Trey & kirk ... What happened there?

[tampa24]

I met Kirk he is really straight but what a cool guy. He was great to talk to. Some of these guys really have to be warmed up and he is one of them so give him some time.

We've probably been a bit spoiled with models like Blake who deliver amazing scenes right from their solo. It's difficult to remember that models like Blake are the rarity whereas models like Kirk and Trey are the norm...plus it'll be fun watching them improve.

Well said Grace!

it doesn't bother me that both guys had no chemsitry because well this is Broke Straight Boys and both guys were with another guy for the first time so I understand the no chemsitry the first time round,
Kirk was how you expect any straight guy to be he liked it but at the same time wasn't really comfortable, look quite a few Broke Straight Boys member were that way take Jamie for instance and look how far he went or how Brody was and he went from just jacking to getting fucked.
So we will probably have to give Kirk some time but I am expecting good things from him, Trey on the other hand was freaking awesome especially being hard without touching himself, the end was also incredible I just loved how much Trey was eyeballing Kirks cumshot, like he wanted to taste some, his own cumshot was quite far we got a shooter, he didn't even give any warning he just shot right on and over Kirks thigh
I personally gave this a 4 because Trey was awesome and Kirk is keeping the spark alive allowing the fantasy of straight guys on this site, also you know what both guys did have a great chemistry together until the cock sucking started

I love chemistry as much as the next person. But on the other hand Broke Straight Boys is supposed to be an amateur model site. So if you want chemistry all the time, go work in a lab. haha I thought the chemistry between htem was decent anyway. At least they were not being cold or rude to each other. We've seen that before too.

While I'm not generally a fan of one-sided scenes this was a perfect example of a nervous and somewhat unwilling straight guy getting sucked off for the first time by a dude. In real life they usually have to be very drunk to do this. haha That way in the morning they can claim to have blacked out and forgotten the whole thing. I felt a little bit like a voyeur watching an uncomfortable and nervous Kirk let another dude touch his dick. I really felt like we were watching a devirginizing of sorts. haha Maybe even a life changing event. So I loved it for that reason. In keeping with the mission statement of the site.

 

[Buckeye1]

I really liked this scene both guys are so cute Kirk looks very different with his lil beard going on, it doesn't bother me that both guys had no chemsitry because well this is Broke Straight Boys and both guys were with another guy for the first time so I understand the no chemsitry the first time round, Kirk was how you expect any straight guy to be he liked it but at the same time wasn't really comfortable, look quite a few Broke Straight Boys member were that way take Jamie for instance and look how far he went or how Brody was and he went from just jacking to getting fucked.
So we will probably have to give Kirk some time but I am expecting good things from him, Trey on the other hand was freaking awesome especially being hard without touching himself just like Carter was, the end was also incredible I just loved how much Trey was eyeballing Kirks cumshot, like he wanted to taste some, his own cumshot was quite far we got a shooter he wasn't even told to cum while still sucking he decided to do that, he didn't even give any warning he just shot right on and over Kirks thigh
I personally gave this a 4 because Trey was awesome and Kirk is keeping the spark alive allowing the fantasy of straight guys on this site, also you know what both guys did have a great chemistry together until the cock sucking started

I had a huge synopsis planned in my head about this scene, but Straightcurious94 pretty much said it all for me. I agree that no chemistry is required when two straight guys get together for the first time. And I do believe that both guys are straight.

I especially loved Trey's cum shot all over Kirk's leg and the bed, and I might add while still working on Kirk's dick. He had to be enjoying what he was doing at that point, at least.

And one last point. I could see the anticipation building in Trey's mind as Kirk was about to cum. Licking his lips like he just couldn't wait. I, too, think he wanted to taste it after Kirk nutted, but was afraid to. That may have been too much for him for his first time.

I thoroughly enjoyed this scene and gave it a 5 rating. Look forward to seeing much more from these two guys.

 

[mikeyank]

I had a huge synopsis planned in my head about this scene, but Straightcurious94 pretty much said it all for me. I agree that no chemistry is required when two straight guys get together for the first time. And I do believe that both guys are straight.

I especially loved Trey's cum shot all over Kirk's leg and the bed, and I might add while still working on Kirk's dick. He had to be enjoying what he was doing at that point, at least.

And one last point. I could see the anticipation building in Trey's mind as Kirk was about to cum. Licking his lips like he just couldn't wait. I, too, think he wanted to taste it after Kirk nutted, but was afraid to. That may have been too much for him for his first time.

I thoroughly enjoyed this scene and gave it a 5 rating. Look forward to seeing much more from these two guys.

I haven't viewed this scene yet, but with an endorsement like that from you Robb, I'm confident that I will enjoy it too, as you highly recommended the Ayden & Carter scene, and that was one of the best yet of BSB2.

I also agree that Straightcurious94 gives us great reviews of the scenes. It goes to prove the old saying, "out of the mouths of babes....."

Yes I agree with all who enjoy a good "one sided scene" of a straight boy getting his dick sucked, and that chemistry is not necessarily the key to Broke Straight Boys scenes, with "believably" straight guys!

I will definitely check this scene out, as now a days I don't view all of the scenes anymore. I check the still pics, look at the reviews and I know which of my fellow forumites have similar taste as mine, and then view a scene if motivated.

Thanks to Robb & Straightcurious and the others who have peaked my interest.

 

[AsIseeIt]

Yes, this site is straight boys doin' "gay" sex. And the boys being "str8" and acting "str8" is what brought as all here. I get that.
and the scenes are also given numbered ratings for the viewr to score our level of satisfaction with the boys and their performance/s.
Chemistry to me, is how things are mixed/blended. Even solo scenes have chemistry (go figure). so, As I See It, str8-bi-unknown will be judged based on chemistry. A big dick is not a guarantee for a 5 score. In my personal exp., I've had many "str8", but only those who are not stereotypical. I never bother with str8's who won't "play" with me. Chemistry? ..... I did not join this site to watch "str8"s be "STR8".
remember: Spencer with Jason? or our infamous Jimmy ?
I joined the site as the name alluded to: Broke Str8 Boys (gay 4pay). I'm interested to see a "str8" do "non-str8" sex. that's the product/selling point of this site- the actualized fantasy of seeing a "str8" guy- hopefully in real life, come into my bedroom and do what i (gay ) normally do.
OTHERWISE, there are the str8 pornsites or any str8 neighbors that i do not care for. Did i go on a tangent here? maybe. I am just hoping to explain why "chemistry" is a standard for me when rating scenes I watched. I want my models to be at least "str8" and really getting into (chemistry) the "gayness" of what "we" paid to see. The model/s level of WILLINGNESS (whether faked or real) to do the "gay", even awkwardly is, observed in "chemistry". I still like Kirk and yes, Trey and would like to see them in more scenes together or otherwise. I only reacted to the lack of chemistry between them. Pardon me if I got lost in my own translation here. Just Trust me I meant well.

 

[JLipps4u]

Yes, this site is straight boys doin' "gay" sex. And the boys being "str8" and acting "str8" is what brought as all here. I get that.
and the scenes are also given numbered ratings for the viewr to score our level of satisfaction with the boys and their performance/s.
Chemistry to me, is how things are mixed/blended. Even solo scenes have chemistry (go figure). so, As I See It, str8-bi-unknown will be judged based on chemistry. A big dick is not a guarantee for a 5 score. In my personal exp., I've had many "str8", but only those who are not stereotypical. I never bother with str8's who won't "play" with me. Chemistry? ..... I did not join this site to watch "str8"s be "STR8".
remember: Spencer with Jason? or our infamous Jimmy ?
I joined the site as the name alluded to: Broke Str8 Boys (gay 4pay). I'm interested to see a "str8" do "non-str8" sex. that's the product/selling point of this site- the actualized fantasy of seeing a "str8" guy- hopefully in real life, come into my bedroom and do what i (gay ) normally do.
OTHERWISE, there are the str8 pornsites or any str8 neighbors that i do not care for. Did i go on a tangent here? maybe. I am just hoping to explain why "chemistry" is a standard for me when rating scenes I watched. I want my models to be at least "str8" and really getting into (chemistry) the "gayness" of what "we" paid to see. The model/s level of WILLINGNESS (whether faked or real) to do the "gay", even awkwardly is, observed in "chemistry". I still like Kirk and yes, Trey and would like to see them in more scenes together or otherwise. I only reacted to the lack of chemistry between them. Pardon me if I got lost in my own translation here. Just Trust me I meant well.

Once again it boils down to personal preference. I for one, do engage in playing with str8 guys who won't play with me! I don't need someone to play with me and get me off. As long as I have hands and a good imagination (and a good porn vid) I can take care of myself. Depends on the guy and the circumstance, and my own level of horniness. If I am desperate for a dick to play with, then I don't care if they don't want to play.
Like a few other of my esteemed friends here on Broke Straight Boys, my objective is to get the guy and to get him off. That, in and of itself, is part of my personal gratification. It is rarely about me getting sexual gratification. Rather, its, "can I convince this guy to let me have his dick." Its about the conquest! Therein lies my motivation and gratification! I'll be happy to take any guys you don't feel are worthy of your time or efforts!

 

[mikeyank]

vive la différence

Yes, this site is straight boys doin' "gay" sex. And the boys being "str8" and acting "str8" is what brought as all here. I get that.
and the scenes are also given numbered ratings for the viewr to score our level of satisfaction with the boys and their performance/s.
Chemistry to me, is how things are mixed/blended. Even solo scenes have chemistry (go figure). so, As I See It, str8-bi-unknown will be judged based on chemistry. A big dick is not a guarantee for a 5 score. In my personal exp., I've had many "str8", but only those who are not stereotypical. I never bother with str8's who won't "play" with me. Chemistry? ..... I did not join this site to watch "str8"s be "STR8".remember: Spencer with Jason? or our infamous Jimmy ?
I joined the site as the name alluded to: Broke Str8 Boys (gay 4pay). I'm interested to see a "str8" do "non-str8" sex. that's the product/selling point of this site- the actualized fantasy of seeing a "str8" guy- hopefully in real life, come into my bedroom and do what i (gay ) normally do.
OTHERWISE, there are the str8 pornsites or any str8 neighbors that i do not care for. Did i go on a tangent here? maybe. I am just hoping to explain why "chemistry" is a standard for me when rating scenes I watched. I want my models to be at least "str8" and really getting into (chemistry) the "gayness" of what "we" paid to see. The model/s level of WILLINGNESS (whether faked or real) to do the "gay", even awkwardly is, observed in "chemistry". I still like Kirk and yes, Trey and would like to see them in more scenes together or otherwise. I only reacted to the lack of chemistry between them. Pardon me if I got lost in my own translation here. Just Trust me I meant well.

I certainly respect your views and preferences, AsIseeIt, however we all approach Broke Straight Boys from our own personal preferences. I did join this site to watch "str8"s be "STR8". To me it is ultra hot to watch a macho str8 guy doing something gay, supposedly only because he's broke, and then to watch him get hard and to look at his face, as he is trying to remain "cool" and keep up his "str8 creds", as the pleasure overcomes his body and he is often forced to show his pleasure, despite his best efforts. Some are better disguising their pleasure than others, but their stiff cock and then ultimately their squirting loads belie their coolness.

And the reason that the initial Spencer scenes, and virtually all of the Jimmy scenes were controversial is because some of us LOVE that kind of str8 guy, while many others HATE that kind of str8 guy.

It appears to me that Clay is hitting his stride in recent weeks, by featuring both kinds here, to appease all of us at least some of the time. And in my humble opinion, that is a very good thing, as going to all of either extreme will alienate at least a segment of the audience.

 

[Buckeye1]

Yes, this site is straight boys doin' "gay" sex. And the boys being "str8" and acting "str8" is what brought as all here. I get that.
and the scenes are also given numbered ratings for the viewr to score our level of satisfaction with the boys and their performance/s.
Chemistry to me, is how things are mixed/blended. Even solo scenes have chemistry (go figure). so, As I See It, str8-bi-unknown will be judged based on chemistry. A big dick is not a guarantee for a 5 score. In my personal exp., I've had many "str8", but only those who are not stereotypical. I never bother with str8's who won't "play" with me. Chemistry? ..... I did not join this site to watch "str8"s be "STR8".
remember: Spencer with Jason? or our infamous Jimmy ?
I joined the site as the name alluded to: Broke Str8 Boys (gay 4pay). I'm interested to see a "str8" do "non-str8" sex. that's the product/selling point of this site- the actualized fantasy of seeing a "str8" guy- hopefully in real life, come into my bedroom and do what i (gay ) normally do.
OTHERWISE, there are the str8 pornsites or any str8 neighbors that i do not care for. Did i go on a tangent here? maybe. I am just hoping to explain why "chemistry" is a standard for me when rating scenes I watched. I want my models to be at least "str8" and really getting into (chemistry) the "gayness" of what "we" paid to see. The model/s level of WILLINGNESS (whether faked or real) to do the "gay", even awkwardly is, observed in "chemistry". I still like Kirk and yes, Trey and would like to see them in more scenes together or otherwise. I only reacted to the lack of chemistry between them. Pardon me if I got lost in my own translation here. Just Trust me I meant well.

To me, "chemistry" is all about emotions...that "something" that clicked that neither participant can really understand. In almost all of my encounters it just rarely happened on the first time. I was always attracted to him and he often fought within himself that he shouldn't be doing this. And "chemistry" may never happen. It must have a mind of its own.

Since I am gay, I am speaking of only gay/straight encounters. I would have to believe that straight/straight encounters must be much more difficult to pull off to get any sort of "chemistry" going. I realize that these guys are performers and sometimes their performing a scene with "chemistry" often comes off as almost fake (which it is). I have watched scenes here though in which true "chemistry" took over the scene and after it was over left both boys wondering, "WTF just happened". For me, those were the most memorable ones.

Kirk and Trey were, in my opinion, just being themselves in an uncomfortable position. Nothing more, nothing less. It was often awkward but in real life it usually is the first time out. I think they did a great job.

 

[AsIseeIt]

dearest dear MIKEYANK, JLIPPS4U and BUCKEYE, I respect and generally share most of your opinions and I'm glad that we seemingly agreed to RESPECTFULLY disagree when our takes are opposites. - NOW, As I See It, .... that's CHEMISTRY !!!

 

[Blue011]

"I Meant Well" -- Really ???

I thought the Kirk and Trey scene was fine. Having been a member of the site for a while, I am used to seeing a progression as models participate in different scenes. Many do start of slowly and develop their skills over this progression. That process seems to increase my interest in the models.

As has been said by other posters, I enjoy watching straight guys experimenting with gay sex.

But, there is a determined minority of posters here who insist that all scenes must follow their prescribed view of what makes any scene hot. As several posters have noted, the site needs to provide interest for all viewpoints. I will support the site even if some scenes are awkward and clunky. It just makes the scenes that do work even better. Sometimes models will surprise you and that surprise is worth a wait.

We still seem to have those who find the silly "boring" and "bored" tag to be a way to interject their displeasure with a particular scene or model. I presume the motivation for this is to effect the opinions and views of other subscribers. Generally, the comment is provided with no basis for this profoundly negative assessment. There is usually an attempt to post a "boring" comment early in the life cycle of a scene in order to brand the offending scene instead of provoking a discussion between members on the forum.

Sometimes I am torn between joining an existing thread which has been branded with a view that I do not share or starting my own to try to frame the discussion in a nuetral manner without the "boring" viewpoint that I do not share. I almost did that with this thread and then I read the comment "I meant well." So, I am giving the poster the benefit of the doubt and assuming that he did not really mean to brand the entire scene as unsatisfactory over the way he framed the discussion thread.

Again, I liked the scene for the same reasons that many here have posted. It was hot, amusing and seemed reality based. Something that I would expect from a good Broke Straight Boys video.

 

[Buckeye1]

dearest dear MIKEYANK, JLIPPS4U and BUCKEYE, I respect and generally share most of your opinions and I'm glad that we seemingly agreed to RESPECTFULLY disagree when our takes are opposites. - NOW, As I See It, .... that's CHEMISTRY !!!

On that we can agree. Thanks AsIseeIt.

 

[lovelumps]

To me it is ultra hot to watch a macho str8 guy doing something gay, supposedly only because he's broke, and then to watch him get hard and to look at his face, as he is trying to remain "cool" and keep up his "str8 creds", as the pleasure overcomes his body and he is often forced to show his pleasure, despite his best efforts. Some are better disguising their pleasure than others, but their stiff cock and then ultimately their squirting loads belie their coolness.

That aspect is so completely sexy to me that I find myself enjoying the reluctant ones more and more. However, I don't enjoy it as much when they have a hard time staying hard. I think that's why the oral scenes lately have been more enjoyable for me to watch. This one in particular. Kirk might have been waging an internal battle, or trying hard not to like having a guy suck his dick, and trying really hard not to show any pleasure, but his body liked it. And, listening to his breathing was half the turn on for me!

 

[mikeyank]

We still seem to have those who find the silly "boring" and "bored" tag to be a way to interject their displeasure with a particular scene or model. I presume the motivation for this is to effect the opinions and views of other subscribers. Generally, the comment is provided with no basis for this profoundly negative assessment. There is usually an attempt to post a "boring" comment early in the life cycle of a scene in order to brand the offending scene instead of provoking a discussion between members on the forum.

I couldn't agree with you more, Blue. It totally bothers me when a poster makes a declarative statement that a scene is "boring", or a model to "ugly" or too skinny or fat or has a bad attitude, without recognizing that these opinions are all subjective.

Just adding three little words like, "in my opinion" seems to make a post much more intelligent and easier to accept, even when I disagree.

Thank you for verbalizing something that has bothered me here for a long time.

 

[mikeyank]

That aspect is so completely sexy to me that I find myself enjoying the reluctant ones more and more. However, I don't enjoy it as much when they have a hard time staying hard. I think that's why the oral scenes lately have been more enjoyable for me to watch. This one in particular. Kirk might have been waging an internal battle, or trying hard not to like having a guy suck his dick, and trying really hard not to show any pleasure, but his body liked it. And, listening to his breathing was half the turn on for me!

The more I read your posts regarding the sex scenes here Laura, the more I see how we have very similar taste in "boys".

 

[lovelumps]

The more I read your posts regarding the sex scenes here Laura, the more I see how we have very similar taste in "boys".

With the possible exception of Jimmy! He just didn't turn me on. (Shit, I just said that out loud.)

 

[Buckeye1]

I couldn't agree with you more, Blue. It totally bothers me when a poster makes a declarative statement that a scene is "boring", or a model to "ugly" or too skinny or fat or has a bad attitude, without recognizing that these opinions are all subjective.

Just adding three little words like, "in my opinion" seems to make a post much more intelligent and easier to accept, even when I disagree.

Thank you for verbalizing something that has bothered me here for a long time.

Hey Mike,
You are boring, ugly, too skinny AND fat, and you have a bad attitude!!! Just sayin' and not another word more.

OMG there goes the meds again. (I wonder how much longer I can use that excuse?)

Sorry, man.

 

[mikeyank]

With the possible exception of Jimmy! He just didn't turn me on. (Shit, I just said that out loud.)

But you did respect the fact that he was "real". Quite honestly, I liked his persona, his camaraderie with his fellow models, his sense of humor and his general demeanor more than I thought that he was the most beautiful guy I ever saw. But often the personality makes a man sexy.

But we don't have to agree on every guy, but basically we apparently are turned on by the same kind of dynamics in the straight guys who appear on the old futon or the current bed here.

 

[mikeyank]

Hey Mike,
You are boring, ugly, too skinny AND fat, and you have a bad attitude!!! Just sayin' and not another word more.

OMG there goes the meds again. (I wonder how much longer I can use that excuse?)

Sorry, man.

Gee that's funny, as I think that you are PERFECT, Robb!

And I said that without the benefit of meds.

Love ya' Robb!!! (Class Clown)

 

[joninliverton]

Gotta agree with Mark on this one. Many of us have said we like to see models develope from the alleged straight guy, then a bit of sucking, then a bit further etc. This is what youre getting.

 

[AsIseeIt]

I thought the Kirk and Trey scene was fine. Having been a member of the site for a while, I am used to seeing a progression as models participate in different scenes. Many do start of slowly and develop their skills over this progression. That process seems to increase my interest in the models.

As has been said by other posters, I enjoy watching straight guys experimenting with gay sex.

But, there is a determined minority of posters here who insist that all scenes must follow their prescribed view of what makes any scene hot. As several posters have noted, the site needs to provide interest for all viewpoints. I will support the site even if some scenes are awkward and clunky. It just makes the scenes that do work even better. Sometimes models will surprise you and that surprise is worth a wait.

We still seem to have those who find the silly "boring" and "bored" tag to be a way to interject their displeasure with a particular scene or model. I presume the motivation for this is to effect the opinions and views of other subscribers. Generally, the comment is provided with no basis for this profoundly negative assessment. There is usually an attempt to post a "boring" comment early in the life cycle of a scene in order to brand the offending scene instead of provoking a discussion between members on the forum.

Sometimes I am torn between joining an existing thread which has been branded with a view that I do not share or starting my own to try to frame the discussion in a nuetral manner without the "boring" viewpoint that I do not share. I almost did that with this thread and then I read the comment "I meant well." So, I am giving the poster the benefit of the doubt and assuming that he did not really mean to brand the entire scene as unsatisfactory over the way he framed the discussion thread.

Again, I liked the scene for the same reasons that many here have posted. It was hot, amusing and seemed reality based. Something that I would expect from a good Broke Straight Boys video.

hi Blue011, I went over my initial text and the other where i attempted to explain my "personal/own" take on chemistry. Yes Blue011, I REALLY meant well. I never said i WAS bored. and I did not attack Trey & kirk, i simply critiqued their performance ( of gay sex ) the way I SAW IT. I posited that it MAYbe due to lack of "chemistry", and inspite of my critque, I still scored the scene a 4 because I like Trey & Kirk. As my call sign clearly indicates: AsIseeIt, It's simply my personal take on the scene. Even though posters that seemed to share mine are not a minority, I really mean it when i say It was not my intention to ASSERT my 2 cents, However, the last time i checked, this space is called the FORUM. This is an exchange room of varying opinions not ONLY a caucus of similar views. And i stand by my "own" opinion-( not an assertion ) on how i understood the Broke Straight Boys sales pitch : G4P -and that is why I subscribed to it. This brings to mind an earlier thread that WEBMONKEY tried to set up: the LIKE/DISLIKE feature for postings. At least YOU questioned my opinion directly and openly. Blue011, I have only been recently posting- @ about 15 postings, I'm really still a NEWBIE in the forum and I'm liking it bcuz it's about sharing PERSONAL PREFERENCES. Whether someone's opinion sway others away from their own... well that is still THEIR personal CHOICE>>> PEACE.

 

[Ms. Kianna]

I'll just say what I said before..........I really hope we see Kirk back. I think he is one, that given the right situation, can be totally swept away and lose that inner battle.