Barebacking sex between the guys

[tampa24]

I somehow managed to miss this post until now.
What the eff is your effing problem?
Mark, AKA Broke Straight Boys, said in a post in this thread that he 'would not put his models at risk.'
I responded and said that there were already two risky episodes.
Slim or someone said that the boys who went bareback were certainly boyfriends.
I responded and said that Tyler was is in one of those episodes and did not think he had a 'boyfriend'.
Then I get shit because I 'attacked' the pasty twink with the cult-like following and then people start correcting me on who is who.
This is effing simple. Mark says he would not put his models at risk and yet there were bareback scenes. Am I the only one who sees this as a inconsistency?

You people have blinders on.

see you around...never.
Final post
John

GL, don't go. I know the rhetoric can get heated at times. Sometimes things are said in a harsh way. Sometimes the person saying them regrets it and sometimes not. You deprive all of us of the benefit of your perspective and your clever wit by walking away. Some of us such as myself agree with many of your takes on different issues. Some will and some won't. You will be missed if you leave us for good. Many of us are very fond of you. Please stay.

 

[Kodieboy]

I guess it is time for me to chime in on this mess. First, GL is right when he says mark said he would never risk his boys. BUT, and its a big but, Mark did NOT make these particular boys film these episodes. They, in fact, chose to do what they did, and, ineach case, we have it recorded.

Now, unless I missed something monumental like a change in the Constitution, then these boys still have the right to choose how they engage in sex. OK, maybe the decision isn't what we would do, but then, we don't have to watch, but, by contract, Mark and David cannot censure the videos due to personal objection, or do some of you not understand contract law? This is a business, the boys are paid to perform, and have artistic license in how they perform, based on the right to bargain. We have also all heard Tyler say that "Condoms are a must", so clearly it can go either way, based on who each boy is performing with. Again, I say, if you don't approve, DON'T WATCH!!

BTW, Tyler, thank you for my little surprise, it arrived today!

I am,

What was the suprise i want to know......... and will we all be jealous.

OOOOOKKKKKKK spill your guts

 

[Kodieboy]

GL, don't go. I know the rhetoric can get heated at times. Sometimes things are said in a harsh way. Sometimes the person saying them regrets it and sometimes not. You deprive all of us of the benefit of your perspective and your clever wit by walking away. Some of us such as myself agree with many of your takes on different issues. Some will and some won't. You will be missed if you leave us for good. Many of us are very fond of you. Please stay.

Ill back Tampa up......... i know im new

 

[Jayman01]

GL, don't go. I know the rhetoric can get heated at times. Sometimes things are said in a harsh way. Sometimes the person saying them regrets it and sometimes not. You deprive all of us of the benefit of your perspective and your clever wit by walking away. Some of us such as myself agree with many of your takes on different issues. Some will and some won't. You will be missed if you leave us for good. Many of us are very fond of you. Please stay.

I agree. GL you add a whole diffrent dimension to this forum... I really wish you would stay. We will miss you very much.

 

[Markymark]

I agree. GL you add a whole diffrent dimension to this forum... I really wish you would stay. We will miss you very much.

Hear hear! GL, you are one of a kind. Please stay with us!?

 

[vicekid]

I somehow managed to miss this post until now.
What the eff is your effing problem?
Mark, AKA Broke Straight Boys, said in a post in this thread that he 'would not put his models at risk.'
I responded and said that there were already two risky episodes.
Slim or someone said that the boys who went bareback were certainly boyfriends.
I responded and said that Tyler was is in one of those episodes and did not think he had a 'boyfriend'.
Then I get shit because I 'attacked' the pasty twink with the cult-like following and then people start correcting me on who is who.
This is effing simple. Mark says he would not put his models at risk and yet there were bareback scenes.

Am I the only one who sees this as a inconsistency?


NO! In those couple of cases it was the model who agreed to go condom less of their own free will. A decision agreed to by the producer and director: David.

You people have blinders on.

I believe we all see quite clearly, but we have different interpretations.


see you around...never.
Final post

I HOPE NOT!
John

GREAT LAKES,

There is no question in my mind that you are taking this way to hard. I would echo the comments of my dear friends Jayman and Markymark. We are blessed in this society to have many freedoms including:

1. Freedom of choice (condom or no condom).

2. Freedom of Speech (to say and argue what we want on this forum within some limits as established by the site).

3. Freedom to respond or not respond to post.

GL I have been reading posts here far longer than you have. I have laughed, cried, agreed, disagreed, loved responses and hated responses. But no matter how my emotions went I stayed on. I IGNORED those comments I did not appreciate and went on.

I have enjoyed reading you 200+ posts, whether I agreed or disagreed with you. You've made for some fun reading. You've made some good friends.

I would ask that you reconsider resigning from the post. We are stronger with you that without you.

Looking forward to you posting back,

Live Long and Prosper,

Vicekid

 

[joninliverton]

Are you guys forgetting that one of the BB scenes featured St. Tyler of Evans??
When exactly did this budding Roman Polaski slash Nelson DeMille slash Stanley Kubrick grow a boyfriend?
And how many readers just got a chubby because I mentioned Tyler and a Nelson in the same post?

And the camera doesn't lie? Did you already forget about the moon landing? Or how about that dog food commercial where the chuck wagon rides across the kitchen floor?

I cannot find the post that Tampa quoted in his last post, so I will reply to this one. I agree with you 100 per cent GL, there was the Tyler episode and also the Erik and Ross episode. Tyler says he has a gf and Erik and Ross both had gfs. When Erik fucked Ross he said he doesnt fuck with condoms however, in an episode of College Boy Physicals he actually DID - again inconsistencies.

There is of course a searching question that we have all failed to ask. With all the ranting and raving on this thread, why is it that the Erik and Ross episode remains one of the highest marked on the site ? Maybe it was because there seemed to be some sort of hidden intamacy between these 2 guys, I certainly felt there was.

 

[Jayman01]

I cannot find the post that Tampa quoted in his last post, so I will reply to this one. I agree with you 100 per cent GL, there was the Tyler episode and also the Erik and Ross episode. Tyler says he has a gf and Erik and Ross both had gfs. When Erik fucked Ross he said he doesnt fuck with condoms however, in an episode of College Boy Physicals he actually DID - again inconsistencies.

There is of course a searching question that we have all failed to ask. With all the ranting and raving on this thread, why is it that the Erik and Ross episode remains one of the highest marked on the site ? Maybe it was because there seemed to be some sort of hidden intamacy between these 2 guys, I certainly felt there was.

I do agree with the intimacy point of view.

 

[slimvintage]

I somehow managed to miss this post until now.
What the eff is your effing problem?
Mark, AKA Broke Straight Boys, said in a post in this thread that he 'would not put his models at risk.'
I responded and said that there were already two risky episodes.
Slim or someone said that the boys who went bareback were certainly boyfriends.
I responded and said that Tyler was is in one of those episodes and did not think he had a 'boyfriend'.
Then I get shit because I 'attacked' the pasty twink with the cult-like following and then people start correcting me on who is who.
This is effing simple. Mark says he would not put his models at risk and yet there were bareback scenes. Am I the only one who sees this as a inconsistency?

You people have blinders on.

see you around...never.
Final post
John

On balance I agree with pretty much all you've said, and again, on balance, I think your posture all through this lamentable thread has been the most consistent and thoughtful. I'm guilty of slovenly thinking fairly often and really appreciate it when someone is kind enough to call my attention to it as, for example, you and also elyot have done.

Please leave the forum if you find it boring or stupid (since mitch/robert was banned it is of course more boring and stupid). Don't however just flounce out because you're feeling a touch tantrumish. I can really only speak for myself, but I love the way you lurch from silly to incisive to witty to temperamental all in the space of a few posts. You have the air of a really amusing MENSA level adolescent who neither suffers fools gladly nor is blind to the emperor's nudity. As someone toward whom you've been a bit scathing, I can sincerely say I'd hate to lose you. But at the same time I would hate for you to get too much satisfaction from my saying it

 

[baal]

I thought it came off as a reaction to someone looking for a reaction myself.

 

[ben83179]

you guys need to relize that there human to and not just here for are enjoyment it is a job. they should not have to put theselves in danger and even if you are tested it doesnt mean that you may not have something. i think that this is a mute point and that it should all be protected sex

 

[Kodieboy]

you guys need to relize that there human to and not just here for are enjoyment it is a job. they should not have to put theselves in danger and even if you are tested it doesnt mean that you may not have something. i think that this is a mute point and that it should all be protected sex

I Think all but a very few here agree with you on this matter..... from what ive read anyway

 

[mikeyank]

I somehow managed to miss this post until now.
What the eff is your effing problem?
Mark, AKA Broke Straight Boys, said in a post in this thread that he 'would not put his models at risk.'
I responded and said that there were already two risky episodes.
Slim or someone said that the boys who went bareback were certainly boyfriends.
I responded and said that Tyler was is in one of those episodes and did not think he had a 'boyfriend'.
Then I get shit because I 'attacked' the pasty twink with the cult-like following and then people start correcting me on who is who.
This is effing simple. Mark says he would not put his models at risk and yet there were bareback scenes. Am I the only one who sees this as a inconsistency?

You people have blinders on.

see you around...never.
Final post
John

John, I do hope that you reconsider. We have had many ups and downs on this board, but overall I find the majority of members are descent people, who we may disagree with at times, but mean no harm. Discussion and disagreement are a good thing, as long as we all present our positions in a civil way. Please stay on, and do comment whenever you feel appropriate. Thanks.

Mike

 

[parisnoyd]

As someone who has decided to never post any longer, I have changed that decision, one time, due to you, GreatLakes. I hope you will reconsider leaving the forum. I am guilty of posting negative posts to you. For that, I feel great regret. As Slim alluded to, Mitch/Robert was a very interesting poster. I begged the man to back off, but he could not. Our loss. You are a very amusing, and insightful poster. Don't leave. You will be missed by so many.

 

[canada]

I cannot find the post that Tampa quoted in his last post, so I will reply to this one. I agree with you 100 per cent GL, there was the Tyler episode and also the Erik and Ross episode. Tyler says he has a gf and Erik and Ross both had gfs. When Erik fucked Ross he said he doesnt fuck with condoms however, in an episode of College Boy Physicals he actually DID - again inconsistencies.

There is of course a searching question that we have all failed to ask. With all the ranting and raving on this thread, why is it that the Erik and Ross episode remains one of the highest marked on the site ? Maybe it was because there seemed to be some sort of hidden intamacy between these 2 guys, I certainly felt there was.

I have seen Erik & Ross on other sites. On those sites they were almost always together and barebacking. I personally believ that these two guys are not straight and are a couple. That being said, I am not attacking them but just giving my opinion.

 

[mikeyank]

As someone who has decided to never post any longer, I have changed that decision, one time, due to you, GreatLakes. I hope you will reconsider leaving the forum. I am guilty of posting negative posts to you. For that, I feel great regret. As Slim alluded to, Mitch/Robert was a very interesting poster. I begged the man to back off, but he could not. Our loss. You are a very amusing, and insightful poster. Don't leave. You will be missed by so many.

Guys. Please do not take this forum so seriously that a member's posts referring to something that you said, should make you never post again. Keep in mind this is a fun fantasy sex site for porn. We all joined and pay our monthly dues cause we like to watch young good looking guys strip naked, and engage in cocksucking and assfucking. All the other stuff is interesting too, but it is not worth "quitting" because of what someone said. Let's please lighten up.

Robert/Mitch was interesting and certainly provoked a lot of comments and discussion, but I would never stop posting because of anything he or anyone else said. Let's have fun. This should be a diversion from "real life", and a fantasy place to have fun and stroke our cocks to the hot sex scenes.

Mike

 

[Kodieboy]

Are we back in school......... and no ones told me?

Dont make me send a my cock after you two

 

[parisnoyd]

Guys. Please do not take this forum so seriously that a member's posts referring to something that you said, should make you never post again. Keep in mind this is a fun fantasy sex site for porn. We all joined and pay our monthly dues cause we like to watch young good looking guys strip naked, and engage in cocksucking and assfucking. All the other stuff is interesting too, but it is not worth "quitting" because of what someone said. Let's please lighten up.

Robert/Mitch was interesting and certainly provoked a lot of comments and discussion, but I would never stop posting because of anything he or anyone else said. Let's have fun. This should be a diversion from "real life", and a fantasy place to have fun and stroke our cocks to the hot sex scenes.

Mike

Mike, I am not offended by what anyone else has posted. I am offended by some of the posts I have made.

 

[mikeyank]

Mike, I am not offended by what anyone else has posted. I am offended by some of the posts I have made.

So you are banning yourself from the forum, as a form of self flagellation ?

I don't really know what to say. Sorry I misunderstood your post.

Mike

 

[slimvintage]

I have seen Erik & Ross on other sites. On those sites they were almost always together and barebacking. I personally believ that these two guys are not straight and are a couple. That being said, I am not attacking them but just giving my opinion.

Right on.