• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Diesal, Kevin & Dylan

ok, I should actually state I'm fairly certain the money storyline was just that; a storyline... I don't think the owner of Broke Straight Boys would go that far.

However, I stand by my opinion in that it's a storyline that did nothing for me, instead, made me grimace in distaste the entire video.

I really hope it's not repeated... I wouldn't mind seeing Dylan again... just not in that storyline.

The stalking remark is because, as much as the majority knows that Broke Straight Boys is fantasy, there will always be a fruitcake or two who not only don't understand the difference between reality and fantasy, they have no hesitation into turning their fantasy into their reality and wont stop at anything to get it. A scene such as this could encourage this type of personality.. I'm more concerned about the safety aspect of it all.

While I agree that the storyline is just that, I also agree that it was probably a poor choice by management. There are a myriad of stories out there that could be convoluted for the futon, this was just an error in judgement. I'm relatively certain that, given the public reaction, it won't be repeated.

As far as the stalking comment, some people somehow always find a way to screw up a good thing. There will always be that segment of society which has no grasp of moral reality, no concept of consequences, and no degree of remorse. It seems as though a lot of people don't think about anyone but themself, and have no idea how their actions affect others.

My momma said it: "If they lined all of the cars in the world up bumper to bumper, some asshole would pull out to pass!"
 
I had thought of offering to take up a collection. LOL

You're still feeling your way back in, so not cool to be brash :wink:

But you can contribute 10. Wait till jon finishes saying he was only joking before budgeting it though...

Welcome back sweet guy.
 
mike, I think she said she was only going to comment on the sex. She didn't say that everyone had to limit their comments to the sex.
If that is the case carking, then I do apologize for the tone of my response. But I definitely do feel that the atmosphere in the forum has changed, and I can't quite get a handle on the current rules and or boundaries that may or may not exist here now.
 
Why do you only want to comment on the sex? Are we no longer "permitted" to discuss our perception of the "reality" of scenes on this new homogenized Broke Straight Boys forum? That was always a fun part of the post viewing discussions on the forum. We used to have some lively, yet controversial threads going, that made me want to return to forum several times a day, to read the latest comments.

Or are you just stating your personal preference as a member of the forum, as opposed to your official status here? The lines are a bit fuzzy to me now, and I'm trying to get a handle on what is considered the proper protocol on this new version of the forum.

Respectfully yours.

Wow Mike! I was just saying that I was only going to comment about the sex and not get into the Dylan debate. I have re-read my post several times to see if it came off any other way than I intended and indeed it doesn't even closely sound like I am dictating how the forum should discuss this scene. I think you are looking for excuses to jump on my back, and I don't appreciate it.

I'll say it again, that was a hot scene!
 
Wow Mike! I was just saying that I was only going to comment about the sex and not get into the Dylan debate. I have re-read my post several times to see if it came off any other way than I intended and indeed it doesn't even closely sound like I am dictating how the forum should discuss this scene. I think you are looking for excuses to jump on my back, and I don't appreciate it.

I'll say it again, that was a hot scene!

I read your remarks just as you intended
 
Wow Mike! I was just saying that I was only going to comment about the sex and not get into the Dylan debate. I have re-read my post several times to see if it came off any other way than I intended and indeed it doesn't even closely sound like I am dictating how the forum should discuss this scene. I think you are looking for excuses to jump on my back, and I don't appreciate it.

I'll say it again, that was a hot scene!
Hi Deidra. In a previous response on this thread to Carking, he also called me out on the same issue, I said:
"I do apologize for the tone of my response." And I repeat my apology directly to you.

To explain my "paranoia" over your statement, I've been a reader, and later a contributor to this forum since it's inception, and any long term reader would have to agree that the tone of the forum has changed recently. It seems to have lost it's edge. And the only times that I can recall a moderator, (Scorpio) making his presence known was during the "Mitch" and possibly "Casper" episodes. Otherwise, we've been pretty much a "self moderating" group, and I thought it was working out nicely.

This thread was starting to question management's values, in portraying a forum member coming to the studio and paying his own money to have sex with his favorite Broke Straight Boys models. Obviously this was a fantasy scene that David had concocted to appease those of us who've fantasized about sucking Diesal's giant cock, or being fucked by the big dicked, hot looking, bad boy Kevin too.

But when you said "I'm only going to comment on the sex", I took that to mean more than you say you did. I guess having a combination member contributor/ "watchful eyes" , I thought you were commenting in your official capacity.

And when you said "I think you are looking for excuses to jump on my back", that is not true at all. I thought your two pieces in behind the scenes were charming, and I related to your experiences getting to meet the models up close and personal. I think your a cool person. I was just expressing my frustration at what I see as the forum turning into a much more politically correct place, than it always has been.

After all, guys and now females, who enjoy watching ostensibly heterosexual young men fucking and sucking with other guys for cash, to get our sexual kicks, are not part of the cultural elite. I like reading the gut feelings of folks like me that get off on watching David interview and convince young straight guys to strip naked and have sex for my entertainment pleasure.

Wow, that was a long response. :001_rolleyes: I hope that I made some sense.
 
If that is the case carking, then I do apologize for the tone of my response. But I definitely do feel that the atmosphere in the forum has changed, and I can't quite get a handle on the current rules and or boundaries that may or may not exist here now.


Mikeyank, I have the utmost respect for you. I am not trying to be condescending or critical. For your own well being and sanity, I pray that you find some way to let go of the whole moderator thing. I think that you are reading way, way more into it than necessary and it is eating you alive. Please, my friend, get a grip on it. Just forget about it and read the words on the page and try not to read between the lines. You will be better off for it, and that is my concern.

Every forum that I have ever been a part of has had a moderator. Nowhere have I ever seen it become a problem until here, this last couple of weeks.
 
Or are you just stating your personal preference as a member of the forum, as opposed to your official status here? The lines are a bit fuzzy to me now, and I'm trying to get a handle on what is considered the proper protocol on this new version of the forum.

Respectfully yours.

Hi Mike, I guess I agree with you I normally do, so I must have missed something here as to "your official status." What is a "watchful eye" person and how did she get elected or appointed? You know us southern boys tend to be a might slow at times, I've been spending a lot of time in Bonusland.

PS: Anyone can jump in here and help me out.
 
mactee, I normally agree strongly with you as well, but now that you are back from bonusland, you are unknowingly stirring up more shit than a manure spreader.

I beg you to go back and read the threads and see where this thing originated, where it has been and where it is headed. Perhaps, you will crystalize a different opinion, perhaps you won't.

I respectfully say that, in my mind, there is no "new forum." I think that there are some hurt feelings and misunderstandings we are having a hard time recovering from. The sooner we all get back to just posting like we always have, the better off we will be as individuals and a forum as a whole.
 
Thank you for your response Mike. I understand you better now. And as for the "watchful eyes" title, that was changed by someone in management I believe trying to find a happy medium on the forum. I will still continue to help moderate the board, but I will also be posting on a regular basis. I took a few days off from posting to let everything cool down, and now that we have threads about other topics than moderators and conspiracies etc, I am throwing myself back into posting about cock and gay sex! Because frankly that's why we are all here!

And did I mention how fucking hot last nights update was. Seriously! I've watched it 4 times!
 
You all know how I feel about the models from last night's update.

However, I do think it is time to add a new verb to the urban dictionary.

You've been "Diesaled".

Now, go wash your face.
 
LOL. I hope "you've been Diesaled" catches on! He'd get a really big kick out of that!
 
Please Don't, Really!

I certainly don’t want anyone to get out the tar and feathers but I just have a different take on this shoot. I’ve viewed it for the third time now and each time I liked it less. I think the reason is simply ME. Dylan was just becoming a “piece of meat.” I love Kevin in anything he’s in. Diesal is just a gentleman Gigantor and I marvel at his entire body, so I know it’s not being able to see those two guys in action. I guess the whole series was just to mechanical. Even with the straight boys that find themselves doing things they never thought they would do, some of them begin to start showing some personal emotions. It could be a gentle touch on the leg, a smooth rubbing of the lower abs of their partner, even a genuine smile. I saw none of this in the shoot and maybe there was not suppose to be any, that’s why I say the reason I didn’t really enjoy it was ME. I’m just an old romantic “southern gentleman” that looks for the small things of intimacy. (And NO, I’m not talking about small cocks, thank you very much.) I know this will, as it should, be a big hit on the site, but I am just looking for something else that I have already seen here a dozen times or more. :confused1:
 
I'll agree with you Mactee. It was not great for me either, and it was ME. I love`Diesal, and when I could just focus on him it was great. But, I am not a fan of Dylan, at all, so it was hard to get into. It's my own personal thing. Dylan does not appeal to me.
 
I beg you to go back and read the threads and see where this thing originated, where it has been and where it is headed. Perhaps, you will crystalize a different opinion, perhaps you won't.

Thank you carking for your timely advice that I took and please forgive me, for the last thing I would want to do would be to spread that stuff.

Thanks Ms.D for explaining your watchful eye position and exhorting us (me) to get back to the basics.

Advice and direction well taken and I will respond in kind.

Much love to all!! Thanks for being my forum friends, you certainly add to my life.
 
Why do you only want to comment on the sex? Are we no longer "permitted" to discuss our perception of the "reality" of scenes on this new homogenized Broke Straight Boys forum? That was always a fun part of the post viewing discussions on the forum. We used to have some lively, yet controversial threads going, that made me want to return to forum several times a day, to read the latest comments.

Or are you just stating your personal preference as a member of the forum, as opposed to your official status here? The lines are a bit fuzzy to me now, and I'm trying to get a handle on what is considered the proper protocol on this new version of the forum.

Respectfully yours.

i believe since you have all made it abundently clear that moderators shouldnt have opinions, she was commenting on the sex part of it only, and not discussing the storyline. really isnt a reason to call her out once again, i thought this arguement had died out.
 
I think it has joe :) But I want to add to the scene of OH gosh okay so I have never seen any gay or straight boy spread someones ass out like that. Kinda hot :P I am loving the new word as well. I was thinking how to use it in a sentence? this is what I have come up with " hey what's wrong with you are you disabled or something ?' " naw man I got Diesalized :)"
 
I think it has joe :) But I want to add to the scene of OH gosh okay so I have never seen any gay or straight boy spread someones ass out like that. Kinda hot :P I am loving the new word as well. I was thinking how to use it in a sentence? this is what I have come up with " hey what's wrong with you are you disabled or something ?' " naw man I got Diesalized :)"

BiGurl, it's just Diesaled. That is the act of giving or receiving an epic cum facial.

"What's that in your hair?" "Oh, dude, I got Diesaled."

"What did you do last night?" "Man, he wouldn't leave me alone, so I Diesaled him."

I think if you want to take that one step further and say "Diesalized", that has an entirely different meaning. Diesalizing would be the act of driving a telephone pole sized penis up someone's ass and making their eyes bug out.

Then, the act of "DeDiesalization" would be when Dr. Rimmerman or Dr. Phingerphuck sticthes him back up so when he farts, it doesn't sound like a tuba.
 
That's Diesalicious!
 
Top