• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

The Horrible Thing Wrong With The Brady-Maverick Video On SBJO:

baal

Well-known Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Posts
954
Reaction score
0
It's not on the main site! I have joined other sites for a few months just to get a Maverick video. I'm even realizing that right behind Cole, Maverick is my second favorite performer on this site. Brady's okay but I'd probably endure Maverick with a :scared: woman!
 
I didn't think there was anything wrong with the film, maybe apart from the quality, albeit that I did download the 1mb version. Lots of chemistry, kissing, sucking, rimming, fucking, showers... the list goes on. I thought it was a very good film.
 
Straight??? Boys Jerk Off???

My problem with "Straight Boys Jerk Off", is that they often have films like this, where neither guy is at all straight, and the only jerking off is at the very end, where they get themselves off with their hands, after the fucking.

Don't get me wrong. I agree that they are both very good looking young men, with fine faces, bodies and cocks, but why is this film on this particular site? But I do not specifically pay for this site, as it is a free bonus site, but I do wonder.

I would have to assume that the majority of members of Broke Straight Boys, (not the majority of posters on the forum, but the majority of members), pay for this site because of our interest in seeing good looking young guys who identify themselves as being straight, performing gay sex acts on camera.

So this film was an excellent example of good looking guys having hot sex, but for guys like me looking to see straight guys having gay sex, I found it rather ho-hum. Next please.
 
Mikey I know that is your thing and i also know that you are very militant about it The reason I joined the site was that Dave's taste in models and mine seem to coincide If the guys are hot and the sex is hot I really don't care what they do in their own lives As far as i am concerned they could be shepards with an intimate connection to their flock Love you take care New site Broke Shepard Boys Interesting don't you think? Are they really shepards ? LOL
 
Brady is for me very hot I love the guy, but this vid was very tacky in its filming maybe ok for a french avant-garde film with all the shadows and crap camera angles and maybe next time some one may like to pay the electricity bill first.
Sorry but you have ruined what could have been a good film with two hot guys.
Out of ten???? 2/10
Sorry team but over the last few weeks standards have dropped.
Mind you you could make it up again with Brady fucking Zakk two stunning guys..
 
My problem with "Many of Our Positions", is that they often have become like this, where neither guy makes a new point at all, and the only jerking off is at the very end, where they get themselves off with another redundancy, at the very end.

Don't get me wrong. I agree that they are always well taken points about good looking young men, with fine faces, bodies and cocks, but why is this same point made by both sides on this particular site at every opportunity? I do not specifically pay to hear this argument repeated constantly, as it is a redundancy, I do wonder at its value.

I would have to assume that the majority of members of Broke Straight Boys, (not the majority of posters on the forum, but the majority of members), pay for this site because of our interest in seeing good looking young guys who identify themselves as being straight, performing gay sex acts on camera.

Of course, my really big assumption is that the majority of members of Broke Straight Boys (not, of course, the majority of posters on the forum, but the majority of members), pay for this site and still give high ratings to a substantial number of films featuring bisexual and gay performers even though they are only interested in seeing young guys who identify themselves as being straight, performing gay sex acts on camera. (Since that is the only actual evidence upon which any conclusions can be drawn.)

So most films on this site are excellent examples of good looking guys having hot sex, I say: next please. For those who feel it necessary to repeatedly tell me they did not get a tiny thrill out of the look on Stephane's face when he achieved his goal of bottoming and loved it, I say: ho-hum.

Yes, this is satire. There is a long standing tradition of it in English literature going all the way back to the sixteenth century. If that doesn't ring a bell, visit Mad Magazine or National Lampoon or The Onion. I fully expect to get taken to task for this. All I ask is that you do this Forum the honor of attacking what I say and not me.
Hi Rifle. You and I have exchanged private messages in the past. I tried to write to you, but you are not accepting PM's. I am curious why that is. I had hoped to exchange some thoughts with you again.

Mike
 
Hi Mike. As you know I love to write. Once in a while I love to put something on paper designed to put us all into high gear and onto a topic we need to discuss. It seems lately it's redundancy. I think you called my attention to it with an excellent posting a few weeks ago on the 'sameness' of our blatherings of late and how we used to really discuss truly interesting topics. At any rate, when I read your note, I thought "Oh, yes," and a parody came to mind. Nothing personal, it could just as easily have been Baal talking about one of his dislikes or Kodieboy fishslapping someone. It just seems like we're always saying the same things over and over again.

Sorry, to answer your question about pm's, two reasons: (1) I've taken some truly brutal pm's - not from the two who took what I said as personal attacks, but from others who mounted their Shetland ponies of personal indignation and road off on High horses of righteous indignation. They threatened me and my family. Hence the removal of all photographs, references, and connections on my membership page. (2) This is a forum and a forum is a public place which thrives on public discussion. I know when I see the name Mikeyank at the top of a page that, as you say, we will more than likely disagree. But, I also know that I will enjoy reading it. It will get my juices flowing. When I see a writing on the forum from anyone, I don't have to worry about thirty pm's having been posted behind it. Nor do I have to worry about people telling me one thing in public and another in private. I choose the way of the Romans and the Greeks: the public forum. Ave Caesar, morituri te salutant!
 
Last edited:
Wow! Can I add my 2 cents (or do I need a bailout from the government to have that luxury).
The film is what it is.
This is America, as individuals we have the ability to enjoy things that the person next to us may not. Therefore we have the right to criticize things that are of no real importance to sustaining our lives, but we can because we can and we do because we do.
I say if you don't like what you see don't look, if you don't like what you are watching turn it off. There is no reason to go on a tirade becasue you do not like a film. Just state your opinion and move on! And remember opinions are like noses, most people have them!
Don't attack each other. Can't we all agree to disagree and get along.
Personally, I enjoyed the bug on the lense more than the actual film but I would never get so angry about it to feel the need to have the bug executed.
Whew, now I feel better, pass the raid.
 
II have given Straight Boys Jerk Off some heavy criticism as of late on the technical issues. Here they had a good pairing of models. I'm sensitive to the fact that some people like the pairings to always involve at least one supposedly straight model. The camera work and camera angles are not at the level they should be. In outdoor filming there are supposed to be people with reflective shields of sorts standing beside models to redirect sunlight onto areas of the model that are in shadow. It seems as if it was just one cameraman. Until Straight Boys Jerk Off can get the camera and lighting skills up to par they just aren't quite ready for prime time......yet.

They fact that we have been critiquing and reviewing more of the Straight Boys Jerk Off vids here in the forum shows that they are trying hard to make some stuff happen over there. They are getting our attention which is a good thing. They should be happy and proud for that much. They are trying to shake things up and I applaud them for that. The fact that we are starting to apply some of the same quality standards to their work as we do to Broke Straight Boys is progress for them. I'm sure it's gotta be difficult though to handle criticism of scenes that you have put a lot of work into. But that's part of making it into the big leagues also.

They should keep in mind though that simply throwing more money the models' way is not in itself going to guarantee a better performance. Just as we saw with the hot tub scene where the models didn't earn their pay. More money definitely helps though to get better looking models who will agree to go farther on camera for you. And I always thought in the past that the money offered to models on Straight Boys Jerk Off was ridiculously low. Starting off with $200 for a scene and offering a model $50 to do oral? And $100-$200 more to get fucked. Please... It's good that they seem to be getting away from such low pay.

The technical issues though are still their biggest weakness over there. They need to keep working on that. They are amassing a decent stable of models. They are getting away from being so chintzy with money. Now they just need to pull all the different aspects of filming together to start putting out the high quality stuff. I know... Easier said than done. Right? haha
 
I'm so sorry Rifle that you have been treated so harshly in here. Especially in the PM's. It pains me to hear that you had to put up with that. There's no excuse whatsoever for people to be making physical threats against you, your family or any of the rest of us in here for stating an opinion. Unfortunately there are some disturbed people out there who see nothing wrong with that.
 
A very clever metaphor lpdude, but be careful about bragging about enjoying the bug on the lens and then killing it - I think that makes you a black widow and there is much debate as to whether spiders are bugs. Anyway, you're right. If you don't like it, don't watch it. If you don't agree, don't read it. So I'll delete it. No reason to make anyone read what they don't want to.

Tampa, I was merely answering Mikeyank's question, I didn't mean to ask for sympathy. Being disturbed is merely a matter of self-delusion: self-control, self-empowerment, self-righteousness -- and we're all capable of that; the rest is the degree, public and private.

Note to Newbies: The wonderful thing about this forum is the opportunity it gives you to say things you'd never say anywhere else. AND the opportunity to hear things said you'd never hear said anywhere else. You'll learn as days go by that many members here are worth listening to for the stability of their positions - I don't think baal or mikeyank or vicekid or lester have moved 2 millimeters in the months I've been reading them - and I don't always agree with them - but I always learn from them - others will bend with the breeze and blow with the force of a tsunami and I learn from them. Ours is a world wide community and we're here for a lot more than just rent boys, rim shots, and southern fried cock. That's the feast we sit down to, two or three times a week. In between there's a hell of a lot of good dinner time conversation. As Auntie Mame said to Patrick, "Life is a banquet and most poor suckers are starving to death!"
 
I'm so sorry Rifle that you have been treated so harshly in here. Especially in the PM's. It pains me to hear that you had to put up with that. There's no excuse whatsoever for people to be making physical threats against you, your family or any of the rest of us in here for stating an opinion. Unfortunately there are some disturbed people out there who see nothing wrong with that.

I think it is absolutely evil for people to do that, and those that do should be taken to task. I would report their PM to the site manager in the first instance and to the police in the second. One should never allow an internet forum to get so out of hand where such PMs (first Davids now Rifles) are sent with threats of violence to the recipients and their families.

Sorry to sound a bit heavy handed, but one hears about lots of strange things happening via the internet. Put it this way, if someone threatened you family in public what would you do ? And before anyone states that a PM is a private message and is not public, well to me it's a method of communication, just as a telephone is. Get them reported guys and get rid of the trash.
 
My problem with "Straight Boys Jerk Off", is that they often have films like this, where neither guy is at all straight, and the only jerking off is at the very end, where they get themselves off with their hands, after the fucking.

Don't get me wrong. I agree that they are both very good looking young men, with fine faces, bodies and cocks, but why is this film on this particular site? But I do not specifically pay for this site, as it is a free bonus site, but I do wonder.

I would have to assume that the majority of members of Broke Straight Boys, (not the majority of posters on the forum, but the majority of members), pay for this site because of our interest in seeing good looking young guys who identify themselves as being straight, performing gay sex acts on camera.

So this film was an excellent example of good looking guys having hot sex, but for guys like me looking to see straight guys having gay sex, I found it rather ho-hum. Next please.


If we were to go down the line of complaining that the films content doesn't match the site name, then the same can be said for Broke Straight Boys So what are we gonna do, remove all the bisexual and gay guys from these sites then ?

No thank you, a bit of mix and match is what makes these sites and why I continue to subscribe. Agree that the quality of Straight Boys Jerk Off has a lot to be desired, especially the outdoor scenes. However, it is a free bonus site which one does not have to watch, but I would not subscribe to it if it was not free.
 
It's not on the main site! I have joined other sites for a few months just to get a Maverick video. I'm even realizing that right behind Cole, Maverick is my second favorite performer on this site. Brady's okay but I'd probably endure Maverick with a :scared: woman!

I agree. Maverick has been in my top ten for a long time. Along with Tanner, and Rider... I just wish we knew if Maverick evolved into liking guys from his start here.:001_unsure:
 
Jayman!
Did you evolve into liking guys from your start in gay sex or were you just gay and didn't know it? Careful, there are a million fundamentalists out there just waiting to hear your answer.
 
Mikey I know that is your thing and i also know that you are very militant about it The reason I joined the site was that Dave's taste in models and mine seem to coincide If the guys are hot and the sex is hot I really don't care what they do in their own lives As far as i am concerned they could be shepards with an intimate connection to their flock Love you take care New site Broke Shepard Boys Interesting don't you think? Are they really shepards ? LOL

I can see the Broke Shepherd Boy Forum now: "He says he's into the ewes, but I saw him really checking out the scrotum on the Rams!" New reason for the group name "Beastie Boys." :001_rolleyes: :wink:
 
Sir, here at the Broke Shepherd Boy Forum we do not serve Rocky Mountain Oysters.
 
Once in a while I love to put something on paper designed to put us all into high gear and onto a topic we need to discuss. It seems lately it's redundancy. I think you called my attention to it with an excellent posting a few weeks ago on the 'sameness' of our blatherings of late and how we used to really discuss truly interesting topics. At any rate, when I read your note, I thought "Oh, yes," and a parody came to mind. Nothing personal, it could just as easily have been Baal talking about one of his dislikes or Kodieboy fishslapping someone. It just seems like we're always saying the same things over and over again.


Hey Rifle,

I do get your point here and you are correct to a certain point. I think the issue of the redundancy of the posts has to do with the fact that we are always discussing sex and the scenes at hand. It is a mixed blessing from the standpoint of a vibrant forum to get multiple updates on the porn every week. Some of the best days of the forum in the past were when we got only one update per week on the porn. I'm not suggesting that we want to go back to fewer updates. We all know we like it that way... But when we only had the one update and plenty of time to kill in between we filled the non site related section of the forum with thought provoking topics that had little or nothing to do with sex or porn. That's the way to get people thinking and sharing ideas.

Since all we seem to be talking about nowadays is the porn, our individual opinions get more and more predictable. The way to get some of the best conversation going as possible is for more people to post on the other section. Whether it's other interests that they have, problems they are dealing with in their personal lives... funny, amusing or thought provoking memories from their life experience. Doesn't matter. Just something that doesn't directly relate to discussing porn.

Trust me guys. There are some very bright in here with very diverse life experiences and perspectives who have plenty to share that would enrich all of us. If only they would share it with us. It could be something personal...or not. Or something serious or funny. It doesn't matter. Just something different from porn.
 
Sorry didn't mean to alarm any bug/spider lovers! Was just making a little joke. Didnt mean to upset any card carrying members of the PBOE (Protect Bogs On Earth). Just trying to lend a little humor.
 
Top