California condom in porn law

[joeychuck2]

Calif made a rule that in porn the guy must use a codom. They said that most people like it without a condom and most of the porn will be done outside of Calif. I know its healthier with a condom but porn is porn. test and monitor the actors .

 

[cum2me01]

I agree. Porn is about eroctic fantacy. How many people day dream or have an erotic dream where you take time to put on a condom. Bareback is a big money maker and the actors are tested and educated on a regular basis. Most STD's are not spread through the porn actors.

 

[another1]

this wrap it before you tap it law is a city of los angeles law.
it not california law, just the law in la.
for the most part, the world around the city will be a condom-free zone.
actors are tested on their own dime and educated on their own time.
the scare that ran through the industry little over a year ago got aids activist groups concerned. they wrote a ballot measure, got the needed signatures to put it on the ballot. the city clerk said it passed muster.
the city attorney went to court saying the voters of the city of los angeles haven't got the power to enact california state law. protective gear in the workplace is a state issue.
the state agency responsible for health and safety in this industry, told the city attorney they saw no reason the people of the city of los angeles could not seek to control the spread of hiv/aids.
the city council, on behalf of the people of the city, enacted a law like the activist got on the ballot. going out to a vote of the people, is saying the people who represent you are not acting in your best interest so your direct involvement is required.
i lean towards sex worker using protection.
testing and teaching are not enough.
there are sites that have raw, unprotected sex, that is good for those seeking it.

 

[angelone]

Where's Ron Paul when we need him? Enough is enough of Big Brother/Sister taking care of us and making decisions for us! Give us the infor but keep out of our bedrooms.

 

[lesit78]

Calif made a rule that in porn the guy must use a codom. They said that most people like it without a condom and most of the porn will be done outside of Calif. I know its healthier with a condom but porn is porn. test and monitor the actors .

Are we talking gay porn, or all porn? Because as a fan of straight porn (I tend to like straight porn way more than gay porn for a variety of reasons), I can tell you that 99% of the time sex is completely unprotected in straight porn. If straight porn sites started shooting safe sex, I'm sure they would lose a lot of viewers and thus revenue.

In gay porn, bareback sex is the exception instead of the rule. However in straight porn, the reverse is true and it's ALWAYS unprotected sex with the guy sometimes cumming right into the girl's pussy and then they always show the cum leaking out of her hot, used pussy always giving the scene a really high rating even if the girl is considered not attractive by some.

 

[another1]

the issue of requiring condoms in the production of sex scenes was that a crossover model became infected and caused the industry in los angeles to shutdown for a period of time.
whether requiring condoms and condom inspections will reduce infections in the industry to zero is questionable. in all likelihood companies will move to the next town.
this law is provide for inspections and a fee to pay for the inspections.
condom inspections!

 

[powabam]

I think the condom decision should be left to either the studio or the performers. I think porn is the fantasy of those who watch it. A law should not constrict any of those. I believe in safe sex in certain situation, but I believe it's up to those who are performing.