AsIseeIt
Well-known Member
In FAIRNESS to BSB2 owner/management, they CANNOT PLEASE ALL OF US - ALL THE TIME.
But WE PAY TO BE ON THIS SITE.
And are we GETTING WHAT WE PAY FOR?
As I see it, I USED to GENERALLY get what I paid for. How about you? - Often?-Sometimes?-All the TIME?
By the way, WHAT did you think you were paying for?
If like me, You subscribed to see: Straight Boys WILLING to have SEX with ANOTHER straight boy because they are broke,
then Don't you think WE ARE GETTING what we paid for?
HOWEVER, are we getting quality? and quality of WHAT are you looking for?
Did BSB2 promise QUALITY? ... OR THAT'S JUST US DEMANDING IT?
I want to know if this is all there is?
... IF, BSB2 was suppose to be an upgrade from BSB1, as I see it, BSB1 was better.
David's BSB1 was better in the sense that in every single episode I remain CURIOUS and OFTEN excited to
see what the model is all about and what he is WILLING to do for cash and how well he'll do it. - EVEN if the model is NOT MY TYPE.
The set in BSB1 is by all means crude/simple but I don't notice it because I AM ENGAGED with the SCENE.
So, I suppose, what I am not pleased about BSB2 is the DIRECTORIAL quality.
The director's ABILITY to create a scene that will make the audience CARE about the model.
His CREATIVITY to make a HESITANT "straight"boy look HOT and SEXY sucking cock or getting fucked.
Yes, David was the sole director @ BSB1 and he managed to keep it FRESH for the MOST part for a long time.
But BSB2 is CONSISTENTLY- INCONSISTENT. -Sometimes CLAY makes a HIT but lately a LOT of MISSES.
You will notice that in television, the successful series' have DIFFERENT directors for each episode.
It keeps the series consistent by having a fresh eye behind the camera.
... From GLEE, to GIRLS.
... From The BORGIAs to MODERN FAMILY, etc.etc.
AM I ALONE WITH THESE OBSERVATIONS?
What ASPECT of BSB2 are you not pleased about?
But WE PAY TO BE ON THIS SITE.
And are we GETTING WHAT WE PAY FOR?
As I see it, I USED to GENERALLY get what I paid for. How about you? - Often?-Sometimes?-All the TIME?
By the way, WHAT did you think you were paying for?
If like me, You subscribed to see: Straight Boys WILLING to have SEX with ANOTHER straight boy because they are broke,
then Don't you think WE ARE GETTING what we paid for?
HOWEVER, are we getting quality? and quality of WHAT are you looking for?
Did BSB2 promise QUALITY? ... OR THAT'S JUST US DEMANDING IT?
I want to know if this is all there is?
... IF, BSB2 was suppose to be an upgrade from BSB1, as I see it, BSB1 was better.
David's BSB1 was better in the sense that in every single episode I remain CURIOUS and OFTEN excited to
see what the model is all about and what he is WILLING to do for cash and how well he'll do it. - EVEN if the model is NOT MY TYPE.
The set in BSB1 is by all means crude/simple but I don't notice it because I AM ENGAGED with the SCENE.
So, I suppose, what I am not pleased about BSB2 is the DIRECTORIAL quality.
The director's ABILITY to create a scene that will make the audience CARE about the model.
His CREATIVITY to make a HESITANT "straight"boy look HOT and SEXY sucking cock or getting fucked.
Yes, David was the sole director @ BSB1 and he managed to keep it FRESH for the MOST part for a long time.
But BSB2 is CONSISTENTLY- INCONSISTENT. -Sometimes CLAY makes a HIT but lately a LOT of MISSES.
You will notice that in television, the successful series' have DIFFERENT directors for each episode.
It keeps the series consistent by having a fresh eye behind the camera.
... From GLEE, to GIRLS.
... From The BORGIAs to MODERN FAMILY, etc.etc.
AM I ALONE WITH THESE OBSERVATIONS?
What ASPECT of BSB2 are you not pleased about?