mikeyank
Long time forumite
My friend Stowe has coined the term 2.5 to describe the most recent re-invention of Broke Straight Boys, which is an apt one as the direction of the site has definitely changed. My question is if it is a change in the right direction or the wrong direction.
As long as there has been a forum here, I have made the point ad infinitum that I am here for the "straight" boys. The internet is filled with porn sites catering to every fetish imaginable, and so many that feature really good looking guys, with great bodies and big dicks who can suck cock and fuck ass with amazing skills.
However, my sexual fetish involves young masculine "believably" straight guys, (and I credit my friend and occasional visitor to our forum, Abush11 for coining that phrase). I like to see guys who do not appear terribly comfortable standing or sitting in front of the camera for the first time, with the prospect of getting naked and jerking off, and eventually giving, and getting a blowjob from a guy, while being recorded and shown to the world on the internet.
The premise of these straight guys being broke and doing something totally against the grain for them, to provide some easy cash is the hook that got me "hooked" on the site. I enjoy the classic rules of progression of a nervous straight boy getting naked and hard, and jerking off and cumming, followed by allowing another guy to suck his cock, and then sucking himself, followed by anal action, totally works for me.
I love to watch the expression on a straight guy's face as he can not control showing the pleasure from the oral skills of his partner. Two of my favorite models from BSB1 were Mike Robbins and Tank Shane. Nothing pleased me more than watching them both lay back, possibly in the classic straight boy getting sucked position with their hands behind their head, and with the proper camera angles, being able to switch my perspective from watching their beautiful hard cocks being sucked and slurped on, to watching their handsome young faces, as they writhe in pleasure from the sensation of the blowjob.
Both Mike and Shane were also incredible tops, using their lean athletic bodies to fuck their male partners with the same fervor that they fuck their female conquests And there too, watching their facial expressions was also a large part of my voyeuristic pleasure. Last weekend, I re-watched a classic Shane & Gino scene, where Gino claimed to be straight and with a girlfriend back home who encouraged him to work for Broke Straight Boys, but he totally loved Shane's cock, and the expression on Shane's handsome face, as with his droopy eyelids partially closed, he nonverbally expressed shock and delight at the pleasure he was receiving.
I know that I am in the minority of posters to the forum who enjoy the more masculine, less giving and less open to gay sex type models that have appeared here. I understand that the current crop of "willing to do it all" models, who have become frequent posters in the forum too, has energized the fan base who heap praises on them for doing "the hard work", and being interested in pleasing their fans.
I was sad to see David and D&E cease creating the scenes, but at the time, I also felt that BSB1 had too many gay appearing models, and I was excited about the new version. The early BSB2 scenes had some raw edginess that had been missing during the latter scenes that D&E produced.
I loved Rocco and Bobby, and Jamie, and yes Jimmy. I disagreed with the blatant use of literally throwing money at the models, and making the models recite demeaning phrases like, "I will do anything for money", but I liked the sexual tension of a gay cameraman with straight guys who were clearly there for the money, and not for gay sex, but who at the same time maintained hard cocks, and shot their cum on screen for my pleasure.
I do not expect BSB2 or BSB2.5 to totally go back to those early days which were "panned" by the forum, but I hope that the pendulum has not completely swung in the opposite direction. I would think that there is still some middle ground, that with three updates per week, we can still see an occasional Scott, or Spencer or the recent banana dicked straight boy Zane Tate who do not all appear to be "as pleased as punch" to be performing gay sex for the entertainment of the gay and bi men and the straight women who enjoy watching cute naked guys having sex online.
I still have no intention of leaving the site at this time, but wanted to offer a dissenting opinion on the recent trend that I have noticed on what is still the only pay site that I belong to. I just wanted to register my opinion with Mark & Clay, and whomever else is involved in the decision making process of whom and what to feature on Broke Straight Boys
And I certainly mean no offense to the current crop of models who are so giving and attentive to the comments of their fans on the forum. I am merely expressing my own feelings and opinions.
As long as there has been a forum here, I have made the point ad infinitum that I am here for the "straight" boys. The internet is filled with porn sites catering to every fetish imaginable, and so many that feature really good looking guys, with great bodies and big dicks who can suck cock and fuck ass with amazing skills.
However, my sexual fetish involves young masculine "believably" straight guys, (and I credit my friend and occasional visitor to our forum, Abush11 for coining that phrase). I like to see guys who do not appear terribly comfortable standing or sitting in front of the camera for the first time, with the prospect of getting naked and jerking off, and eventually giving, and getting a blowjob from a guy, while being recorded and shown to the world on the internet.
The premise of these straight guys being broke and doing something totally against the grain for them, to provide some easy cash is the hook that got me "hooked" on the site. I enjoy the classic rules of progression of a nervous straight boy getting naked and hard, and jerking off and cumming, followed by allowing another guy to suck his cock, and then sucking himself, followed by anal action, totally works for me.
I love to watch the expression on a straight guy's face as he can not control showing the pleasure from the oral skills of his partner. Two of my favorite models from BSB1 were Mike Robbins and Tank Shane. Nothing pleased me more than watching them both lay back, possibly in the classic straight boy getting sucked position with their hands behind their head, and with the proper camera angles, being able to switch my perspective from watching their beautiful hard cocks being sucked and slurped on, to watching their handsome young faces, as they writhe in pleasure from the sensation of the blowjob.
Both Mike and Shane were also incredible tops, using their lean athletic bodies to fuck their male partners with the same fervor that they fuck their female conquests And there too, watching their facial expressions was also a large part of my voyeuristic pleasure. Last weekend, I re-watched a classic Shane & Gino scene, where Gino claimed to be straight and with a girlfriend back home who encouraged him to work for Broke Straight Boys, but he totally loved Shane's cock, and the expression on Shane's handsome face, as with his droopy eyelids partially closed, he nonverbally expressed shock and delight at the pleasure he was receiving.
I know that I am in the minority of posters to the forum who enjoy the more masculine, less giving and less open to gay sex type models that have appeared here. I understand that the current crop of "willing to do it all" models, who have become frequent posters in the forum too, has energized the fan base who heap praises on them for doing "the hard work", and being interested in pleasing their fans.
I was sad to see David and D&E cease creating the scenes, but at the time, I also felt that BSB1 had too many gay appearing models, and I was excited about the new version. The early BSB2 scenes had some raw edginess that had been missing during the latter scenes that D&E produced.
I loved Rocco and Bobby, and Jamie, and yes Jimmy. I disagreed with the blatant use of literally throwing money at the models, and making the models recite demeaning phrases like, "I will do anything for money", but I liked the sexual tension of a gay cameraman with straight guys who were clearly there for the money, and not for gay sex, but who at the same time maintained hard cocks, and shot their cum on screen for my pleasure.
I do not expect BSB2 or BSB2.5 to totally go back to those early days which were "panned" by the forum, but I hope that the pendulum has not completely swung in the opposite direction. I would think that there is still some middle ground, that with three updates per week, we can still see an occasional Scott, or Spencer or the recent banana dicked straight boy Zane Tate who do not all appear to be "as pleased as punch" to be performing gay sex for the entertainment of the gay and bi men and the straight women who enjoy watching cute naked guys having sex online.
I still have no intention of leaving the site at this time, but wanted to offer a dissenting opinion on the recent trend that I have noticed on what is still the only pay site that I belong to. I just wanted to register my opinion with Mark & Clay, and whomever else is involved in the decision making process of whom and what to feature on Broke Straight Boys
And I certainly mean no offense to the current crop of models who are so giving and attentive to the comments of their fans on the forum. I am merely expressing my own feelings and opinions.