• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Poll: Male/Female vids

Male/Female Vids: Good Idea or Not

  • Yes/

    Votes: 11 17.7%
  • No

    Votes: 44 71.0%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 7 11.3%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .
I can't vote because the question is too general.

I would not mind having a separate section of the site featuring male/female vids made by our current models and not some reject. These vids would NOT replace our 3 regular Broke Straight Boys updates. Perhaps it could be a section of the BTS section of the forum or if it became large enough could be an add-on fee based section of the site. In this way, the members who don't like male/female vids are not losing anything and those who want them could access them either via BTS or paying an add-on fee to access that section of the site.


-
 
I can't vote because the question is too general.

I would not mind having a separate section of the site featuring male/female vids made by our current models and not some reject. These vids would NOT replace our 3 regular Broke Straight Boys updates. Perhaps it could be a section of the BTS section of the forum or if it became large enough could be an add-on fee based section of the site. In this way, the members who don't like male/female vids are not losing anything and those who want them could access them either via BTS or paying an add-on fee to access that section of the site.


-

No way dear friend. I don't want any part of this site to have films with women in them. I believe Sex Spies had or has women in them so put the vids on that site. Leave Broke Straight Boys male on male PLEASE.
 
I agree with Stowe1.

The occasional male/female porn would be great (with reservations of course)

1) Does not replace our regular updates
2) Includes our straight boy models.
3) Does not have the regular porn bimbos - I absolutely loathe panting, moaning skanks (at least use girls with a bit of class).

The reason it would be better to have on here than one of the bonus sites is for poor shmucks like me - the bonus sites also bugger up and I can not download or stream any vids.

Regards Luke
 
I agree with Stowe1.

The occasional male/female porn would be great (with reservations of course)

1) Does not replace our regular updates
2) Includes our straight boy models.
3) Does not have the regular porn bimbos - I absolutely loathe panting, moaning skanks (at least use girls with a bit of class).

The reason it would be better to have on here than one of the bonus sites is for poor shmucks like me - the bonus sites also bugger up and I can not download or stream any vids.

Regards Luke

I actually agree on all aspects of your post.
 
Girls Gone Wild

There is already a "gay sex" site which has a straight sex component and that is Corbin Fisher.

Corbin Fisher has a only gay sex side and also one where their models engage in straight sex. There have been a number of Corbin Fisher models who have only done solos and straight sex.

Unlike here, Corbin Fisher does not have a Forum where you can see paying subscriber reactions; but, Corbin Fisher is considered one of the more financially successful gay sites.

I also had a conversation with Brad Posey of Club 1821 (the guy who did the famous Simon Rex shoots just before he became an MTV DJ) who told he that he always had wanted to do a series where his models were photographed and videotaped having straight sex. He claimed that Corbin Fisher almost hired him to do this for them; but, as it turned out, they thought they could do it better in house.

Obviously, all this straight sex was going to be filmed from the point of view of a gay audience and focus more on the guys than the girls.

I think rrhill is definitely on to something.
 
Last edited:
Show me the Straight side too

There is already a "gay sex" site which has a straight sex component and that is Corbin Fisher.

Corbin Fisher has a only gay sex side and also one where their models engage in straight sex. There have been a number of Corbin Fisher models who have only done solos and straight sex.

Unlike here, Corbin Fisher does not have a Forum where you can see paying subscriber reactions; but, Corbin Fisher is considered one of the more financially successful gay sites.

I also had a conversation with Brad Posey of Club 1821 (the guy who did the famous Simon Rex shoots just before he became an MTV DJ) who told he that he always had wanted to do a series where his models were photographed and videotaped having straight sex. He claimed that Corbin Fisher almost hired him to do this for them; but, as it turned out, they thought they could do it better in house.

Obviously, all this straight sex was going to be filmed from the point of view of a gay audience and focus more on the guys than the girls.

I think rrhill is definitely on to something.

The average straight porn scenes focusses on the girls only. If Bluemedia created a site were I could watch some of my favourite Broke Straight Boys have sex with a girl - or two guys one girl...

Imagine a model as Jimmy... He would haven been in heaven!

That way I get to know another side of these boys, their straight side... their hidden side...

All that filmed by a craftsman like Clay who focusses on the guy, the look on his face, the horny glow in his eyes. Porn for gay man, with a girl present, but with a handsome guy in the lead role.

Kinky... yes... I would subscribe today...

resize.php
 
Last edited:
I still say that I think a LARGE majority of subscribers to Broke Straight Boys don't read forums and even more don't post on them. To make changes based on what we write here would be a problem.
As for me Im 100% against it but if it were balanced I'd just view what I'd find appropriate for me.
I've been around long enogh to remember the days when there was only straight porn available easily ad I could block out the women in my mind and just focus on men. I don't think the porn idustry will go back to that in my lifetime.
 
Last edited:
I still say that I think a LARGE majority of subscribers to Broke Straight Boys don't read forums and even more don't post on them. To make changes based on what we write here would be a problem.
As for me Im 100% against it but if it were balanced I'd just view what I'd find appropriate for me.
I've been around long enogh to remember the days when there was only straight porn available easily ad I could block out the women in my mind and just focus on men. I don't think the porn idustry will go back to that in my lifetime.

Broke Straight Boys should stay exactly as it is now, without girls.

The girls themed site has to be a separate site of course... What would be a good name for that new porn site?
And the customer base could be there once Broke Straight Boys TV gets aired in the US and Western-Europe. Youngsters are very liberal when it comes to sex. It would not surprise me if Broke Straight Boys.TV becomes an instant hit because it's never done before. The fan base these models get, would consist of many straight boys and girls too...
 
For me it would "prove" to me that the "Broke Straight Boys" are actually straight to see them with a female. It's not that I question some of the guys sexuality, but this would prove it without a doubt to me. I wouldn't want it to become one of the main updates, but I enjoy seeing a hot straight boy fucking a sexy cute female BUT not some porn bimbo as someone already stated. The fake moaning drives me crazy and is annoying as hell. Just my opinion and thanks for the chance to comment on it.
 
Since the fantasy (for me, at least) is straight boys getting pulled into gay sex so that eventually they come (cum) to enjoy it, then having "our boys" confirming their straightness would be no fun.
 
I've subscribed to Corbin Fisher for years and it has been honored as the number 1 site of its kind. Here's the deal: you can subscribe to the m/m site only. The straight/bi side is a separate subscription, and I say bi because many of the guys most often do each other as well as a woman in a particular scene. I also subscribe to Sean Cody and it is strictly m/m. Incidentally both have gone bareback in the past 12 months. If Broke Straight Boys wants to open a completely separate site it may make sense for economic reasons, but I would hate to see an overlap into what up to now has been Broke Straight Boys
 
Top