Upcoming scene -"Gage Owens And Jason Sterling" - Why the rush for Jason to bottom?

[johnny]

I Love That Mike...xoxo

 

[ertas23]

Guys - every site that promotes straight guys doing things they never thought they would do is big business. I do believe that many of the guys we meet - who claim they are straight and have never had a dick in their mouth or their cock up another guys ass or one up theirs is reasonably a truth. Now, apply the motto that established Broke Straight Boys as a leader in the field (before Gay for Pay was a Tyra Banks expose-inspired reality check for society).

My reality (or fantasy, perhaps) tells me when one of the models out of two or three says he is willing to try bottoming for the additional cash can well be based on that monetarily enticed need. So what if the premise of the video has been discussed before we see it? They need to keep the illusion that it is a real discussion and a "caving in" for the person who agrees to do it. I suppose they could say, "Ok folks. We're gonna stop filming so our bottom can go prep so we will resume the shoot once he's back." No, they need to make it seem real (and we all pray the sheets aren't going to be stained if there is no prep.)

Again, it shows the necessity of the site to try and please millions of viewers. But I'm certain in each our own lives we have dealt with spontaneously taking the cherry of a straight boy. No prep and sometimes lucky, sometimes not. They get the assurances all worked out ahead of time.

Yet, I do have to agree with some who hoped that there might appear on set someone who is as resistant to being fucked as Diesal or Shane orJimmy and others. It keeps you coming back for the next scene staring that "not on your life for any price" guy to capitulate for the cash. 10-12-15 scenes down the road and it happens, everyone is in hog heaven (or disappointed from believing it won't ever happen). I thought maybe Tanner was going to be that guy.

I hope they can find a guy like that and pull that "will he or won't he" anticipatory story out here once again. Trouble is, maybe the other guys would hate him for only being a top?

There I go again. Brevity is only a word in my vocabulary!

 

[betudidntknow]

On the other hand, I like that Jason is bottoming. He has had a scene as a top with Zander Floyd before. I did notice some of the other recent models have skipped the oral and gone straight to topping once then becoming a power bottom (Gage Owens) or just straight to power bottoming (Danny). I remember after Gage Owens's topping scene, the director/owner told him he wanted to try something out and have him bottom next time and a miracle happened. Maybe the same happened to Jason. I think he'll do great as a bottom and i wouldn't mind seeing him get fucked by some of the other newbies too.

I do acknowledge that my tastes are a little different since I'm not really here for the "broke/straight" theme of this sight, but purely for the attractive guys having sex. Which is why i wouldn't mind skipping solos/orals scenes or combining them together or with the BTS.

Wow! I admit, I was a little surprised by this upcoming scene with Jason as the bottom as, I shared with my buddy MikeYank via e-mail. While I do understand MikeYank, well as the others' who've commented, Alydreams45, I also agree with your point as we share a similar taste regarding the "broke/straight" theme. One thing for sure, Jason's not going to soon forget this experience....Gage Owens is Packing!

Louis does make a good point also. These guys don't just show up and bottom! They don't even eat before hand! Just sayin

 

[Youngandconfused22]

I'm confused why this is a discussion. This is a porn website right, that men have sex with men for money. It's not like Broke Straight Boys forces their models to bottom. I'm pretty sure they agree to whatever is filmed beforehand. It's the models decision not ours. I agree with whatever they do that makes them happy since the main reason they are here is for money.

 

[stowe1]

This observation seems a bit misplaced here. They already rushed him into gay sex back on 8/9 when he was in a scene with Zander Floyd where he did his first oral as well as his first time fucking, after having done his solo scene on 7/29. He's not being rushed here since it will have been slightly more than a month since his last scene. Are you concerned because he is bottoming after only one topping scene? If so, how many times should a guy top before he bottoms so as not to be considered being rushed in your eyes? Just wonderin" ...

We once had a model named Diesal who appeared in 36 scenes, (all of my numbers include BTS) and it was in scene #15 where he bottomed for Jimmie Slater. That was his only time. We had another model named Mike Robbins who appeared in 35 and only bottomed one time during part of one of his latter scenes. Tank Shane appeared 16 times and also bottomed once at the end of his career here and we had a model named Jimmy Johnson who was in 36 scenes and bottomed zero times here.

Those are examples of how many times I believe a (believably) "straight" guy should wait until bottoming, but "that's just me".

Thanks for the history lesson, albeit I was aware of all four cases you cite. And thanks for the clarification. Just so I understand fully, for those models you consider "believably straight" they should never bottom (JJ) or just do it once (the other 3 you cited). And I don't necessarily disagree with you. You might recall that one of the things we bonded over leading to our being friends was the belief the Jimmy should never bottom. A problem might arise over who you consider "believably straight" and what others might consider. If I were Emperor and ran things there are a few guys currently that are believably straight to me that should never bottom (e.g., Drake and Zeno Kostas). And there are some others I think are not macho enough or too nelly who should never top and only bottom. But, alas, I'm not the Emperor so I'll just have to hope that those guys do as little in the category I think they don't fit into as possible. And then there is they issue of the models who might need the extra money they get for bottoming.

 

[mikeyank]

Thanks for the history lesson, albeit I was aware of all four cases you cite. And thanks for the clarification. Just so I understand fully, for those models you consider "believably straight" they should never bottom (JJ) or just do it once (the other 3 you cited). And I don't necessarily disagree with you. You might recall that one of the things we bonded over leading to our being friends was the belief the Jimmy should never bottom. A problem might arise over who you consider "believably straight" and what others might consider. If I were Emperor and ran things there are a few guys currently that are believably straight to me that should never bottom (e.g., Drake and Zeno Kostas). And there are some others I think are not macho enough or too nelly who should never top and only bottom. But, alas, I'm not the Emperor so I'll just have to hope that those guys do as little in the category I think they don't fit into as possible. And then there is they issue of the models who might need the extra money they get for bottoming.

Obviously there are no Emperor's in the audience here, and we all have our own opinions and desires as to what is a turn-on and a turn-off here Stowe. And to me the whole purpose of the forum is for us to express our own honest thoughts and opinions, and my honest opinion is that in his second scene with another guy on Broke Straight Boys, I'd prefer not to see Jason bottom.

 

[mikeyank]

I'm confused why this is a discussion. This is a porn website right, that men have sex with men for money. It's not like Broke Straight Boys forces their models to bottom. I'm pretty sure they agree to whatever is filmed beforehand. It's the models decision not ours. I agree with whatever they do that makes them happy since the main reason they are here is for money.

Please don't be confused, youngandconfused by this discussion. As I just replied to Stowe, the purpose of the forum is for us to express our thoughts on scenes and what we enjoy and do not enjoy watching here, and my preference is for Jason not to get fucked in his second ever Broke Straight Boys scene with another guy. It's as simple as that.

 

[Stripe222]

It's porn. If the fantasy doesn't fit with a scene, wait for the next one. Watch the old scenes. Join another site. There are a gazillion sites out there. Lots of free porn.

Most of the scenes on Broke Straight Boys rate over a 4. They must be doing something right. Give it a rest.

 

[joeychuck2]

I think to equate "real life" situations like gay marriage and equality for the LGBT community, with the fantasy world of "reel life" in this particular fantasy porn site is unfair.

I understand and respect your views Joey how you enjoy watching so called straight guys being topped, particularly being topped by a gay guy, and that is a popular view here. I also understand that Broke Straight Boys is changing, but when I first watched Jason Sterling's solo, I mentioned how he was a breath of fresh air to me, reminding me of the "old school" Broke Straight Boys boys, and I am disappointed that in his second scene with another guy, he will be getting fucked. But that is just my own personal take on things. I hope you thoroughly enjoy the scene Joey! I can only speak for myself.

Mike Broke Straight Boys exists in "the real world" it IS part of our "real life" . At the time we watch it it might be a fantasy. What we are talking about here is not a scene it is the change going on in Broke Straight Boys's presentation to us. It is a business decision they are making and your and my preferences for a scene. They are changing to keep customers here. It is changing just as the World is changing with accepting gay sex. Without that the idea of 2 men having sex would not be possible in porn. Comparing the change in same sex marriage and the change in Broke Straight Boys is fair. My premise was the world is changing to see men having sex with each other and so Broke Straight Boys is showing it to us.

 

[stowe1]

Obviously there are no Emperor's in the audience here, and we all have our own opinions and desires as to what is a turn-on and a turn-off here Stowe. And to me the whole purpose of the forum is for us to express our own honest thoughts and opinions, and my honest opinion is that in his second scene with another guy on Broke Straight Boys, I'd prefer not to see Jason bottom.

Tsk, tsk, mikey. No need to get belligerent. I know what the purpose of the forum is having been schooled in that by someone who has been here "forever". And no one is questioning or challenging your right to your opinion or to expressing it herein. However, it is within the spirit of the forum for a forumite, who might not understand fully the opinion of another to ask that forumite to explain the basis for his opinion and/or seek clarification of it.

 

[mikeyank]

Tsk, tsk, mikey. No need to get belligerent. I know what the purpose of the forum is having been schooled in that by someone who has been here "forever". And no one is questioning or challenging your right to your opinion or to expressing it herein. However, it is within the spirit of the forum for a forumite, who might not understand fully the opinion of another to ask that forumite to explain the basis for his opinion and/or seek clarification of it.

Fair point, my erudite colleague from Pittsburgh. I believe that I did answer your query, and I will now take the advice of another long standing forumite, and "give it a rest".

 

[johnny]

Tsk, tsk, mikey. No need to get belligerent. I know what the purpose of the forum is having been schooled in that by someone who has been here "forever". And no one is questioning or challenging your right to your opinion or to expressing it herein. However, it is within the spirit of the forum for a forumite, who might not understand fully the opinion of another to ask that forumite to explain the basis for his opinion and/or seek clarification of it.

Not just cause I love him. But for the three years I have been a member. He has explained how he feels.
I think there all gay. But that is just me.Mikes Fantasy Straight boy's.
Broke Straight Boys has changed. It is just another Gay site.We are lucky to have the Forum. But mike has always said he wants too see Straight boy's Always.
Sorry Mike I think the old day's of the Straight boys is OVER. And most of the members don't give a
shit. A different Broke Straight Boys for a different time. Fun to have a Fantasy. But the straight boy fantasy is over.

 

[betudidntknow]

Not just cause I love him. But for the three years I have been a member. He has explained how he feels. I think there all gay.
And Broke Straight Boys has changed. It is just another Gay site.We are lucky to have the Forum. But mike has always said he wants too see Straight boy's.
Sorry Mike I think the old day's of the Straight boys is OVER. And most of the members don't give a
shit.A different Broke Straight Boys for a different time. Fun to have a Fantasy. But the straight boy fantasy is over.

I don't know if that's necessarily the case (at least for me Johnny). The key word here is "Straight Boy Fantasy"! Each individual has their own idea of what that is or means to them! There is a tendency to challenge that according to what an individual idealizes. Be it based on their own experiences or the perception they have of a model they see. I don't think there isn't a "fantasy" scenario that hasn't been done or attempted on this site. It's just become so complex! I do agree though, "Fun to have a Fantasy"! And as individuals, we can do with that what we want!

 

[Buckeye1]

Sorry Mike I think the old day's of the Straight boys is OVER. And most of the members don't give a
shit. A different Broke Straight Boys for a different time. Fun to have a Fantasy. But the straight boy fantasy is over.

If that's the case, then they should change the name to "Broke Who Gives a Shit Boys".

I don't think that is the case though. The interviews of the models through the BTS confirms to me that most of the guys here have a straight life off screen. To me, that would make them true "gay-for-pay" straight guys. Good enough for me.

 

[johnny]

I don't know if that's necessarily the case (at least for me Johnny). The key word here is "Straight Boy Fantasy"! Each individual has their own idea of what that is or means to them! There is a tendency to challenge that according to what an individual idealizes. Be it based on their own experiences or the perception they have of a model they see. I don't think there isn't a "fantasy" scenario that hasn't been done or attempted on this site. It's just become so complex! I do agree though, "Fun to have a Fantasy"! And as individuals, we can do with that what we want!

I guess I just need to watch what I say. I am from San Francisco so I really have never dealt with Straight boy's.
There always was enough Gay boys to go around. So why bother with straight boys.( For Me )
I joined thinking Broke Straight Boys was a fun site to join. My interest in straight boys didn't start till then.
But when I joined there were boy's I felt were straight. But the longer I am a member the less I feel it. And Again
( That is just me ) But I always remember mike talking about His Fantasy ( Straight Boys ) I guess I just don't understand why people question him
I know he was excited by Jason so his being fucked so soon took away his fantasy.
But you know I am having a hard time explaining the point I am trying to make.So I am just going to have to let this pass.
Before I stick my foot in my mouth. And (another thing about me). I am just not into feet.
I am sure that is a turn off to allot of people.So Sorry. Over and Out..

 

[johnny]

If that's the case, then they should change the name to "Broke Who Gives a Shit Boys".

I don't think that is the case though. The interviews of the models through the BTS confirms to me that most of the guys here have a straight life off screen. To me, that would make them true "gay-for-pay" straight guys. Good enough for me.

See I put my foot in my mouth already....Don't taste that bad actually..

 

[Buckeye1]

See I put my foot in my mouth already....Don't taste that bad actually..

You are a jewel, Johnny. BTW I'm not into feet either. lol

 

[mikeyank]

But I always remember mike talking about His Fantasy ( Straight Boys ) I guess I just don't understand why people question him
I know he was excited by Jason so his being fucked so soon took away his fantasy.

Thanks for your support Johnny. Apparently some members of the forum get offended in some way, when I describe my straight boy fantasy, and you have it exactly right, that by having Jason get fucked in his second ever scene with another guy does take away from my fantasy. My original point was, what's the rush? But I did promise to "give it a rest", so enough said.........for right now anyway.

 

[mikeyank]

You are a jewel, Johnny. BTW I'm not into feet either. lol

I couldn't agree with you more Robb that Johnny is a jewel, and one of the best thing to happen here in the last few years was Johnny joining the forum, along with Buckeye1 rejoining the forum recently as well.

I am a member here, number one for the forum, and you two guys are a big part of my total forum experience!!!

 

[Buckeye1]

I couldn't agree with you more Robb that Johnny is a jewel, and one of the best thing to happen here in the last few years was Johnny joining the forum, along with Buckeye1 rejoining the forum recently as well.

I am a member here, number one for the forum, and you two guys are a big part of my total forum experience!!!

You should have been a diplomat or a lawyer. lol