• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Vadim & Tate

I for one, enjoy Tate Thompson's work, his candor and his willingness to participate in scenes for my viewing pleasure. I really thought this was an all around great scene (for me to watch) but, if you are impressed with an upcoming scene that you shot....I might better restock my supply of lubricant and clean "cum rags"! :tongue_smilie: Sincerely..fast be-cum-ing a big fan of "Tate Thompson" and of course JohnnyBlumedia!


Unquestionably I think on a far different mindset than most on here. Perhaps it is because I am a bit too analytical with the perceptions observed with the one head, conflicting with the lack of perceptions and imminent conclusions that cannot exude from the other. Nevertheless, I appreciate everyone's input on here and commend their candor and willingness to express themselves, even though they rarely - if at all - concur with those I express.
 
Unquestionably I think on a far different mindset than most on here. Perhaps it is because I am a bit too analytical with the perceptions observed with the one head, conflicting with the lack of perceptions and imminent conclusions that cannot exude from the other. Nevertheless, I appreciate everyone's input on here and commend their candor and willingness to express themselves, even though they rarely - if at all - concur with those I express.

Well, like I always say, "put 100 guys in a room, and you're going to get 100 different 'positions'!":shock: Just sayin'
 
Well, like I always say, "put 100 guys in a room, and you're going to get 100 different 'positions'!":shock: Just sayin'


Good morning, Ms. Beth. I hope you put your vibrator on STUN.
I am not so sure that is correct, Ms. Beth. Put 100 men in a room, I am confident I would be in one position for some of them. Gee, I wonder what that position could be?!
 
Unquestionably I think on a far different mindset than most on here. Perhaps it is because I am a bit too analytical with the perceptions observed with the one head, conflicting with the lack of perceptions and imminent conclusions that cannot exude from the other. Nevertheless, I appreciate everyone's input on here and commend their candor and willingness to express themselves, even though they rarely - if at all - concur with those I express.

I know that you often make this statement or something similar. I'll share this with you because you also seem to be a fan of Damien Kyle (I will not refer to him by "your pet name for him" out of respect). I didn't always enjoy Damien. I thought his initial scenes were nothing special for me. I looked at him pretty "objectively" as I watched him perform. After a few bottoming scenes,( in which he appeared to me) to be in excruciating pain and discomfort, I was actually "turned off" by his performances! One scene I watched and I saw something in his eyes and his "breathing" as if he were focused. He appeared to be making a conscious effort to give a better performance. When I saw that, I started watching and listening to him differently in future scenes. By this time, his scene with Romeo came out and it blew me away. I wasn't fixated on him physically! I learned more about him as a person after I had already decided in my mind, "I like this model". I've grown to enjoy him (because of him as a person as well as a performer) more than possibly, any other model presently active.

So, the perception that observations made with one's head (on their penis) conflicting with one's head (on their shoulders) may be just that; "a perception". But, this is a porn site. I am here because I want to have the "head of my penis" become engorged with blood from the visualization of nice looking guys engaging in sexual acts. Guys I may never meet in real life, nor do I have to leave my home to enjoy!

I can still enjoy them, care about them as young adult people, who are here ultimately for my viewing pleasure. Whether I think about them with one head, or the other. As far as being analytical, I scrutinize things too! But at the "end of the day" it's just porn.........
 
I know that you often make this statement or something similar. I'll share this with you because you also seem to be a fan of Damien Kyle (I will not refer to him by "your pet name for him" out of respect). I didn't always enjoy Damien. I thought his initial scenes were nothing special for me. I looked at him pretty "objectively" as I watched him perform. After a few bottoming scenes,( in which he appeared to me) to be in excruciating pain and discomfort, I was actually "turned off" by his performances! One scene I watched and I saw something in his eyes and his "breathing" as if he were focused. He appeared to be making a conscious effort to give a better performance. When I saw that, I started watching and listening to him differently in future scenes. By this time, his scene with Romeo came out and it blew me away. I wasn't fixated on him physically! I learned more about him as a person after I had already decided in my mind, "I like this model". I've grown to enjoy him (because of him as a person as well as a performer) more than possibly, any other model presently active.

So, the perception that observations made with one's head (on their penis) conflicting with one's head (on their shoulders) may be just that; "a perception". But, this is a porn site. I am here because I want to have the "head of my penis" become engorged with blood from the visualization of nice looking guys engaging in sexual acts. Guys I may never meet in real life, nor do I have to leave my home to enjoy!

I can still enjoy them, care about them as young adult people, who are here ultimately for my viewing pleasure. Whether I think about them with one head, or the other. As far as being analytical, I scrutinize things too! But at the "end of the day" it's just porn.........


I am not on a mission to deny anyone their sexual enchantments with the videos and the models in them. Along this same line, so many seem to persistently remind me this is porn website. I think I have deduced this by now.
My addressing Damien as Dimmie is neither disrespectful against him or against me. If he had a problem with this, I am confident he would have expressed as much the first time I did it; he has not because he knows I would never intentionally disrespect him and - hopefully - anyone else. When you stated you would not address him as I do out of respect, I got the impression you believe I address him as such out of disrespect, which is hardly the case. Dimmie and I have chatted on the fly, and I shall leave it at that.
You say you care about the models as young adult people. I admire this most sincerely. Rest assured I also care about them as people, but if their performances lack what I am seeking, their credibility as a model is weakened, but not destroyed.
I appreciate your input. Spanks
Cheers.
Jack
 
"My addressing Damien as Dimmie is neither disrespectful against him or against me. If he had a problem with this, I am confident he would have expressed as much the first time I did it; he has not because he knows I would never intentionally disrespect him and - hopefully - anyone else. When you stated you would not address him as I do out of respect, I got the impression you believe I address him as such out of disrespect, which is hardly the case. Dimmie and I have chatted on the fly, and I shall leave it at that."

Ohh, Okay, I guess you've got that sh..t on lock down! Good on you! But, again "perception"! I "respectfully" choose not to use your nick name for him. It is Your nickname....not mine to use for him. BETUDIDNTKNOW, I have my own "Nickname" for him. And, he knows what it is too!
 
"My addressing Damien as Dimmie is neither disrespectful against him or against me. If he had a problem with this, I am confident he would have expressed as much the first time I did it; he has not because he knows I would never intentionally disrespect him and - hopefully - anyone else. When you stated you would not address him as I do out of respect, I got the impression you believe I address him as such out of disrespect, which is hardly the case. Dimmie and I have chatted on the fly, and I shall leave it at that."

Ohh, Okay, I guess you've got that sh..t on lock down! Good on you! But, again "perception"! I "respectfully" choose not to use your nick name for him. It is Your nickname....not mine to use for him. BETUDIDNTKNOW, I have my own "Nickname" for him. And, he knows what it is too!


I would love to know what your nickname is for Dimmie, but out of the same respect you accorded me, PM me, if you so desire. If not, I understand and shall leave you with yours, as you have exhibited kind respect to leave me with mine.
 
I would love to know what your nickname is for Dimmie, but out of the same respect you accorded me, PM me, if you so desire. If not, I understand and shall leave you with yours, as you have exhibited kind respect to leave me with mine.

I will exercise the later option, T.Y. :smile:
 
Sir egg, I used his last name so you knew I was addressing you in particular...and I'll say it again...if that scene I speak of does not change your opinion...I doubt anything will. If you're looking for authenticity that can be seen past the camera lens...you will clearly see it. If you can't see it on THAT scene?? I highly recommend a trip to your local optician...ha ha ha. We will see I guess...we will see - I sit here and remain confident with a smile on my face.
Johnny
 
Sir egg, I used his last name so you knew I was addressing you in particular...and I'll say it again...if that scene I speak of does not change your opinion...I doubt anything will. If you're looking for authenticity that can be seen past the camera lens...you will clearly see it. If you can't see it on THAT scene?? I highly recommend a trip to your local optician...ha ha ha. We will see I guess...we will see - I sit here and remain confident with a smile on my face.
Johnny

Johnny, your jocularity, though a tad on the sardonic side, is appreciated. I have particular reasons why I said what I did. If it interests you enough to learn them, PM me as one professional to another.
Cheers.
Jack
 
Johnny, your jocularity, though a tad on the sardonic side, is appreciated. I have particular reasons why I said what I did. If it interests you enough to learn them, PM me as one professional to another.
Cheers.
Jack
Was not being cynical - nor was I mocking you in any way...I like to joke around, laugh and smile. My point was I really think you will see what it is that you see missing - particularly from Thompson. I will let you know when the scene is about to go up....or perhaps I should just let it go up...there is no doubt you will know which scene I am referencing upon seeing it....it does really stand out- I expect you'll be pleasantly surprised. You must understand, although I can't always pull that "x-factor" out of each model in every scene...too many variables including natural chemistry that's not forced...this one doesn't disappoint. Also understand, I have that same critical eye as you...am looking for the same thing you speak of...when I see it- I know it's there.
Johnny
 
Was not being cynical - nor was I mocking you in any way...I like to joke around, laugh and smile. My point was I really think you will see what it is that you see missing - particularly from Thompson. I will let you know when the scene is about to go up....or perhaps I should just let it go up...there is no doubt you will know which scene I am referencing upon seeing it....it does really stand out- I expect you'll be pleasantly surprised. You must understand, although I can't always pull that "x-factor" out of each model in every scene...too many variables including natural chemistry that's not forced...this one doesn't disappoint. Also understand, I have that same critical eye as you...am looking for the same thing you speak of...when I see it- I know it's there.
Johnny


I understand you most succinctly, Johnny. However, and you have compelled me to tell you here for the umpteenth time, why I cannot agree with you.
On December 4, 2011, while en route from Chicago after auditioning for a major motion picture, I stopped at a rest stop along I-65 to get some coffee to help keep me awake. The instant I exited my Prius, I was physically struck by a blatant hit-and-run driver, who knocked me completely across the tar macadam and left me there for dead. The physical results from this incident were devastating: I suffered massive brain trauma that affected my speech pattern as well as my capacity for storing memories. Each day, my memories fade all the more, so I am careful what I do and with whom I do these things. At the same time, my testicles were so badly damaged that I had to have them surgically removed, replaced with prosthetic "balls" that hide my shame. No matter how hard I try, I cannot accrue an erection, and my ability to produce testosterone is a huge zero. Even a Reebok pump could not help me, nor any medication.
This is why, Johnny, I am not excited by the videos you shoot nor the ones I film. I suppose it makes me a perfect candidate for being a videographer, as the models' actions and physiques (not to mention their nakedness) does nothing for me at all. My best friend once called me a "unique eunuch," which hurt me enough to cause me to actually laugh at it.
As for Paul, I had a godson whom I practically raised since his youth. When he matured, his physical resemblance to Paul is quite uncanny. If I did not know better, I would swear they were one and the same person. Sadly, however, my godson entered the gay porn industry against my better judgment and request. In time, I saw less and less of him until one early morning, I received a call from his mum, asking me to verify Pup (my godson) was in Indy at such-and-such address. When I got there, I found him next to a trash bin, completely naked. He had been murdered, a knife's penetrating his rectum and then rammed down his throat as if to slit his throat from the inside. (The coroner said he found feces in Pup's throat.) It almost killed me, as it did when I had to tell his mum. I never allowed her to see Pup in that condition, so I paid for his closed-casket funeral and had him cremated, his cremains remaining with me in the same urn that houses those belonging to my wife and my deceased infant son.
I am sorry you had to read this, Johnny. I wanted to PM you and express it all there.
Cheers, my friend.
Jack
 
I understand you most succinctly, Johnny. However, and you have compelled me to tell you here for the umpteenth time, why I cannot agree with you.
On December 4, 2011, while en route from Chicago after auditioning for a major motion picture, I stopped at a rest stop along I-65 to get some coffee to help keep me awake. The instant I exited my Prius, I was physically struck by a blatant hit-and-run driver, who knocked me completely across the tar macadam and left me there for dead. The physical results from this incident were devastating: I suffered massive brain trauma that affected my speech pattern as well as my capacity for storing memories. Each day, my memories fade all the more, so I am careful what I do and with whom I do these things. At the same time, my testicles were so badly damaged that I had to have them surgically removed, replaced with prosthetic "balls" that hide my shame. No matter how hard I try, I cannot accrue an erection, and my ability to produce testosterone is a huge zero. Even a Reebok pump could not help me, nor any medication.
This is why, Johnny, I am not excited by the videos you shoot nor the ones I film. I suppose it makes me a perfect candidate for being a videographer, as the models' actions and physiques (not to mention their nakedness) does nothing for me at all. My best friend once called me a "unique eunuch," which hurt me enough to cause me to actually laugh at it.
As for Paul, I had a godson whom I practically raised since his youth. When he matured, his physical resemblance to Paul is quite uncanny. If I did not know better, I would swear they were one and the same person. Sadly, however, my godson entered the gay porn industry against my better judgment and request. In time, I saw less and less of him until one early morning, I received a call from his mum, asking me to verify Pup (my godson) was in Indy at such-and-such address. When I got there, I found him next to a trash bin, completely naked. He had been murdered, a knife's penetrating his rectum and then rammed down his throat as if to slit his throat from the inside. (The coroner said he found feces in Pup's throat.) It almost killed me, as it did when I had to tell his mum. I never allowed her to see Pup in that condition, so I paid for his closed-casket funeral and had him cremated, his cremains remaining with me in the same urn that houses those belonging to my wife and my deceased infant son.
I am sorry you had to read this, Johnny. I wanted to PM you and express it all there.
Cheers, my friend.
Jack
So sorry for your loss and all your misfortune...I really am - what a tragic story, but the great thing is that you are still with us. There are many great things you can get satisfaction with and fulfillment outside of sex itself. Although you said you "disagree" with me... I was trying to point out that those intangibles you speak of that are often missing from scenes, those authentic connective signals you wish to see- really shine through in the scene I speak of. Just because you are unable to pleasure yourself physically form the videos, it doesn't mean you can't enjoy a more mentally satisfying experience. Thanks for being so candid and sharing...to be honest I really didn't understand some of your comments or remarks (especially when it came to Paul's videos) now it makes perfect sense. I think the loss of your ability to be erect during a scene could only un-cloud your viewing of it...more than the typical viewer - lending way to a more critical eye that's looking to be satisfied with more of the MENTAL aspects of sexuality...in particular, some sort of cerebral connectedness between the models...perhaps that's WHY you long to see it so badly...because that's the only real connection to your own sexuality that's relatable. Although I agree, those moments, whenever they can be captured, do make for the most intense of scenes for all viewers to enjoy...even if they aren't consciously aware of why they are enjoying it more than usual. We have similar eyes then, I've shot between 1500 and 2000 scenes in my tenure - gay, straight and bi content...have even shot more famous performers that I ACTUALLY am very attracted to...not ONCE have I EVER been stimulated or turned on in the least while working...many people will never understand this...many simply do not believe me...I have no reason to lie
 
So sorry for your loss and all your misfortune...I really am - what a tragic story, but the great thing is that you are still with us. There are many great things you can get satisfaction with and fulfillment outside of sex itself. Although you said you "disagree" with me... I was trying to point out that those intangibles you speak of that are often missing from scenes, those authentic connective signals you wish to see- really shine through in the scene I speak of. Just because you are unable to pleasure yourself physically form the videos, it doesn't mean you can't enjoy a more mentally satisfying experience. Thanks for being so candid and sharing...to be honest I really didn't understand some of your comments or remarks (especially when it came to Paul's videos) now it makes perfect sense. I think the loss of your ability to be erect during a scene could only un-cloud your viewing of it...more than the typical viewer - lending way to a more critical eye that's looking to be satisfied with more of the MENTAL aspects of sexuality...in particular, some sort of cerebral connectedness between the models...perhaps that's WHY you long to see it so badly...because that's the only real connection to your own sexuality that's relatable. Although I agree, those moments, whenever they can be captured, do make for the most intense of scenes for all viewers to enjoy...even if they aren't consciously aware of why they are enjoying it more than usual. We have similar eyes then, I've shot between 1500 and 2000 scenes in my tenure - gay, straight and bi content...have even shot more famous performers that I ACTUALLY am very attracted to...not ONCE have I EVER been stimulated or turned on in the least while working...many people will never understand this...many simply do not believe me...I have no reason to lie

Johnny, for what it may/not be worth, I would not input much emphasis or importance on whether or not others will understand your not being stimulated when you film porn. As I defined, I am exactly the same, but for entirely different reasons. Call it desensitization, call it mundane, call it rote, call it whatever. From what I have seen on here, and I know I am by far NOT the only one here, your most recent shoots have been incredibly awesome. You were able to assist the models invoke their inmost talents and explode them before the camera lens, as attested by the final redacted footage. Throughout my tenure as videographer, I have not shot as many as you, nor shall I pretend to. I have, however, shot gay, bi, hetero, spanking, etc., videos, many for private persons via contract, meaning I am disallowed to exhibit their shoots without their expressed written (and notarized, for my own protection) permission. I have also shot weddings and bar/bat mitzvahs, as well as birthday parties, funerals, bon voyage bashes, prom parties, post-prom celebrations, and the like. The pay was moderate for most of these private videos, but it is fun and always cool to be wanted. With my being born Yiddish, I also used to film circumcisions - but the tips were lousy. (Think about it!)
Anyway, I understand your position behind a camera, serving as videographer, director, and producer all in one. 'Taint easy, but it is adventurous inasmuch as no two videos are ever alike, per se, though the scripts may be the same. For this reason, I opted to film more than one genre, but have since filtered them all down to a chosen few, since age is overtaking me.
From one videographer to another, well done, Johnny. No one can fully appreciate the artistry of another until one walks a reel in his shoes.
Spanks for your attention.
Cheers.
Jack
 
I was trying to point out that those intangibles you speak of that are often missing from scenes, those authentic connective signals you wish to see- really shine through in the scene I speak of. ...looking to be satisfied with more of the MENTAL aspects of sexuality...in particular, some sort of cerebral connectedness between the models... Although I agree, those moments, whenever they can be captured, do make for the most intense of scenes for all viewers to enjoy...even if they aren't consciously aware of why they are enjoying it more than usual.

That's exactly what makes or breaks a scene. It can't be forced if the connection between the model and viewers is not there. But that also explains how different sets of good looking models can do the same kind of scene with the same positions and poses...and some will get rave reviews, average reviews or much worse. It hard to describe what that "It" is...but when it's there, you know it. haha
 
...in particular, some sort of cerebral connectedness between the models...perhaps that's WHY you long to see it so badly...because that's the only real connection to your own sexuality that's relatable. Although I agree, those moments, whenever they can be captured, do make for the most intense of scenes for all viewers to enjoy...even if they aren't consciously aware of why they are enjoying it more than usual.

Well this also works for me! I know the most applicable (and also the most popular term used) is: "chemistry" between the models. I've often stated and feel strongly that, "chemistry" cannot be directed between the models. But, when the camera is able to capture that moment of "authentic connective signals" even briefly, it gives me a feeling I can't describe! I'll just call..."it"! As for your statement:"I've shot between 1500 and 2000 scenes in my tenure - gay, straight and bi content...have even shot more famous performers that I ACTUALLY am very attracted to...not ONCE have I EVER been stimulated or turned on in the least while working...many people will never understand this...many simply do not believe me...I have no reason to lie" I say, that's professionalism! Pardon the crude comparison but, What kind of Gynecologist would a man be if, every examination he did, was an extension of his own sexual desires? I actually thought that, sometimes the previous director gave us HIS vantage point when shooting scenes, rather than trying to capture what the viewing audience would enjoy. (If that makes sense.) I like your approach to filming, I like that you are truly an extension of the "viewer" through the eyes of the camera as you direct the scenes. You really make me glad to be a voyeur Johnny!
 
Well this also works for me! I know the most applicable (and also the most popular term used) is: "chemistry" between the models. I've often stated and feel strongly that, "chemistry" cannot be directed between the models. But, when the camera is able to capture that moment of "authentic connective signals" even briefly, it gives me a feeling I can't describe! I'll just call..."it"! As for your statement:"I've shot between 1500 and 2000 scenes in my tenure - gay, straight and bi content...have even shot more famous performers that I ACTUALLY am very attracted to...not ONCE have I EVER been stimulated or turned on in the least while working...many people will never understand this...many simply do not believe me...I have no reason to lie" I say, that's professionalism! Pardon the crude comparison but, What kind of Gynecologist would a man be if, every examination he did, was an extension of his own sexual desires? I actually thought that, sometimes the previous director gave us HIS vantage point when shooting scenes, rather than trying to capture what the viewing audience would enjoy. (If that makes sense.) I like your approach to filming, I like that you are truly an extension of the "viewer" through the eyes of the camera as you direct the scenes. You really make me glad to be a voyeur Johnny!
Thank you...that's EXACTLY what I'm thinking as I'm shooting it live- you have to float from shot to shot without hesitation...for me, the easiest way to make these choices is to imagine a viewer watching what I'm seeing as it unfolds- everyone has certain angles of shots that are their favorites...and not everyone is the same- enough shot variety should be able to please most...and I'm glad you are pleased
Johnny
 
Thank you...that's EXACTLY what I'm thinking as I'm shooting it live- you have to float from shot to shot without hesitation...for me, the easiest way to make these choices is to imagine a viewer watching what I'm seeing as it unfolds- everyone has certain angles of shots that are their favorites...and not everyone is the same- enough shot variety should be able to please most...and I'm glad you are pleased
Johnny


Johnny, I feel I can finally comment, as I am beyond my annual mourning phase vis-a-vis my late wife. You manage to improve with every shoot. I should be so talented, but as with you, I do my best with what - and who - I have to work. I see great things cumming from this site, courtesy of your expertise and overt experience. By all means, keep UP the good work on either side of the lens.
Good form.
Cheers and spanks for your efforts.
Jack
 
Top