Even though I like you as a top dominant guy I would like you to do other things that what we´ re used to these last few months. I know and I understand fully that it may be difficult for straight guys being fucked by other men cause thay tend to think that they will lose their straightness and masculinity. Even if Jimmy dislikes sex with men he took giant steps and broke some barriers if given sufficient amount of money. So why not seeing him bottom with more money?
-
CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.
when will we see Jimmy bottom?
- Thread starter Luc
- Start date
Ms. Kianna
BSB Addict
People on the forums have said many times, that they do not enjoy seeing bottoms be in obvious pain or misery. It would be very obvious from the moment the camera came on that Jimmy was in misery. Just the idea of bottoming upsets him, so the actual action of bottoming would torment him more than he would be able to hide.
I was straight before and as I already said I know it is difficult for straight guys to accept the fact of bottoming. There is a sort of game of refusing bottoming. Of course I dislike torture or insane things done and if one day Jimmy or other models like him bottoms it is a clear decision they make. I repeat that it would be a giant leap for him to do that but if given enough money it is possible that he says yes.
Many of us feel that a scene with Jimmy bottoming would be waste of time and good money. He's getting to the point where he is improving, but we have no reason to believe that a scene with him bottoming would do any better in the ratings than the majority of his work so far.
He would likely come into such a scene with a sense of martyrdom. Like a lamb being led to slaughter. And if he's not going to get any pleasure out of it, nor pretend that he's getting any pleasure out of it...then Broke Straight Boys shouldn't throw away the money.
He would likely come into such a scene with a sense of martyrdom. Like a lamb being led to slaughter. And if he's not going to get any pleasure out of it, nor pretend that he's getting any pleasure out of it...then Broke Straight Boys shouldn't throw away the money.
jakitov
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
- Posts
- 25
- Reaction score
- 0
You make a lot of sense, tampa24, but what if Jimmy were to get to the point that, maybe because of a lot of money but maybe because, he felt that he finally really wanted to try it? I can't even imagine, really, how hot that would be. But only if he were comfortable with himself doing it and could do it without making all of us feel really uncomfortable. Some truly straight guys can actually do that. They can just shift away from what they've been told all their lives that it meant and just get into the physical sensation of it, enjoying it for the same reasons we do--it FEELS good.
Ms. Kianna
BSB Addict
But don't forget, Diesal finally agreed to bottom, only after he found another guy that he had MAJOR CHEMISTRY with. Can you ever see Jimmy feeling that kind of "film melting" chemistry/passion with another guy?
It would be great, but I can't even fathom it actually happening.
If you asked him real nice Ms K it would be hard for him to resist. But it would have to be with his Bromance mate, Rob Ryder. Think he could be borrowed?
Ms. Kianna
BSB Addict
If you asked him real nice Ms K it would be hard for him to resist. But it would have to be with his Bromance mate, Rob Ryder. Think he could be borrowed?
Rob would be willing to top Jimmy. But, according to Rob, Rob is just acting when it comes to the chemistry he shows on screen.
Jimmy could not "act" that kind of chemistry, so I don't think it would work.
rolltideboi08
Virgin
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Posts
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
If he could reach a comfort level mentally with trying it...I'd love to see it. Yes. But only if he fully consented and would not feel physically or psychology tortured by it.
stowe1
Ye Olde Curmudgeon
Jimmy bottom? Hopefully never, ever!!!
I agree wholeheartedly!! As I've said in several posts on a few earlier threads, Jimmy's personna is that of the straight, donminant top. For me that would be completely gone if he ever bottomed. I've had experience back in the day with many Jimmy types and they never bottom. That's who he is and I personally don't want him to change that.
I agree wholeheartedly!! As I've said in several posts on a few earlier threads, Jimmy's personna is that of the straight, donminant top. For me that would be completely gone if he ever bottomed. I've had experience back in the day with many Jimmy types and they never bottom. That's who he is and I personally don't want him to change that.
stowe1
Ye Olde Curmudgeon
Jimmy, Rob, and Joey Stefano
I want to see my man Rob top more and there are plenty of candidates on cdudes, some of whom I have suggested in other posts on this forum. But not Jimmy. And Ms. K further says that Rob has indicated that he is acting when it comes to chemistry on screen. I have to say when I first watched Rob's bottoming scenes on cdudes, from his performances, I just presumed he was gay. It wasn't until he posted on this forum that I learned he was straight. It was then that I put forth the premise that he is the best bottom I've seen in current day porn. The only one that comes close to him is the late, great Joey Stefano from the 80's and early 90's. But for him it was easy because a) he was gay and enjoyed bottoming and b) as was the case with so many of the porn actors in that era, the film makers had so many of them hopped up on popppers, coke, and what have you. But for Rob, as a straight guy to be able so convincingly perform as if he were the consummate bottom speaks volumes about his acting abilities. And that's why I'm always pushing for him to do more topping scenes, because his talents are such that he can be a convincing dominant top or a convincing caring gentler one. Not many can pull that versatility off at all and few can do it well, but I know Rob can.
And I agree with Ms. K that Jimmy just couldn't act that type of chemistry. He is the consummate straight dominant top who rarely sucks dick (and I personally don't care if he ever does again) and never, evere bottoms. And for him to try to act otherwise would be the ruination of the Jimmy personna.
Rob would be willing to top Jimmy. But, according to Rob, Rob is just acting when it comes to the chemistry he shows on screen.
Jimmy could not "act" that kind of chemistry, so I don't think it would work.
I want to see my man Rob top more and there are plenty of candidates on cdudes, some of whom I have suggested in other posts on this forum. But not Jimmy. And Ms. K further says that Rob has indicated that he is acting when it comes to chemistry on screen. I have to say when I first watched Rob's bottoming scenes on cdudes, from his performances, I just presumed he was gay. It wasn't until he posted on this forum that I learned he was straight. It was then that I put forth the premise that he is the best bottom I've seen in current day porn. The only one that comes close to him is the late, great Joey Stefano from the 80's and early 90's. But for him it was easy because a) he was gay and enjoyed bottoming and b) as was the case with so many of the porn actors in that era, the film makers had so many of them hopped up on popppers, coke, and what have you. But for Rob, as a straight guy to be able so convincingly perform as if he were the consummate bottom speaks volumes about his acting abilities. And that's why I'm always pushing for him to do more topping scenes, because his talents are such that he can be a convincing dominant top or a convincing caring gentler one. Not many can pull that versatility off at all and few can do it well, but I know Rob can.
And I agree with Ms. K that Jimmy just couldn't act that type of chemistry. He is the consummate straight dominant top who rarely sucks dick (and I personally don't care if he ever does again) and never, evere bottoms. And for him to try to act otherwise would be the ruination of the Jimmy personna.
These guys are "porn stars" ... it wouldn't be the first time or the last that a gay for pay took it even though it wasn't his favorite. I've personally known several who have for other companies... They are performers.. I say perform for the money. He's only doing this in the first instance for money. Typically even the strictest tops in this arena ultimately bottom out. He's a cute guy ... But he far from being among the best tops I've seen in the gay for pay arena.
And I'll add.. there are gay for pay performers for other major Internet sites that keep that fact to themselves and learn quickly where their bread is buttered. Again... perform ... put your back into it.. Don't wince and have gay sex like you're swallowing a bitter pill. Either do it and deal ... or do manual labor or some run of the mill minimum wage job. I like seeing trade in the process of crossing their boundaries but there is still something self loathing about those gays that enjoy and even worse make excuses for the performance or lack of performance by gay for pay trade that openly disdain aspects of our lifestyle and sexual practices.
If Jimmy bottoms one day he would have to accept it and feel comfortable with it. At the time I was still straight it was unthinkable for me to have sex with other men and even more being fucked by men. Experiencing with guys was a very big giant leap for me and it was an even bigger giant leap to try bottoming. So I know how difficult it may be for Jimmy to do that. I did not lose my masculinity nor my dominant side and I am and remain very straight looking. So why would it be different for Jimmy?
Welcome to the forum Rippedguy!
I agree with many of your comments so far. I would take some small exception however to the use of the label of porn "stars". Of course whether a model is considered a "star" is subjective and up to each individual viewer. But there are some models here on the old and new site who never reached the deserving status of "star" quality. There are some models who richly deserve the title...while others are still in the process of reaching it. There are many on the old and new site who are porn "models" or "actors", but will never be "stars".
I agree with many of your comments so far. I would take some small exception however to the use of the label of porn "stars". Of course whether a model is considered a "star" is subjective and up to each individual viewer. But there are some models here on the old and new site who never reached the deserving status of "star" quality. There are some models who richly deserve the title...while others are still in the process of reaching it. There are many on the old and new site who are porn "models" or "actors", but will never be "stars".
Similar threads
