Dear Slim,
I like a large penis as much as the next guy or gal as magnifying glasses are inconvenient, get in the way, and sometimes require cleaning with heavy usage. However, "large" can fall anywhere within the range of 6 inches and upwards to infinity. Due to political correctness issues, anything below 6 inches requires "rounding off" the actual measurement to the next higher whole number "giving them the benefit of the doubt". But isn't it a mean-spirited curiousity in how we delight in hearing about the "smallest of the small" and use that to measure up the relative manliness of the owner, as if they really had a choice and deserved what little they got.
Furthermore, isn't it even more odd that the less we like an individual, the happer we are to learn of their miniscule appendage measurements and, conversly, the more we like an individual, it validates our opinion of them as a man's man to learn that they are generously endowed.
Just some things to think about and ask yourself why? Why does this have to be this way? What valid purpose does this serve? Who gets to make the rules, anyway? Outside of mere bragging rights, what difference does it make if you truly love your partner or yourself?
Sincerely,
Stimpy, Smaller in size and Bigger in heart (in case you were wondering)
Stimps, it's simple my dear fellow.
When we were mostly either farmers, slaves or royalty, there were very specific reasons, central to the well being of the social order, for a guy to have a really big, long, thick, stiff dick.
Since female children are stronger, and survived the vicissitudes of an ancient childhood better, and since boys were eventually the ones who did the very hardest physical labor and/or were expected to become kings upon the deaths of their fathers, it was important for men to sire a few men, as many as possible in fact since they were the weaker sex in childhood and tended, stupidly, to die off before they were five.
Physiologically the big dick played an enormous role in this whole socio-economic saga. I think most of the following is true, but welcome input:
During intercourse, and perhaps absent some of the mutual affection that we expect spouses to have for each other ever since people began marrying for love (a fairly recent state of affairs), a big willy with some staying power is thought to have a better chance of provoking, in its owners' partner, a vaginal orgasm. This specific type of orgasm creates a pH environment which is specially friendly to the male sperm (as opposed to the female sperm). Male sperm, like the baby males they give rise to, are weaker, making them slower in the race to fertilize the ovum, so a pH that helps them, poor little tykes, makes for male babes. That's one advantage to having a gigantor in your jeans if you want a bunch of sons. The other reason a big willy helps produce boys is because if you actually ejaculate near the cervix, rather than just somewhere in the vagina, you short circuit the marathon and deliver the sperm much nearer the eggy. That also gives an advantage to the sperm that will go on to produce male babies.
So size matters. For geopolitical and socioeconomic reasons. Only.
Your name does make me smile.
