• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Idea's, suggestions for the new Broke Straight Boys

Oh come on Tampa, subtitles !! lol. Get a hearing aid or turn the volume up :001_tt2:

LOL You know what I mean Jon. :wink:

When we have a model like CJ (AKA "Mumbles") and he purposely whispers something like, " I love it when you push it to the left. That's the spot." LOL Things like that would be nice to know. And it would add to the enjoyment of the scene. Certainly not subtitling entire scenes though. Just a sentence or quick comment on maybe one out of every 7-10 vids.
 
Actually I meant to say something about the sound volume. Broke Straight Boys videos are consistently lower volume than I would like, and I have my Quicktime turned up all the way. I do like to hear what they whisper/mumble/moan to each other, especially when one actually comes out with a very sincere-sounding 'fuck me!'
 
This has nothing to do with the filming, but i'll throw it out there anyway. Perhaps Broke Straight Boys could set up a forum chatroom, where forum members could meet. I don't mind all this posting, but sometimes you want to talk to someone, like right now. Unfortunatley, you have post, or send them a private message and then hope they will see it while you still need to talk to them.
BTW, speaking to the racial diversity. And I think David mentioned this once before, they film who they get to come in and apply. And, it seems that the majority of the recruits are guys who find Broke Straight Boys on the internet and get in touch with them. It sounded as if Broke Straight Boys does not actually go out searching for new talent. It finds them. Hence, mostly broke white boys.
I for one am not surprised. This would be in line with what occurs in movies and on television. I've been viewing porn since it first appeared back in the 70's and to my recollection, other racial groups have never been a big part of the porn industry, at least not mainstream. That being said, if you go to other sites, you find exclusive videos of just abut any kind of diversification you could imagine.
 
Personally I like the format, but some edgy stuff would be great. One thing that I would really like to see is a little more attention to the guys great bodies when they first get naked. I think that a pan and pause on the important parts, both front and back would be nice. Followed by a long pause of a full body shot. All of this while they are still flaccid, just the boys as they look, all natural and all. I think that's what a lot of us look for in the "straight boys" we admire so much.

Also, really, close-ups are a dime a dozen. Nice no doubt, but too much is not good. Personally I want to see the boys in action, not just their dicks or a pumping fist. Why can't more sites show the guys from head to at least just below the balls when they are coming? The money shot always has to be a close up. Why? Personally, I'd like to see the guy's face and balls, all in one shot, leading up to and including the orgasm. I've seen a millions cocks shoot a load, it's the guys body language and facial expression when he comes that makes it HOT. And while I'm on the subject, is there a rule that says one cock in the frame at any given time? :thumbdown: It seems like it. Broke Straight Boys is not as bad as many, but come on, sometimes you've got 3 or 4 naked hot guys in the room and even if the others have already shot their load, they are still HOT! Seems like the photographer is not looking at the shoot with any sensitivity for what the viewer wants to see.

Anyway, all in all you guys are GREAT, and sorry to rant, I know there is no pleasing everyone. Just my thoughts. Thanks for listening. Good luck and looking forward to the coming changes. But this site is definitely one of the best.
 
Pastol.

Very good points about being able to see the boys' faces when they shoot their loads. I also find that very stimulating.
 
Personally I like the format, but some edgy stuff would be great. One thing that I would really like to see is a little more attention to the guys great bodies when they first get naked. I think that a pan and pause on the important parts, both front and back would be nice. Followed by a long pause of a full body shot. All of this while they are still flaccid, just the boys as they look, all natural and all. I think that's what a lot of us look for in the "straight boys" we admire so much.

Also, really, close-ups are a dime a dozen. Nice no doubt, but too much is not good. Personally I want to see the boys in action, not just their dicks or a pumping fist. Why can't more sites show the guys from head to at least just below the balls when they are coming? The money shot always has to be a close up. Why? Personally, I'd like to see the guy's face and balls, all in one shot, leading up to and including the orgasm. I've seen a millions cocks shoot a load, it's the guys body language and facial expression when he comes that makes it HOT. And while I'm on the subject, is there a rule that says one cock in the frame at any given time? :thumbdown: It seems like it. Broke Straight Boys is not as bad as many, but come on, sometimes you've got 3 or 4 naked hot guys in the room and even if the others have already shot their load, they are still HOT! Seems like the photographer is not looking at the shoot with any sensitivity for what the viewer wants to see.

Anyway, all in all you guys are GREAT, and sorry to rant, I know there is no pleasing everyone. Just my thoughts. Thanks for listening. Good luck and looking forward to the coming changes. But this site is definitely one of the best.

Dear Pastol,

Very astute observations and clear presentation of what needs to be addressed in future shoots. I definitely agree that filming the face adds so much more to the mechanical launching of their cum shot, whether oozing or shooting great wads of cum. Their face is a major part of this equation and deserves to be included in the "money shot" and not just for facials. Furthermore, I really hate deliberately misguided cumshots not even coming close to the intended target, namely their mouth-the big opening above the chin. If the recipient of the rich load is unwilling to swallow, then it is much better enduring the load landing on their chest, their package, or their ass rather than to screw up the whole episode with a half-hearted and poorly aimed facial.

Finally, who cares if some overstimulated guy actually cums in a condom. Isn't that what they were created for anyway? There are several options as to what can be done with its contents and they all are sexy if given some thought. And besides, you got what they had to contribute anyway. So, why..."cry over spilled milk"? Whoopty-do! Get over it already!

Now that I feel totally drained, I'll try to save up for my next outpouring! I have enjoyed entertaining your thoughts Pastol. You needn't be so shy about posting your worthy observations. Nice to meet you and keep on contributing to the forum!



Stimpy
 
Mark, the changes sound very exciting as a plus to what will remain. May I suggest that the models be asked to do more dirty conversation during the scene and could there be more facial cum shots at the end.
Thanks for listening to the suggestions
GayMusic01
 
This thread advertises for members to make comments about Broke Straight Boys and the other sites as well. College Dudes, and Boy Gusher among one or two others are mentioned. However, when clicking on the Bonus Sites, only the original sites College Boy Physicals, ABFT, HSBoys, and the female one are all that come up. How does one access the other sites? Are they free sites attached to Broke Straight Boys, or does one have to pay for those sites?
Thank you,
JLipps
 
I am wholeheartedly in support of the "show faces" request. That is where the power is. Also, I am probably really strange and alone is this attitude, but I most prefer the first "solo" episode, and the first and maybe second one to follow. I like to believe that the guys are straight (I truly believe some of them are, or want to be bi, or have been bi and are moving along the spectrum. But I must prefer the crossing the line, the first oral, the first touching, et cetera. The onlyh anal I really enjoy is face-to-face, when there is the chance of a kiss or so. And the two cum shots when Nu came so close to actually taking Shane's (T-shirt Shane) load was too hot to bare. So much for this.
 
I am wholeheartedly in support of the "show faces" request. That is where the power is. Also, I am probably really strange and alone is this attitude, but I most prefer the first "solo" episode, and the first and maybe second one to follow. I like to believe that the guys are straight (I truly believe some of them are, or want to be bi, or have been bi and are moving along the spectrum. But I must prefer the crossing the line, the first oral, the first touching, et cetera.
Great great great! Love it! Besides, solos are HOT, what better way to add more to the catalog?
 
I have enjoyed entertaining your thoughts Pastol. You needn't be so shy about posting your worthy observations. Nice to meet you and keep on contributing to the forum!

Stimpy
Thank you Stimpy, JLipps4u, and buckhorn526 for validating my point(s). It is good to know that I am not alone in these things. :thumbup: Nice to meet all of you.

you guys =>:kissass:<= me (hehehe, I wish)
 
Last edited:
Undie votes for:

1) more volume
2) seeing straight guys watching other guys cum
3) self sucking solos!


Undie

Dear Undie.

I have to agree as this is a proven formula, just not proven on Broke Straight Boys unfortunately. If the recruiters were to have this as part of their recruiting objectives, I think there would be substantial benefits to the site and the forum as well.

This beauty pictured below speaks volumes in itself and reminds me of the old adage "a picture is worth a thousand words". So true, so true!

I feel that Broke Straight Boys needs to be sure to include the facial reactions during a episodes as it so enrichens the whole experience. And, then, who doesn't enjoy seeing "volume in cum shots" The more, the merrier!

Sincerely,

Cumrag27, aka Stimpy
 

Attachments

  • self%20suck.jpg
    self%20suck.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 87
Last edited:
Hi Mark,
I know I have posted a few suggestions & made a few comments on this thread about the "new Broke Straight Boys" but it suddenly just hit me.
The best suggestion I can give you is - allow the models to be who "they" are. Not who we, as viewers, think they should be.
 
To thy own self be true

Hi Mark,
I know I have posted a few suggestions & made a few comments on this thread about the "new Broke Straight Boys" but it suddenly just hit me.
The best suggestion I can give you is - allow the models to be who "they" are. Not who we, as viewers, think they should be.

Dear raysvq and Mark,

This is a most wise suggestion raysvq has made. I wish I had thought of it first.

Stimpy
 
Hi Mark,
I know I have posted a few suggestions & made a few comments on this thread about the "new Broke Straight Boys" but it suddenly just hit me.
The best suggestion I can give you is - allow the models to be who "they" are. Not who we, as viewers, think they should be.
I certainly go along with that Ray. I love the quasi documentary, reality show aspect to Broke Straight Boys It's like the old Candid Camera television show that was what host and creator, Allen Funt called catching people in "the act of being themselves".
 
I still haven't quite figured out the Broke Straight Boys appeal but here I am still subscribing after years, and having just flirting with several other sites and left them. College Dudes gets on my nerves for some reason--seems too forced. You can say that it's the 'reality aspect' and let's just wink about how str8 some of these guys are (though I have had discussions with friends who say they think that sexual orientation is a much more fluid thing with young guys these days... hey more power to them!) and the pay negotiations, and the editing (one time Dustin made a crack about how these things really go on for hours) and the alleged str8 porn (what IS Zakk staring at during the one scene with his cute floppy-haired buddy? I'd prefer to think it was a mirror) but there is something weirdly endearing about a lot of these guys. Str8 or not, they mostly do seem like just guys who could use some money and are willing to play around. Even poor tough-guy Dustin had some sweet moments.

So I don't know if I've added anything useful...
 
forays into the unknown and previously forbidden zone

I still haven't quite figured out the Broke Straight Boys appeal but here I am still subscribing after years, and having just flirting with several other sites and left them. College Dudes gets on my nerves for some reason--seems too forced. You can say that it's the 'reality aspect' and let's just wink about how str8 some of these guys are (though I have had discussions with friends who say they think that sexual orientation is a much more fluid thing with young guys these days... hey more power to them!) and the pay negotiations, and the editing (one time Dustin made a crack about how these things really go on for hours) and the alleged str8 porn (what IS Zakk staring at during the one scene with his cute floppy-haired buddy? I'd prefer to think it was a mirror) but there is something weirdly endearing about a lot of these guys. Str8 or not, they mostly do seem like just guys who could use some money and are willing to play around. Even poor tough-guy Dustin had some sweet moments.

So I don't know if I've added anything useful...

Dear Dckevin1,

What I most appreciate is your tongue and cheek acceptance that "Broke Straight Boys" is not so strictly defined as "Straight exclusively". Yes, you are so right that one's sexuality is more frequently than not on a sliding scale or continuum and necessarily creates a "gray area that can fluctuate ". Further, we have observed that more and more young people today are freely comfortable with exploring their sexual limits on a no-strings attached basis. That does not mean they always remain in an "exploratory mode", but it is more likely, especially if they have a "pleasurable trip along the way".

Newbies need to be treated with respect and almost reverence. If the limits are to be explored to the greatest extent, we should be generous enough at Broke Straight Boys to provide a "safe and secure environment that fosters low-risk "forays into the unknown and previously forbidden zone". Any anal experimentation of newbies needs to gently introduce both butt plugs and dildos in a prolonged basis as opening up their otherwise extremly tight rear door but increasing the chances of a more pleasureable introduction to anal pleasures.

Whatever you do, please express yourself freqently on the forum. While your thoughts may not always be accepted, at least you will know you have done your part in getting a point across. Thanks for your thoughts and please don't keep them to yourself anymore!

Sincerely,


Cumrag27, aka Stimpy
 
a new twist

I would like feedback from as many members/staff as possible on this idea: or scene 1, have a predetermined line, of what is 'scene 1 worthy', and put ideas/suggestions that have been posted on the forum(if the update is with 'return models'), as to what it is exactly they will be doing on the scene. It is upto YOU whether you choose to show the actual drawing, but this way, with the models being 'forewarned' of what the 'worst possible case' could be between the 2 of them, they could have the option to decline the shoot?

Also Along with the possible scenarios, Broke Straight Boys management could make up a suitable dollar amount for the scene, and/or model in the scene.

This is just an idea/opinion to spice things up
 
Top