Dear Mikeyank,
I am sorry that I have not responded sooner than this but neither did I want to condemn you to a lifetime of inconclusive and unending Republican Presidential Primaries. After spending zillions and zillions of bucks from the Super Rich, they only prove that knowing where you want to go as a party is only in reference to where Obama currently is. They never have one original or productive solutions of how we can get out of this financial funk unless we all agree with the status quo that the object of ALL their politics is to enhance only the riches of the rich (top 1%ers) and both the middle and lower classes can ALL be dammed! They have a decidedly different view of preeminencea rose to preminence in the world and only credit the "Robber Barons" and other unscrupulous greedy bastards in our murky and monopolistic business practices in the past. All of our past workers, according to them, have contributed exactly $0.00 to our national wellbeing and don't have wealthye in the new "weathy only need apply" policy for future national prosperity.
Getting back to Jimmy and Ty, in answer to your question, I was must say I refuse any longermmy upset me anylonger so I guess I was indifferent to the scene finding it no more redeeming that most of his episodes. I fully believe when people, in the course of their regular daily events, continue to find themselves repeatedly in surroundings that are the mere antithesis of their conscious and directly chosen sexual orientation, then it only seems rational that there is something more in this repetitive activity other than merely money needed to run the household, be that as it may. It is sorta like that old line from Hamlet that goes like this:
The quotation "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." comes from Shakespeare's Hamlet, Act III, scene II, where it is spoken by Queen Gertrude, Hamlet's mother. The phrase has come to mean that one can "insist so passionately about something not being true that people suspect the opposite of what one is saying." I think Jimmy is handsome, has a nice body and boner, and knows exactly what he is getting into plowing into the open mouths and asses of willing male co-worker seems a bit disingenuous, regardless of how aversive the scene might be,Jimmy simply appears to be returning back to the same thing over and over again. I feel all the positive strokes he keeps on getting only assures that he will remain in this same dilemma he professes to dislike, all the while making his livelihood on being in gay porn.
All actions have consequences. Therefore, could Jimmy at least admit to some degree he is "NOT COMPLETLY STRAIGHT" but, at a minimum, Bisexual at the very least? I think not! Then, it would appear that he is in denial of his real-life sexual identity! That's all I was attempting to convey!
Sorry to have you waiting so long for this response to your query?
Sincerely,
Stimpy
, I will watch it sometime soon, keep an open mind, and give an opinion on it.
, whether it is "ironic" or "sarcastic" and/or decidedly "orgasmic", all I know for sure is that..."it takes a village"...not unlike 
And that ain't no river in Egypt!
Please!!!!
