our Jake Tipton transforms and pounds sweet ass on major gaysite

[KRU1996]

Jake Tipton has become Zane Tate anders pounding Johnny Rapid ---> Ronan Kennedy Brodyand Tyler are better although jr is yummy

 

[another1]

jake was billed as Zane Tate when he first appeared on his first site.

 

[louis33705]

Apparently he has been signed on with Men.com. That site features former Broke Straight Boys models such as Jimmy Johnson, Johnny Forza, and Scott Harbor. From what I have read, that site pays top dollars for their models and they stay around for quite a while. Johnny Rapid, for example, has done 115+ scenes and continues strong.

This is Jake's profile pic on Men.com

 

[mikeyank]

Apparently he has been signed on with Men.com. That site features former Broke Straight Boys models such as Jimmy Johnson, Johnny Forza, and Scott Harbor. From what I have read, that site pays top dollars for their models and they stay around for quite a while. Johnny Rapid, for example, has done 115+ scenes and continues strong.

This is Jake's profile pic on Men.com

View attachment 13281

That's great news Louis. He is a very hot guy, with lot's of fans, and I'm happy to see that he has a great job and his fans can still be entertained by him. Seems like a "win win" situation for Jake and his fans.

 

[peterh6308]

Little Johnny Rapid is in a class by himself!! I like Jake and hope him well, hell I do him!!

 

[joninliverton]

That's great news Louis. He is a very hot guy, with lot's of fans, and I'm happy to see that he has a great job and his fans can still be entertained by him. Seems like a "win win" situation for Jake and his fans.

Little Johnny Rapid is in a class by himself!! I like Jake and hope him well, hell I do him!!

Indeed, he's better off there than here with his haters.

 

[peterh6308]

Indeed, he's better off there than here with his haters.

Don't include me as a hater I've always liked Jake. I could care less if a model has done work before here as long as he's cute and performs well. Hell believe it or not the innocent Peter has got skeletons in his closet too lol

 

[peterh6308]

Was cruising the web and came across a scene from Sketchy Sex. It included Sam and Bryan fucking some dude while Trent watched. Was thinking this could have been a great BB scene on College Dudes

 

[mikeyank]

As much as I didn't want to get into it again, how does my being "turned off" by a Broke Straight Boys model who claims to be a first time straight guy, and turns out to have had gay sex on video before, make me a "hater"? I will never get that, at all.

Does every time someone on the forum say that they are not turned on by a particular model, make them a hater?????
It's such a silly point of view!

 

[bad4apple]

Jake was also on Dream Boy Bondage where he got beat up badly.

 

[joninliverton]

As much as I didn't want to get into it again, how does my being "turned off" by a Broke Straight Boys model who claims to be a first time straight guy, and turns out to have had gay sex on video before, make me a "hater"? I will never get that, at all.

Does every time someone on the forum say that they are not turned on by a particular model, make them a hater?????
It's such a silly point of view!

Bollox Mike. You change your view on Jake every time there is a thread. Peter I'm sorry I included you as a hater, you are clearly not but Mike has said so many negative points about Jake that he has hung himself.

 

[juanjo]

Jake and Johnny have both done scenes on Dick Dorm as well.

 

[mikeyank]

Bollox Mike. You change your view on Jake every time there is a thread. Peter I'm sorry I included you as a hater, you are clearly not but Mike has said so many negative points about Jake that he has hung himself.

You are TOTALLY incorrect Jon. I've been 100% consistent on my take regarding Jake since Day 1.

1-I thought he was hot when I saw the still pic of the three newcomers, Dimitri, Ronan Kennedy and Jake.

2-When I first started to read the "detective" reports that Jake had been on multiple sites prior to arriving here, including bottoming, I said that I lost interest in watching his continued performances here as I knew that it was not at all true that I was watching a newbie progress, such as with Ronan Kennedy and Dimitri, (although his situation turned out quite differently).

3-I said if Mark wants to bring him back, he would be another of many that I am not interested in watching (including Romeo, Sergio and Tate and later models such as Adam Stripz, Salem Pierce, Sebastian Wilde, etc, etc,). I am very particular in which models turn me on, and whom I enjoy watching in a scene.

If not enjoying all models makes me a HATER in your eyes, then I just don't get it. I thought it was called individual taste. In fact, you too Jon are not a fan of all models here, both presently and in the past, so according to your definition, you are as much a HATER as am I.

I do believe that I've been 100% consistent in my take from the very beginning, and actually find it personally insulting to me in saying that I change my view on Jake in every thread that he is mentioned. That is blatantly untrue.

 

[Ambivalent]

To Mike, and Jon:

#1) I love both you guys.

#2) Jon - you and I strenuously disagree with Mike's feelings about Jake as a model on this site: and, I am sure, will always do so. (I am not happy that people here didn't receive Jake happily. Because I think he would have been a beautiful long-term addition to the site.)

#3) However, Mike has not been inconsistent, Jon. He is a generous and a nice person. For him, the "straight-guy" fetish is BIG - it matters a LOT to him. (I guess I am the same with regard to a couple of fetish-sites I subscribe to.) Mike has consistently (and kindly) said that while Jake doesn't appeal to him, because he broke the rules of that particular fetish, he (Mike) appreciates that other people like Jake, and understands the reasons why. It is not in Mike's nature to "hate" anyone, or anything.

#4) Jon - for sure, I WISH that the members who found out that Jake didn't meet their expectation as a "Broke Straight Boys" could have found it in their hearts, back at that time, to say, "Well, I don't like that this model has appeared on other sites before, but - he's cute, and I would like to GIVE HIM A CHANCE to show what he can do." (In fact, I hope that that might be the model, for new prospects in the future.)

#5) But, Jon, we have to recognize, while we get a lot of great models on here, strings-free. . . for guys like Mike who have a "straight-boy fetish" this is their go-to place. (I am the same with a couple of excellent fetish sites I am on - like a foot-fetish site, for example: I don't mind being candid about that. If the guys wore SOCKS on that site, I would be really PISSED OFF.) Mike, and the guys who come here primarily for the joy and fantasy of straight guys gradually turning gay - as much as I DON'T identify with that fantasy, Jon - have a legitimate right to expect at least a good deal of it, here. Because that is how this site is identified, advertised, and marketed.

************************************************** *

I love Jake, too. And I am really, really sad that he had to go to other sites, to work as a model, and that we no longer get to enjoy him, here. Jon, I think this was a MISTAKE on the part of the members who spoke out against Jake, and the management, who didn't see fit to do a BTS interview with Jake, and clear all this up. (Mostly it is a management issue - they could have rehabilitated Jake's image quite easily, had they chosen to do so.)

But Mike is a stand-up guy, a really nice human being, and he needs what he needs from Broke Straight Boys, and that's why he's here. He doesn't hate anybody. From time to time, he has strong opinions, just like you and I do, Jon - but (unlike in MY case) in Mike's case, they are always gently and kindly expressed.

In this matter - which even I think, is super-overdue to be retired - Mike was not a fan of Jake appearing HERE, anymore. I don't agree with him, and neither do you, Jon. And I certainly hope that, if we get a stellar model in the future (we haven't had a lot of stellar new models, lately) if that new model turns out to have a work-history like Jake's, people will be willing to take a second look, and judge the new model on his beauty, personality, and performance, before they decide he isn't right for Broke Straight Boys

But, for sure, I think Mike was (in the first instance) just expressing his visceral reaction to a guy who didn't meet his expectation of what this site advertises itself as providing. While I didn't agree with him, personally, I think this is OBVIOUSLY FAIR. And, lately, Mike (like the nice guy he IS) has been trying to reach out and be kind to those who WERE fans of Jake's, and offer support and understanding for OUR taste, and OUR feelings. And, Jon, while I don't agree with Mike's (or others') concern about Jake's being here in the first place, I think this gesture on Mike's part was (and is) a very classy and kind and genuine thing for him to do. It speaks volumes, about the man, that he is always trying to show kindness and appreciation to people with whom HE doesn't necessarily (in the first instance) agree. And I think that Mike has been perfectly consistent in his views, from the start.

Jon, YES: I am sad we lost Jake. I am sorry that, if you now want to see Jake's videos, you have to pay more, and go to another site. (Though, the "Amateur Boys' First Time" site is turning out to be a pretty good consolation-prize.) I hope that, if we get another new model who is as good as Jake, but who has similar "back-story" issues, members will think twice before piling on, and at least give that model a chance to explain himself in a BTS video, before they give him the "thumbs-down."

But, Jon, Mike and all the other Broke Straight Boys members who come here primarily for the "straight-guy" fetish, have paid for that fetish, and deserve to have it recognized. And Mike himself is a kind and LOVELY human being, so let's recognize that. And let's all keep being friends, as best we can, despite (even significant) differences in taste and opinion.

Because life is SHORT. But the loves and friendships which light it up, are eternal. And that's what we need to hang onto. Even - and ESPECIALLY - when we disagree. We'll all be gone from this blighted earth soon enough. . . just, in the meantime, let's offer each other all the care and support, and love, and laughter, we can. We haven't long, to be good to each other - and we must make the most of the time we have, with each other.

"A" XOXOXOXOXOXOXO

 

[mikeyank]

Thank you Ambi for recognizing that I am genuine and consistent in my feelings, and for everything you said. You are a mensch!!! And I say that with the most respect.

 

[johnny]

Calling mike a Hater is one of the worst things I have ever heard. He is one of the Kindness, Nicest men I have ever known.
He has his opinions as we all do. But Hater? What a mean thing to say. Especially coming from you jon.

 

[mikeyank]

Calling mike a Hater is one of the worst things I have ever heard. He is one of the Kindness, Nicest men I have ever known.
He has his opinions as we all do. But Hater? What a mean thing to say. Especially coming from you jon.

You are a sweetheart johnny and I love your defending me. I think the world of you too.

But Jon and I have been "sniping" at one another for six years now, on and off a couple of times for Jon, so I never take anything he says too terribly seriously, and at the end of the day we can always bond over David, or the Beatles, or some of the old time forumites like rifle or was it aquarius??? lol

 

[Ambivalent]

Hey, Mike and Johnny ~

Hugs to both of you. Mike, thank you for your letter, and (of course) I meant every word I said about you. I had a very wonderful boss, whose family were Polish refugees from the Second War, who told me, in Yiddish, that I was a "golden soul." (I could say the same about you, Mike; I am sorry I can't translate properly - I didn't learn a lot of Yiddish, growing up as a little Calvinist pig-farmer, in arctic Canada ;-)

Hang on, Johnny, I love you, too. You know, Jon has a very pointed way of expressing himself. You and I dwell in artistic realms - you do hair, and I write speeches - but you and I kind of live in this same sort of existence, Johnny. Jon is an ENGINEER, and, for people in that realm, things are kind of "black-and-white". (As they are NOT, for us.) Jon speaks out quite vocally, about any subject he feels strongly about - as do I - and his language is sometimes pretty tough. But I do not believe, that, in his heart of hearts, Jon is meaning to hurt anyone's feelings - he is just USING language in the way he was trained, to do. In sharp, black-and-white, contrasts. I wouldn't write as Jon does, Johnny, but - I am NOT Jon. I am ME.

I think Jon is a nice guy, and just gives out his impressions and ideas in a very tough and vivid way. And it seems to me that Jon observed that, when he tried to "soften" his approach for awhile, some jackass told him that he was being a "wuss". (I would like to strangle that jackass, BTW: because I appreciate and love the softer side of Jon. I know he is wickedly funny and smart, but I am loving the opportunity to get to know his gentler nature.)

I will just say, in Jon's defence - and, as you all know, he wasn't always such a great fan of MINE, or I of HIM - he expresses himself sometimes in a very direct and tough manner. SOMETIMES, there is a dry (VERY dry) English sense of humour, and playfulness, lurking behind his comments, which isn't apparent to everybody. (It is kind of akin to hitting a friend HARD, on the shoulder, in boarding-school, to show him you love him: even while you are meaning to be nice to him.)

This style of expression is foreign to most of us in North America, where we mostly "play it straight". Here, if I wanted to tell Johnny that I loved him, I would say just that, in precisely those words. If I were ENGLISH, and wanted to express precisely the same thing, I might say, "Johnny, you WANKER, you're SUCH a bloody IDIOT!" And then give him a little hard PUNCH in the SHOULDER, KNOWING he would get the subtext. (We North Americans are BAD at subtexts, since most of us can hardly READ, to begin with! LOL!!! But British culture is full of that stuff - AND INCREDIBLY strange, and hard for us to understand, for those of us across the sea.)

So, look, guys - and this is an exercise in cross-cultural translation - I think some of you may be misunderstanding Jon, a bit. He writes in very direct, and sometimes HARSH terms (which my Scottish Great-Aunts would NOT appreciate: whenever I was rude, they would shake their fingers at me and say, "AYE, 'A', we've NO ROOM for a wee ENGLISHMAN, in THIS FAMILY!") But the English sense of humour is a little different, from the North American one. And, I think, sometimes when Jon is seeming hard and harsh, he's just expressing his own opinion, and waiting to see, what YOU'LL SAY BACK - and, if you PUNCH HIM BACK, with a LAUGH - he'll understand that, and respect and love you, for having the courage of your convictions.

It is kind of a North American thing, that we feel like we have to be treacly-sweet ALL the time: as if every sentence we spoke were our LAST SENTENCE, from our death-bed. The English tradition is much different, and allows for (and EXPECTS) that there will be MUCH, MUCH playful poking-in-the-eye, and cuffs about the ears, and jolly INSULTS of ALL KINDS - even while a great mutual love and respect is preserved, UNDERNEATH.

These are very different modes of self-expression. As Canadians, though, we sort of get exposed to both of them - as people from the U.S. don't necessarily, always.

So. . . this was kind of a controversial subject, and lots of people have strong feelings about it. I think most of us have said what we have to say, and I hope most of us can move on from it, now.

And, for those who are mad at Jon, for posing his opinions in such a tough and highly-charged fashion: well, I think that's just Jon. He expresses himself VIVIDLY, that's for sure. But, if you disagree with Jon, and hit him back hard (with YOUR POINTS), and tell him a JOKE, he'll always respect you for standing up for yourself, I think. I DON'T think, Johnny, that Jon is mean at heart ~ I just think he is just schooled in a "bare-knuckles" kind of conversation, and, while he gives it out, TOUGH, he can take it BACK, too: if you disagree with him, and have something to say. And have the courage to have a laugh, with him.

Guys, when I started out on this board, I didn't like Jon at all. In fact, I think I maybe HATED him, for an hour or two. I just didn't GET the way he expresses himself, which (at least on big, controversial subjects) is sometimes alien, and anathema, to a lot of Americans, AND Canadians. To employ a trite little "Briticism": Jon takes the piss out of EVERYBODY." But what most people DON'T realize is: Jon doesn't mind if YOU TAKE the PISS OUT OF HIM, TOO. He will laugh, and thank you for it. He has just grown up in a more rugged, and angular, conversational culture, than most of us have.

That's it, that's all, I need a drink, and a few moments to go whack off to a classic Jason Matthews video. But, let's live and love each other in peace and harmony, everyone. If it doesn't help US, it will at least sell some Coca-Cola.

"A" XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO

P.S. We're from all races and religions. We come from all nations, continents, and regions. And we all want to suck cute guys' cocks, really, really, badly. . . . And I guess that makes us a perfect, United Nations of love, and desire. (Except, FIZZIER ;-)

 

[peterh6308]

You are a sweetheart johnny and I love your defending me. I think the world of you too.

But Jon and I have been "sniping" at one another for six years now, on and off a couple of times for Jon, so I never take anything he says too terribly seriously, and at the end of the day we can always bond over David, or the Beatles, or some of the old time forumites like rifle or was it aquarius??? lol

They go back and forth just like family does and like Mikeyank said "for years" I personally love it because I know at they end of the day they are still friends and love and respect each other. And they may both disagree with me, but their really from the same Lot!! xoxo to both my Mates....

 

[johnny]

Ambi
I saw the softer side of jon. And I liked it. I guess I am a bit of a "wuss" Came home. After checking the Paul thread lol.
Saw the Jake thread and the word Hateful used towards mike. Mike has been SO good to me. It just pissed me off.
As anyone who knows mike has too know he is not a hateful man. I also write to fast. Things just come out before I think of the ramifications.
Like I do with Paul. He must think I am a pretty silly man. But that is just me. I write what I feel.
But I feel I am getting better. Writing and reading on the forum has taught me allot. So I hope my little hissey fit shall pass.
Just don't fuck with mike. lol Is hissey a word?
Love You Ambi sleep tight. xoxo johnny
Just saw Peters post and hope we all can be Mates.....