More intimacy on BSB

[silvercamel]

Since we seem to have exceeded for some time now the hesitation for models to kiss, maybe the next step would be to have them embrace each other - hug and kiss, touching, etc. In other words, more intimacy= particularly with those models who "seem to be getting along well". Imagine Max and Blake embracing while they kissed.

What do you think?

 

[joninliverton]

Since we seem to have exceeded for some time now the hesitation for models to kiss, maybe the next step would be to have them embrace each other - hug and kiss, touching, etc. In other words, more intimacy= particularly with those models who "seem to be getting along well". Imagine Max and Blake embracing while they kissed.

What do you think?

Super idea Silver. Would be nice to just get the camera following the guys into the bedroom, kiss, strip, touch etc etc. It won't suit all the pairings but someone like Max and another I agree. I often find it very "cold" when they are asked to take their clothes off at the very beginning - it is such a waste.

 

[grace17]

Oooooh this thought sends my girlie heart into a flutter of anticipation.....

I'm not sure if intimacy can be faked enough to satisfy me, but the models are definitely kissing more and sometimes they even look like they're enjoying it....although it's probably just Oscar worthy acting skills on their part. Lol.

 

[silvercamel]

Oooooh this thought sends my girlie heart into a flutter of anticipation.....

I'm not sure if intimacy can be faked enough to satisfy me, but the models are definitely kissing more and sometimes they even look like they're enjoying it....although it's probably just Oscar worthy acting skills on their part. Lol.

Well, if the price is right!

 

[Ms. Kianna]

.........I love it when one wraps his hand around the neck of the other, and pulls him in for a steamy kiss.......

 

[cumrag27]

Who could ask for more?

Just like in the unforgettable episode shared between Shane Erickson and Josh, I love even the slightest gesture showing sincere affection and caring for their partner. Even just a glance at the right time can tell much about how the couple feels about each other. It doesn't have to be directly sexual in nature to please me and in fact it rarely is.


Sincerely,



Stimpy

 

[tangogent]

I'm in one thousand percent agreement.

The odd hand on the neck or on the thigh has often
brought me 'over the edge' whilst watching a clip here.

Where's the ballot-box so I can stuff it on this issue?

Bring on the nuzzling and ear-licking!

Hands on neck, yes!

TG
x

 

[mikeyank]

I agree that intimacy can be very exciting on this site, but only if it comes organically to the scene, (thanks to my friend Stowe for the idea of that word "organically"). I don't want to see any of it suggested or insisted upon by Clay, but only if it is a natural reaction.

I joined this site to see STRAIGHT guys performing gay sex acts. I don't expect or want a straight guy to hold hands, look lovingly at their partner and certainly not to give his partner a passionate kiss upon command.

Throughout the history of Broke Straight Boys, there have been a handful of situations where the models were so caught up in the pleasure they were feeling that these acts happened spontaneously and that is what made them so hot.

I am not a fan of mainstream gay porn, but I watched the free bonus scenes of College Dudes that Mark provided, and to watch two buff handsome young guys get naked, start kissing and having a passionate lovemaking session does not float my boat.

But when it happens "by accident", and the models themselves are shocked by it, then it is steamy hot as was the Porn Shane & Josh scene.

 

[joninliverton]

Mike, I appreciate yours and your best friend Stowe's views on what you expect to see on this site. However, as can see from the previous posts, there are a few people who like Silvercamel's idea. Whilst the site is called Broke Straight Boys, it doesn't necessarily mean that Broke Straight Boys will not pretend to passionate, strip etc for the benefit of some of the members. They already allegedly act out their current part, so why not let them act a bit further.

 

[Buckeye1]

Kissing and/or intimacy probably would be fake or scripted at first for a "real" straight boy, but practice makes perfect. It would at least loosen up the models and make it more comfortable for them accept. After all sucking cock and fucking were also new to them and they conquered that, in most cases. Why should kissing/intimacy (and rimming/cum eating) be so different? They are all part of the gay life style. The whole concept of this site is to see how far a straight boy will go for money. I would like to see just that....how far will they go? We just might be pleasantly surprised.

 

[mikeyank]

Mike, I appreciate yours and your best friend Stowe's views on what you expect to see on this site. However, as can see from the previous posts, there are a few people who like Silvercamel's idea. Whilst the site is called Brokestraightboys, it doesn't necessarily mean that broke straight boys will not pretend to passionate, strip etc for the benefit of some of the members. They already allegedly act out their current part, so why not let them act a bit further.

Jon, as evidenced by the great popularity of the scenes involving intimacy, chemistry, and tenderness, I do not in any way doubt that perhaps the majority of members enjoy these type of scenes.

I am only speaking for myself and my ideal type of scenes. As I often say, with three updates a week, I believe that there is plenty of opportunity for Mark to feature many kinds of scenes to satisfy the varied tastes of the Broke Straight Boys audience.

As my desires and expectations appear to be in the minority at this time, I would be satisfied with even a handful of Jimmy/Mike Robbins/Tank Shane types who very vocally proclaim their "straightness", but still get very hard and experience great orgasms from another man, but would never admit it, and if these types of models were told to be intimate with their partners, it would not ring true at all.

So, in no way am I trying to discredit anyone else's desires or expectations here. I am just stating my own, and would hope to see at least a smattering of "my kind" of scenes on Broke Straight Boys from time to time.

 

[mikeyank]

Kissing and/or intimacy probably would be fake or scripted at first for a "real" straight boy, but practice makes perfect. It would at least loosen up the models and make it more comfortable for them accept. After all sucking cock and fucking were also new to them and they conquered that, in most cases. Why should kissing/intimacy (and rimming/cum eating) be so different? They are all part of the gay life style. The whole concept of this site is to see how far a straight boy will go for money. I would like to see just that....how far will they go? We just might be pleasantly surprised.

As strange as it may seem to a gay man such as you or I Robb, there is a big difference in the mind of many guy's who live a straight lifestyle and only "dabble" in gay sex either for money or as a "secret life", away from their family and friends.

This topic has come up here before, and I can't recall the model's but I do recall David having a long discussion with the models in the pre-sex banter on this subject.

And from personal experience, over 20 years ago, I met a hot 19 year old guy who considered himself bisexual, but lived a very straight lifestyle back in his neighborhood, and during one of our first sexual encounters he gave me a surprising rim job, which lead to him fingering me and trying to open me up to receiving his big banana shaped cock in my ass, (which I didn't allow).

However in another encounter shortly after that night, during our sex play, I tried to kiss him, and he stopped me and told me that he only kissed girls, as kissing was "too intimate" for him to do with a man, and I thought to myself that his sticking his tongue up my ass was not "too intimate" but kissing was. That is the mindset of some straight guys who dabble in gay sex on the "down low".

 

[rbar]

...However in another encounter shortly after that night, during our sex play, I tried to kiss him, and he stopped me and told me that he only kissed girls, as kissing was "too intimate" for him to do with a man, and I thought to myself that his sticking his tongue up my ass was not "too intimate" but kissing was. That is the mindset of some straight guys who dabble in gay sex on the "down low".

I've heard that a few times myself! I don't get it. You'll suck dick, rim and (beg to) get fucked, but wont kiss? Bizarre.

I was, ahem, dating a married cop, and one day while fucking him, he turned around and asked me, "Do you think I'm gay?" I was just like, "Dude. Im IN you! You just asked me to take the condom off, because you wanted to see if you could feel me cumming inside you. But, you won't kiss, so, noooooooooo, you couldn't possibly be gay."

Just FYI, I didnt take the condom off, until I was ready to nut, and then blew it down his throat, not up his ass, and he swallowed every drop! Yeah, he was TOTALLY straight!

 

[Buckeye1]

As strange as it may seem to a gay man such as you or I Robb, there is a big difference in the mind of many guy's who live a straight lifestyle and only "dabble" in gay sex either for money or as a "secret life", away from their family and friends.

This topic has come up here before, and I can't recall the model's but I do recall David having a long discussion with the models in the pre-sex banter on this subject.

And from personal experience, over 20 years ago, I met a hot 19 year old guy who considered himself bisexual, but lived a very straight lifestyle back in his neighborhood, and during one of our first sexual encounters he gave me a surprising rim job, which lead to him fingering me and trying to open me up to receiving his big banana shaped cock in my ass, (which I didn't allow).

However in another encounter shortly after that night, during our sex play, I tried to kiss him, and he stopped me and told me that he only kissed girls, as kissing was "too intimate" for him to do with a man, and I thought to myself that his sticking his tongue up my ass was not "too intimate" but kissing was. That is the mindset of some straight guys who dabble in gay sex on the "down low".

I've heard that before, Mike, about kissing being too intimate. In fact Jimmy said the same thing in one of his scenes, but like they say, money talks and he did eventually kiss, sort of.

In your personal experience, there was not the incentive (money) to kiss. Had you offered him several hundred dollars for him to kiss you, you would probably been covered in his spit. If a guy will rim your ass for free, he will kiss for "X" amount of dollars.

I'm sure Clay has talked at length to each model and knows exactly what each is willing to do here. I don't know if money is negotiated with each one individually or if there is a "standard" scale for such things. It doesn't really matter. The question is, is the model willing to do something sexual with another guy for the amount of money offered him. Some will take the offer and hate it and never do it again. Some will be indifferent about it and will probably do it again FOR THE MONEY. And then some will find it not as bad as they thought it was going to be and will take it to the next level and actually enjoy themselves. This last group reminds me of the Max/Carter scene and the Max/Blake scene (their second one). It probably started out being all about the money, but somewhere during the scene, the magic started to happen and they both went with it. Both scenes as of now have a rating of 4+ and the Max/Carter scene was the highest rated scene in Broke Straight Boys history, I think. And the joy of all of this is that they "seemed" to be having fun doing it.

But as I said, I'm sure Clay and Mark have considered all of this and work closely with the models to try to please everyone some/most of the time. I really have no complaints.

 

[silvercamel]

I agree that intimacy can be very exciting on this site, but only if it comes organically to the scene, (thanks to my friend Stowe for the idea of that word "organically"). I don't want to see any of it suggested or insisted upon by Clay, but only if it is a natural reaction.

I joined this site to see STRAIGHT guys performing gay sex acts. I don't expect or want a straight guy to hold hands, look lovingly at their partner and certainly not to give his partner a passionate kiss upon command.

Throughout the history of BSB, there have been a handful of situations where the models were so caught up in the pleasure they were feeling that these acts happened spontaneously and that is what made them so hot.

I am not a fan of mainstream gay porn, but I watched the free bonus scenes of College Dudes that Mark provided, and to watch two buff handsome young guys get naked, start kissing and having a passionate lovemaking session does not float my boat.

But when it happens "by accident", and the models themselves are shocked by it, then it is steamy hot as was the Porn Shane & Josh scene.

The Josh/Shane episode is my all-time favorite. I've watched it many, many times. And as a result (and in comparison with some Max/Carter or Max Blake scenes) I have noticed a couple of things:

Their kissing - which at the time was very unusual - was actually very chaste - no tongues. And the passion/intimacy I'm talking about was fairly limited. All to say, the relationships between models have evolved and hopefully will continue.

 

[mikeyank]

I've heard that before, Mike, about kissing being too intimate. In fact Jimmy said the same thing in one of his scenes, but like they say, money talks and he did eventually kiss, sort of.

In your personal experience, there was not the incentive (money) to kiss. Had you offered him several hundred dollars for him to kiss you, you would probably been covered in his spit. If a guy will rim your ass for free, he will kiss for "X" amount of dollars.

I'm sure Clay has talked at length to each model and knows exactly what each is willing to do here. I don't know if money is negotiated with each one individually or if there is a "standard" scale for such things. It doesn't really matter. The question is, is the model willing to do something sexual with another guy for the amount of money offered him. Some will take the offer and hate it and never do it again. Some will be indifferent about it and will probably do it again FOR THE MONEY. And then some will find it not as bad as they thought it was going to be and will take it to the next level and actually enjoy themselves. This last group reminds me of the Max/Carter scene and the Max/Blake scene (their second one). It probably started out being all about the money, but somewhere during the scene, the magic started to happen and they both went with it. Both scenes as of now have a rating of 4+ and the Max/Carter scene was the highest rated scene in BSB history, I think. And the joy of all of this is that they "seemed" to be having fun doing it.

But as I said, I'm sure Clay and Mark have considered all of this and work closely with the models to try to please everyone some/most of the time. I really have no complaints.

I suppose that you are right Robb, about my 19 year old friend being willing to kiss me for cash, but my relationship with him was not blatantly about money. I did always buy him White Castle hamburgers on our way back to his neighborhood in Queens, and I would buy him drinks and stuff when we were out.

As far as the models on the site, all of your questions are part of the fun for me on Broke Straight Boys, trying to figure out who is telling us the truth and what they actually will do for the cash, and why. The concept of the site still turns me on. I just want the models to be believable too, as we watch the progression of straight guys getting into gay for pay sex on the internet.

And I agree with you Robb that Mark and Clay, "try to please everyone some/most of the time." That's enough for me too, plus of course this forum where I get to hang with the "cool kids" like you, Robb.

 

[Beth]

I've heard that a few times myself! I don't get it. You'll suck dick, rim and (beg to) get fucked, but wont kiss? Bizarre.

I was, ahem, dating a married cop, and one day while fucking him, he turned around and asked me, "Do you think I'm gay?" I was just like, "Dude. Im IN you! You just asked me to take the condom off, because you wanted to see if you could feel me cumming inside you. But, you won't kiss, so, noooooooooo, you couldn't possibly be gay."

Just FYI, I didnt take the condom off, until I was ready to nut, and then blew it down his throat, not up his ass, and he swallowed every drop! Yeah, he was TOTALLY straight!

I just love your sense of humor, straight as it is!

 

[joninliverton]

I didn't realise that hookers and male prostitution was so rife in the US. I'm also rather surprised that good looking forumites choose to go down that road and pay for younger company.

 

[JohnnyG919]

I agree that intimacy can be very exciting on this site, but only if it comes organically to the scene, (thanks to my friend Stowe for the idea of that word "organically"). I don't want to see any of it suggested or insisted upon by Clay, but only if it is a natural reaction.

I joined this site to see STRAIGHT guys performing gay sex acts. I don't expect or want a straight guy to hold hands, look lovingly at their partner and certainly not to give his partner a passionate kiss upon command.

I'm with Mikey on this one. It's not a matter of not wanting any intimacy at all. It's hot when it happens "organically" (i.e. it just sort of happens naturally (or appears to) because the guys get into it more than they expected to.) It's actually the fact that you don't really expect two straight guys to get into it that makes it hot. I would point to the scene with Diesal and Jimmy Slater as a classic example of this (though it's definitely not the only one.) I know Miss K remembers this one. ;-)

Now as the corollary to that, if it happens too often, then you start to expect it and it's not really all that hot anymore. So I don't think it's something that we should see all the time.

That said, there are other issues that come into play as well. First of all, this site is about STRAIGHT boys doing gay things. Too much intimacy and they stop appearing straight - whether they actually are or not. At that point, this site is no different than the myriad other sites out there where mostly straight guys are actually pretending to be gay. (Or in some cases where they go all "Victor Victoria" and have straight guys pretending to be gay guys who are pretending to be straight guys doing gay things.) It kind of defeats the purpose of this site to overdo it.

It has to be an occasional thing. In fact, in Broke Straight Boys 1.0, David used to catch hell all the time because a lot of people thought that all of the models were actually gay. (In fact many of them were.) He was constantly trying to prove to folks the models were actually straight. I'm not certain of this, but I would bet that was one of the factors that led to the creation of Broke Straight Boys 2.0 even if it was only a small one.

 

[juanjo]

I agree with MikeYank - I do not expect two straight boys to come here and start acting like they are gay boys on a romantic lark.