I appreciate Betu bringing this up. As I'm sure Betu already knows, because he's very intelligent, his analogy is imprecise. If we are talking about a situation with a john (or a Jon) with a hustler, the john may be disappointed with the final "unveiling", as it were. The john may feel the body hair is too out of control or too short. He may not like the hustler's legs, chest, belly, penis size or whatever. He may feel that the body odor is unpleasant or that general hygiene is lacking. Betu's question comes down to, Is it fair to also criticize the hustler to his face for any perceived lacks of pleasing bodily attributes or the quality of his sexual skills? On the face of it, I would say no. Why? Because if the john is displeased he always has the option of bolting and never seeking the hustler's services again.
On a porn site such as this we don't really have the option of never having to see a model again. We DO always have the option of never watching another scene with a model we don't care for whatever reason...be it due to an unappealing body, personality or what have you. But that also ignores the point that our money is being used to pay certain models we don't care for, for every scene they're in, whether we actually watch and enjoy their work or not. Over the longer term, that can grate on some nerves. lol With the diverse body types that
Broke Straight Boys tries to bring us, in an attempt to please as many customer tastes as possible, we have to accept that we definitely will not like them all. We can only hope on a good site that we will find far more models we really like, than not. It's just an unwritten and mostly unspoken understanding of membership.
In this situation we are talking about a model who is nearly universally well regarded in here. Some members are certain to have reactions to any major changes of grooming among their favorite models. I think back to Rocco and Aiden with their beautiful extra-long hair and then coming back for scenes with shaved heads. Or
Zeno Kostas with beautiful short hair and then beautiful fairly long hair...but then taking it super long without much styling done with it. Of course people (paying members) are going to comment either for or against the change.
Getitboy is fully entitled to his opinion in here as much as anyone else...just as all of us are free to agree or disagree with him. I appreciate his desire to stick up for the underdog or otherwise come to the defense of someone he feels is being treated unfairly. That's admirable in my book. The one point where Getitboy and I part ways in our opinions is on the issue of body shaming. For me that means criticizing someone's body for something permanent or semi-permanent that they have very little or no control over whatsoever. True body shaming in my mind is saying... You're ugly. Your nose is too big. You have a small dick. You have a lazy eye and it drives me crazy. I can't stand your red hair. I don't like that big scar on your belly. You're way too skinny. Eat something! You're too fat. Lose weight! You're so short! Your freckles are so ugly. Your acne scars are a total turnoff to me.
Those are all examples of what I would consider body shaming. In this thread we have been discussing temporary and personal choice issues of body grooming. Those are things that are choices that can be changed within minutes or weeks. I don't feel that we body shame anyone if we say politely. You know... I really don't care for your new moustache. I hope you'll consider shaving it off. I really prefer your haircut to be longer/shorter. I think the manscaping on you looks best when you leave more hair here, and shave it off or leave less hair there.
On a more controversial subject I don't think it's body shaming any model to politely ask them not to get more tattoos. lol
