Carter Blande and Paul Cannon

[cumrag27]

First off why does it matter .... these guys are actors and I for one don't buy that any of them are totally straight.
Now to the scene at hand... (that was a play on words) I did enjoy the scene and that was only because of Paul. Not a fan of Carter... once again just not into thin guys.
Now my curiosity once again goes to the tatoo... why does a guy whose last name is Blane .... have a rather large tatoo that says "Roberson"? Makes me go hmmmmm ?

Dear Erikthbod,

I was told when texting, Blane is the proper abbreviation for Robinson. I work extra hard to keep up with the latest texting tricks.



Stimpy

 

[mikeyank]

Awwwwwww....... First my bubble got burst, when that beautiful newbie Jake was "outed" as appearing other places, now Paul! Damn, there goes another fantasy for Mikey. Please don't, don't, don't tell us if you find AYDEN anywhere else.

Thank you Ms. K. Let us please keep AYDEN pure, at least in my fantasies.

 

[Buckeye1]

Dear Erikthbod,

I was told when texting, Blane is the proper abbreviation for Robinson. I work extra hard to keep up with the latest texting tricks.



Stimpy

Well that makes perfect sense to me. I have always thought of Robinson every time I see the name Blane. ???? lol

 

[another1]

I never thought he was a virgin, based on his solo, but this is disappointing news to me. This is the only pay site I belong to, as I can watch hot guys having sex "anywhere" on the net, but I like the fantasy of real straight guys doing stuff with guys for the first time before my very eyes.

I understand that it is often a fantasy, but if I can convince myself that they are straight first timers, the site can work for me. Once I know they have been elsewhere prior to here, it becomes just another porn site to me. I can't control the type of guys, and the type of scenes that turn me on here. It is an automatic reaction.

Although, as Stowe pointed out, these scenes were shot in July, is it possible that he worked here first, and then went to the other site, before his scenes were shown here? I understand that it all seems silly for this to matter, to those who don't share my fetish for watching hot young "believably" straight guys having gay sex, but for me it does matter.

mike, it does matter!
don't be disappointed, because this is october! this episode is from july.
i believe there is a photo of max, carter and paul on facebook from that photo i believe that what you are seeing is the real thing.
the fantasy lives on and reality continues to change.

 

[mikeyank]

Like I said before...it's all about fantasy not reality, and what may not matter to you does matter to others...

Exactly Grace, To me it's like when Frank Sinatra sang about, "stomping on a dream."

 

[another1]

Me too, Mike.

For me, Broke Straight Boys is about the fantasy going on in my head and when that fantasy is wrecked, especially so early on, my interest in a model and his scenes drops dramatically. But that's just how I feel, I understand that Paul being on another site won't make a difference to some others...

I haven't watched his latest scene with Carter and now I won't bother, which is a pity because his solo did intrigue me.

suddenly, i find myself in the role of cheerleader! grace, where paul went is to me less important than where he started.
since carter is on my favorites list, i urge you to watch this oral episode with carter and paul.
the other site referenced has a very quick turn around time between production and release, they also have a poorer quality, i would bet any scenes on other sites were done last month. this episode with carter and paul was done in july.
another reason i urge you to watch it is because i think it is good.

 

[mikeyank]

mike, it does matter!
don't be disappointed, because this is october! this episode is from july.
i believe there is a photo of max, carter and paul on facebook from that photo i believe that what you are seeing is the real thing.
the fantasy lives on and reality continues to change.

Thanks another1 for your perspective, for much like Peter Pan, "I do believe in fairies", (well maybe fairies is not the word I had in mind in this situation, but you get the idea).

 

[another1]

Ironic that Clay picked him up on the side of the road, since that's the general idea behind BaitBus, too... Coincidence? Or does he just hang around freeways hoping some stranger will pick him up and pay him to do gay porn?

i remember truckstops!

 

[rbar]

i remember truckstops!

sounds like i missed some opportunities! lol

 

[grace17]

suddenly, i find myself in the role of cheerleader! grace, where paul went is to me less important than where he started.
since carter is on my favorites list, i urge you to watch this oral episode with carter and paul.
the other site referenced has a very quick turn around time between production and release, they also have a poorer quality, i would bet any scenes on other sites were done last month. this episode with carter and paul was done in july.
another reason i urge you to watch it is because i think it is good.

Another1, you're the coolest (and smartest) cheerleader I know

 

[Youngandconfused22]

I enjoyed the scene I didn't love it. Mainly because it was one sided and Paul clearly wanted to try and it sucks he never did. I personally think Paul will get better with time. Carter has had better scenes. Cumshots were good but since it was one sided I can only give it a 3.

 

[rbar]

Another1, you're the coolest (and smartest) cheerleader I know

or at least the most magnanimous!

 

[tampa24]

Me too, Mike.

For me, Broke Straight Boys is about the fantasy going on in my head and when that fantasy is wrecked, especially so early on, my interest in a model and his scenes drops dramatically. But that's just how I feel,

Agreed. It is disappointing to have the fantasy crushed right out of the gate. He's a great looking guy and seems very nice. But if he is gay or has already made the rounds of the gay porn circuit...my interest in him will decline considerably.

 

[joeychuck2]

I enjoyed the scene but thought they could have done more right away

 

[tangogent]

Perhaps all the above is congruent with me sense that he seemed oddly at ease with all the
male-to-male stuff, which greatly detracted from the potential of the pairing.

TG
x

 

[joninliverton]

Whilst guys have asses and women have fanny's, then there will always be the "spoilers" who ruin certain members fantasy about models - especially the newbies. You can't live with them, but you certainly can live without them..

 

[Huh?]

What's interesting to me about all of this discussion I seem to have stirred up is that there is a common refrain of "it's fantasy." But I have to ask, what exactly is the fantasy that you guys are trying to promote? If the idea is simply that you want to see a straight guy having gay sex, then I think MOST men would say (and I'm NOT claiming their view to be correct) that once a guy appears on this site, he can not be considered "straight" anymore. He doesn't even have to do anything. Just showing his face on camera on a gay porn site would be enough to brand him "gay." Many more guys would say that once a guy appears on this site and allows another guy to even touch him he can no longer be considered straight. Keep upping the male-male interaction, and more and more men would consider that guy to no longer be straight.

As a result, to me, the whole "straight guy having gay sex" fantasy is a very limiting and extremely confusing and uneven view of what the site is about. If that's really what it's all about, then no guy should appear here more than a few times (few=very small number). I doubt the site would last very long if that were the way it should be viewed.

I much prefer the idea that this site is like a project researching male views of sexual identity and sexual exploration. Why is it not acceptable for a guy to enjoy anal stimulation and STILL be straight? If a guy finds he likes anal stimulation, why can he not prefer such stimulation from a Real Cock rather than a Dildo and STILL be straight? Does straightness have more to do with your preferences for full relationships with others or is it just a matter of which gender you have sex with? If it's just a matter of whom you have sex with, how can a top be considered "straight" if he's having sex with men?

There is a lot more that this site could be, I think, if people could open themselves to other interpretations of what is or could be going on here. That's why I get very nervous when people make comments like "this guy is ONLY a top." Forcing roles on people necessarily limits the possibilities and makes the site significantly less interesting.

The point of my post about Paul being seen elsewhere was only in regards to him not being a virgin. I found the idea of him being a virgin intriguing from the "sexual exploration" standpoint. When I saw him elsewhere, that intrigue disappeared. True, the other scene may have been filmed AFTER his Broke Straight Boys scenes. I don't know. I don't subscribe to that other site...I happened to catch the scene in another "collector" site which shows snippets of scenes from various porn sites. I have not seen Paul bottom anywhere else, and that is what I am most interested in. For me, that fantasy has not been broken, since I can still consider him to be a virgin in the sense of having never been on the receiving end of anal sex. But I will lose interest in him as a model here if that never happens, just as I have others who refused to develop further, and insisted on claiming to be "straight" while plugging, sucking, or getting sucked by every guy on the site.

 

[Coach2012]

What's interesting to me about all of this discussion I seem to have stirred up is that there is a common refrain of "it's fantasy." But I have to ask, what exactly is the fantasy that you guys are trying to promote? If the idea is simply that you want to see a straight guy having gay sex, then I think MOST men would say (and I'm NOT claiming their view to be correct) that once a guy appears on this site, he can not be considered "straight" anymore. He doesn't even have to do anything. Just showing his face on camera on a gay porn site would be enough to brand him "gay." Many more guys would say that once a guy appears on this site and allows another guy to even touch him he can no longer be considered straight. Keep upping the male-male interaction, and more and more men would consider that guy to no longer be straight.

As a result, to me, the whole "straight guy having gay sex" fantasy is a very limiting and extremely confusing and uneven view of what the site is about. If that's really what it's all about, then no guy should appear here more than a few times (few=very small number). I doubt the site would last very long if that were the way it should be viewed.

I much prefer the idea that this site is like a project researching male views of sexual identity and sexual exploration. Why is it not acceptable for a guy to enjoy anal stimulation and STILL be straight? If a guy finds he likes anal stimulation, why can he not prefer such stimulation from a Real Cock rather than a Dildo and STILL be straight? Does straightness have more to do with your preferences for full relationships with others or is it just a matter of which gender you have sex with? If it's just a matter of whom you have sex with, how can a top be considered "straight" if he's having sex with men?

There is a lot more that this site could be, I think, if people could open themselves to other interpretations of what is or could be going on here. That's why I get very nervous when people make comments like "this guy is ONLY a top." Forcing roles on people necessarily limits the possibilities and makes the site significantly less interesting.

The point of my post about Paul being seen elsewhere was only in regards to him not being a virgin. I found the idea of him being a virgin intriguing from the "sexual exploration" standpoint. When I saw him elsewhere, that intrigue disappeared. True, the other scene may have been filmed AFTER his Broke Straight Boys scenes. I don't know. I don't subscribe to that other site...I happened to catch the scene in another "collector" site which shows snippets of scenes from various porn sites. I have not seen Paul bottom anywhere else, and that is what I am most interested in. For me, that fantasy has not been broken, since I can still consider him to be a virgin in the sense of having never been on the receiving end of anal sex. But I will lose interest in him as a model here if that never happens, just as I have others who refused to develop further, and insisted on claiming to be "straight" while plugging, sucking, or getting sucked by every guy on the site.

I have been the member of this site twice. Between both times I read over and over the arguements regarding straight versus gay on this site. Reading your comment reminded me of my issues regaring this site. The last time I came to the conclusion that I joined the site to see straight young men having gay sex. At least BSB2 has gotten rid of the cheesey part of David allegedly "tricking or bribing" young men during the shooting of the video into doing things they didn't really want to do. As I came to believe that was a real farce with BSB1 I left, My conclusion was if I wanted to watch gay men have sex on a porn site, there were definitely better gay sites with consistently better looking young men than BSB1.

BSB2 has been so much better especially lately. The models are very good looking, generally have great personalities, and, at a minimum, act genuinely straight. It has been great. The problem I have is looking at what this means to me. I guess what I am really sadly saying about myself is that I get my rocks off watching great looking young men having gay sex because they either have no other way to make cash or are so desperate for cash that they are willing to sell their bodies to get by. That scares me.

 

[Beth]

To me, all the models are people or guys. I do like guys, guys who are willing to "let themselves go; enjoy the moment" even if it's not with a girl, it is with a hole...a hole that accepts you for you. Sttraight, curious, bi or gay, all guys need that physical contact. I am glad to be a member of this site...fuck on boys...I'm watching!

 

[erikthbod]

I have been the member of this site twice. Between both times I read over and over the arguements regarding straight versus gay on this site. Reading your comment reminded me of my issues regaring this site. The last time I came to the conclusion that I joined the site to see straight young men having gay sex. At least BSB2 has gotten rid of the cheesey part of David allegedly "tricking or bribing" young men during the shooting of the video into doing things they didn't really want to do. As I came to believe that was a real farce with BSB1 I left, My conclusion was if I wanted to watch gay men have sex on a porn site, there were definitely better gay sites with consistently better looking young men than BSB1.

BSB2 has been so much better especially lately. The models are very good looking, generally have great personalities, and, at a minimum, act genuinely straight. It has been great. The problem I have is looking at what this means to me. I guess what I am really sadly saying about myself is that I get my rocks off watching great looking young men having gay sex because they either have no other way to make cash or are so desperate for cash that they are willing to sell their bodies to get by. That scares me.

Whoa !.... What? ..... Isn't that what it's all about.... Give me the money $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$