wm-design | Support | Logout
  • CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Tanner Valentino and Ronan Kennedy...

johnny said:
I LOVE TANNER..BUT I MAY MISS WHAT THERE GIVING US FOR CHRISTMAS.SORRY If You Guy's Think I am A RUDE ASSHOLE. BUT THAT IS NOT A CHRISTMAS GIFT FOR ME.....
Click to expand...

Not a Christmas gift for me either. Maybe the Ronan Kennedy/Tanner scene should have been saved for Christmas. You're not rude, Johnny, you're posting truth.
 
I just NOW watched the scene - Friday just came and went and I had not looked ahead to see who was doing a scene for about the last two weeks. Just view em as time permits. I noticed the Kaden Alexander/Rowan scene first so watched that and got a bit confused by some of the comments made but now, after viewing this scene and scanning through the comments, I realize why folks were upset about the high score on the aforementioned vid in comparison to this. Others have made comments similar to what I wrote as a comment under the scene (which I rarely do but found that scene hot but rated low).

I will just cut and paste what I wrote under the scene. The condom issue has certainly been discussed here already and I just comment to let you know I gave it five stars all around...

My comment:

"Only a 4.05 for these two guys? I am thinking that the two who are truly hot individually but "burning hot" when paired got "down-graded" on the ratings because folks have gotten used to bareback and are turned off by condom sex. Too bad. They were great together. I boldly give 5 stars all the way 'round!!"
 
I ate a Magic Brownie so this is just a paranoid theory. Some little jealous divabitch is jealous of Ronan Kennedy/Tanner popularity and high rating is working overtime voting low for their scene and bringing down the average.
 
elyot1 said:
I ate a Magic Brownie so this is just a paranoid theory. Some little jealous divabitch is jealous of Ronan Kennedy/Tanner popularity and high rating is working overtime voting low for their scene and bringing down the average.
Click to expand...

Or maybe they didn't like the scene and are voting accordingly??
 
ertas23 said:
My comment:

"Only a 4.05 for these two guys? I am thinking that the two who are truly hot individually but "burning hot" when paired got "down-graded" on the ratings because folks have gotten used to bareback and are turned off by condom sex. Too bad. They were great together. I boldly give 5 stars all the way 'round!!"
Click to expand...
That was my thought too Ertas that it was a protest vote due to the condoms! I agree with you that it was two beautiful guys with rock hard dicks with great cum shots. Great scene! I'd love to see them paired together again, with the proper time for the testing and they could set records here!!! :thumbup:
 
elyot1 said:
I ate a Magic Brownie so this is just a paranoid theory. Some little jealous divabitch is jealous of Ronan Kennedy/Tanner popularity and high rating is working overtime voting low for their scene and bringing down the average.
Click to expand...
Yeah..It just don't seem fittin...Something has to be off. I Mean..They are the two BEST BOY'S on this site. No others even come close.
 
peterh6308 said:
Or maybe they didn't like the scene and are voting accordingly??
Click to expand...

I am suspecting Peter is right. The low rating seems to be holding so I'm accepting it as fact, but searching for an explanation.

There are some rules in great Theatre, dating back to Shakespeare and before. He would tell us that great theatre has a foundation in natural forces, which we would term TRUTHS. Really good pornography has a foundation in these natural laws which are vaguely described in really good theatre. It follows rules.

An element of theater is Drama, and Drama draws from conflict. SEX brings HOT drama to pornography when it demonstrates domination and submission. When sex doesn't follow this rule, then a sub-group of people miss the drama and don't like it and downgrade it. This is my explanation, for instance, as to why some people like big dick. The big dick dominates the little hole, and the little hole submits. A truth. A drama. And high ratings follow. There are many examples of this back in the old BSB1. David was great at producing drama from very ordinary situations, and I could point out MANY examples that others conclude without recognizing the reason for their choices.

I know tastes vary. But in a flip flop scene, an assortment (not that large) will look at the scene as untruthful for a few reasons, which come out in the comments about it. Mainly the low rating is due to the fact that the domination abd submition in the scene is inconclusive and the drama is unsatisfied. Then, the scene was unresolved and untruthful and unsatisfactory and disappointing to a certain group who would otherwise have loved either party. Any sex act between these two would get high rating if it followed the simple rule that someone has to dominate and someone has to submit. This is a truth in pornography. I think.

This may not explain the low rating, but it has to be some version of it, since it is VERY difficult to find anyone who puts either of the models down.

Sex is complicated. But I am a simple man. I totally accept the unresolved drama in pornography if both models in the scene cum a lot, which they sure did in this scene.

Then I move on to the next scene which, in my opinion, follows concepts in theater and good pornography. LOLOLOL
 
Last edited:
Very hot scene! 4 rating?

mikeyank said:
That was my thought too Ertas that it was a protest vote due to the condoms! I agree with you that it was two beautiful guys with rock hard dicks with great cum shots. Great scene! I'd love to see them paired together again, with the proper time for the testing and they could set records here!!! :thumbup:
Click to expand...

Loved the scene. I think it is one of Ronan Kennedy's best in that he was fully invested in the scene, and truly seemed to enjoy Tanner's molestation of his fine ass. Tanner is a master of sex. Top or bottom does not matter, the boy knows how to please his partner. The kissing was not the contrived pecks or lips smacking seen in many other scenes. There really seemed to be something real behind them.

I've not really thought too much of Ronan Kennedy being a boy who could enjoy a bottom scene. I always thought it was a waste of his talent, but when he jumped on top of Tanner, I gained a new appreciation of Ronan Kennedy as a bottom and overall performer. I did not think I could drool anymore over that absolute studliest of studs.

How this scene could only be a 4 is beyond me. WTF? I demand a recount, and full investigation of the integrity of the voting structure. Clearly there is a glitch of major proportion here. Did the site get invaded by Vlad and his little merry men of hackery? Or did the link redirect people to a scene of Trump twittering his tweeties, or is that tweeting his twitters? :fuckedup:
 
stowe1 said:
I don't like flip-flops generally because there is never enough time for either of the models to show us his full playbook and potential. And in this scene, Ronan Kennedy had two minutes less fuck time than Tanner. In addition, the scene seemed to me to be too frenetic which takes away from the limited time each guy does have in a flip-flop. Then there is the fact that I don't like condom scenes. Having said that I do appreciate that Sha did explain why it was a condom scene. Although I'm mystified in this sense: On several past occasions mgmnt and Sha in particular has stated that they don't bring models out to do a one scene shoot given the expense involved, but usually at least 3 scenes. If that is the case, then there should have been enough time to test. But perhaps, they did break protocol and bring these guys in for this one "battle of the massive dicks" scenes. This inquiring mind would like to know the answer to that question.

Now as to the scene itself, it was good but not great especially given the potential it had with whom many view as the site's top two models in it. They both did well in orals, but as mentioned earlier the fucking was too frenetic for my taste. And for these two, there should be two separate scenes so we can get the benefit of each guy's topping skills on the other. In the dick department, both seem pretty close in length but Ronan Kennedy definitely has the edge in girth. All in all I still gave 4's all around, very good but not exceptional. (And given the circumstances I did not deduct my usual point for condom scenes. Had I done so it would have been 3's.)
Click to expand...
peterh6308 said:
Or maybe they didn't like the scene and are voting accordingly??
Click to expand...
StudddAndy said:
I am suspecting Peter is right. The low rating seems to be holding so I'm accepting it as fact, but searching for an explanation.

There are some rules in great Theatre, dating back to Shakespeare and before. He would tell us that great theatre has a foundation in natural forces, which we would term TRUTHS. Really good pornography has a foundation in these natural laws which are vaguely described in really good theatre. It follows rules.

An element of theater is Drama, and Drama draws from conflict. SEX brings HOT drama to pornography when it demonstrates domination and submission. When sex doesn't follow this rule, then a sub-group of people miss the drama and don't like it and downgrade it. This is my explanation, for instance, as to why some people like big dick. The big dick dominates the little hole, and the little hole submits. A truth. A drama. And high ratings follow. There are many examples of this back in the old BSB1. David was great at producing drama from very ordinary situations, and I could point out MANY examples that others conclude without recognizing the reason for their choices.

I know tastes vary. But in a flip flop scene, an assortment (not that large) will look at the scene as untruthful for a few reasons, which come out in the comments about it. Mainly the low rating is due to the fact that the domination abd submition in the scene is inconclusive and the drama is unsatisfied. Then, the scene was unresolved and untruthful and unsatisfactory and disappointing to a certain group who would otherwise have loved either party. Any sex act between these two would get high rating if it followed the simple rule that someone has to dominate and someone has to submit. This is a truth in pornography. I think.

This may not explain the low rating, but it has to be some version of it, since it is VERY difficult to find anyone who puts either of the models down.

Sex is complicated. But I am a simple man. I totally accept the unresolved drama in pornography if both models in the scene cum a lot, which they sure did in this scene.

Then I move on to the next scene which, in my opinion, follows concepts in theater and good pornography. LOLOLOL
Click to expand...
I wasn't going to comment on scenes anymore, but these three posts seem to sum up my opinion of this scene. I love both of these models and both are at the very TOP of my favorites. I rated the scene all fives because of that reason.
 
Here's a pic for Little Johnny in San Francisco!!!!! :xmaschristmas:


getPart
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Jaybifla
“Best of Broke Straight Boys”. Who next?
Replies
7
Views
627
mikeyank
mikeyank
officialbdillin
Does Ronan Kennedy Have An Official Twitter?
Replies
0
Views
418
officialbdillin
officialbdillin
mikeyank
Straight Boy Takes One For The Team - Nico Fucks William - scene thread
Replies
16
Views
1K
mikeyank
mikeyank
mikeyank
    • Love
Best Of Adam Baer Videos Part 2 - Scene thread
Replies
5
Views
660
mikeyank
mikeyank
mikeyank
    • Love
    • Like
The Best of Gay Porn Star Ronan Kennedy - Scene Thread
Replies
11
Views
801
Jaybifla
Jaybifla
Top