• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Paul/Scott/John

I agree with everybody's comments that Paul is a total hottie and a damn good cocksucker. I think John has more potential of a Broke Straight Boys career than Scott does.

Did anybody notice this though? Go back and watch the episode again. Pay attention at the 5:09 time mark. This is the point when Paul stopped sucking Scott's cock and went over to John. Now look at Scott. Do you see him checking out Paul's ass big time? And then, at 5:25, Scott start's licking his lips and hanging his tongue out while he's staring at Paul's ass. --- Now, I'd do the same thing, but that would be understandable ... but Scott is supposed to be "straight".

Things that make you go, hmmmmmmmmmm ...
 
I agree with everybody's comments that Paul is a total hottie and a damn good cocksucker. I think John has more potential of a Broke Straight Boys career than Scott does.

Did anybody notice this though? Go back and watch the episode again. Pay attention at the 5:09 time mark. This is the point when Paul stopped sucking Scott's cock and went over to John. Now look at Scott. Do you see him checking out Paul's ass big time? And then, at 5:25, Scott start's licking his lips and hanging his tongue out while he's staring at Paul's ass. --- Now, I'd do the same thing, but that would be understandable ... but Scott is supposed to be "straight".

Things that make you go, hmmmmmmmmmm ...

Yes Dee I noticed that but as I said earlier on, the scene went the say it did because of direction. God knows what would have happened if the other 2 lads were set free to do what they wanted.
 
Trying hard? the only one I saw trying hard, was Paul! the other two guys could have stayed at home!

Not all of us will agree but I have the same opinion as you! People will say since they are straight their action or lack there of is totally apart of what makes it great. Personally I think if they are going to be paid to do "gay" sex they should actually do stuff. People complain about Kodi doing so much extra and not focussing on his partner. I think this is the exact same thing but on the opposite side of the spectrum. They just cared about their own needs. I believe that if you are getting paid to do this go in and give 100% not 25%. I think this site is really good for this. I just don't think people should make excuses for them when they give less then 100% and just say it's them being "straight" If Paul wasn't in this scene it would have been a mess! I know people will disagree, so let's open up a discussion!

You are preaching to the choir guys. I can see cutting the straighter models more slack in the very beginning. But also not to the point that they are getting paid to do next to nothing in a scene. Where that line falls though is so subjective to each viewer. I don't see where the "go slow approach with the straight model" applies to Scott. Possibly even John.

In Scott's solo he speaks of his potential and real sexual partners in some of the ambiguous telltale gender-neutral terms. He said maybe he could use his solo money to, "...pay someone to come fuck my brains out." When asked if if he gets sex in addition to his 3-4 a dayer masturbation habit...he says, "Oh yeah. I've got a fuck buddy." So who knows if he's bi, gay, straight-curious or some variation thereof.

Now we know that Scott and John are roommates in real life. Who have done a 3-way together. (MMF) We'll never know for sure. But it's quite possible that Scott's fuck buddy is the guy sitting on the other end of the couch. lol If so, good for Scott! :) All this to say I guess that this scene did not rise to the fantasy threshold (for me) of two totally straight guys being broken in to gay sex for the first time. That's one reason why this scene didn't do much for me. It was just so-so because Paul was the only one doing anything actively. But then again the very end gave us something cool that we had never seen before on Broke Straight Boys
 
Last edited:
You are preaching to the choir guys. I can see cutting the straighter models more slack in the very beginning. But also not to the point that they are getting paid to do next to nothing in a scene. Where that line falls though is so subjective to each viewer. I don't see where the "go slow approach with the straight model" applies to Scott. Possibly even John.

In Scott's solo he speaks of his potential and real sexual partners in some of the ambiguous telltale gender-neutral terms. He said maybe he could use his solo money to, "...pay someone to come fuck my brains out." When asked if if he gets sex in addition to his 3-4 a dayer masturbation habit...he says, "Oh yeah. I've got a fuck buddy." So who knows if he's bi, gay, straight-curious or some variation thereof.

Now we know that Scott and John are roommates in real life. Who have done a 3-way together. (MMF) We'll never know for sure. But it's quite possible that Scott's fuck buddy is the guy sitting on the other end of the couch. lol If so, good for Scott! :) All this to say I guess that this scene did not rise to the fantasy threshold (for me) of two totally straight guys being broken in to gay sex for the first time. That's one reason why this scene didn't do much for me. It was just so-so because Paul was the only one doing anything actively. But then again the very end gave us something cool that we had never seen before on Broke Straight Boys

You said what I meant to say but more eloquently! I guess it's not my cup of tea but at the same time the scene wasn't half bad!
 
Not all of us will agree but I have the same opinion as you! People will say since they are straight their action or lack there of is totally apart of what makes it great. Personally I think if they are going to be paid to do "gay" sex they should actually do stuff. People complain about Kodi doing so much extra and not focussing on his partner. I think this is the exact same thing but on the opposite side of the spectrum. They just cared about their own needs. I believe that if you are getting paid to do this go in and give 100% not 25%. I think this site is really good for this. I just don't think people should make excuses for them when they give less then 100% and just say it's them being "straight" If Paul wasn't in this scene it would have been a mess! I know people will disagree, so let's open up a discussion!

I believe that "Gay for Pay" means giving 100% to the scene. Just sitting/lying there disconnected is not acceptable. I think a lack of effort is why we get frustrated with some scenes. Now, I do think we have to give some guys a pass the first time with another guy on camera. However, if the boy returns, then the expectation should be 100% effort. Maybe we need to be let in on the conversations before the camera rolls. What has been agreed to in the secne from the models? What have the boys been directed to do or not do? In this case were John and Scott instructed not to touch Paul? Threesomes are tricky. If all three players are not into each other, then someone gets left out at least for part of the time. Not very exciting. In this scene it was all about John and Paul for me. Big missed opportunity for a great scene with these two. I have said before that it is all in the coaching. What expectations have been discussed before the scene? Have the boys been ecouraged to let loose, explore, push themselves for the sake of the members who make all this possible? Straight, bi, or gay these boys are getting paid for having sex with boys. If a model can't get past his straightness after a couple of scenes he shouldn't come back.

5 Stars for this scene, but only for the ending with John and Paul. I don't know if it was planned that Paul would take John's load, but it didn't seem planned. It was so awesome. Paul is so sexy and natural. Love you Paul!!
 
Paul deserves major KUDOS, took the cum shot like a man!!! Might add don't think that was his first taste of man juice.
 
I don't know why we keep trying threesomes..............

I so agree with you Ms. Kianna, the 3some scenes almost always center on one guy and one guy seems to be left out in the cold to play with himself, the camera doesn't even pan to him. I don't even care for the 4some scenes too often the camera misses something hot because it's focused on the wrong couple at the time. I do think there have been a couple of HOT 3somes but for the most part they don't seem to work in this setting. Maybe if the "stage" area was bigger for more combinations?
 
The end saved the whole thing!
I would like to see John and Scott fuck on cam. The way they were looking at each others cocks......makes me believe they wouldn't be fucking for the first time. hehe Let's see if these boys evolve.
Paul is a trooper. He's growing on me.
~Jstwicked
 
The end saved the whole thing!
I would like to see John and Scott fuck on cam. The way they were looking at each others cocks......makes me believe they wouldn't be fucking for the first time. hehe Let's see if these boys evolve.
Paul is a trooper. He's growing on me.
~Jstwicked

I don't really care for either John or Scott, but if they must return, I think it would be interesting to see John fuck his roomie, Scott. I think Scott is so ready. That is the only way I would watch either of these two guys again!

Paul, I'd love to see paired with Trey.
 
I thought it was interesting to have two roommates be the objects of
another chap's sexual attentions, and their non-verbal communication
to each other added something for me.

Paul was the beauty of the trio and it's always exciting to see a beauty
serve less attractive men (IMHO, naturally).

The ending was worth the whole month's subscription. AT LAST: we
saw what is most often the ending of a blowjob. The blow-er took
the blow-ee's cum and swallowed a mouthful of it. Paul looked
good with creamy-white cum on his smiling mouth.

Let's have more BJs with 'happy endings', please.

TG
x
 
Top