I've been kinda busy so watched this film straight after watching the Tristan/Ian one. Two completely different films which should keep members from both camps happy.
You'd think so, right? Yet, people who don't want passionate sex type of scenes but more of straight guys doing a regular suck/fuck scene didn't post on this scene one, so, it makes me wonder. What do these people want really?
I'm asking this because, when I watched the scene, I thought, they would comment on it and say they prefer this type of scene with a reluctant guy being fucked to a passionate type of scene... Yet, no post here.
So, Mikey, if you're reading this and this is not an accusion, can you help me and maybe others understand what you really want? Why didn't you comment on what seems to be the type of scenes, you're looking for on Broke Straight Boys? No kissing, passion .. I, do think, Broke Straight Boys should try and make everyone happy by doing scenes like they used to, no passion .. and scenes like the Paul and Romeo ones, with passion, hot kissing ...[/
Hi Milla,
Thanks for asking a sincere question which I will attempt to answer for you in my most honest manner. First of all, human sexuality is so complex, and difficult for one person to explain what turns them on to someone who comes from a different place, in what excites them, so I hope I am able to express myself in a way that will answer your question.
Yes the two most recent scenes featured on
Broke Straight Boys are different in that Tristan & Ian features kissing and simulate love making, while Paul & Shane feature raw sex without the passion, but neither fit into the niche of porn which BSB1 and the early days of BSB2 offered to me. I know that I overuse the term "believably straight", but I learned it from former forumite Abush11 and it really does describe what I look for on this site.
In the earlier versions of
Broke Straight Boys, guys would show up and identify themselves as 100% straight, and we would watch over time as they agreed to do more and more, (with the mentioning of the money in every episode to highlight the idea that these guys are still straight). But the paradox was that we would watch as pleasure would often overtake them so despite what they said, the truth was seen in their faces and in their bodies as the sexual pleasure overtook their bodies and they forgot for that moment that they were "acting". That whole concept and those kind of scenes were a huge turn on for me.
However, even the popular models all seemed to have their "limits" as straight guys typically do even in this industry. Some would not bottom, while many would get fucked on camera, but not kiss, as they said, "kissing is too intimate". That line always makes me laugh, that ass fucking is less intimate than kissing, but I know that they are coming from the same place that straight guys I've had sexual encounters with say the exact same thing. So the older models still "rang true" to me on the "believably straight" scale, even in performing regularly on
Broke Straight Boys
Getting back to the film in this thread, Paul Fucks Shane, I "fell in love" with Paul early on. He is so hot and handsome with a beautiful body and cock and a wonderful funny friendly personality, and as some on this forum have called, "boyfriend material". But now that he has become one of the regulars in the all out gay sex films, he no longer has that aura of an experimenting straight boy for me, and quite frankly his scene partner Shane is not my type at all.
I try very hard to refrain from making negative comments about scenes, particularly when the scenes are very popular with the current membership of
Broke Straight Boys and the forum, so typically if a scene or the models do not interest me, I will not comment. But as you did ask Milla, this is my (rather long) answer. I sincerely appreciate your interest in my perspective.