• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

More Facebook and Social Networking Privacy Issues

I am somewhat amazed that a company would even ask for that.
 
I am somewhat amazed that a company would even ask for that.

I'm amazed that in the Land of the Free that people are even being asked for passwords with a straight face by companies only considering whether to hire them, to share that private personal info like it's public domain.

Where does it end? Will we be asked to turn in transcripts of our text messages from the last 6 months to a landlord deciding whether we can rent from him/her?
 
Tampa, Good to see you have picked up your old thread. The issue of what is private and what is not is important to all of us. There is a lot of money to be made in the "information business." People in the advertising business want to know all about us so they can spend their advertising dollars well. But at what cost to us.
 
Seems like 1984 again?

I'm amazed that in the Land of the Free that people are even being asked for passwords with a straight face by companies only considering whether to hire them, to share that private personal info like it's public domain.

Where does it end? Will we be asked to turn in transcripts of our text messages from the last 6 months to a landlord deciding whether we can rent from him/her?

Tampa, Good to see you have picked up your old thread. The issue of what is private and what is not is important to all of us. There is a lot of money to be made in the "information business." People in the advertising business want to know all about us so they can spend their advertising dollars well. But at what cost to us.


Dear Tim114 and Tampa24,

I have always dispised the format of Facebook and the near insane amount of self-reporting people do setting themself up for all sorts of negative consequences. It verges on self-sabotague yet, people still persist. I cannot understand its near-addictive appeal. I only had limited usage of what was available through Facebook to stay connected with a few friends. I am grateful I canceled my Facebook membership once Tampa started the Facebook privacy policy thread. Why risk subjecting oneself to all the unwanted global scrutiny?

For others, it is a brief dip into self-indulgence approaching narcissism as if it was just a one-time only visit to their allotted 15 minutes of fame. It seems others cannot get enough froom inserting their nose into other people's business. What ever became of basic human interaction one-on-one? Or spending a little quality time with friends and loved ones? Facebook is too "Orwellian" for this old man. Hopefully, others will begin to see this as an unnecessary evil in life where the risks far outweigh the positive aspects of membership. I really don't feel I am ready for a keeper managing my life without my control.


Sincerely a Facebook hater,



Stimpy
 
Dear Tim114 and Tampa24,

I have always dispised the format of Facebook and the near insane amount of self-reporting people do setting themself up for all sorts of negative consequences. It verges on self-sabotague yet, people still persist. I cannot understand its near-addictive appeal. I only had limited usage of what was available through Facebook to stay connected with a few friends. I am grateful I canceled my Facebook membership once Tampa started the Facebook privacy policy thread. Why risk subjecting oneself to all the unwanted global scrutiny?

For others, it is a brief dip into self-indulgence approaching narcissism as if it was just a one-time only visit to their allotted 15 minutes of fame. It seems others cannot get enough froom inserting their nose into other people's business. What ever became of basic human interaction one-on-one? Or spending a little quality time with friends and loved ones? Facebook is too "Orwellian" for this old man. Hopefully, others will begin to see this as an unnecessary evil in life where the risks far outweigh the positive aspects of membership. I really don't feel I am ready for a keeper managing my life without my control.


Sincerely a Facebook hater,



Stimpy

I have been using Facebook for a short time for a limited purpose. I too think this mode of communication can well come back to bit one on the ass. It is a matter of just how many people can see a post. I leave a post on my Facebook page; then my "friends" can see it. And then all of my friend's friends can see it, etc. Not sure how all of this works. I just assume it is broadcasting to the world, which it probably is. Good for advertising purposes, which is where their money comes from. What many users have in mind, probably not.
 
Senators ask feds to probe requests for passwords

Senators want feds to look into employers asking for Facebook passwords during job interviews
By Manuel Valdes, Associated Press | Associated Press – 10 mins ago...


SEATTLE (AP) -- Two U.S. senators are asking Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate whether employers asking for Facebook passwords during job interviews are violating federal law, their offices announced Sunday.

Troubled by reports of the practice, Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer of New York and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut said they are calling on the Department of Justice and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to launch investigations. The senators are sending letters to the heads of the agencies.

The Associated Press reported last week that some private and public agencies around the country are asking job seekers for their social media credentials. The practice has alarmed privacy advocates, but the legality of it remains murky.

On Friday, Facebook warned employers not to ask job applicants for their passwords to the site so they can poke around on their profiles. The company threatened legal action against applications that violate its long-standing policy against sharing passwords.

A Facebook executive cautioned that if an employer discovers that a job applicant is a member of a protected group, the employer may be vulnerable to claims of discrimination if it doesn't hire that person.

Personal information such as gender, race, religion and age are often displayed on a Facebook profile — all details that are protected by federal employment law.

"We don't think employers should be asking prospective employees to provide their passwords because we don't think it's the right thing to do. While we do not have any immediate plans to take legal action against any specific employers, we look forward to engaging with policy makers and other stakeholders, to help better safeguard the privacy of our users," Facebook said in a statement.

Not sharing passwords is a basic tenet of online conduct. Aside from the privacy concerns, Facebook considers the practice a security risk.

"In an age where more and more of our personal information — and our private social interactions — are online, it is vital that all individuals be allowed to determine for themselves what personal information they want to make public and protect personal information from their would-be employers. This is especially important during the job-seeking process, when all the power is on one side of the fence," Schumer said in a statement.

Specifically, the senators want to know if this practice violates the Stored Communications Act or the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Those two acts, respectively, prohibit intentional access to electronic information without authorization and intentional access to a computer without authorization to obtain information.

The senators also want to know whether two court cases relating to supervisors asking current employees for social media credentials could be applied to job applicants.

"I think it's going to take some years for courts to decide whether Americans in the digital age have the same privacy rights" as previous generations, American Civil Liberties Union attorney Catherine Crump said in a previous interview with the AP.

The senators also said they are drafting a bill to fill in any gaps that current laws don't cover.

Maryland and Illinois are considering bills that would bar public agencies for asking for this information.

In California, Democratic Sen. Leland Yee introduced a bill that would prohibit employers from asking current employees or job applicants for their social media user names or passwords. That state measure also would bar employers from requiring access to employees' and applicants' social media content, to prevent employers from requiring logins or printouts of that content for their review.


Just thought I would share this article from Yahoo.


Stimpy
:2c:
 
Top