Kyle Hartley goes for broke and breaks the sound barrier!

[Ms. Kianna]

Unfortunately, I have an odd reaction to Duncan; he just
puts me to sleep! I know his genital gigantism will assure
him many fans (on the Forum and in life), but I need
'poi-sson-ality".

As we prove here every day, 'Variety's the spice of Life'.
Duncan's simply not on my spice-rack.

I may wait to see
Kyle in a second pairing (should he be with us so long).

TG
x

Ditto from me. If I can't get a feel for a model's personality my interest just isn't piqued, not matter the size and appearance of his bits and pieces...so it often takes a bit longer for me to appreciate some models, especially the newbies and that includes Duncan and his upcoming pairing with...what was his name again...

Then again...some model pairings can be pleasantly surprising...

Duncan reminds me of a more grown up Corey, from BSB1. I was not a Corey fan, so..........not fair, I know, but maybe he will grow on me.

 

[centex]

I have to agree with you in all except to heck with all this dam manscaping it is nice to see a guy with pubes I hate when a guy look like a teenager or a little boy all shaved. Kyle looked very hot and I see he is coming back for seconds very soon , Keep up the great videos

 

[cumrag27]

Clarification:

...A few comments:

1. Natural or manscaped pubes - it's really up to the individual. And whether or not any one of us prefers one or the other is up to us and we can surely express our views on that. But in doing so, it is really not necessary to be condescendning or snarky about the individual or where he comes from.

My Original Statement:
"I know we were warned in advance, but this time you need to take heed and adjust your volume down. I know this boy is probably already considered to be a "Kentucky Wonder". Just a little constructive criticism is due. Kyle really needs to look up the virtues of manscaping as he is presently! With his underwear removed, Kyle could easily pass for "Rumpelstiltskin" or a terrorist. Take your choice!"

Dear Stowe1,

If this was "condescending" OR "snarky", then I don't know the meanings of these words! Personally, I feel calling Kyle a "Kentucky Wonder" is a positive statement that refers to my assumption that others on the forum probably are liking him MUCH MORE than I do. I guess it is still okay for me to form my opinion about Kyle. Correct?

Saying "with his underwear removed, Kyle could easily pass for Rumpelstiltskin or a terrorist" was simply at attempt at humor and no implicit slight of Kyle's value as a human was ever intended by me. I am a lifelong resident of "that most sophisticated of ALL states we all look up to in awe" as "ARKANSAS", one of the least progressive of all 50 states in the country and certainly several levels below KENTUCKY's current rankings. It reminds me of a saying that goes as follows..."The pot calling the kettle black". Usually, "slights" come from positions of superiority and not from the opposite side!

I am sorry Stowe1, but I felt compelled to bring this up as clarification. Perhaps I used poor judgement in my choice of examples when writing my original post. Mostly, I wanted others to understand I don't take pleasure in putting down others, especially near strangers like Kyle. He has never done anything to me or against me. However, as a model criticism is part of the cost of putting yourself out there and of fame. I hope you won't take offense to my attempt at my clarification.



Sincerely,



Stimpy

 

[Huh?]

Finally a young guy with natural pubes. No "manscaping"! Nothing wrong with a guy that looks grown up for once!

I agree. I like the natural look.

 

[joninliverton]

Cant wait for the duo with Duncan, from the still it looks like he's gone right into it. I rushed through the solo of Kyle and havn't read this thread either. I'm such a busy dude these days.

 

[stowe1]

...A few comments:

1. Natural or manscaped pubes - it's really up to the individual. And whether or not any one of us prefers one or the other is up to us and we can surely express our views on that. But in doing so, it is really not necessary to be condescendning or snarky about the individual or where he comes from.

My Original Statement:
"I know we were warned in advance, but this time you need to take heed and adjust your volume down. I know this boy is probably already considered to be a "Kentucky Wonder". Just a little constructive criticism is due. Kyle really needs to look up the virtues of manscaping as he is presently! With his underwear removed, Kyle could easily pass for "Rumpelstiltskin" or a terrorist. Take your choice!"

Dear Stowe1,

If this was "condescending" OR "snarky", then I don't know the meanings of these words! Personally, I feel calling Kyle a "Kentucky Wonder" is a positive statement that refers to my assumption that others on the forum probably are liking him MUCH MORE than I do. I guess it is still okay for me to form my opinion about Kyle. Correct?

Dearest Stimpy: You might well have intended it as a compliment, but it could also be seen, given the context of the post, as a sarcastic rejoinder. Yes, it is still okay for you to form and express an opinion about Kyle as is stated in the quote from me you used above, the sentence before the one which you highlighted.



Saying "with his underwear removed, Kyle could easily pass for Rumpelstiltskin or a terrorist" was simply at attempt at humor and no implicit slight of Kyle's value as a human was ever intended by me. I am a lifelong resident of "that most sophisticated of ALL states we all look up to in awe" as "ARKANSAS", one of the least progressive of all 50 states in the country and certainly several levels below KENTUCKY's current rankings. It reminds me of a saying that goes as follows..."The pot calling the kettle black". Usually, "slights" come from positions of superiority and not from the opposite side!


Dearest Stimpy: Your reference to Rumplestiltskin is obscure at best. He spun straw into gold. I thought your problem with Kyle's pubes was that they were too long and bushy. I thought perhaps you had your "R" fairy tales mixed up and you meant Rapunzel, she of the long golden hair. And I think using any reference to terrorist or terrorism is about as far from humor as one can get. And Believe me, "slights" can come from inferiority as well as superiority. May be done differently, but effect can be the same.

I am sorry Stowe1, but I felt compelled to bring this up as clarification. Perhaps I used poor judgement in my choice of examples when writing my original post. Mostly, I wanted others to understand I don't take pleasure in putting down others, especially near strangers like Kyle. He has never done anything to me or against me. However, as a model criticism is part of the cost of putting yourself out there and of fame. I hope you won't take offense to my attempt at my clarification.


My Dearest Stimpy: I appreciate your clarification and would not for one second think you were putting down Kyle on purpose or that it was your intention to do so. But you, as a wordsmith of some stature, know that words and how they are used have meaning not only in the way the writer intends, but also in how the reader interprets. It is the old saw: "The writer implies, and the reader infers". What words the writer uses to imply something, the reader can infer something entirely different from that which the writer intended.




Sincerely,



Stimpy

Stimpy - Great colloquy here.


Stowie

-

 

[JLipps4u]

I like Kyle. I think he is a young man who enjoys sex and is willing to see and try what might feel good. He is adventurous and I like it. I also like his natural look.

 

[joeychuck2]

Agreed I think he enjoyed jerking off infront of us. His hardon and cum prove it. I cant wait to see him with another guy soon. I think he would do more with no second thoughts