USARick2
Active Member
If it would be something different that Jimmy was doing, like sucking or being a bottom, that would be one thing. But he never does anymore then he did in the previous scene, so its like watching the same thing each time.
Seriously, "art form???". A guy jerking off in a solo is art??? There may be some porn that is vaguely "artistic", but most porn is made to help men (and far fewer women) fantasize and cum. Internet wanking 101. I think if you asked any of the guys on this site if they considered themselves "artists", they'd laugh you out of the room. Porn actors, "models", perform sex acts, some better and hotter than others. True actors, sculptors, painters, authors, etc. create art.
I'll probably get jumped all over for writing the above, but I just watched Rocco and Anthony. DEFINITELY not art.
Sorry, my post wasn't meant to laugh at or deride you. I should have read yours more closely to see that you weren't referring to the models.
Art is a very subjective subject. As far as gay erotic art, for me it brings to mind Herb Ritts, Mapplethorpe, and Tom of Finland. I honestly can't say that I think of the current plethora of porn as art. There are some very slick sites out there like Falcon and Lucas that produce very professional porn, and that may qualify as art in some minds, but I think they produce a product to be consumed for profit as opposed to a work to be appreciated. True art is often also consumed for profit, and some artists make art for that purpose alone, but in general most artists produce art because they have to. They have a deep seated need to express themselves and create art whether it ever sells or not. This was very true for some of the great masters in history who never saw a dime for their creations.
I see porn as a commercial enterprise. It's overwhelmingly about money. There may be some producers and directors who aspire to being artistic and indeed may capture that goal. But I believe the vast majority of porn has far less lofty aspirations.
abe, did you lease out you screen name and avatar?
the solos are how fngs are introduced.
off the top of my head, i can think of 8 solos that i can see in my mind's eye on command.
i wouldn't have wanted to miss any one of them.
here goes: bobby, jack, kevin, anthony, chad, kurt, seth and my favorite from his solo forward, colin.
solos have the function of letting me see guys i may never want to see again, but they also introduce me to guys i hope to see many more times.
i count solos, not to counting them devalues the art form and inflates the results.
i have come to this opinion and firmly believe it is valid.
fairness, in my opinion, never involves exclusion.
I would suppose in some part it is a question of availability. I agree that there is such a thing as over exposure. That said I enjoy watching Jimmy in action and look forward to seeing him in upcoming videos for as long as he is inclined to do them. He is one hot stud puppy
thanks juanjo im reliable and get the job done not every model is so its not easy to just rotate guys...its hard to get hard u know what i mean