johnny
BSB Addict
That's a prick I would Love to play with.lolHe's a prick
That's a prick I would Love to play with.lolHe's a prick
You and me buddy!That's a prick I would Love to play with.lol
A Facebook post on the latest Bieb's stupidity which is hysterical:
https://www.facebook.com/menshumor/...4470.276620012351729/1082361975110858/?type=1
******************************
LOL! That's pretty damned funny, Stowe!!!!
"A" )))
Thank you so much Ambi. The word that comes to mind to describe what I just saw is........................... Scrumdelicious!!!
I think so much less of CK and/or his company and/or its ad dept or agency. Having Bieber as its model cheapens the brand - in, of course, my most humble opinion.
I was thinking the same thing Ambi about Marky Mark, another true beauty in his youth, and you're right that his offences with the law were a lot more serious than egging or whatever Justin did wrong. And of course the marketing folks at Calvin Klein are looking for good looking guys who will attract the youth market to sell jeans or underwear.********************************************
Understood, of course, Stowe. But "Marky Mark" (one of CK's previous models - more of my vintage) was no saint, either. He beat people up - with sticks - and now seeks exoneration. (Bieber has been guilty of lots of things - primarily bad singing and fits of adolescent pique, but - - - he hasn't beaten anyone up with a stick yet, to my knowledge.) http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/should-mark-wahlberg-be-pardoned-1988-assault-n263831
Calvin Klein, as a brand - has never really been concerned with exalting moral probity. They hire guys with nice abs, to show off underwear. Lots of their model-choices have not been good role-models. So I am not sure if Justin Bieber cheapens the brand; confirms its wickedness; or just needs a chance to grow up, as Wahlberg did.
~ "A" XOXOXOXOXOXOXO
View attachment 13449
I think so much less of CK and/or his company and/or its ad dept or agency. Having Bieber as its model cheapens the brand - in, of course, my most humble opinion.
********************************************
Understood, of course, Stowe. But "Marky Mark" (one of CK's previous models - more of my vintage) was no saint, either. He beat people up - with sticks - and now seeks exoneration. (Bieber has been guilty of lots of things - primarily bad singing and fits of adolescent pique, but - - - he hasn't beaten anyone up with a stick yet, to my knowledge.) http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/should-mark-wahlberg-be-pardoned-1988-assault-n263831
Calvin Klein, as a brand - has never really been concerned with exalting moral probity. They hire guys with nice abs, to show off underwear. Lots of their model-choices have not been good role-models. So I am not sure if Justin Bieber cheapens the brand; confirms its wickedness; or just needs a chance to grow up, as Wahlberg did.
~ "A" XOXOXOXOXOXOXO
View attachment 13449
I was thinking the same thing Ambi about Marky Mark, another true beauty in his youth, and you're right that his offences with the law were a lot more serious than egging or whatever Justin did wrong. And of course the marketing folks at Calvin Klein are looking for good looking guys who will attract the youth market to sell jeans or underwear.
And the ads of both Marky Mark and Justin Beiber sure attract the attention of this way way over post teen!!!
You guys should really read what I wrote. Did I say anything about Marky Mark? No. Thus it is illogical for you to infer that my disapproval of Bieber was in any way an endorsement of Mark. I did not approve of him either and still don't. He was then and still is a raging homophobe. And while even I can admire their physcial attributes, CK could have easily found others who have either the same or better physical attributes but who present a more wholesome public image - in my humble opinion, of course.
I agree with Stowie1 - Bieber is a dick and if he is a homophobe (I know not) then I hate him even more.