Connor, Aiden And Johnny 3 Way Fun - Scene thread

[kgmets]

Just watched the post scene interview: Apart from absolutely loving the three way sex they just had, there was an interesting discussion of the position sometimes called the "sandwich" or the "train" fuck, which can work very well PROVIDED that the two tops (one of whom is in the middle both giving and receiving) have exact timing and coordination of their thrusts into the two butts being fucked. I knew exactly what they meant, having on been the total top in a few of those over the years in that, with perfect coordination, the total top on one end experiences the feeling that he is not only fucking the dude in the middle (which he is) but also fucking the ass of the dude on the other end (which in fact is the cock of the dude in the middle). Also David clearly loved this scene as he gave all three of them $1200 each which I believe is the highest per model scene payment since he has resumed filming.

 

[br6205]

Just watched the post scene interview: Apart from absolutely loving the three way sex they just had, there was an interesting discussion of the position sometimes called the "sandwich" or the "train" fuck, which can work very well PROVIDED that the two tops (one of whom is in the middle both giving and receiving) have exact timing and coordination of their thrusts into the two butts being fucked. I knew exactly what they meant, having on been the total top in a few of those over the years in that, with perfect coordination, the total top on one end experiences the feeling that he is not only fucking the dude in the middle (which he is) but also fucking the ass of the dude on the other end (which in fact is the cock of the dude in the middle). Also David clearly loved this scene as he gave all three of them $1200 each which I believe is the highest per model scene payment since he has resumed filming.

After rewatching I agree fully.

 

[SFPS01]

I think its safe to say that No Broke Straight Boys was anywhere to be found in this scene. Any pretense to the contrary would be insulting to most members' intelligence. My patience has just about been used up...

 

[Jaybifla]

I’m actually confused with the topic of money. $1200 each? Is the word out on that, because I would think more models would be signing up and many favorites would be begging to come back. I only say this, because I remember Ethan Steel making reference in his initial interview to getting $2000 when he started for the week and he did a solo and 6 scenes that week.
To be fair, money isn’t really any of our business, but I’m thinking the money talk is just scripted for entertainment purposes.

 

[kgmets]

I’m actually confused with the topic of money. $1200 each? Is the word out on that, because I would think more models would be signing up and many favorites would be begging to come back. I only say this, because I remember Ethan Steel making reference in his initial interview to getting $2000 when he started for the week and he did a solo and 6 scenes that week.
To be fair, money isn’t really any of our business, but I’m thinking the money talk is just scripted for entertainment purposes.

In David's first period filming, I recall him paying tops $1000 and bottoms $1500 (which seemed realistic as one would think that straight boys doing gay porn for money would require more money to bottom particularly if giving up virgin asses). Whether reality or for entertainment purposes, David is clearly more parsimonious in what he says he is paying the second time round. Also he now says he is paying tops and bottoms equally, which is a big change for his first period filming. I have no idea whether you are correct or not, but either way what David is saying is more frugal this time around.

 

[kgmets]

I think its safe to say that No Broke Straight Boys was anywhere to be found in this scene. Any pretense to the contrary would be insulting to most members' intelligence. My patience has just about been used up...

I totally respect your right to your opinion as an individual member, as after all that is what this Forum is all about. But, given the fact that the overall Broke Straight Boys membership currently rates this scene as 4.48 out of a possible 5 stars, is it possible for you to show a scintilla of respect for the other members to have their opinions as well rather than rejecting them as "insulting your intelligence"? From your prior posts, I'm guessing that your answer to that is an absolute NO. By all means remain steadfast to your opinion, but, if you can, please try to be more tolerant of those who respectfully disagree with you.

 

[kgmets]

P.S. Upon rereading your post, you wrote "insulting to most members' intelligence" as opposed to "insulting your intelligence". So I correct myself to be accurate in my quotation of you. But the obvious response to that and the central point of my prior post is that this scene currently has an overall Broke Straight Boys membership rating of 4.48 out of a possible five stars in respectful disagreement to your viewpoint. Your viewpoint continues to deserve our respect, just as the majority contrary viewpoint deserves your respect.

 

[mikeyank]

I think its safe to say that No Broke Straight Boys was anywhere to be found in this scene. Any pretense to the contrary would be insulting to most members' intelligence. My patience has just about been used up...

I refrained back from quickly agreeing with your post SFPS01, as I had said I would hold back my own personal opinions on the current scenes, as the way we truly vote on the scenes is with our wallets. And I am friends with people who have stopped subscribing due to the absence of any models who bring forth any relationship to the “mission statement” of the site of getting straight guys to have gay sex for money. The three models in this scene are perhaps the most extreme example. They may be sexy and great sexual performers but in no way are they “Broke Straight Boys”.

And the high rating for this scene is an indication that those who are current members who vote are satisfied with all gay theme of the majority of current models, but it does not indicate all the former members who have left for the exact reason SFPS01 stated. I remain out of a sense of loyalty to the site and that all of the great archives from David’s original stint as director during the Broke Straight Boys-1 era, as well the later Broke Straight Boys-2 era with guys who may or may not have been really straight, but sure satisfied my fantasies including Johnny Forza, Adam Baer, Paul Canon, (who played the role to perfection) to Ayden Troy and Tyler White, just to name a few.

I am here for the archives, the memories and the forum and the hope that we may someday get another Jake Spencer or Sky Clesi or even an Ashton Taylor or Johnny Cox who tried gay sex on film but could not really do it or another Ethan Steel who does it well. I am caught in the middle as I do agree with SFPS01 but for the affordable price of membership, I remain, although not at all satisfied with the vast majority of the current product.

 

[SFPS01]

I totally respect your right to your opinion as an individual member, as after all that is what this Forum is all about. But, given the fact that the overall Broke Straight Boys membership currently rates this scene as 4.48 out of a possible 5 stars, is it possible for you to show a scintilla of respect for the other members to have their opinions as well rather than rejecting them as "insulting your intelligence"? From your prior posts, I'm guessing that your answer to that is an absolute NO. By all means remain steadfast to your opinion, but, if you can, please try to be more tolerant of those who respectfully disagree with you.

Kgmets, I appreciate the "space" you offer me for allowing me to voice my opinions regarding this scene. And trust me, I also respect everyone's right to voice there's as well. I do take umbrage with your comment of "given the fact that the overall Broke Straight Boys membership currently rates this scene as 4.48 out of a possible 5 stars" I am not sure where or how you have access to the ratings makeup as you state "overall Broke Straight Boys membership". What you probably meant to say was "the membership who voted". As far as my comment of "insulting my/our intelligence go" that was meant as a direct correlation between the title of this website vs the actual players in this scene. My comments are reflective of my opinion and were/are not intended to be a consensus of the membership as a whole. I however, have difficulty deluding myself that the boys in this scene are anything close to being Broke Straight Boys Does "scintilla of respect for the other members to have their opinions" mean that I should not voice mine or should I be compelled to agree with everyone that comments? Does showing "respect" mean I shouldn't comment if I don't like a particular scene? JMO

 

[Jaybifla]

And the high rating for this scene is an indication that those who are current members who vote are satisfied with all gay theme of the majority of current models, but it does not indicate all the former members who have left for the exact reason SFPS01 stated.

I don’t know that I agree. There are a lot of pairings that I don’t like, but I don’t necessarily give the scenes bad scores. I try to be completely fair.
Also, I have to disagree about the score. The current score for this scene isn’t bad, but I wouldn’t call it great for a threesome. It’s not as high as the last threesome, which I believe was Jos Alvarez, Ben, & Richie, and it isn’t as entertaining either. A straight guy, Bi guy, and gay guy. Perfect.

 

[mikeyank]

I don’t know that I agree. There are a lot of pairings that I don’t like, but I don’t necessarily give the scenes bad scores. I try to be completely fair.
Also, I have to disagree about the score. The current score for this scene isn’t bad, but I wouldn’t call it great for a threesome. It’s not as high as the last threesome, which I believe was Jos Alvarez, Ben, & Richie, and it isn’t as entertaining either. A straight guy, Bi guy, and gay guy. Perfect.

I agree that the threesome you mentioned was a great mix of straight, bi and gay. Three straight tops wouldn’t make much sense, nor do three gay guys on “Broke Straight Boys”; which we are talking about here.

 

[kgmets]

Kgmets, I appreciate the "space" you offer me for allowing me to voice my opinions regarding this scene. And trust me, I also respect everyone's right to voice there's as well. I do take umbrage with your comment of "given the fact that the overall Broke Straight Boys membership currently rates this scene as 4.48 out of a possible 5 stars" I am not sure where or how you have access to the ratings makeup as you state "overall Broke Straight Boys membership". What you probably meant to say was "the membership who voted". As far as my comment of "insulting my/our intelligence go" that was meant as a direct correlation between the title of this website vs the actual players in this scene. My comments are reflective of my opinion and were/are not intended to be a consensus of the membership as a whole. I however, have difficulty deluding myself that the boys in this scene are anything close to being Broke Straight Boys Does "scintilla of respect for the other members to have their opinions" mean that I should not voice mine or should I be compelled to agree with everyone that comments? Does showing "respect" mean I shouldn't comment if I don't like a particular scene? JMO

Yes I respect your opinion, and yes the 4.48 rating for this scene was in fact the rating at the time I wrote my posts yesterday, and the latter was based upon the totality of the Broke Straight Boys membership who took the time to vote on the scene. We are in complete agreement about both of those facts.

 

[br6205]

I believe a guy must use what ever gifts they have to earn a living. But they must also realize over exposure limits their time doing porn. Today I just saw Johnny Hunter on yet another site in less than a week. A model should plan their appearance to keep working as long as they can.

 

[Jaybifla]

I believe a guy must use what ever gifts they have to earn a living. But they must also realize over exposure limits their time doing porn. Today I just saw Johnny Hunter on yet another site in less than a week. A model should plan their appearance to keep working as long as they can.

I do agree with this. I’m not that familiar with any of Johnny’s other work, but Michael Boston is losing my interest. I do love me some Michael Boston, but he is constantly filming and it’s overkill for me. Johnny Rapid, Armond Rizzo, etc. It’s gotten to the point where I don’t want to see any of them in anything anymore.
There’s a meme going around that says “stop casting James Corden in everything” and it makes me laugh because it’s true. It’s how I feel about some of these adult models.

 

[br6205]

Add Bentley to this over exposure list. I saw him twice today on 2 other sites.

 

[SFPS01]

Sad to say but our uniqueness here appears to be fading. I am wondering how much the COVID 19 virus is to blame for our current state of affairs...or other factors.

 

[br6205]

Other top sites seem to handle it better, some find unused episodes or other more distant ones wrt models for example. Some widen their net going to more distant locations.