Johnny Forza vs Carson Hawke

[littlemonster]

My opinion basically was based off the "ayden/alex" forum. I think Mactee was saying cut the guys slack they can't all be great and cut alex slack. ("they are straight") People in this room seemed to agree with him (not 100% but did agree) So it just didn't make sense to me when we come over to this room all of that stuff is dismissed and it has to be amazing and just because he didn't seem into it, it was horrible. Once again this scene was not my favourite by any chance so don't think I'm just defending a scene I love. Also I'm not attacking I just want to understand this shift.

 

[grace17]

These guys are paid to preform sex scenes I think Mr Hawk has all the personality of road kill.Is this site once again trying to prove these guys are straight by draining the passion out of every scene I thought that was what killed BSB1

Hi and welcome to the forum Kelly, I see Beth's bumped '10 random facts' for you. Wander over and take a peek sometime...

 

[KellyG]

thanks for the welcome and sorry to be so negative on my first post I am usually a positive, life embracing kind of guy

 

[joninliverton]

Wow 3 pages already. I will not read the posts but watch the film tomorrow and then give my opinion, which will alter the world lol x

 

[mikeyank]

Wow 3 pages already. I will not read the posts but watch the film tomorrow and then give my opinion, which will alter the world lol x

Jon, your post made me smile. It's like I always tell my "former boyfriend", and your "current suitor", Stowie that we should never take any of the stuff in the scenes too seriously. After all, it's only porn.

I was also thinking that I have not yet watched it, and neither have you, but I feel like I can predict what both of our reviews will be after viewing it. We are both kind of fanatical in defending our positions.

 

[another1]

i notice carson does not appear in the boys section!

 

[erikthbod]

i notice carson does not appear in the boys section!

Yep... I thought that was odd too. OK ... about the scene... I once said I could watch Johnny do anything... Well, scratch that one off the bucket list. Johnny was awesome as always/

 

[tampa24]

Wow 3 pages already. I will not read the posts but watch the film tomorrow and then give my opinion, which will alter the world lol x

I'm waiting on the edge of my seat.

 

[mikeyank]

I was also thinking that I have not yet watched it, and neither have you, but I feel like I can predict what both of our reviews will be after viewing it. We are both kind of fanatical in defending our positions.

Well, I did watch it, and I was wrong about my "predication" of what my review would be based on reading this thread.

I did not enjoy it at all. I was expecting another nervous straight boy in Carson, who was trying to hold back his emotions during the scene. He actually does not seem to have any emotion, especially while he was being fucked. He didn't appear to even be aware that Johnny's large cock was inside him. From watching Carson's facial expressions, he could have been filing his nails while he was taking that pounding. Nothing, nada from Carson.

Carson does have a pretty face and I did enjoy watching the first part of the scene with his pretty lips and face with Johnny's cock in it, but he really seemed bored while getting fucked, and I can't believe it was his first time either, for he showed no pain, or no pleasure. It was like an out of body experience for him. Not very interesting or erotic.

I really don't see much potential in Carson for any further visits to the Broke Straight Boys studio.

 

[joninliverton]

Well, I did watch it, and I was wrong about my "predication" of what my review would be based on reading this thread.

I did not enjoy it at all. I was expecting another nervous straight boy in Carson, who was trying to hold back his emotions during the scene. He actually does not seem to have any emotion, especially while he was being fucked. He didn't appear to even be aware that Johnny's large cock was inside him. From watching Carson's facial expressions, he could have been filing his nails while he was taking that pounding. Nothing, nada from Carson.

Carson does have a pretty face and I did enjoy watching the first part of the scene with his pretty lips and face with Johnny's cock in it, but he really seemed bored while getting fucked, and I can't believe it was his first time either, for he showed no pain, or no pleasure. It was like an out of body experience for him. Not very interesting or erotic.

I really don't see much potential in Carson for any further visits to the Broke Straight Boys studio.

Gotta agree with you regarding the first part Mike. I'm not sure this is Carson's first time being fucked either - he didn't restrain much and Jonny just slid in as if he was parking his car. The second half was one way traffic and yet I felt Carson was enjoying it, but didnt show it.

Yet another film with only one cum shot and as it lasted just over 16mins I felt a little short changed.

 

[BenBen]

I was pretty disappointed by this video also. How can you make a sex video with 2 cute sexy guys and still have it come out boring? Like several other views said the pics did not match up with the video at all. I would have liked to have seen Johnny going down on Carson maybe that would have been hot, it looked hot in the pics. When Carson had his mouth on Johnny's dick, Johnny was making some noise like he enjoyed it. Not sure if he was acting or if Carson was working some tongue magic on Johnny's dick head?

I don't think all the blame can be put on Carson and Johnny, I think this could have been a HOT video if it would have been cut and filmed better. The camera angles sucked! Get the camera on the action and put the hot stuff in the frame. Is Clay getting bored with porn already? It looked like Clay totally phoned this job in. I'm so sick of the bottom not getting any attention lately. Is this a cost cutting feature? Is Broke Straight Boys trying to save some cash by not showing both guys sucking and cumming?

Lately we don't hear much from the powers that be and Clay rarely deigns to wander amongst the common people and comment on anything. So I doubt we will every ehar anything on this. You'd think all the bad reviews the latest releases have produced someone would wake up and pay attention to the viewers? I'm a new member and I will be around for another month or two because I'm still sorting through so many older hot scenes but if this is the future direction of Broke Straight Boys I'm not impressed. Maybe it's time to bring in some Pinch Hitters and knock one out of the park.

 

[Keelin]

Being somewhat new to this site, I'm a little surprised (in a bad way) to read some of the comments in this thread. Carson is still a human being with feelings. Would you really say those words to his face?

When you ask straight (or "straight") guys to do stuff with each other, there are gonna be some who can't get overtly enthusiastic about the idea. You gonna get a few "misses".

The main reason I signed up to this site in the first place is because the videos seem to be natural. Or as natural as you can get considering the situation. No one is overtly demanding that the models fake it or do stuff simply because it's expected.

No one has sex with a To-Do list by the bed and I don't want to watch other people having sex by committee. Listening to models monotonously groan or huff-n-puff is the best way to make me turn it off.

Having said that I can understand the disappointment as I stop watching after a few minutes. Carson seemed deeply unhappy and very reluctant. And Johnny was valiantly trying to drum up fake chemistry* to compensate.

If you're gonna give someone a blow-job, at least make an effort so the other person has a fighting chance of actually enjoying it.


Keelin


*I'm not sure if that's the word I want as I'm talking about internal chemistry/hormones/whatever. The point where I stopped watching was when Johnny had to stop fucking so he could start wanking to keep his dick hard. It give me the impression Carson's attitude was so strong he was being effected by it.

 

[mikeyank]

Keelin, you've raised some interesting points.

Being somewhat new to this site, I'm a little surprised (in a bad way) to read some of the comments in this thread. Carson is still a human being with feelings. Would you really say those words to his face? This is always a dilemma to me. Should we temper our comments on the forum due to concern that the model being criticized may read them, or should we be honest, and use the forum to express our true feelings? I tend to go for the more honest approach, but try to never be personally attack a model or to be nasty.

When you ask straight (or "straight") guys to do stuff with each other, there are gonna be some who can't get overtly enthusiastic about the idea. You gonna get a few "misses".

The main reason I signed up to this site in the first place is because the videos seem to be natural. Or as natural as you can get considering the situation. No one is overtly demanding that the models fake it or do stuff simply because it's expected. I totally agree that I like to believe that I am watching a real situation unfolding before my voyeuristic eyes, and not watching a "staged porn shoot", (although I intellectually understand what it is).

No one has sex with a To-Do list by the bed and I don't want to watch other people having sex by committee. Listening to models monotonously groan or huff-n-puff is the best way to make me turn it off. Fake porn noises and facial expressions are a turn-off to me too.

Having said that I can understand the disappointment as I stop watching after a few minutes. Carson seemed deeply unhappy and very reluctant. And Johnny was valiantly trying to drum up fake chemistry* to compensate. On this point I disagree. If I believed that Carson was deeply unhappy and reluctant, I would have been sympathetic and been captivated by the human drama in the situation. To me, Carson just seemed to be in a different zone, like an outer body experience. To me he didn't appear happy or sad. He just laid there expressionless.

If you're gonna give someone a blow-job, at least make an effort so the other person has a fighting chance of actually enjoying it.

Keelin

*I'm not sure if that's the word I want as I'm talking about internal chemistry/hormones/whatever. The point where I stopped watching was when Johnny had to stop fucking so he could start wanking to keep his dick hard. It give me the impression Carson's attitude was so strong he was being effected by it.

The business of being a performer in a sex scene is not for everyone. It takes more than good looks to be successful at it. It is much the same as in "legitimate" acting. There have been a slew of pretty girls and pretty boys who were cast to act in film or television, and were compete failures as they did not have the ability to act and emote on screen. In a porn movie I need to see some real emotion, be it pleasure, passion or even reluctance, but to me Carson was like a rag doll in this scene, and when I looked at him to try to gauge what he was feeling, I saw nothing.

 

[melodility]

Keelin, you've raised some interesting points.

The business of being a performer in a sex scene is not for everyone. It takes more than good looks to be successful at it. It is much the same as in "legitimate" acting. There have been a slew of pretty girls and pretty boys who were cast to act in film or television, and were compete failures as they did not have the ability to act and emote on screen. In a porn movie I need to see some real emotion, be it pleasure, passion or even reluctance, but to me Carson was like a rag doll in this scene, and when I looked at him to try to gauge what he was feeling, I saw nothing.

This has been a really interesting thread with brand new posters putting forward some strong opinions. I'm new to these forums too (but not the site) and have pretty much posted only on non-site related threads because I haven't liked any of the recent scenes enough to post something positive. I know this is all anonymous, but I can't bring myself to post negative comments about the models - it would make me feel fucking awful to read negative comments about myself, so...... I know these guys really put themselves out there by doing this sort of work anyway, that doesn't mean I have to take the opportunity to denigrate them. So I do agree with Keelin (welcome!) in pointing out whether posters would feel comfortable verbalising their comments to a model's face.

That said, where posts seem a bit vicious and/or single out a model for attack, the forum community as a whole does tend to rally to the defence and ask that posters keep it respectful - after all, these are our boys! It's one of the reasons I joined the forums in the first place.

The scene..........yeah, it wasn't a turn-on. Not for me. Considering the calibre of the regulars, to succeed on this site you have to put some EFFORT in, take pride in doing a good job. There are subscribers to please. And we all make an effort in our day jobs to ensure we keep those day jobs, right? There was a definite difference in effort between established (Johnny)and new (Carson) models here. However, there were positive comments on the scene page - so some members got what they wanted out of it. As was said above, it would be impossible to put a scene together that ticked EVERYONE's boxes.

 

[Ms. Kianna]

Being somewhat new to this site, I'm a little surprised (in a bad way) to read some of the comments in this thread. Carson is still a human being with feelings. Would you really say those words to his face?

When you ask straight (or "straight") guys to do stuff with each other, there are gonna be some who can't get overtly enthusiastic about the idea. You gonna get a few "misses".

The main reason I signed up to this site in the first place is because the videos seem to be natural. Or as natural as you can get considering the situation. No one is overtly demanding that the models fake it or do stuff simply because it's expected.

No one has sex with a To-Do list by the bed and I don't want to watch other people having sex by committee. Listening to models monotonously groan or huff-n-puff is the best way to make me turn it off.

Having said that I can understand the disappointment as I stop watching after a few minutes. Carson seemed deeply unhappy and very reluctant. And Johnny was valiantly trying to drum up fake chemistry* to compensate.

If you're gonna give someone a blow-job, at least make an effort so the other person has a fighting chance of actually enjoying it.


Keelin


*I'm not sure if that's the word I want as I'm talking about internal chemistry/hormones/whatever. The point where I stopped watching was when Johnny had to stop fucking so he could start wanking to keep his dick hard. It give me the impression Carson's attitude was so strong he was being effected by it.

I would never suggest that we attack a model. That our criticism tear apart their looks or body........But, on their performance, we should give our honest feelings. If we "sugar coat" our responses to spare their feelings, we are giving them, Clay, and Mark false information.

If we don't tell them that a guy's "performance" is boring, we may get twice as many boring performances out of them.

Also, the model, like Blake, may come hear for honesty so that he can genuinely try and improve his performance. Lying would be counterproductive for them. If you knew a guy that was trying to be a professional singer, and he couldn't carry a tune in a bucket..........would you keep telling him he was doing a great job?

 

[tampa24]

Let me start off by saying I love these forums it brightens up my boring days but I'm getting really confused. People tend to change there thought on how a scene should run every time one is released. Some scenes it's alight when they are not fully into it because there straight some scenes they'll get ripped up because they weren't into it. Some terrible scenes will be heavily defended because maybe they were a little nervous and some scenes that are not bad at all (this one) will be shred apart. No wonder this site apparently can't please everyone no one can make up there mind on what they want. Make up your mind!

The forum brightens my day too, LM and you're right people do change their minds. I know in the past my perceptions of a scene has occasionally changed after reading comments and then re-watching the scene or viewing a similar scene. But, for the most part I don't think people dramatically change their minds from scene to scene so much as they have very different likes and dislikes and reactions to scenes. Not everyone is going to enjoy every scene and not every scene is going to please everyone...human nature makes it impossible...

[Littlemonster, are you sure that it is the same people who are seemingly inconsistent in their wants and desires based on their reviews? It is my experience that there are several different "factions" on this board, all with very different taste, desires, and requirements of what makes a "good" scene to them. To call the forum at large inconsistent is not accurate if you look at who is doing the critiquing. There is no one voice to speak for the whole forum, and I don't see it as we can't make up our mind, for some like one thing and others like something totally different.

I can see your confusion LM. But as the others are saying, the forum will never speak with one voice on any subject. If you're waiting for that to happen, you have a long wait. haha Just like with a focus group you will never find 100% agreement on any topic. Whether the subject is what makes good porn, or which political ideology is best or which wine is best...there will never be a unanimous decision. You may find that certain forum members seem inconsistent (to you or others) in their opinions...but I think that's a rarity.

No matter what the site does, they are never going to please all of the people all of the time. In fact they are never going to please all of the people even once.

 

[tampa24]

I would never suggest that we attack a model. That our criticism tear apart their looks or body........But, on their performance, we should give our honest feelings. If we "sugar coat" our responses to spare their feelings, we are giving them, Clay, and Mark false information.

If we don't tell them that a guy's "performance" is boring, we may get twice as many boring performances out of them.

Also, the model, like Blake, may come hear for honesty so that he can genuinely try and improve his performance. Lying would be counterproductive for them. If you knew a guy that was trying to be a professional singer, and he couldn't carry a tune in a bucket..........would you keep telling him he was doing a great job?

Well said MsK. I try to keep my critiques focused on the model or director's performance. There have been a few models who I have not cared for at all. Yet as soon as someone says that that model is fat or ugly for instance then I feel the need to jump to their defense. Because I think personal attacks like that are uncalled for. No actor or model likes to read bad reviews of their work. But we have to be relatively honest in our posts in order to give reliable feedback to mgmt. How can models or actors improve if they are only told that their work is always good or great?

 

[Keelin]

I'm willing to accept that I may have been a little over sensitive and misinterpreted.

That said, where posts seem a bit vicious and/or single out a model for attack, the forum community as a whole does tend to rally to the defence and ask that posters keep it respectful - after all, these are our boys! It's one of the reasons I joined the forums in the first place.

That's good to hear

I would never suggest that we attack a model. That our criticism tear apart their looks or body........But, on their performance, we should give our honest feelings. If we "sugar coat" our responses to spare their feelings, we are giving them, Clay, and Mark false information.

If we don't tell them that a guy's "performance" is boring, we may get twice as many boring performances out of them.

Also, the model, like Blake, may come hear for honesty so that he can genuinely try and improve his performance. Lying would be counterproductive for them. If you knew a guy that was trying to be a professional singer, and he couldn't carry a tune in a bucket..........would you keep telling him he was doing a great job?

But sugar coating a bitter pills makes it easier to swallow. So what's wrong with that?

I agree that honest feedback is good. I just wasn't very happy about the way it was being expressed. I like to think it's possible to express a negative option in a positive manner. With a bit of tact. But as I say, perhaps I was being a little over sensitive*.

No matter what the site does, they are never going to please all of the people all of the time. In fact they are never going to please all of the people even once.

Really?? You mean the bod's at Broke Straight Boys aren't miracle workers? I'm shocked!

Keelin


*This is my tactful way of saying that to my delicate English ears, some Americans can seem direct and abrupt to the point of rudeness even though that's not their intention.

 

[mikeyank]

I would never suggest that we attack a model. That our criticism tear apart their looks or body........But, on their performance, we should give our honest feelings. If we "sugar coat" our responses to spare their feelings, we are giving them, Clay, and Mark false information.

If we don't tell them that a guy's "performance" is boring, we may get twice as many boring performances out of them.

Also, the model, like Blake, may come hear for honesty so that he can genuinely try and improve his performance. Lying would be counterproductive for them. If you knew a guy that was trying to be a professional singer, and he couldn't carry a tune in a bucket..........would you keep telling him he was doing a great job?

Well stated, Ms. K. I completely agree.

 

[joninliverton]

I'm not sure why all this drama has appeared on this thread. This scene was no way as bad as the previous 2 duos, apart from the fact that Carson didn't cum.