• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Politics Discussion (BE RESPECTFUL)

I did read the article and the Executive Order. Unfortunately you did not completely read the article or the Executive Order. The article you linked was an announcement that Trump was expected to release an Executive Order resetting federal policy on what is or is not an acceptable gender. There was nothing in the Politico article to support your suppositions concerning the order. There were not two Executive Orders released on this subject, just one. If you read the actual order when it was released, you would have noticed that section 2 of the order states that there are only two recognized sexes - male & female. It then goes on to define what is a male and a female and state that those characteristics apply at the moment of conception [which btw, is scientifically incorrect]. It then states that those characteristics are immuntable and cannot be changed after conception [also scientifically illiterate]. It then abolished any categorization of people as nonbinary, trans, etc. It concludes by discussing among other items that certain spaces that are designated as female only are restricted to women who are biological women from birth. The Executive Order did not refer to Ms. Jenner by name but it did refer to her because it referred to all trans men and women. The fact is that you really need to know the facts before you start posting opinions which may r may not be correct.

The Executive Order does have a direct impact on Ms. Jenner. Technically, her passport, assuming she has one, is now revoked if it "incorrectly" lists her sex as female. Likewise, in any interaction she might have with a federal agency, like Social Security, Midicare, etc., she has to be listed as a male. Any private or public agency that receives federal funding also has to treat her and refer to her as male.

I strongly suggest that you do not read more into a general news or opinion article that what is actually stated. The writers of the articles often use rather inprecise language in their articles. It is always best to carefully check out any source material referenced in the article. This Politico article referred to non-binary and other options and obviously what the author meant by that and what you assumed he meant by the phrasing were quite different.

The point is, her govt. name remains "Caitlyn Marie Jenner," and that's precisely what I was responding to: claims that "Trump ordered the govt. to call her Bruce," which is incorrect. Any trans person that legally changed their name will retain that name; that's the assertion I made, and it's correct.

And as I explained a few times, such executive orders (the planned one mentioned in the article and the one posted on the White House website) take time to go into effect and will likely be challenged in court. If affected by this, Caitlyn Jenner, who legally changed her sex to female years ago and had sex reassignment surgery, will likely take the matter to court.
 
The point is, her govt. name remains "Caitlyn Marie Jenner," and that's precisely what I was responding to: claims that "Trump ordered the govt. to call her Bruce," which is incorrect. And as I explained a few times, such executive orders (the planned one mentioned in the article and the one posted on the White House website) take time to go into effect and will likely be challenged in court.

If affected by this, Caitlyn Jenner, who legally changed her sex to female years ago and had sex reassignment surgery, will likely take the matter to court.
She will take them to court. But what an ignorant fucking cunt. These are the people she votes for.
 
Top