• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

On prank call, Wis. governor discusses strategy

Jayman01

BSB Executive Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Posts
4,515
Reaction score
1
Location
USA
On prank call, Wis. governor discusses strategy


Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker talks to the media at the state Capitol in Madison, Wis., Wedn...
By RYAN J. FOLEY, AP
Wed Feb 23, 10:02 PM EST


On a prank call that quickly spread across the Internet, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker was duped into discussing his strategy to cripple public employee unions, promising never to give in and joking that he would use a baseball bat in his office to go after political opponents.

Walker believed the caller was a conservative billionaire named David Koch, but it was actually the editor of a liberal online newspaper. The two talked for at least 20 minutes — a conversation in which the governor described several potential ways to pressure Democrats to return to the Statehouse and revealed that his supporters had considered secretly planting people in pro-union protest crowds to stir up trouble.

The call, which surfaced Wednesday, also showed Walker's cozy relationship with two billionaire brothers who have poured millions of dollars into conservative political causes, including Walker's campaign last year.

Walker compared his stand to that taken by President Ronald Reagan when he fired the nation's air-traffic controllers during a labor dispute in 1981.

"That was the first crack in the Berlin Wall and led to the fall of the Soviets," Walker said on the recording.

The audio was posted by the Buffalo Beast, a left-leaning website based in Buffalo, N.Y., and quickly went viral.

Ian Murphy told The Associated Press he carried out the prank to show how candidly Walker would speak with Koch even though, according to Democrats, he refuses to return their calls.

Murphy said he arranged the call Tuesday after speaking with two Walker aides, including the governor's chief of staff. He placed the call using Skype and recorded it.

Walker spokesman Cullen Werwie confirmed that it was Walker's voice on the call. At a news conference, Walker acknowledged being deceived but stuck to his message that the union changes were needed to balance Wisconsin's budget.

"I'm not going to let one prank phone call be a distraction from the job we have to do," Walker said. "The things I said are the things I've said publicly all the time."

On the call, the governor said he was ratcheting up the pressure on Senate Democrats to return to the Capitol a week after they fled to block the legislation. He said he supported a move to require them to come to the Capitol to pick up their paychecks rather than have the money deposited directly.

He also floated an idea to lure Democratic senators back to the Capitol for negotiations and then have the Senate quickly pass the bill while they are in talks.

Walker said aides were reviewing whether the GOP could hold a vote if Democrats were not physically in the Senate chamber but elsewhere in the building. At the news conference, he insisted that idea was not a trick but an effort to get Democrats back to work.

Democrats seized on Walker's recorded comments as evidence that the governor plans to go beyond budget cuts to crushing unions.

"This isn't about balancing the budget. This is about a political war," Rep. Jon Richards of Milwaukee yelled Wednesday on the floor of the state Assembly.

The governor's plan would strip most public employees of their collective bargaining rights and force them to pay more for their health care and retirement benefits. Unions could not collect mandatory dues and would be forced to conduct annual votes of their members to stay in existence.

The proposal has set off more than a week of protests at the Capitol.

The GOP-controlled state Assembly began debating the bill Tuesday and was still hearing dozens of Democratic amendments nearly 24 hours later before taking a break. Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald said he expected to take a vote on the bill by the end of the day.

Anti-union proposals in other states have also drawn protests, and Republican state senators in Ohio on Wednesday agreed to a small concession in a bill similar to the one in Wisconsin. They said they would support allowing unionized state employees to collectively bargain for wages — but not for benefits, sick time, vacation or other conditions. Wisconsin's proposal also would allow state workers to collectively bargain only for wages.

On the call, Walker said he expected the anti-union movement to spread across the country and he had spoken with the governors of Ohio and Nevada. The man pretending to be Koch seemed to agree, telling Walker, "You're the first domino."

"Yep, this is our moment," Walker responded.

The remarks showed Walker's private relationship with David Koch. He and his brother, Charles, own Koch Industries Inc., which is the largest privately-owned company in America and has significant operations in Wisconsin.

Its political action committee gave $43,000 to Walker's campaign, and David Koch gave $1 million to the Republican Governors' Association, which funded ads attacking Walker's opponent in last year's election.

The Kochs also give millions to support Americans For Prosperity, a conservative business group that launched a $320,000 television ad campaign in favor of Walker's legislation Wednesday. When the caller asked how he could help, Walker suggested outside groups could try to influence people to call their lawmakers and spread the message that his proposal is necessary.

On the recording, after Walker said he would be willing to meet with Democratic leaders, the caller said he should bring a baseball bat to negotiations.

Walker laughed and responded that he had "a slugger with my name on it."

The caller suggested he was thinking about "planting some troublemakers" among the protesters, and Walker said his administration had thought about doing that, too, but decided against it. Walker said the protests eventually would die because the media would stop covering them.

Walker told reporters the plan to bring in outside agitators was one of many ideas his supporters and aides have raised that were dismissed.

At the end of the call, the prankster says: "I'll tell you what, Scott, once you crush these bastards, I'll fly you out to Cali and really show you a good time."

"All right, that would be outstanding," Walker replies, adding that the standoff is "all about getting our freedoms back."

The caller responds: "Absolutely. And you know, we have a little bit of vested interest as well" and laughs.

Walker's budget bill also allows his administration to sell power plants that heat and cool state buildings to private companies without any bids.

Critics have seized on that provision, saying they are convinced the Koch brothers' business interests would be able to buy power plants on the cheap, and then profit by running them and driving up the price of energy.

Koch Industries has denied any interest in buying the plants. Republicans tried to privatize Wisconsin's power plants in 2005, but the plan was vetoed by Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle.

Immediately after taking office, Walker also pushed for legislation that would limit damage awards in lawsuits against many businesses.

Koch Industries lobbied for the bill, and Walker signed it into law last month. Walker is also seeking passage for another Koch Industries-backed bill to weaken state regulations by giving him the power to approve all rules proposed by agencies, a proposal that is moving quickly through the Legislature.

Koch Industries recently opened a lobbying office a block from the Capitol. Seven lobbyists have registered in Wisconsin to lobby for various Koch Industries companies.

Even before recordings of the call surfaced, the government watchdog group Common Cause in Wisconsin released a statement saying Walker's agenda matched with that of Koch Industries.

"Koch Industries and other corporate citizens have legitimate interests in Wisconsin, but their demonstrated willingness to push large amounts of money into state politics has given them a dangerously outsized voice," said Bob Edgar, the group's national president. That voice, he said, is "now demanding a return on its investments."

___

Associated Press Writer Scott Bauer contributed to this report.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Sorry, folks this news has been full of all kinds of good news lately. I was rolling on the floor laughing about this. In this day and age if you are not talking face to face you better becareful just who you are talking too. LOL:thumbup:
 
Jay(you da)man, thank you so much for that!

During the last few days, even before this Dildo (fake koch) conversation hit the world wide web, Walker has had a cornered, rabbit in the headlights look on his face during statements to the media. Some of his ilk seemed to recognize after the elections that their winning the House didn't represent carte blanche to dismantle the country, but I guess they forgot, and can't resist trying.

Every extra day that the people of Wisconsin can continue to make the sacrifice to protest, will make it a little more difficult for other egomaniac, ambitious, retrograde governors, who don't get it, to pull the same thing on their citizens.

The pundit's mantra regarding Libya is that Gaddafi has declared war on his own people. Is Muammar Abu Minyar al-Walker taking note? What if he ends up in his barricaded office in the Wisconsin Statehouse without food or water?:thumbup::w00t:
 
Is America Broken or What?

Gov. Walker is the product of the far right that only looks out for the interest of the most wealthy individuals. There is no place in the US for such a contemptible abuse of power. But, we have a voting public that follow without question (like sheep) the irrational rantings from the likes of Limbaugh, Glen Beck, and the far-right extremist elements in the Republican party. The only way that we get people like this elected is that there is a concerted effort in a "disinformation campaign" which is further exacerbated by an "uninformed electorate" to begin with who fools themself into thinking there is a simplistic answer for everything. That is simply delusional. Life is more comples than a True & False exam.

Life is not simple but rather highly complex. For you to make the right decisions all along the way means you have to invest your time and energy in informing yourself about both sides of the issues and hear unbiased journalists making objective reports that do not feed on sensationalism and further instilling fear and inaction in the public. It also demands an understanding of history and this is not limited to only American History.

When you look at what happened in Europe leading to WWI and WWII, look at the history of South America, and a string of dictatorships America has supported worldwide, realize each of these failed nations have lost their overall perspective as to national goals. Instead, they have fallen victim to having the most narrow of interests, lets say "taxes only" and forget about honest and objective reporting and a citizenry that takes an active interest in the way the country is being run. My German relatives are often disgusted that Americans are too passive politically speaking and let big business interests run over us; the super rich and powerful have undue and totally disproportionate influence on the US political process; and we do not hold people accountable for their misdeeds such as the stock market manipulations that continue to exists even though we almost had a great depression, many unemployed, and many loosing their homes to foreclosure a year ago as a consequence.

Oddly enough, if your are middle or lower class economically, you are always held accountable for those decisions diminishing social programs that will be needed more by us than any of the super rich. The excessive demands from big business are dismantling our infrastructure that was the results of past abuses of middle and lower income people. We simply are not minding the store, if we continue to allow this to take place. Republicans like to suggest that we are postponing our debt onto the backs of our next generation. They love nothing more than to tell us that the Government must live within their means just like households when most households aren't able to maintain their prior standard of living. The Republicans and other fiscal conservatives never look at the excessive spendings when disproportionate tax breaks are given to the wealthy and big business interests, like Koch mentioned in Jayman's article. Who other than the middle class and lower class people pay for all of these perks afforded to the wealthy. Evidently, no one but the middle and lower class.

When government contracts are awarded without competitive bidding, who is to pay for this total lack of accountability? I would like to ask how about all the millions of higher skills jobs exported abroad that have been the basis for our national wealth and productivity. How are we ever going to once again regain our international standing economically since these "free traders" basically "strip mined our economy" for short term profits with diminished prospects for future reinvestment? All they cared for was lining their own pockets.

Unless we only want to become a shadow of what the US used to stand for, we will continue to loose ground unless we all stand together and fight the good fight and realize that Democracy only comes at a cost -- our personal investment of our time and energy to address the many problems we face as a nation.

Sincerely,


Stimpy
 
During the last few days, even before this Dildo (fake koch) conversation hit the world wide web, Walker has had a cornered, rabbit in the headlights look on his face during statements to the media. Some of his ilk seemed to recognize after the elections that their winning the House didn't represent carte blanche to dismantle the country, but I guess they forgot, and can't resist trying.

Every extra day that the people of Wisconsin can continue to make the sacrifice to protest, will make it a little more difficult for other egomaniac, ambitious, retrograde governors, who don't get it, to pull the same thing on their citizens.

The pundit's mantra regarding Libya is that Gaddafi has declared war on his own people. Is Muammar Abu Minyar al-Walker taking note? What if he ends up in his barricaded office in the Wisconsin Statehouse without food or water?:thumbup::w00t:

He could very well wind up barricaded in his office if he doesn't cool his jets so to speak. His political agenda has been exposed publicly and it also leaves the door open for numerous law suits too. It will be interesting to see how he deals with the federal investigations into unfair trade and blatant attacks against individuals rights will play out. I really am not sure how a spin master could possibly pull him out of this political abyss
 
Gov. Walker is the product of the far right that only looks out for the interest of the most wealthy individuals. There is no place in the US for such a contemptible abuse of power. But, we have a voting public that follow without question (like sheep) the irrational rantings from the likes of Limbaugh, Glen Beck, and the far-right extremist elements in the Republican party. The only way that we get people like this elected is that there is a concerted effort in a "disinformation campaign" which is further exacerbated by an "uninformed electorate" to begin with who fools themself into thinking there is a simplistic answer for everything. That is simply delusional. Life is more comples than a True & False exam.

Life is not simple but rather highly complex. For you to make the right decisions all along the way means you have to invest your time and energy in informing yourself about both sides of the issues and hear unbiased journalists making objective reports that do not feed on sensationalism and further instilling fear and inaction in the public. It also demands an understanding of history and this is not limited to only American History.

When you look at what happened in Europe leading to WWI and WWII, look at the history of South America, and a string of dictatorships America has supported worldwide, realize each of these failed nations have lost their overall perspective as to national goals. Instead, they have fallen victim to having the most narrow of interests, lets say "taxes only" and forget about honest and objective reporting and a citizenry that takes an active interest in the way the country is being run. My German relatives are often disgusted that Americans are too passive politically speaking and let big business interests run over us; the super rich and powerful have undue and totally disproportionate influence on the US political process; and we do not hold people accountable for their misdeeds such as the stock market manipulations that continue to exists even though we almost had a great depression, many unemployed, and many loosing their homes to foreclosure a year ago as a consequence.

Oddly enough, if your are middle or lower class economically, you are always held accountable for those decisions diminishing social programs that will be needed more by us than any of the super rich. The excessive demands from big business are dismantling our infrastructure that was the results of past abuses of middle and lower income people. We simply are not minding the store, if we continue to allow this to take place. Republicans like to suggest that we are postponing our debt onto the backs of our next generation. They love nothing more than to tell us that the Government must live within their means just like households when most households aren't able to maintain their prior standard of living. The Republicans and other fiscal conservatives never look at the excessive spendings when disproportionate tax breaks are given to the wealthy and big business interests, like Koch mentioned in Jayman's article. Who other than the middle class and lower class people pay for all of these perks afforded to the wealthy. Evidently, no one but the middle and lower class.

When government contracts are awarded without competitive bidding, who is to pay for this total lack of accountability? I would like to ask how about all the millions of higher skills jobs exported abroad that have been the basis for our national wealth and productivity. How are we ever going to once again regain our international standing economically since these "free traders" basically "strip mined our economy" for short term profits with diminished prospects for future reinvestment? All they cared for was lining their own pockets.

Unless we only want to become a shadow of what the US used to stand for, we will continue to loose ground unless we all stand together and fight the good fight and realize that Democracy only comes at a cost -- our personal investment of our time and energy to address the many problems we face as a nation.

Sincerely,


Stimpy

You make my point exactly. I wonder if the Koch's stocks dropped a few points on the stock exchange??? LOL:001_tt2: More importantly I wonder how they are getting along with the Federal Trade Commission these Days???
 
The state of Wisconsin, like my home state of New York, is broke. And in no small part due to the unions representing public employees.

The National Educators association (NEA, teachers union) donate 95% of their political campaign funds to Democrat candidates. Yet 33% of the rank and file call themselves Republicans. Is this fair?

Democrat politicians are in the pocket of these public sector unions. If a Democrat doesn't support their agenda, these unions will run another well-financed candiate in a primary against them.

In a collective bargaining situation, these elected Democrat politicians who are supposed to represent the people, the taxpayers, can not play an adversarial role vis-a-vis the public sector unions. it means our tax dollors go to finance one particular party and we taxpayers pay the bill in higher taxes year in and year out.

This is pure corruption at the expense of the taxpayer and should have no place in the U.S..

Governow Scott Walker is one of those who sees that this must finally come to a end in this country. He sees that it is undemocratic.
 
Not Wisconsin exactly but...

Gerson is brilliant pretty much all the time, but he is at his best in this article. I didn't want to open a new thread for it, but I think this one can take the content pretty well, so here it is.

Conservatives shouldn't be so surprised by freedom
By Michael Gerson
Monday, February 28, 2011; 8:00 PM

It is the conservative critique of the freedom agenda that democratic transformations are hopeless or dangerous in societies lacking democratic cultures. The people of Iraq, George F. Will said in 2004, are "just three people away from democratic success. Unfortunately, the three are George Washington, James Madison and John Marshall." Middle Eastern tyrants, Peggy Noonan once argued, "have functioned in history as - ugly imagery coming - garbage-can lids on their societies. They keep freedom from entering, it is true. But when they are removed, the garbage - the freelance terrorists, the grievance merchants, the ethnic nationalists - pops out all over."

The Arab winter of discontent provides evidence to assess the claim that Arab peoples are leaderless trash. It is true that few world-historic figures have emerged from these events. Mohamed ElBaradei and Amr Moussa will not be confused with Vaclav Havel or Nelson Mandela. Even Wael Ghonim - the Google guy - symbolizes a new type of decentralized, Web-based leadership rather than providing it himself.

But a leaderless revolution is impressive in its own way. Whole nations have reached a critical mass of humiliation. Technology has provided both a comparison to more successful societies and a mechanism to collect and channel discontent. Politicians and opportunists of various stripes have struggled to keep up with a generational revolt.

While the revolution is democratic in form, it may take a while to get the content right. Civic institutions in the Middle East - political parties, courts and electoral systems - are weak by the design of dictators. Democratic transitions can be difficult. Even Washington, Madison and Marshall presided over a democratic culture in which one in seven human beings was eventually owned by another - a contradiction resolved only by a civil war that left an estimated 6 million pounds of human and animal carcasses lying on a field near Gettysburg. I suspect that Arab transitions, whatever their difficulties, will be better than this.

No good outcome is guaranteed. But two things have changed permanently in the Middle East.

First, the people of that region now have heroes of reform who look exactly like themselves. They have seen Arab men and women impatient with injustice and capable of unsuspected greatness. With little help from outsiders - and no leadership from the United States - Arabs have demanded accountable government. Generations will recall these shining events, which serve the symbolic purpose of Bunker Hill.
ad_icon
Click here!

Second, every Arab ruler, from colonels to monarchs, now knows something new: fear. The political theory they have offered since Nasser - nationalism without freedom - has produced backward economies, corrupt elites and angry citizens. Leaders are waking to find themselves in a besieged palace or boarding a plane for exile. Even in the absence of a working democracy, this is a form of accountability. It is a good thing for a government to fear the governed.

With exquisite timing, some conservatives have chosen this moment to expand their critique of Islam, discerning (like Glenn Beck) the first signs of the coming global caliphate. Is Islam compatible with democracy? "It is not," says Andrew McCarthy, "it never has been, and it never will be." Violence and coercion, he argues, are essential to Islam. The intensity of this view seems to increase as evidence for it is contradicted.

Never mind that practitioners of every religion with roots in ancient and medieval cultural practice must confront and marginalize disturbing aspects of their own traditions. Never mind that Islam takes vastly different theological forms in Saudi Arabia, Albania, Bangladesh and Indonesia. Never mind that since Sept. 11, 2001, America has found Muslim allies willing to die at our side in the fight against Islamic radicalism. Just to demonstrate some connection to reality, perhaps conservatives should delay their criticisms of Islam's irredeemable violence until after the inspiring, courageous, mainly peaceful protests of Muslims in the Middle East draw to a close.

For some conservatives, liberty is found only in their private stock, aged in Anglo-Saxon cellars, to be sipped and savored at their leisure. But much of the world, it turns out, is thirsty and cares little about the vintage. Perhaps it is natural for a revolutionary power to grow old and cautious, producing thinkers who prefer stability to idealism. But it is sad. Americans such as Lincoln, FDR and Reagan did not believe in the existence of permanent tyranny because they did not accept the possibility of permanent servitude. Eventually the mind and soul of man revolt. As some are perpetually surprised to witness.

[email protected]
 
Slimvintage,

Nice thought but I believe misconceived. You're not alone though. The prevailing opinion in the U.S. media seem to agree with you.

I believe the recent "Jasmin Revolution" was started by those truly seeking democracy and freedom in the Middle-East. However, I feel the ones who started this revolution are very probably not going to be the ones who end it.

Peggy Noonan is probably right. The same old, bad actors in the region are likely to be the ones left standing in the end. All it ever takes in the Middle-East are a few bombs and an assassin's bullit or two and the whole democracy movement will run for cover.

Then come the Imams or the Mullahs and we will hear "death to America" chanted in the streets.

By-and-large, we have seen pro-American governments (except for Libya) topple. Alhough most of these leaders were pro-American, their populations literally dispise the United States. A recent post-Mubarak poll showed the Egyptians have an 84% unfavorability rating toward America.

This is a region that has only known violence and oppression for millenia. It is has been led for 1400 years by a religion that tells its people that an elected secular legislature is forbidden because it plays God.

So you tell me how this will end.

Yes, there are those in that region who yearn for freedom and democracy, but our wishful thinking will not prevent them from being swept away by the dark forces that have always ruled there.

This the the 10th year that we have been at war in that part of the world. But our level of ignorance to that region, especially in our government, is totally shocking.
 
Last edited:
Slimvintage,

Nice thought but I believe misconceived. You're not alone though. The prevailing opinion in the U.S. media seem to agree with you.

I believe the recent "Jasmin Revolution" was started by those truly seeking democracy and freedom in the Middle-East. However, I feel the ones who started this revolution are very probably not going to be the ones who end it.

Peggy Noonan is probably right. The same old, bad actors in the region are likely to be the ones left standing in the end. All it ever takes in the Middle-East are a few bombs and an assassin's bullit or two and the whole democracy movement will run for cover.

Then come the Imams or the Mullahs and we will hear "death to America" chanted in the streets.

By-and-large, we have seen pro-American governments (except for Libya) topple. Alhough most of these leaders were pro-American, their populations literally dispise the United States. A recent post-Mubarak poll showed the Egyptians have an 84% unfavorability rating toward America.

This is a region that has only known violence and oppression for millenia. It is has been led for 1400 years by a religion that tells its people that an elected secular legislature is forbidden because it plays God.

So you tell me how this will end.

Yes, there are those in that region who yearn for freedom and democracy, but our wishful thinking will not prevent them from being swept away by the dark forces that have always ruled there.

This the the 10th year that we have been at war in that part of the world. But our level of ignorance to that region, especially in our government, is totally shocking.

Thanks for your reply lubetube.

Just as Gerson is typical of the nerdy, overly intellectual left, some of your very well put observations are the same ones I hear from the righties he quotes in his article.

The situations in (especially) Egypt and Libya don't respond to the same old cliché evaluations made by pundits in the West up to now, nor should the same fears be trotted out again to keep us from supporting the changes that are taking place there. We as Americans must reject the Willsian vision of democracy as being something we hold the planetary patent on. That a people choose their own governments, and unchoose them at the polls when they stop liking them, is all we can reasonably or morally require of a political system for it to qualify. Certainly to fret about how religious or secular someone else's set-up is, or that they despise us for butting in with our own values, are both legitimate concerns, but we only defeat our ability to help if we attempt blatantly to influence the political outcomes of other nations' elections. It's when we do that we hear "death to America" chanted in the streets.

There's something inherently dishonest in decrying another country's choice of pious, Allah-fearing men as their governors, while at the same time insisting that our own candidates' religious beliefs revolve around fundamentalist Christianity and that series of social issues we all know by heart.

But your response to Gerson's article is thoughtful and well-written and made me feel ok about posting it on this thread. Thanks.
 
The state of Wisconsin, like my home state of New York, is broke. And in no small part due to the unions representing public employees.

The National Educators association (NEA, teachers union) donate 95% of their political campaign funds to Democrat candidates. Yet 33% of the rank and file call themselves Republicans. Is this fair?

Democrat politicians are in the pocket of these public sector unions. If a Democrat doesn't support their agenda, these unions will run another well-financed candiate in a primary against them.

In a collective bargaining situation, these elected Democrat politicians who are supposed to represent the people, the taxpayers, can not play an adversarial role vis-a-vis the public sector unions. it means our tax dollors go to finance one particular party and we taxpayers pay the bill in higher taxes year in and year out.

This is pure corruption at the expense of the taxpayer and should have no place in the U.S..

Governow Scott Walker is one of those who sees that this must finally come to a end in this country. He sees that it is undemocratic.

Slimvintage,

Nice thought but I believe misconceived. You're not alone though. The prevailing opinion in the U.S. media seem to agree with you.

I believe the recent "Jasmin Revolution" was started by those truly seeking democracy and freedom in the Middle-East. However, I feel the ones who started this revolution are very probably not going to be the ones who end it.

Peggy Noonan is probably right. The same old, bad actors in the region are likely to be the ones left standing in the end. All it ever takes in the Middle-East are a few bombs and an assassin's bullit or two and the whole democracy movement will run for cover.

Then come the Imams or the Mullahs and we will hear "death to America" chanted in the streets.

By-and-large, we have seen pro-American governments (except for Libya) topple. Alhough most of these leaders were pro-American, their populations literally dispise the United States. A recent post-Mubarak poll showed the Egyptians have an 84% unfavorability rating toward America.

This is a region that has only known violence and oppression for millenia. It is has been led for 1400 years by a religion that tells its people that an elected secular legislature is forbidden because it plays God.

So you tell me how this will end.

Yes, there are those in that region who yearn for freedom and democracy, but our wishful thinking will not prevent them from being swept away by the dark forces that have always ruled there.

This the the 10th year that we have been at war in that part of the world. But our level of ignorance to that region, especially in our government, is totally shocking.

Dear Lubetube,

Even with the American-backed Shah of Iran being toppled in 1979, our foreign policy chose to go with the "status quo" rather than upset the apple cart. The deposed Shah of Iran was put in place by our own CIA being involved directly in the overthrow of an existing government in 1953 putting The Shah of Iran in power. This intervention held for some 26 years and, then, the people had enough of this regieme or abuses from his special guards. The Iranian Royal Family was "Pro American" in name and military hardware only. But at the grassroots level, the people of Iran only viewed American actions as furthering their misery, subjugation, and lack of advancement to a democratic form of government. The same today can be said for Afghanistan with it's corruption extending from the top down. Our effectiveness has been minimal when it comes to the Taliban and their fervor to take complete control of what is currently a corrupt system. They may be just as corrupt, but at least the Taliban represents someone the people can relate to, even if they do not approve of their harsh methods.

We have a succession of foreign policies disasters of backing "dictators" who were unethical and corrupt. For the record, Pres. Ronald Reagan even supported Saddam Hussein at one time giving his dictatorship arms and military training to further secure the hold it had on its own people of Iraq. It boils down to this, our foreign policy agenda has had little to do with supporting true democratic reforms of their governments in the region and too much to do with satisfying our own economic and business interests first and foremost. Very little money and manpower was spent to foster in the native population an accurate understanding of and an appreciation for what democracy had to offer its people. It had no long-range planning which placed the benefit of the local people first.

It is no wonder so many people, in so many African and Middle Eastern countries, have so dim a view of America today. It appears to them that we only came to plunder their goods and resources for our own economic interests, with our unquenchable thirst for oil being #1. If the case was reversed, wouldn't you too resent the largest and wealthiest country that did so little to improve the lot of the resident people too. It is not inconceivable that China could easily turn the tables on us one day in the not so distant future. There is no written or unwritten rule that guarantees America's international economic or military status as being forever "Preeminent in the world". Actually being #1 and saying we're #1 are two very different things.

The same can be stated in the way we treat our workers. In recent years when the big push was for industry to downsize and become more productive, it was our workforce that has proved itself again and again that they can be just as productive as any worker in the world, other than those working for slave wages. Yet, it the American worker, and not management, that has steadily had their "standard of living" eroded while top management has achieved higher and higher highs in compensation and benefits at the expense of the workers. I grew up in a time when American workers had the highest standard of living in the world. This was something that attested to our national greatness. What has happened since?

When the Republicans talk about "family values", in the typical 50's and 60's family, they could exist comfortably off of the earnings in many cases of the “father” as the sole breadwinner. Yet, with all their talk of "family values", who opposes universal health care, who opposes essentially protecting of worker rights and their health on the job, and who has done everything in their power to dismantle social welfare programs and retirement systems that were common back then. Republicans only focus on profits made in the "short-term" and as a direct consequence, we have no where near the productive capacity America had even a decade ago. Without these productive capacities, what is the American Family going to rely on for their income; fostering the increased numbers of the middle class as a national goal rather than padding the pockets of only the super-rich; or in providing for essential national security for the protection of all in future conflicts. Without our productive capacity, even when taking into account the consequences of Great Depressions of the 1930's, we would never have had the ability to win WWII without our industrial might. Not everything must be imported from China. Now, doesn't that make everyone feel real secure? I hope not!

Instead of always concentrating on the short-range profits, America needs once again to realize that we need a combination of both long- and short-range planning to prosper as a nation. We must begin with putting our “financial house” in order again starting with Wall Street Executives responsible for our most recent financial melt-down. As mentioned recently at the Academy Awards, not even the first executive from Wall Street has been prosecuted for the abusive and unethical events leading to this financial melt-down that has resulted in so many loosing their lifetime savings, their jobs, their homes, and their futures as viable lower- and middle-class family units.

Labor unions such as the teachers in Wisconsin represent largly lower- and middle-income people in our society. As we extended for two additional and unnecessary years the "Bush Tax Cuts" for the wealthiest Americans, Republicans insisted on keeping these tax cuts to the wealthiest to approve the Health Care Bill. We need to return to a time when both upper and middle-classes share in the tax burden, and not only the middle class. Talk about the teachers being oppressors, well don't you think it is only fair to look at those who have the most wealth, as part of their social contract with America. The wealthy have a responsibility to pay for a proportional part of the financial arrangements of running out country. There have been for many decades hundreds and thousands of millionaires that, through existing tax loopholes and services from a gifted tax accountant, have avoided paying any taxes what so ever.

As a single individual tax-payer and retired educator, I have never hit anywhere near $75,000 in any one year after 36 years in public education working on average 11.5 months per year (not just 9 months) and yet I have had no convenient tax loopholes to avoid paying taxation like my wealthier Americans. I don't find too many wealthier citizens coming to help on my behalf reducing my tax liabilities!


Sincerely,


Stimpy
 
Top