• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Tanner, Brandon & Tyler

Me too Billy, but obviously there are guys who enjoy watching pain. We've had a hand full of guys over the years like Abram and Brandon who should be allowed to just top and give the fans of straight tops enjoy them as they are. Everyone else seems to bottom so they should leave a few good one's for those of us into that.

Mikeyank, while I do understand that you are just voicing your opinion, as well as sharing the opinion of others who also would prefer that certain guys of their liking who emote a more masculine persona remain in the role as "top" as that is what you guys like, but to say that any of those guys " should be allowed to just top" and give the fans of straight tops to enjoy them as they are, seems a bit....for the lack of a better definition...."controlling to me". First of all, a few who share the same opinion as you do, are not the sum total of the membership of this site. I know that members' suggestions and feed back are taken into consideration for the improvement of the entertainment of the viewing but, at the same time, this is porn and generally, we all have the choice when becoming members to watch what entertains us, and not watch what doesn't entertain us. I think with all of the understanding of the porn business that you have learned from former producers and people in the business, you would understand that the industry has changed. In order to provide the amount of updates needed to keep that edge, when models are in the studio for a shooting session, what are they to do if all of the models who are available at that time just happen to be those who as you say, should remain or only be allowed to top? Beside all of that, this site provides entertainment for a variety of people who enjoy a variety of "straight boy" fantasies. I just think it's unfortunate when those who want certain things in porn and this site, forget that there are countless other sites out there too that provide for their needs. Just as those who are told when the scenes and the models appear less than the title BrokeStraight.....don't like it, don't watch it....."Simple as".......

Disclaimer: While I am merely offering this as my opinion and perspective, another way of looking at things, hopefully, I was able to convey it in a respectful manner. As this is my perspective....I am not right, nor do I think I am. This is just how I internalize the statement to which I am responding to. Thanks...Betudidntknow:001_cool:



Despite your disclaimer, I think your post was an insult to mikey. He can and has spoken in general to your post. But as a member and his friend, I find your post disingenuous. Despite your implication, mikey did not purport to represent any one other than himself as he was agreeing with funbilly. For you to suggest that his expressing his view about certain people should top only has any influence over who does top and who doesn't is ludicrous. You are expressing your opinion and that is great. But in doing so, you did not have to slam mikey for doing the same even as you acknowledge that is what he was doing.
 
I'm pretty sure Broke Straight Boys doesn't force the models to bottom. They just offer them a bigger paycheck if they do, and let them make the decision. There are several models I would rather see as "only tops", Brandon being one of them, but he decided he wanted the extra cash, which I respect. After all, it is his ass. After watching this scene, I have a hunch that he may have thought he made a mistake this time. lol
I have no more inside information on the subject than you do Robb, but it is my feeling that they are required to bottom if they want to continue getting work. I don't believe that either Abram or Brandon really wanted to do it, but did want the paycheck. I guess only Sha or someone from management has the real answer, but that is how it appears to me.
 
Despite your disclaimer, I think your post was an insult to mikey. He can and has spoken in general to your post. But as a member and his friend, I find your post disingenuous. Despite your implication, mikey did not purport to represent any one other than himself as he was agreeing with funbilly. For you to suggest that his expressing his view about certain people should top only has any influence over who does top and who doesn't is ludicrous. You are expressing your opinion and that is great. But in doing so, you did not have to slam mikey for doing the same even as you acknowledge that is what he was doing.
Thank you very much Stowe and I do appreciate your getting how I intended to present myself, but I also understand that sometimes when I write how I feel, I come across differently than I intended it. But overall, both you Stowe and Betu are real friends of mine and while I disagree with Betu's premise, I certainly respect him and defend his right to say whatever he chooses.
 
I have no more inside information on the subject than you do Robb, but it is my feeling that they are required to bottom if they want to continue getting work. I don't believe that either Abram or Brandon really wanted to do it, but did want the paycheck. I guess only Sha or someone from management has the real answer, but that is how it appears to me.


I remember back in the early days of bsb2.0 that this discussion came up,I believe on the forum; and one of the models, I'm thinking Jason, but again I can't be sure did tell us that bottoming pays more and that is the incentive given for someone to bottom. (We know that David did that on screen in his time here.) And sometime after that, again I believe on the forum some model did tell us that bottoming was "encouraged". Whether that is true or not, I know not and obviously things on this site change over time. So as you say only the current regime can speak to what the policy is now and as to that occurring again a crap-shoot. Some times they tell us, some times they don't.
 
I remember back in the early days of bsb2.0 that this discussion came up,I believe on the forum; and one of the models, I'm thinking Jason, but again I can't be sure did tell us that bottoming pays more and that is the incentive given for someone to bottom. (We know that David did that on screen in his time here.) And sometime after that, again I believe on the forum some model did tell us that bottoming was "encouraged". Whether that is true or not, I know not and obviously things on this site change over time. So as you say only the current regime can speak to what the policy is now and as to that occurring again a crap-shoot. Some times they tell us, some times they don't.

And Stowe1, please feel free to interpret my post as you see fit:001_cool:
 
And Stowe1, please feel free to interpret my post as you see fit:001_cool:




I might express my opinion and point out why I might disagree with what your view, as you have expressed it in your own words, is; but that is not interpreting it b/c only you know what your intent was. What I wouldn't do, as you did with mikey's post, is to infer what he meant by his words; or to state as fact what you think the power his words had regarding actions on this site.
 
I might express my opinion and point out why I might disagree with what your view, as you have expressed it in your own words, is; but that is not interpreting it b/c only you know what your intent was. What I wouldn't do, as you did with mikey's post, is to infer what he meant by his words; or to state as fact what you think the power his words had regarding actions on this site.
Thank's again Stowe. I can assure you and all that there was no inference when I agreed with the comments by Elyot saying "The only part of this scene I didn't enjoy was watching Brandon bottoming. Why make tops bottom? Have him do what he does best." and by Funbilly saying "Yea but if he is not enjoying it and obviously in pain what is the point? A big turn off for me."

I was being genuine and sincere in my feeling exactly the same way, with absolutely no hidden agenda behind my words, just speaking from my heart, (and from my groin too, lol).

And as far as my words affecting actions on the site, I am reminded of the "Jake Tipton incident", where he was exposed as a liar by other forumites who recognized him from doing gay porn on other sites prior to Broke Straight Boys, whereas he had told management here and told us in his interview that this was his first time. I stated on this forum that I wasn't as turned on by him as I had been during his initial scenes prior to gaining that knowledge, and some fellow members agreed with my feeling and others disagreed. Broke Straight Boys subsequently decided to let him go and at least two forumites "blamed" me for his being fired. If I actually had that power with my words to influence management here, things would be a lot different than they are now, and I can think of at least six models who would not have been in as many scenes as they were over the last year. lol

The truth is that I am just another "schlub" sitting at my keyboard expressing my own personal thoughts and opinions here. If someone agrees with my opinions and says so, I like that and it's cool, but if they disagree and say so, I can handle that as well. To me that is actually what a forum should be and is all about, expressing one's views and having a discussion with our fellow members.
 
Last edited:
If someone agrees with my opinions and says so, I like that and it's cool, but if they disagree and say so, I can handle that as well. To me that is actually what a forum should be and is all about, expressing one's views and having a discussion with our fellow members.
QUOTE]

And with this point...we are totally in agreement!:smiley-love001:
 
If someone agrees with my opinions and says so, I like that and it's cool, but if they disagree and say so, I can handle that as well. To me that is actually what a forum should be and is all about, expressing one's views and having a discussion with our fellow members.
QUOTE]

And with this point...we are totally in agreement!:smiley-love001:
I love you too buddy!!!!!!! :smiley-love021:

Sorry Peter. I know you enjoy sitting on the sidelines watching me at war with other forumites. lolololol
 
If someone agrees with my opinions and says so, I like that and it's cool, but if they disagree and say so, I can handle that as well. To me that is actually what a forum should be and is all about, expressing one's views and having a discussion with our fellow members.
QUOTE]

And with this point...we are totally in agreement!:smiley-love001:

I love you too buddy!!!!!!! :smiley-love021:

Sorry Peter. I know you enjoy sitting on the sidelines watching me at war with other forumites. lolololol


Betu told everyone in a PM he hated you!! lololol now lets keep the mud slinging going, no room for that lovey dovey bullshit....
 
Betu told everyone in a PM he hated you!! lololol now lets keep the mud slinging going, no room for that lovey dovey bullshit....
That's the Peter I know and love. There was one week during Christmas where Peter got soft, but now:

images
 
OMG!

That scene was is so freakin hot! Tanner's lustful facial expressions looking up at Brandon really got me going. Tanner started out as one of the straighter models. Now that he's really tried gay sex, he seems to have taken to cock like a duck to water. hahaha Gosh I love Tanner. Brandon is really showing some star-level skills onscreen. Tyler looked great too.

This scene is an instant classic. A great job by all.

Thank you!! :thumbup:
 
Top