Ambivalent
BSB Addict
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Posts
- 1,811
- Reaction score
- 2
Hey, guys,
I'm not sure if this should go under this heading, or under the "general" heading (because it doesn't relate to any specific video) but, here it is. . . .
Usually, when Stowe speaks about a video, he either opens or concludes by saying. . . "This video rated an "x" on my rating scheme." After all these years, I am kind of wondering what Stowe's rating scheme IS. . . and what some of yours might be, also!
Mine is simple. It amounts to three "P's":
*Pulchritude* (or beauty);
*Passion (in performance); and,
*Personality.
I give precisely a third, for EACH. (And each is, obviously, subjective.) And there is certainly room for "play", amongst these three categories. Sometimes I have encountered a model who is not the most physically beautiful guy I've ever laid eyes upon, to my idiosyncratic taste - but, he turns out to be a TOTALLY PASSIONATE PERFORMER, or to have an irresistibly winning PERSONALITY. That kind of stuff can and does win me over. . . and, a model like that can and will come to the top of MY personal "rating-scheme". And the same is true about models who have strengths or weaknesses on the other dimensions I have mentioned (only as perceived by ME, because it's all personal) ~ but these are the things I am thinking about, when I rate models, here on Broke Straight Boys, or on College Dudes.
Now, I am an INFJ (on the Myers-Briggs personality scale): and, for the most part, I make these decisions unconsciously and intuitively, and either feel an intense liking for and connection to a model, or don't. I am also keenly aware that models are people, too - just like us!: and mostly resist subjecting them to elaborate taxonomies.
BUT - this is the way I "rate" models (usually, post facto): and I just thought I would share it, with you.
"A" XOXOXOXOXO
I'm not sure if this should go under this heading, or under the "general" heading (because it doesn't relate to any specific video) but, here it is. . . .
Usually, when Stowe speaks about a video, he either opens or concludes by saying. . . "This video rated an "x" on my rating scheme." After all these years, I am kind of wondering what Stowe's rating scheme IS. . . and what some of yours might be, also!
Mine is simple. It amounts to three "P's":
*Pulchritude* (or beauty);
*Passion (in performance); and,
*Personality.
I give precisely a third, for EACH. (And each is, obviously, subjective.) And there is certainly room for "play", amongst these three categories. Sometimes I have encountered a model who is not the most physically beautiful guy I've ever laid eyes upon, to my idiosyncratic taste - but, he turns out to be a TOTALLY PASSIONATE PERFORMER, or to have an irresistibly winning PERSONALITY. That kind of stuff can and does win me over. . . and, a model like that can and will come to the top of MY personal "rating-scheme". And the same is true about models who have strengths or weaknesses on the other dimensions I have mentioned (only as perceived by ME, because it's all personal) ~ but these are the things I am thinking about, when I rate models, here on Broke Straight Boys, or on College Dudes.
Now, I am an INFJ (on the Myers-Briggs personality scale): and, for the most part, I make these decisions unconsciously and intuitively, and either feel an intense liking for and connection to a model, or don't. I am also keenly aware that models are people, too - just like us!: and mostly resist subjecting them to elaborate taxonomies.
BUT - this is the way I "rate" models (usually, post facto): and I just thought I would share it, with you.
"A" XOXOXOXOXO
Last edited: