Mmm... A current point of controversy is how there seems to be fewer and fewer 100% gay men in porn who will only mate with other cisgender males, whether in movies or in their private lives off-camera.
Here's an off-forum thread about it.
Here, at Broke Straight Boys/College Boy Physicals, we're used to sexually fluid male adult performers, but outside this platform, there seems to be more and more of such fluidity, and some gay viewers feel lied to and used by bisexual or hetero performers who claim to be gay. Some of those viewers equate sex w/ a trans man with sex w/ a cis woman, and more and more gay porn actors have been hitting it w/ trans men. Technically, those actors are no longer gay but pan, right? Their reasoning is that as gay men, they'd NEVER do it w/ a cis woman, a trans man, or a trans woman—even w/ male genitalia.
WhyNotBi, now merged w/ MEN, has just released a DP scene feat. a cis man, a trans woman (shemale), and a trans man.
This appears to be a result of advancement in diversity, in recognizing all sexual identities and orientations, thus catering to viewers (incl. bisexuals and pansexuals) interested in expanded forms of sexuality.
That said, some feel this is an attempt to bisexualize or even heterosexualize gay men in a form of conversion therapy, thus giving homophobes ammunition to say that yes, gay men can choose to love women, be w/ women, mate w/ women and raise a family w/ women if they choose so.
Some of those observers wish to only monetarily support 100% traditional gay performers (who only do it w/ cis males, in porn or real-life), and they find it harder and harder to detect that.
What do y'all think?
Here's an off-forum thread about it.
Here, at Broke Straight Boys/College Boy Physicals, we're used to sexually fluid male adult performers, but outside this platform, there seems to be more and more of such fluidity, and some gay viewers feel lied to and used by bisexual or hetero performers who claim to be gay. Some of those viewers equate sex w/ a trans man with sex w/ a cis woman, and more and more gay porn actors have been hitting it w/ trans men. Technically, those actors are no longer gay but pan, right? Their reasoning is that as gay men, they'd NEVER do it w/ a cis woman, a trans man, or a trans woman—even w/ male genitalia.
WhyNotBi, now merged w/ MEN, has just released a DP scene feat. a cis man, a trans woman (shemale), and a trans man.
This appears to be a result of advancement in diversity, in recognizing all sexual identities and orientations, thus catering to viewers (incl. bisexuals and pansexuals) interested in expanded forms of sexuality.
That said, some feel this is an attempt to bisexualize or even heterosexualize gay men in a form of conversion therapy, thus giving homophobes ammunition to say that yes, gay men can choose to love women, be w/ women, mate w/ women and raise a family w/ women if they choose so.
Some of those observers wish to only monetarily support 100% traditional gay performers (who only do it w/ cis males, in porn or real-life), and they find it harder and harder to detect that.
What do y'all think?
