mikeyank
Long time forumite
On the "Mick is a good Broke Straight Boys" thread, Stimpy has raised the issue of having openly gay boys appearing on the site as well as supposedly straight guys, and how David did have openly identified gay guys appearing on BSB1.
At one time, I would have dismissed this notion totally by saying that I joined a site called Broke Straight Boys and not broke GAY boys, because of my fetish for wanting to see and engage young guys who identify as being heterosexual performing gay sex. I personally find it very erotic watching a very masculine young man who identifies and leads his life in a very straight lifestyle, get naked for my voyeuristic eyes and do things that go against his grain, all in the name of earning some money, (while I have often said that I seriously doubt that any true straight "Kinsey 0" would have gay sex, anymore than I a "Kinsey 6" would ever have heterosexual sex, despite the monetary reward). I believe our Broke Straight Boys models fall somewhere in the middle of the scale, and may live the straight life, they also have untapped desires, that they can explore under the premise of doing it all for the money.
But as I said at one time I would have "demanded" all very straight types on the site, but as I have read and shared opinions with the rest of the forum over the years, I've discovered that all members of Broke Straight Boys are not looking for what I am looking for, and so I have taken a rather inclusive attitude of saying that many different types should be featured here, (providing that they remain physically fit and attractive), and that can certainly include openly gay models.
However as much as I enjoyed David's work on BSB1, I must point out that David was often "disrespectful" to the gay models, offering less money than he did to the straight guys, and set up scenarios where the straight guys would be rather aggressive with the gay bottoms, such as Torin & Steven with pretty young Aiden, and with both Jordan and Mike Robbins double teaming Preston and Scott, or Tank Shane with both Gino and Nathan, (neither of whom was openly gay, but they both definitely enjoyed receiving the cock of straight Shane).
I don't see the lack of gay models here as being in any way anti gay or as a political statement. For me it is only a harmless way of engaging in my own particular sexual fetish of watching naked straight guys having gay sex. But I love this site, and want it to flourish and I am totally in favor of all kinds of variations to attract the widest possible audience, however without straying too far from the initial mission statement of the site. With three updates a week, I am content to get a "core" straight guy scene once every couple of weeks, and to let others who may enjoy a more lovemaking type scene get their share too. But of course the provision is that the guys remain very good looking with good bodies, for I do not want to pay to watch average or subpar looking models.
At one time, I would have dismissed this notion totally by saying that I joined a site called Broke Straight Boys and not broke GAY boys, because of my fetish for wanting to see and engage young guys who identify as being heterosexual performing gay sex. I personally find it very erotic watching a very masculine young man who identifies and leads his life in a very straight lifestyle, get naked for my voyeuristic eyes and do things that go against his grain, all in the name of earning some money, (while I have often said that I seriously doubt that any true straight "Kinsey 0" would have gay sex, anymore than I a "Kinsey 6" would ever have heterosexual sex, despite the monetary reward). I believe our Broke Straight Boys models fall somewhere in the middle of the scale, and may live the straight life, they also have untapped desires, that they can explore under the premise of doing it all for the money.
But as I said at one time I would have "demanded" all very straight types on the site, but as I have read and shared opinions with the rest of the forum over the years, I've discovered that all members of Broke Straight Boys are not looking for what I am looking for, and so I have taken a rather inclusive attitude of saying that many different types should be featured here, (providing that they remain physically fit and attractive), and that can certainly include openly gay models.
However as much as I enjoyed David's work on BSB1, I must point out that David was often "disrespectful" to the gay models, offering less money than he did to the straight guys, and set up scenarios where the straight guys would be rather aggressive with the gay bottoms, such as Torin & Steven with pretty young Aiden, and with both Jordan and Mike Robbins double teaming Preston and Scott, or Tank Shane with both Gino and Nathan, (neither of whom was openly gay, but they both definitely enjoyed receiving the cock of straight Shane).
I don't see the lack of gay models here as being in any way anti gay or as a political statement. For me it is only a harmless way of engaging in my own particular sexual fetish of watching naked straight guys having gay sex. But I love this site, and want it to flourish and I am totally in favor of all kinds of variations to attract the widest possible audience, however without straying too far from the initial mission statement of the site. With three updates a week, I am content to get a "core" straight guy scene once every couple of weeks, and to let others who may enjoy a more lovemaking type scene get their share too. But of course the provision is that the guys remain very good looking with good bodies, for I do not want to pay to watch average or subpar looking models.
).
