene could have worked a little; its called EDITING for a reason. All these things are forgivable in a way but JIMMY is NOT!!!

I think you are the delusional one if you ever think I have ever slept with a model.
 
Mark, it is no secret to anyone, that I just adore you.:001_wub:

Chuck and Steven probably get tired of me telling everyone that posts with a problem to PM you, because you are so wonderful, caring, and involved, that you will personally take care of everything. We all know that they are wonderful too, I just tend to gush over you, much like Slimmie gushes over Steven.:001_rolleyes:

But, I have to tell you..........Jimmy in the BTS is funny and awesome. Jimmy in a porn scene is so predictable that I have stopped watching them.:sleep:

I know that you listen to us, but do you get the time to watch what we are seeing? I wonder if the final cut, is missing some of the things that you are expecting it to have.
I agree with you 100% Ms. K that Mark is a "wonderful, caring, and involved" owner. After all, he is the one that has given us this forum to speak out on. How many site owners provide their membership with a place to question even the integrity of the owner, and the product that he produces? Not many, I would have to say, and I thank Mark for all he does for us.

I also agree with you that "Jimmy in the BTS is funny and awesome". However, I also see the same persona in his scenes, in the pre-sex banter, and in some of his quips. To me he is a terrific young guy.

Obviously the majority of the poster's on this board agree with you that his sex scenes have become "predictable" and "boring", and that too is your right to state, as that is the purpose of this board.

I agree with you 100% Ms. K that Mark is a "wonderful, caring, and involved" owner. After all, he is the one that has given us this forum to speak out on. How many site owners provide their membership with a place to question even the integrity of the owner, and the product that he produces? Not many, I would have to say, and I thank Mark for all he does for us.

I also agree with you that "Jimmy in the BTS is funny and awesome". However, I also see the same persona in his scenes, in the pre-sex banter, and in some of his quips. To me he is a terrific young guy.

Obviously the majority of the poster's on this board agree with you that his sex scenes have become "predictable and "boring", and that too is your right to state, as that is the purpose of this board.

My problem is with the obnoxious, rude comments by member's attacking Mark's integrity, and being rude to the young man who is trying his best to portray the role of 'Jimmy Johnson'. If you don't like his scenes, that is all fine and good, and can be said in a respectful manner. To me, this has become like a "mob mentality" with many of his detractors getting downright ugly in their attacks.

I've said this many times here, but folks, it's only porn we are talking about. Please keep things in perspective, as the vitriolic attacks on the site owner, and one of his porn actor's is actually rather disgusting, in my opinion.
 
I guess we're going to go through the same threads every time we have an episode with Jimmy. I'm used to it by now so I'm not worried. You guys expressed that you didn't care for the episode and some people expressed the episode was ok for them. They have the right to do so; Opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one, so chill out.

It's not new that I like Jimmy and this new guy Bradley is really cute. I like the boys, but I didn't care for the episode simply because it's a jack off scene and they bore me. Some members actually love jack off scenes, should I start a thread so I can yell at them? Seriously.if you don't like an episode, fine, you can talk about it but at least, be cordial.
Steve

I'm speaking for myself, Steve, when I ask: How can one be cordial to a man, the owner of the site, when he comes on after 3 pages of negative feedback on a scene and only gives us his opinion? I was not looking for an opinion, I was looking for a response, which he finally made, albeit triggered by the less than cordial response I made to him. Do you think he would have responded if I had not called him out on the dismal failure of this scene? I can be cordial to intelligent men when they address the issues, such as you did when you answered another 1's concerns about the audio problems in the car; when Mark said that the scene would have gotten a better response if Jimmy had not been in it, etc. Those kind of responses merit a cordial reply.

My friend, Abe, gave a very lucid response and wrote it in an extremely cordial way. And what was your reply? Excuses about how hard it is to get a straight guy to do gay porn! What is the expression: "Money talks, bullshit walks? You offer what you can pay for a scene, and if he doesn't accept, than he is not really broke. So, you look for another one.
 
And I totally understand what you guys are saying but some of you are not talking in a proper manner and that's what irritates me. You have the right to not like an episode/model but it's not a reason to unload the anger on us. And now hearing that "We" sleep with models? really? Are we going that low now? I'm sorry but it's a shame. We probably have one of the best team in the porn business with a class "A" étiquette. Everybody cares and I'm not embellishing, we do care. Hell, we work on improving the site all day long, every day.

Ok some of the episodes are not up to par, but we can't have 100% of really great episodes either. Clay got out of the studio and shot outdoor for a change; granted the audio was not great but at least we're trying. We have more NEW straight guys coming; granted they're paired with Jimmy, but at least, you get to see new guys. It's not like the new guys will disappear and never come back. Bradley is coming back and you'll get to see/hear him again, unfortunately, for now, you guys seem to only focus on the negatives and don't get to enjoy this new guy.

Once again, I didn't like this episode just because it's a jack off scene and I don't like them, but the boys were ok to me.

When we go to events/clubs, people/members are all over Jimmy, then we come here and we get to see your comments, it's really confusing. That's why Mark said "I guess I'm not sure what you guys want at this point." Because seriously, I'm confused too. I wish the members we meet at the events would use the forums so we could hear their opinions as well.

Anyway, I have to get back to work but wanted to give my 2 cents, as usual.

I'm speaking for myself, Steve, when I ask: How can one be cordial to a man, the owner of the site, when he comes on after 3 pages of negative feedback on a scene and only gives us his opinion? I was not looking for an opinion, I was looking for a response, which he finally made, albeit triggered by the less than cordial response I made to him. Do you think he would have responded if I had not called him out on the dismal failure of this scene? I can be cordial to intelligent men when they address the issues, such as you did when you answered another 1's concerns about the audio problems in the car; when Mark said that the scene would have gotten a better response if Jimmy had not been in it, etc. Those kind of responses merit a cordial reply.

My friend, Abe, gave a very lucid response and wrote it in an extremely cordial way. And what was your reply? Excuses about how hard it is to get a straight guy to do gay porn! What is the expression: "Money talks, bullshit walks? You offer what you can pay for a scene, and if he doesn't accept, than he is not really broke. So, you look for another one.
 
When we go to events/clubs, people/members are all over Jimmy, then we come here and we get to see your comments, it's really confusing. That's why Mark said "I guess I'm not sure what you guys want at this point." Because seriously, I'm confused too. I wish the members we meet at the events would use the forums so we could hear their opinions as well.
The way I see it Steve is that there is a very diverse audience for Broke Straight Boys, and it would be impossible to please ALL of the people ALL of the time, as we are all different genders, ages, sexual orientations, and with different taste in our porn. I joined this site because it was about straight boys having gay sex. Other's have commented that they don't care if the model's are gay, straight or bi, that they just come here for hot guys having sex.

I recall when David was the director, and an active participant on the board, he used to get frustrated as some folks would ask for one type of scene, and he would try it, and other's would ask for something totally opposite. I recall David saying the same thing that Mark said, "I guess I'm not sure what you guys want at this point."

The answer is that there is not a unified "you guys" in the audience, and the kind of guys and scene's that turn me on are a total turn off to others. And we must keep in mind that the percentage of membership who even comment on the board is a tiny fraction of overall membership.

I appreciate you Steve, Mark, and Clay for the work that you do here, and I do understand how difficult your job's are trying to keep the overall audience happy, when there is no one profile to fit your varied audience.

And most of all, thank you for this message board, to give us a voice that will be heard, even if it is a confusing, varied, mixed voice that you are hearing.
 
And I totally understand what you guys are saying but some of you are not talking in a proper manner and that's what irritates me. You have the right to not like an episode/model but it's not a reason to unload the anger on us. And now hearing that "We" sleep with models? really? Are we going that low now? I'm sorry but it's a shame. We probably have one of the best team in the porn business with a class "A" étiquette. Everybody cares and I'm not embellishing, we do care. Hell, we work on improving the site all day long, every day.

Ok some of the episodes are not up to par, but we can't have 100% of really great episodes either. Clay got out of the studio and shot outdoor for a change; granted the audio was not great but at least we're trying. We have more NEW straight guys coming; granted they're paired with Jimmy, but at least, you get to see new guys. It's not like the new guys will disappear and never come back. Bradley is coming back and you'll get to see/hear him again, unfortunately, for now, you guys seem to only focus on the negatives and don't get to enjoy this new guy.

Once again, I didn't like this episode just because it's a jack off scene and I don't like them, but the boys were ok to me.

When we go to events/clubs, people/members are all over Jimmy, then we come here and we get to see your comments, it's really confusing. That's why Mark said "I guess I'm not sure what you guys want at this point." Because seriously, I'm confused too. I wish the members we meet at the events would use the forums so we could hear their opinions as well.

Anyway, I have to get back to work but wanted to give my 2 cents, as usual.

I think you guys are reading too much into what you may be hearing at the pride events. While some attendees are surely Broke Straight Boys members (i.e. another1), you're probably meeting a lot of folks who are not members of Broke Straight Boys and/or College Dudes. So you're hearing feedback from people who think Jimmy is drop dead gorgeous, but who may not even be customers of Broke Straight Boys

So if you're listening to pride event attendees as to what they want to see (who may not even be sober, they're out among tons of other screaming gay people), you're listening to the wrong audience.

What it boils down to is what do your paying customers want, and what do your affiliates want.

Screaming pride event gay people can make you some quick cash by purchasing t shirts and other Broke Straight Boys gimmicks, but they don't generate long term revenue unless they sign up for recurring memberships to the site(s) and don't cancel.

Again, in my opinion this train wreck of a scene was not as much about Jimmy being in another scene as it was about a brand new guy not even getting naked, and having to do yet another one sided non reciprocation oral scene with the new guy doing the sucking.

I like Jimmy, I am a fan of Jimmy, I have defended Jimmy many times before. But this issue is not with Jimmy, it's with whoever is coming up with this brilliant ideas for scene content. Come on, whoever came up with the idea for this scene has no clue what members want to see.

The car thing was perfectly fine (other than the audio issues another1 pointed out), and the scene would have been ok if Jimmy would have sucked the new guy instead of the other way around.

You guys are completely ignoring that the members hate one sided scenes, and even more than that we hate when the new guy doesn't even show us what he looks like.

You're just blaming it on the fact Jimmy was in the scene, and ignoring everything else. Yes Jimmy has been severely over used lately, which is only generating more complaints but seriously, as I pointed out earlier it could have been Colin and the new guy and the reactions from members would have been similar. There probably wouldn't have been any Colin bashing, but members would still be screaming because it was a one sided scene where the brand new model did all the work and didn't even get naked.

And finally, I think you guys did Jimmy a severe dis service putting him in a scene like this. Jimmy has struggled valiantly to get members to like him more, he has done everything but stand on his head in order to try to reach out to the members. He has really improved his performances, but you guys keep putting him in the types of scenes you have to know that your members are going to hate. So that only incites members more when they see a scene like this, and the typical reaction is to blame Jimmy because he is fast becoming the Broke Straight Boys whipping boy and I feel that is a very cruel, and unfair dis service to be putting him in scenes like this.

How do you think this makes him feel?

You guys need to do everything you can to try to help Jimmy, put him in scenes where people aren't going to scream about it where you can showcase his humor, and his great personality.

For God's sake don't put him in a scene with a new model, where the other guy doesn't even get naked and is forced to suck Jimmy's cock. You're only asking for trouble by doing that.

I am very angry and annoyed at the decision that was made to put Jimmy in a scene like this, not because I am against Jimmy but instead because I feel it is unfair to him not to mention cruel.
 
Jimmy's OWN site a brilliant idea

One has to ask, what is Clay trying to do here? There was a request for more interview. Watch what you wish for, you just might get it. We learned that Jimmy likes cock, "why else would I be doing this?" he opines. We are already clear that quality is not a goal of this sight and now it seems quantity has joined that list of non goals. If I gave a damn, I would be pissed off. I have given up expecting anything.

larkster your are a intelligent guy, YES give Jimmy his OWN site. Why didnt i think of that. man ! i dread up coming videos with Jimmy. Hey Mark & Clay just think of all the $$MONEY$$BUCKS$$Dollars$$ Jimmy will make you guys. Jimmy = Dollars For Mark, think about $ it $ cha ching.and give us more bang for our buck, at least for me. or another idea, make jimmy exclusive to your cheesier Dr.Office bonus site. anyway just get him off BSB2please! im tired of having to mute him just to see his nice ASS. Jamie is the full meal deal.
 
Jimmy's OWN site a brilliant idea

larkster your are a intelligent guy, YES give Jimmy his OWN site. Why didnt i think of that. man ! i dread up coming videos with Jimmy. Hey Mark & Clay just think of all the $$MONEY$$BUCKS$$Dollars$$ Jimmy will make you guys.Pompous Jimmy = Dollars For Mark, think about $ it $ cha ching.and give us more bang for our buck, at least for me. or another idea, make jimmy exclusive to your cheesier Dr.Office/College Boy Physicals bonus site. anyway just get him off BSB2please! im tired of having to mute him just to see his nice ASS. Jamie is the full meal deal.
.
 
Hey Mark & Clay just think of all the $$MONEY$$BUCKS$$Dollars$$ Jimmy will make you guys. Jimmy = Dollars For Mark, think about $ it $ cha ching.and give us more bang for our buck, at least for me.
You seem to be putting down capitalism. Why else would Mark be in business, if not to make money? I don't understand the point you are trying to make about $$MONEY$$BUCKS$$Dollars$$????
 
correction/capitalism

You seem to be putting down capitalism. Why else would Mark be in business, if not to make money? I don't understand the point you are trying to make about $$MONEY$$BUCKS$$Dollars$$????

you certainty didnt undertsand my point, im DEFINITELY not putting down capitalism, just the very opposite. Giving Jimmy his very own site, would generate yet another site for mark and increasing his revenue. aka $M$B& Dollars.(more Business not Less)

Please understand, im NOT a fan of Jimmys work or lack there of. just my opinion.
 
Please listen to this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dear Broke Straight Boys Management,

I am sorry that our being so very short-fused has evolved over time from the very thing Steve mentioned, having Jimmy in future scenes with newbies. This same situation happened with the OVER USE of Mike Robbins and those objecting can clearly see the inevitable, the approaching TRAIN WRECK with continuing to overuse Jimmy. Why would anybody want to pair Jimmy with his limited skills sexually and his limited positive attitude to broadening his skill base. Would you pair in anyother normal business a new employee with some experienced employee that refuses to do 50% of his job. Hell No!!!!! This is the basis for my objection to having Jimmy on the site. He simply refuses and gets away with it! I have asked myself over and over again concerning Jimmy WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE? The answer seems so very obvious.

As far as the feedback at the various events go, consider it like polling for an election at the voting site. People have no personal accountability in a face-to-face encounter and are in the majority of the cases going to give you the answer you are looking for, regardless of how they voted. Also, Jimmy has always been much more personable in the BTS footage when he is not expected to do anything sexual, only to put on his charm. I never ever see this same degree of personal charm during an episode and I am doubly angered why he can't muster the same charm while on set. Please listen. This undying loyalty for Jimmy, as if he is the second cuming of Christ, is purely DELUSIONAL and the root of why the forum has been so HATEFUL in responding. The only time you actually know where you stand with any model is when people are willing to invest their personal time tell you the way it is. None of us have joined Broke Straight Boys or the forum to put you down! We feel shortchanged as customers by the likes of Jimmy, when there is Colin or Chad waiting in the wings, waiting for Jimmy to get off the filming schedule so they can have a crack at it. When you compare any one of Colin's performances, they are head over heel better than any episode Jimmy was ever included.

I thought when Broke Straight Boys-2 was introduced, there was a commitment to avoiding overusing the same old same old. Evidently not!

PLEASE PLEASE LISTEN AND THINK OF WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN. I ONLY WANT Broke Straight Boys TO BE SUCCESSFUL AND NOT END UP AS TRAIN WRECKAGE AS IT APPEARS TO BE HEADING NOW!


Sincerely,


Stimpy
 
i don't know how the pride visitors and forum contibutors compare.
but being in both catagories, i value face time with the models.
face time on video is harder because what you see is what the director and editor gave you to see. face time in person is easier because what you see is what is there and what the model want you to see.
when it comes to jimmy, i have met and chatted with him. from that i came away liking him. on our first meeting, he ask me what i thought could improve his performance and after some thought i told him that not looking distracted and being more involved in his scene would go a long way. i personally think he has incorporated those suggestions into his scenes since then as he said he would try to do. kudos to him. i have no frequency problems. i like watching jimmy and will watch future scene with him in them, until the decision to produce no more jimmy is made (however and when it is made). i am in no hurry to see that time come. that is just me.
as i said in an earlier post, for me this was not about jimmy. he and brad were both hot and interacted well. the one-sidedness of the scene was not the drawback.
because of who i am and what i like, this scene did not work for me.
as a nosy/inquisitive person i like to listen to conversations. without knowing it, in throw away lines are telling things. that's why i wanted to hear what brad was saying, to pretend that we were all meeting brad for the first time. the hum of the air conditioner spoiled that for me. that alone made a scene that could easily been a high 3 to low 4 rated scene, a scene rated lower.
it was not the concept that i had a problem with, it was the way it was presented to my ears. my eyes said, holy shit, but my ears said, for the love of all you hold dear stop trying to hear what he is saying; it's starting to hurt! mercifully, the scene cut to the singing bed.
i am sure that clay will find a way to correct for background sound. he has over the past many months adjudged for the things i thought and posted should be changed.
please, do not consider my comments just another non jimmy post. that would lower any other value my comments might have. i have a lifetime of experience with eavesdropping and voyeurism.
being a fan is a matter of choice and not an article of my faith. i feel free the say when i think the execution could have been better or a model could do better and say it without changing my fan status.
 
Top