• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Upcoming Scenes

Nothing wrong with Kodi or anyone finding religion, but sadly he became a homophobe according to reports.
I hadn't heard that Stowe, but if that were the case after watching all the "kodying" he did while taking big dicks up his boy butt, and shooting his cum while being fucked, that would seem to be a classic case of hypocrisy!

quote-hypocrisy-is-the-homage-vice-pays-to-virtue-francois-de-la-rochefoucauld-155988.jpg
 
where is the proof that a loud bottom boy is faking it? look at the size of Kodi's hips, his asshole stretched nearly half the width of his buttocks by the HUGE dicks he took. maybe he was just uninhibited and vocalized what he was feeling, phsyically and emotionally. all young men are taught to masturbate quietly,m cuz they normally start in a houseful of family usually at night--everyone is asleep and besides masturbating is...ahem...WRONG...so getting caught is humiliating. so we learn to withhold vocalization.

once out on my own, fuck it it was my apartment and I get let loose with a howl if I felt like it when I came. with other guys, I really reverted, growling snarling sometimes even biting the guy I was fucking. And I was a rough fuck. not at first--eased the other guy into it not only for his comfort but because the more enagaged he was, the better I made him feel, the rougher and harder I could get with him. I SO "get" Ben. I fucked every guy I was with starting out like they had never had a cock up their ass before. to so many bottom guys who are used to the top being a dick and just ramming it in, rarely giving them the chance to "catch up", this was a new experience for them, and I was rewarded for my initial efforts by a boy on my cock who I could do ANYTHING to cuz he was so dick drunk, his asshole so comfortable, warm, stretched out, he could just let loose.

I LOVE loud bottoms and tho I understand the sociological training of men to with-hold vocalizing sexual pleasure, assuming a bottom is faking his vocalizations just isn't right. A great part of pleasure I got from sex was the uninhibited vocalization--both mine, growling, etc., and his too. if my cock in him set off his prostate or adrenal response and he felt comfortable enough to vocalize that pleasure/pain/adrenalin response, then I, as a top, had done my job right. so just look again at how small Kodi's entire receiving area was and the size of the cocks he took and wonder if u wouldn't have been hollering a bit too.

I mean, measuring his butt cheeks across at his taint--what? 5-6"s maybe. and he's taking a cock that has a 2 1/2" diameter? not too mention the relatively small length of his rectal/anal canal...he's a tiny guy! so his canals are, what, 4" or so long put together--and the guy topping, losing an inch or so to buttocks obstruction, whatever, is still getting 6" or so in there? that is a holler waiting to happen, especially if he LIKES it. cuz he'll push his own threshold to take as much more of that cock as he can get.

the asshole has three barriers--anal ring, entry rectal ring and exit rectal ring where it meets the colon and makes a 90 deg. left turn. there's a name for that organ but I forget. Tht organ is responsible for withholding chyme for nutrient removal and then releasing it into the rectal canal. that's why butt fucking isn't "unnatural". the enter rectal system is well designed to be fucked. the rctal canal is lined with mucoid covered MUSCLE and is designed to stretch and compress as it fills with chyme and then contracts to expel the waste thru the anal canal. the truly interesting part is that little organ at the top will close when the rectum is full. when a cock fills the space in the rectum, that little organ responds by closing cuz it thinks the rectum is full. I've fucked guys for 47 years and have got shit on my dick twice. the rectum is designed==muscle covered with low friction mucous-- to expel ALL the waste it has collected, cuz that waste is poisonous to the body. so it's very rare if the guy just took a regular shit right before sex that there is any waste left in the rectum. douching is nice, cuz it gets rid of any stragglers, but normally the human asshole is "wired" to switch from its biological function to its sexual function thru stimulation.

that little 90 deg organ at the top of the rectal canal closes cuz it thinks the rectum is full cuz it's full of cock. the mucoid membranes of the anal canal are designed to stretch and contract and are mucoid covered to make expelling waste more efficient, which is also perfect lubrication for taking cock. Yes, the anal canal is dry--probably to eliminate a moist area exposed to the air which would be ripe for infection to take hold. but it's also designed to open without pain at least 1-2 times a day for 80 or so years. it's a tough ring of muscle. expanding and contracting is its function. doesn't matter from which direction that expansion is instigated. the "pain" from opening that canal designed to open is purely psychological. it's unusual, at first, for the pressure to open to come from the outside. it doesn't "hurt", it's just an unusual feeling, so the mind fights back, consciously attempting to stop the expansion. this causes resistance, so the cock literally has to break thru that resistance and that is what "hurts". think about it--does it hurt to shit? normally, no. the anal ring is performing exactly the same function admitting a cock as it does expelling waste. so the "hurt" part must come from somewhere else and it is manufactured in the brain attempting to keep the hole closed.

same goes for entering the next barrier, the rectum. no way that can physically hurt, cuz the rectum opens and closes all the time. it's the resistance from the brain that attempts to keep that hole closed. we hear it all the time when they break in some guy--just relax. and it's the truth--without conscious resistance, a lubed cock will just slide right in there. HOWEVER, simple physics comes into play and a 2-3" diameter cock sliding into a narrow and short rectal canal in proportion to the guy being fucked is gonna set off some major reactions. that is a LOT of unusual stretching going on. some guys, it doesn't get so much of a reaction--perhaps their anal/rectal canals are more flexible, or they are so well trained in suppressing vocalizing sexual pleasure, it just doesn't seem like they're feeling that stretching.

Me? I always encouraged every guy I was with to let it out! howl, holler, scream, grunt, call me a mother fucker, cuz suppressing that is suppressing part of the enjoyment I want them to experience as their top. are there quiet bottoms who are enjoying themselves as much as a loud bottom? sure. but to be quiet as a disconnect from what is happening to u, like entering a fugue state in which YOU are no longer part of ur own body--that's just not psychologically healthy. A form of denial that can't possibly make having sex with a guy fun at all.

so--in conclusion--YAY LOUD BOTTOMS!!!! and growly, snarling somewhat violent big bear tops.
 
addendum: left out WHY the brain resists the opening of these canals. potty training. humans are about the only species who just doesnt' shit where they are standing whenver the urge hits. humans are taught to consciously keep those orifices closed and to only relax them in the appropriate place. not being in the appropriate place, attempting to open those orifices goes against YEARS of pscyhophyisological training to keep those orifices closed unless u have to shit and are in an appropriate place to shit. that is why the brain rebels and consciously attempts to keep those orifices closed when taking a cock.
 
That was very cute Crandall. Being taken on a ride where we are tempted to imagine all the intricate details and dimensions of Kodi's rectum was a hoot. haha

I must say that while many of us back in the day got tired of Kodi overacting and hamming it up for the camera, we were not oblivious to the fact that he was one of the finest models to ever land on the site. We never hated him. That's for sure. lol Kodi's scene with another favorite model of mine, Colin is such a favorite that I downloaded it for safekeeping and still go back to watch it several times a year. :)

https://members.brokestraightboys.com/play/NzUx/kodi-&-colin
 
Awww. That is very Sad to see..But with all the fake news today. You just never can tell for sure? xo

I would like to believe that with his newfound religious zeal that he decided to stop doing porn himself, but without turning homophobic against gay people in general. We'll never know for sure what was in his heart and mind on that point. But I never knew of him to make any homophobic remarks after he left.
 
If Kodi found religion why did he suck off and take Clay's cum in his mouth on Clay's site?

Poor Kodi. You couldn't pay me enough money to do that.

That's a fair question though Elyot. I think that those scenes were filmed while Kodi was still with Broke Straight Boys, regardless of when they were actually released on Clay's site. I can't prove that for sure of course. But I don't believe Kodi's scenes there were filmed after he left, but rather before. That was one of the big scandals that went down during the Clay era. He was using Broke Straight Boys's own studios and models to film scenes for his own private site, (even possibly paying the models with Broke Straight Boys funds) without the knowledge or consent of the powers that be over here. If you check out several early scenes of Clay's site (which I don't care to at all) you will see that some of them are filmed on very familiar Broke Straight Boys sets.
 
If Kodi found religion why did he suck off and take Clay's cum in his mouth on Clay's site?

Poor Kodi. You couldn't pay me enough money to do that.

That's a fair question though Elyot. I think that those scenes were filmed while Kodi was still with Broke Straight Boys, regardless of when they were actually released on Clay's site. I can't prove that for sure of course. But I don't believe Kodi's scenes there were filmed after he left, but rather before. That was one of the big scandals that went down during the Clay era. He was using Broke Straight Boys's own studios and models to film scenes for his own private site, (even possibly paying the models with Broke Straight Boys funds) without the knowledge or consent of the powers that be over here. If you check out several early scenes of Clay's site (which I don't care to at all) you will see that some of them are filmed on very familiar Broke Straight Boys sets.
I never watched any of Clay's scenes from his own site where he unfortunately appears himself having sex with the models, but it is also my understanding that he was using Broke Straight Boys models, and perhaps the set to film his own stuff simultaneously while shooting Broke Straight Boys

And it is also my belief that at the very end of the Broke Straight Boys-TV series when Mark looks at the camera and tells us that he was "betrayed" by someone he trusted that he was referring to Clay, who did leave Broke Straight Boys very suddenly around that time, with no explanation offered as to the reason he was gone.
 
That was very cute Crandall. Being taken on a ride where we are tempted to imagine all the intricate details and dimensions of Kodi's rectum was a hoot. haha

I must say that while many of us back in the day got tired of Kodi overacting and hamming it up for the camera,

like I said, a helluva an assumption to make ("...Kodi overacting and hamming it up for the camera...") with no evidence. a group of u just ganged up with ur only evidence being a shared unsubstantiated conviction which u all then decided was "the truth" (t.m.) and it wasn't just Kodi's ass nor vocalizations I was referring to, tho his was the sample I used as an e.g. (example given).

all human rectal/anal systems are the same. the attempt to consciously keep those orifices closed for anyone potty trained is the same and, as stated, human beings are one of the few species that develops this psychophysiological mandate. the rest of the species, except for pets who are trained along the same lines, just let loose wherever they happen to be.

This little gang that developed this conviction would seem to substantiate my observation that men are taught or learn to withhold vocalization of sexual pleasure, as, as a group, u all condemn such action as being fake--since u don't do it, someone else that does MUST be faking. I know I learned/was taught to withhold vocalization of sexual pleasure right along with other boys at that age. but, as with most things foisted upon me by an artificial social structure, I did not submit. there's a reason for my innate reaction to most social artifice--I was born an empath--so whether u/they/whoever vocalized or not, I could "read" the emotional/physical/psychological response, deliberately stifled or not.

please, challenge the content of my posts if u like--that doesn't bother me a bit and I would happily engage in discussion of the content. but it is the height of disrespect--to anyone, not just me--to write off the entirety of the content of a disposition on a personal level, and flippantly at that. to me, this is not the way adults communicate/interact. If all u took away from my post was a means by which to flippantly disregard the content to suit ur preconceived, unsubstantiated groupspeak OPINION that Kodi, or any loud bottom, is faking his vocalizations is unresponsive to what I submitted and very self-serving and, frankly, insulting.

I left the school yard a long time ago and never liked other children anyway--mostly due to this kind of irrelevant mockery. don't agree with the content? then say so and substantiate ur position--do not presume that mockery and flippant disregard equates to engaging in a rational adult conversation.

or go ahead and do so. the next time, I will simply not respond...I find engagement in such "conversations" annoying and a complete waste of time.

have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
My belief is that no one person's theories or postulations are any more valid than anyone else's, and when this forum is "firing on all cylinders", we will have a variety of sometimes diverse, but all valid opinions offered here. And as long as we are respectful to one another in our debates, it makes for a very good forum. I love freedom of expression, here and everywhere in life!:thumbup:
 
My belief is that no one person's theories or postulations are any more valid than anyone else's, and when this forum is "firing on all cylinders", we will have a variety of sometimes diverse, but all valid opinions offered here. And as long as we are respectful to one another in our debates, it makes for a very good forum. I love freedom of expression, here and everywhere in life!:thumbup:

Thanks for this, and I totally agree. It is my observation that the forum is beginning to pick up and be fun again. YEA!
 
like I said, a helluva an assumption to make ("...Kodi overacting and hamming it up for the camera...") with no evidence. a group of u just ganged up with ur only evidence being a shared unsubstantiated conviction which u all then decided was "the truth" (t.m.) and it wasn't just Kodi's ass nor vocalizations I was referring to, tho his was the sample I used as an e.g. (example given).


This little gang that developed this conviction would seem to substantiate my observation that men are taught or learn to withhold vocalization of sexual pleasure, as, as a group, u all condemn such action as being fake--since u don't do it, someone else that does MUST be faking. I know I learned/was taught to withhold vocalization of sexual pleasure right along with other boys at that age. but, as with most things foisted upon me by an artificial social structure, I did not submit. there's a reason for my innate reaction to most social artifice--I was born an empath--so whether u/they/whoever vocalized or not, I could "read" the emotional/physical/psychological response, deliberately stifled or not.

please, challenge the content of my posts if u like--that doesn't bother me a bit and I would happily engage in discussion of the content. but it is the height of disrespect--to anyone, not just me--to write off the entirety of the content of a disposition on a personal level, and flippantly at that. to me, this is not the way adults communicate/interact. If all u took away from my post was a means by which to flippantly disregard the content to suit ur preconceived, unsubstantiated groupspeak OPINION that Kodi, or any loud bottom, is faking his vocalizations is unresponsive to what I submitted and very self-serving and, frankly, insulting.

I left the school yard a long time ago and never liked other children anyway--mostly due to this kind of irrelevant mockery. don't agree with the content? then say so and substantiate ur position--do not presume that mockery and flippant disregard equates to engaging in a rational adult conversation.

or go ahead and do so. the next time, I will simply not respond...I find engagement in such "conversations" annoying and a complete waste of time.

have a nice day.

Well alrighty then. LOL

Your opinions and perspectives are as valid to be shared and heard as anyone else's in here CRandall. That's what we're all doing. Sharing our opinions and perspectives. We will agree and disagree among oursleves. As has been said before, it would be boring and a total waste of time to even have this forum if everyone in here agreed on everything all of the time. As much as any of us might feel that we speak "the truth" of a situation, none of us can ever claim to have the concurrence and backing of the Almighty himself. lol

Cheers! :thumbup1:
 
You quoted Tampa as saying,
I must say that while many of us back in the day got tired of Kodi overacting and hamming it up for the camera,

But Tampa's full quote went on to say,
I must say that while many of us back in the day got tired of Kodi overacting and hamming it up for the camera, we were not oblivious to the fact that he was one of the finest models to ever land on the site. We never hated him. That's for sure.

....If all u took away from my post was a means by which to flippantly disregard the content to suit ur preconceived, unsubstantiated groupspeak OPINION that Kodi, or any loud bottom, is faking his vocalizations is unresponsive to what I submitted and very self-serving and, frankly, insulting.

I left the school yard a long time ago and never liked other children anyway--mostly due to this kind of irrelevant mockery. don't agree with the content? then say so and substantiate ur position--do not presume that mockery and flippant disregard equates to engaging in a rational adult conversation.

or go ahead and do so. the next time, I will simply not respond...I find engagement in such "conversations" annoying and a complete waste of time.

have a nice day.

So I don't know why you took offense at Tampa's remark. And, I agree with him that your post on the mechanics of anal sex was very enlightening. I have always understood that some turds are as big as some dicks and the dick shouldn't be all that painful, but never understood just how that works. Cool post.
 
Poor Kodi. You couldn't pay me enough money to do that.

That's a fair question though Elyot. I think that those scenes were filmed while Kodi was still with Broke Straight Boys, regardless of when they were actually released on Clay's site. I can't prove that for sure of course. But I don't believe Kodi's scenes there were filmed after he left, but rather before. That was one of the big scandals that went down during the Clay era. He was using Broke Straight Boys's own studios and models to film scenes for his own private site, (even possibly paying the models with Broke Straight Boys funds) without the knowledge or consent of the powers that be over here. If you check out several early scenes of Clay's site (which I don't care to at all) you will see that some of them are filmed on very familiar Broke Straight Boys sets.


Couldn't pay me enough either. Thanks for the explanation.
 
So I don't know why you took offense at Tampa's remark. And, I agree with him that your post on the mechanics of anal sex was very enlightening. I have always understood that some turds are as big as some dicks and the dick shouldn't be all that painful, but never understood just how that works. Cool post.

I guess we all agree it's a very nice post! Just a little misunderstanding... Everybody likes Kodi anyway!
 
I did not include the part of the quote u highlighted in red cuz whether Kodi was still appreciated as a model has nothing to do with the causes, physiological changes, etc. for a bottom boy being loud. the two sentence phrases aren't about the same subject. whether he was liked or not has nothing to do with the unsubstantiated groupspeak opinion he was faking his reactions. that's why I didn't include that part of the quote, cuz it had nothing to do with the subject I was addressing...loud bottoms faking it.

doesn't matter. I tend to use forums to address not just the person I am interacting with, but also write for lurkers just to pass on information. so many young men simply have never learned how their bodies operate and way too many people, male, female, whatever, often have so submitted to social artifice training they may simply not know they have a choice--"guys don't like it if I get too loud so I should do whatever I can to be quiet--and all the time his cock is in me, I wanna holler and moan--but I don't dare cuz that's not what I am 'supposed' to do."

and the guys who don't like the bottom being too loud? same socially artificial training. hear it in scenes here and elsewhere all too often--stop being a bitch. stop crying. shut up and take it. way too common to be a coincidence. it's a taught trait and imposed by those it has been imposed upon.

Any guy I ever fucked? EVERYBODY heard it. let loose! surrender to the pleasure and anything you feel. better than suppressing or worse, fugueing out. but just my opinion. on this forum I fully expect a dismissive smart remark, cuz thinking is haaaaard. knowing stuff is haaaard. easier to be flippant from disinterest or ignorance. The "Idiocracy" happened a looooong time ago.

exchanges like these make me think of the trial scene in that movie when all the prosecuting attorney can manage in response to a reasoned statement is "but...but...he's a fag!"

yeah--that's worth engaging.

never mind. groupthink me off the forum too. didn't know ya before I met ya and tomorrow I'll forget ya. works wonders.
 
LOL Betu! :) I must admit that in spite of the apparent contradiction/borderline hypocrisy I don't care for Sebastian's haircut. Some people carry off certain grooming looks better than others.

All that said, I may not care for the side view angles and views from the back of Robb's new haircut. But the frontal view looks pretty good to me. :) I normally am all about seeing full heads of hair on younger people...without crew cuts, flat tops and so on.

I like Robb's new hair style, too. I'm way into "hot boys" hair styles, going back to the 1940's when that was about the only "come fuck me" fashion statement available to a guy.

To be conservative, however, (LOL) I agree that we have not yet seen Robb in profile, or what happens when someone jerks his hot clothes off and starts hammering his ass. We just see it from the front while Robb is contemplating what's about to happen.

And I think that a good style on a Model needs to stand the test of "Exactly how fuckable is the style?" It may look great to start with, before the sucking and fucking starts, but will the whole style get jacked apart when someone starts slam-fucking the kids hot little ass. LOL

I'll know more when I see Ryan climb on top of this kid.
 
Last edited:
Top