• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Poll: Male/Female vids

Male/Female Vids: Good Idea or Not

  • Yes/

    Votes: 11 17.7%
  • No

    Votes: 44 71.0%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 7 11.3%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .
I mean, if straight guys are open minded enough to have sex with a guy why not have male/girl scenes. You just might have to add another dude to that scene to spice it up probably.
 
I mean, if straight guys are open minded enough to have sex with a guy why not have male/girl scenes. You just might have to add another dude to that scene to spice it up probably.
Big difference here, Graham. Our models might be open minded enough to have sex with a guy (for pay). We don't get paid here to watch male/girl scenes. In fact we pay to watch straight guys have gay sex for pay. :w00t:
 
Big difference here, Graham. Our models might be open minded enough to have sex with a guy (for pay). We don't get paid here to watch male/girl scenes. In fact we pay to watch straight guys have gay sex for pay. :w00t:
Why not have both and expand the website to different options tho. Like, have another section for some people that like girl/male scenes.
 
Why not have both and expand the website to different options tho. Like, have another section for some people that like girl/male scenes.

if it's in a separate section that people pay a different fee to see, that's fine. But I don't want my dues used to make hetero scenes that I will have no interest in.
 
I've subscribed to Corbin Fisher for years and it has been honored as the number 1 site of its kind. Here's the deal: you can subscribe to the m/m site only. The straight/bi side is a separate subscription, and I say bi because many of the guys most often do each other as well as a woman in a particular scene. I also subscribe to Sean Cody and it is strictly m/m. Incidentally both have gone bareback in the past 12 months. If Broke Straight Boys wants to open a completely separate site it may make sense for economic reasons, but I would hate to see an overlap into what up to now has been Broke Straight Boys

****************************************************************************

Hey, guys,

There have been a couple of threads on this, but perhaps this is the place to reply??? (And I'd like to reply for dear James, and for all my lovely women friends who enjoy seeing great models in straight/bi scenes, but with an emphasis on the male models - something you cannot get in straight erotica - where the male models are usually ugly as sin, to make the old men who are watching it feel better about themselves - LOL!)

As far as a recommendation or prescription for Broke Straight Boys, I think rrhill and AtlantaGuy (and I believe Tampa said something similar in a previous thread) are right on the money. I have no doubt that, with all the great models Broke Straight Boys has in its stable of regulars, it could sponsor a very successful straight/bi associated site, and maybe should look into that! I also have no personal objections to an occasional straight/bi "teaser" appearing right HERE, but, as a practical matter, I feel pretty certain that most of the people who subscribe here subscribe for the guy-guy sex, and it is true, some gay guys are turned off by the sight of straight sex ~ and certainly don't want to pay for it! So, I think a separate, but cross-advertised and promoted site, is likely the way to go, as far as this question is concerned.

That being said, I would just like to put on the record (to quote the very wise, and funny, BETH!): I personally, am not one of those gay guys who has an allergy to the vagina: or any other part of the female form, for that matter - LOL! In fact, having grown up steeped in classical art (there was nothing else to DO, growing up in the arctic, but pore over those old art texts my parents bought me): I think the female form is miraculously beautiful, just as the male form is. So - seeing a naked girl - even one who is getting great physical pleasure - hardly sends me running for the hills ;-)))

I honestly don't think anyone can question my homosexual bona fides, either. I have never held a girl's hand; or KISSED a girl; much less DATED a girl. In my personal, emotional, and sexual response, I am 100 per cent GAY. Gay as Christmas. Queer as a $3.00 bill. When I was young and thinner and much less bald, the cutest cheerleader in school once was so importunate as to plop down on my lap, snuggle in, and KISS ME, sighing, "Oh A. - couldn't WE just get away sometime, and spend a nice weekend, together?" I felt NOTHING. And, since that time, I have been honoured by about six women who proposed marriage to me - but, obviously, there was nothing I could constructively do about that, either. BUT. . . that didn't keep me from appreciating that all these women were beautiful ~ really, works of art, in their own right.

For me, the full human emotional and sexual response is triggered always and only by a MAN. There is something about the way a man's face is sculpted; the strength of his broad shoulders, and the leanness of his hips; the length and strength and curvature of his legs and the power of his chest; and the resonance of his voice: whether it is a lyrical tenor, or a powerful baritone; that makes me think ~ "Could I please be with YOU???" ;-)))

All that being said, I have had a number of crushes who were TRULY "straight boys", and whom I loved notwithstanding the fact that I knew I could never, ever, be with them. . . and I was always fascinated (as disinterestedly, as one with a prior erotic interest could BE) in all the JOYS and PLEASURES that animated THEM, in their erotic lives. . . just as they animated my dreams.

In this regard, I have always appreciated what my favourite model, JASON, has from time to time suggested on these boards, about the realiity of "pansexuality" ~ the notion that sometimes, it is less the person's physical form or gender or orientation, that excites one most, but rather, some intangible something, that flickers so enticingly, in his (or her) EYES. . . .

I am not a pansexual. I am not even a BISEXUAL. But, I think I have some inkling, as to what JASON was getting at.

But this question is not even that complex. Perhaps I am just a pervert (!!!); certainly I am a voyeur; but when it comes to seeing a heterosexual or bisexual or pansexual man whom I think is truly, ineffably, gorgeous, have sex with a woman to whom he is truly, and thrillingly, attracted ~ I find it a tremendous revelation, and amazingly erotic, as well!!!! IF ONLY BECAUSE, while many people find it amazing to see a beautiful straight guy have sex with another GUY (whom he doesn't really want): I think it is almost OVERWHELMING to see a beautiful straight guy have sex with a woman, whom he really DOES want!!! It is the PASSION, and the DESIRE, which so appeals. . .

Some of my gay friends (purer of heart, aesthetic, and ideology, than I) sometimes ask me: "A", how could you POSSIBLY watch that stuff??? I answer simply (and truthfully): I just close one eye. ;-))) But truthfully, the beautiful man's joy, and passion, make it all worthwhile, as far as I am concerned, in the watching ;-)))

A very practical problem is this. I have had precisely two personal friends in this industry, who were models (both now retired): one who was gay (and Canadian); and one who was straight (and from "somewhere in Europe"). The straight guy told me that his girlfriend was totally OK with his consorting with MEN on video (as long as the "shoots" were safe, and protected) - as long as he NEVER did such things with WOMEN. (She would have seen that as threatening, and an infringement upon their personal relationship.) Such scruples could, I suppose, impede the development of a "Broke Straight Boys Couples" site. (Though, I think there might be guys who were single enough, and broke enough, to give that a whirl, as well.)

So, for the sake of all those out there - the girls, the bisexual guys, and the guys like me, who are simply inveterate voyeurs - I hope that Broke Straight Boys will consider founding a separate site, dedicated to straight and bisexual experience, which those models who wish to, could participate in. (Joyously, and randily!) I think it could be quite successful ~ without impinging at all (even IF cross-advertised, or if the occasional bonus or preview video were shared) upon the enjoyment of those who love Broke Straight Boys as an all-male site, and who pay for that particular configuration of pleasure.

That's my best answer, on this topic!

Your old libertine,
"A" ;-))))) XOXOXOXOXOXO
 
Why not have both and expand the website to different options tho. Like, have another section for some people that like girl/male scenes.

***************************************************

Hey, Graham. Totally agreed, but - I think the key is just as Tampa said (and he is a very nice and wise human being): if there is a "straight/bi option", it ought to be packaged in a separate subscription, so that those who are not desiring this, are not paying for it. This would be both fair, and ought to cause no one any anxiety - and has been accomplished successfully, elsewhere. Of course, it would require a revision and expansion of Broke Straight Boys's business model, so people at the head office would have to do their due diligence in terms of market research, and decide if it were worth their while.

All the best,
"A" XOXOXOXOXOXO

P.S. Thank you for the suggestion, Graham. You offered it politely, and kindly, and I appreciate VERY much those who received it in the same manner. My personal belief is that suggestions and ideas hurt nobody, and OUGHT to be received kindly and graciously, as well ;-) The members will say what they think; the management will ruminate; and all will be well, at the close of the day ;-))) There is really nothing to fuss about ;-)))
 
***************************************************

Hey, Graham. Totally agreed, but - I think the key is just as Tampa said (and he is a very nice and wise human being): if there is a "straight/bi option", it ought to be packaged in a separate subscription, so that those who are not desiring this, are not paying for it. This would be both fair, and ought to cause no one any anxiety - and has been accomplished successfully, elsewhere. Of course, it would require a revision and expansion of Broke Straight Boys's business model, so people at the head office would have to do their due diligence in terms of market research, and decide if it were worth their while.

All the best,
"A" XOXOXOXOXOXO

P.S. Thank you for the suggestion, Graham. You offered it politely, and kindly, and I appreciate VERY much those who received it in the same manner. My personal belief is that suggestions and ideas hurt nobody, and OUGHT to be received kindly and graciously, as well ;-) The members will say what they think; the management will ruminate; and all will be well, at the close of the day ;-))) There is really nothing to fuss about ;-)))

Suggestions are ok but if Graham's is implemented then there will be a mass exodus. Now that would be funny - a model suggesting something that is taken on board, then the site goes belly up. Don't think so Graham. As I said previously - put the hetero porn in some obscure corner of the site like HSBoys.
 
Thank you Ambi for a very thorough and even-handed response to this matter. :) These are just my own musings here over the possibility of Broke Straight Boys ever having a separate hetero section. I think the only way it's feasible is if it's a hetero and a bi selection of scenes. If it doesn't include bi MMF scenes it won't work. Preferably it would include mostly the male models who perform the gay for pay sex on this site. It would also have to be set up so that all the models are paid much less for doing straight/bi scenes as compared to the gay for pay. Otherwise you'd have a stampede of some of the best male applicants insisting on only doing scenes on the hetero side.

They need to be aware of the commercial reality that straight porn pays peanuts for men in the industry. Bi scenes with 2 dudes fooling around in them would pay a little more. But far and away the wages should be set up so that Broke Straight Boys pays the most attractive salaries to the guys willing to do gay for pay. (If this should ever come to pass of course)
 
Hell noooooooooooo Tell Cliff he can go work on Fisherman's Warf lol
 
While I voted no, I will make an exception if the following conditions are met:

1. It has to involve Jimmy getting pegged by a hot German blonde in a nurse's outfit.

2. The strap-on has be a minimum of 12" long and 8" around.

3. The initial penetration has to be with Jimmy doggy-style with the same speed as Duncan did with Anthony.

4. None of that fancy-schmancy prep like enemas, lube, dilators, or toys. Have the blonde nurse use spit.

5. For good measure, have Duncan appear half-way through the anal scene and gag Jimmy with his huge dong until he nuts down Jimmy's throat.

This may sound harsh, but I want a realistic depiction of Jimmy getting his cherry popped. :001_tongue:
 
While I voted no, I will make an exception if the following conditions are met:

1. It has to involve Jimmy getting pegged by a hot German blonde in a nurse's outfit.

2. The strap-on has be a minimum of 12" long and 8" around.

3. The initial penetration has to be with Jimmy doggy-style with the same speed as Duncan did with Anthony.

4. None of that fancy-schmancy prep like enemas, lube, dilators, or toys. Have the blonde nurse use spit.

5. For good measure, have Duncan appear half-way through the anal scene and gag Jimmy with his huge dong until he nuts down Jimmy's throat.

This may sound harsh, but I want a realistic depiction of Jimmy getting his cherry popped. :001_tongue:

ROTFLMAO Dracythis. You gave me a fit of the giggles. haha

Remind me never to piss you off. LOL

Thanks for a great laugh D. :biggrin: We can at least dream, can't we?
 
While I voted no, I will make an exception if the following conditions are met:

1. It has to involve Jimmy getting pegged by a hot German blonde in a nurse's outfit.

2. The strap-on has be a minimum of 12" long and 8" around.

3. The initial penetration has to be with Jimmy doggy-style with the same speed as Duncan did with Anthony.

4. None of that fancy-schmancy prep like enemas, lube, dilators, or toys. Have the blonde nurse use spit.

5. For good measure, have Duncan appear half-way through the anal scene and gag Jimmy with his huge dong until he nuts down Jimmy's throat.

This may sound harsh, but I want a realistic depiction of Jimmy getting his cherry popped. :001_tongue:

Stay close to your computer, Clay may have some questions about lighting.....:001_tongue:
 
While I voted no, I will make an exception if the following conditions are met:

1. It has to involve Jimmy getting pegged by a hot German blonde in a nurse's outfit.

2. The strap-on has be a minimum of 12" long and 8" around.

3. The initial penetration has to be with Jimmy doggy-style with the same speed as Duncan did with Anthony.

4. None of that fancy-schmancy prep like enemas, lube, dilators, or toys. Have the blonde nurse use spit.

5. For good measure, have Duncan appear half-way through the anal scene and gag Jimmy with his huge dong until he nuts down Jimmy's throat.

This may sound harsh, but I want a realistic depiction of Jimmy getting his cherry popped. :001_tongue:
Jimmy did tell us on this forum many times, if he is going to be fucked he wanted to be paid a million dollars, or it would have to be by a woman with a strap on.

I continue to be amused by the strong overreaction that handsome young Jimmy gets out of some of the more sensitive gay members here. However based on the clips provided here, I am pleased to see that he is in better shape than ever, and apparently making more money than ever continuing to film gay for pay porn, as he now has a large audience outside of the Broke Straight Boys world.

More power to you, my handsome young prince Jimmy Johnson. :thumbup:
 
ROTFLMAO Dracythis. You gave me a fit of the giggles. haha

Remind me never to piss you off. LOL

Thanks for a great laugh D. :biggrin: We can at least dream, can't we?

Piss me off? I didn't mention a 40 grit sandpaper condom..... LOL
 
Top