Levi Jackson Toy Play

[StudddAndy]

I thought this scene was a little reminiscent of an Archived scene in which toys were the feature. After all for entertainment purposes. I applaud Broke Straight Boys for visiting the concept again. It was something different.
View attachment 16309View attachment 16312

And as far as the hair style young guys experiment with and wear from time to time?...It could be just a case of: Who wore it better?
View attachment 16310View attachment 16311

Who is the other guy with the Dildo? Please. I need to see this, too.

 

[Buckeye1]

Who is the other guy with the Dildo? Please. I need to see this, too.

The other guy is Colin...he doesn't hace a last name.

 

[Buckeye1]

I liked this scene and I usually don't care for "toys." I'm just glad Levi is back. Don't give a shit how he wears his hair. My way of thinking...gotta have hair to criticize someone else about their hair...hence I keep my mouth shut (for once).

 

[betudidntknow]

The other guy is Colin...he doesn't hace a last name.

Vanguard was his stage name Lastname

 

[mikeyank]

The other guy is Colin...he doesn't hace a last name.

Vanguard was his stage name Lastname

I guess our buddy Tampa has been away too long as we see Colin's face on Tampa's avatar every-time he posts, (all 12,000 plus). lololol

.

 

[peterh6308]

I guess our buddy Tampa has been away too long as we see Colin's face on Tampa's avatar every-time he posts, (all 12,000 plus). lololol

.

Whatever, we know its your little dig at Tampa for having more posts then him now..... lol

 

[mikeyank]

Whatever, we know its your little dig at Tampa for having more posts then him now..... lol

It took me nine long hard years to finally pass the great Tampa in posting, so why can't I gloat a bit????? lololololol

 

[another1]

Rusty, Colin, and Spencer had scenes with toys.

 

[mikeyank]

I have to agree with you, SFPS01. This scene did nothing for me. Maybe I'll feel differently when they pair him with another model, especially since I was one of the guys who said I like to see the tops at least try bottoming. What I find ironic is that lately the forumites have been kvetching about there being a lack of believable tops in BSBs stables. They've either been too old and too experienced, or obviously gay and clearly another bottom (and too experienced). So what do they do? They take a handsome young man who's happily topped a wide variety of his stable-mates, and give him a club kid haircut and some dildoes. Geez! I'll give him credit for getting hard and shooting his load (maybe I'm just jealous because it's more than I've ever been able to do). Unless he does something phenomenal bottoming with another guy, I think I want him to stick with topping.

PS I would not call that last Dildo a "Tanner'". Tanner has a beautiful dick! I thought that one was just ugly.

I really like the way you think OF!!! Levi was never one my real favorites here, but I do like the fact that he came across as the "holy grail" for me on Broke Straight Boys, the believable straight boy. And you're right, to appease the folks who believe that all models eventually HAVE to bottom here, they are "greasing the skids", literally by grooming him for that "deflowering" that will happen soon, and I say why not have one or two to just top?

Some of my favorite models throughout the history of Broke Straight Boys have been either exclusive or primarily tops and many of these are on my all time favorites list, headed by Tank Shane, Mike Robbins, and Jimmy Johnson, and the list includes Diesal, Dustin, Braden and others whose names do not come to mind right now. But I see that soon "another one bites the dust". lol

 

[peterh6308]

Rusty, Colin, and Spencer had scenes with toys.

Rusty was by far the best solo toy play ever on this site!!!!

 

[oldfart63]

I really like the way you think OF!!! Levi was never one my real favorites here, but I do like the fact that he came across as the "holy grail" for me on Broke Straight Boys, the believable straight boy. And you're right, to appease the folks who believe that all models eventually HAVE to bottom here, they are "greasing the skids", literally by grooming him for that "deflowering" that will happen soon, and I say why not have one or two to just top?

Some of my favorite models throughout the history of Broke Straight Boys have been either exclusive or primarily tops and many of these are on my all time favorites list, headed by Tank Shane, Mike Robbins, and Jimmy Johnson, and the list includes Diesal, Dustin, Braden and others whose names do not come to mind right now. But I see that soon "another one bites the dust". lol

The only reason I like to see a top guy "bottom" is because I think guys should have some idea what their partners are dealing with. Some guys, like Tanner, seem to keep that in mind and top their partner with some style. I think most guys just plow away, basically jacking themselves off with the other guy's ass. That works great if you've got a bottom who just wants to get pounded into oblivion, otherwise we seem to say the final product showed the guys "just going through the motions", or that they didn't show any "chemistry". Once in a while I enjoy a scene where the guys just take it to Poundtown, but I think the ones I enjoy the most are the ones where the models at least appear to care that each other ends up having a good time while they crank out a scene. I know it's make believe, but who says you can't make believe that you've got a couple of hot guys making love instead of just fucking their brains out.

 

[Youngandconfused22]

While I admire that Levi did this scene and I'm happy he's willing to try bottoming now. However he should have still had a partner with him like Gage Owens or someone to insert the toys and maybe some rimmingans some fingering. Also there should have been at least some different positions.

 

[johnny]

While I admire that Levi did this scene and I'm happy he's willing to try bottoming now. However he should have still had a partner with him like Gage Owens or someone to insert the toys and maybe some rimmingans some fingering. Also there should have been at least some different positions.

YA..I Agree..He should a showed us his Ass..After All..It's Almost Valentines Day..HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY.

 

[betudidntknow]

The only reason I like to see a top guy "bottom" is because I think guys should have some idea what their partners are dealing with. Some guys, like Tanner, seem to keep that in mind and top their partner with some style. I think most guys just plow away, basically jacking themselves off with the other guy's ass. That works great if you've got a bottom who just wants to get pounded into oblivion, otherwise we seem to say the final product showed the guys "just going through the motions", or that they didn't show any "chemistry". Once in a while I enjoy a scene where the guys just take it to Poundtown, but I think the ones I enjoy the most are the ones where the models at least appear to care that each other ends up having a good time while they crank out a scene. I know it's make believe, but who says you can't make believe that you've got a couple of hot guys making love instead of just fucking their brains out.

I liked your point as, it's something I really hadn't given thought to. Many models who only top may lack the real understanding of what their partners may be experiencing sensation wise. Some may experience pain while some may experience something else. But I agree, it may help them be a bit more sensitive? I have my own selfish reasons though..... since I only top, when I watch porn, especially Gay porn, I want to see that "guy that may appeal to me" in the role of bottom, at least half the time. Other wise, I might as well watch him in Straight Porn only topping women, where at least I could imagine he is doing it for the pleasure. Again, that's my selfish reason....I watch gay porn to get the pleasure of the gay experience.

 

[mikeyank]

I liked your point as, it's something I really hadn't given thought to. Many models who only top may lack the real understanding of what their partners may be experiencing sensation wise. Some may experience pain while some may experience something else. But I agree, it may help them be a bit more sensitive? I have my own selfish reasons though..... since I only top, when I watch porn, especially Gay porn, I want to see that "guy that may appeal to me" in the role of bottom, at least half the time. Other wise, I might as well watch him in Straight Porn only topping women, where at least I could imagine he is doing it for the pleasure. Again, that's my selfish reason....I watch gay porn to get the pleasure of the gay experience.

I fully understand your perspective Betu as I understand OF's points as well. I just ask why they cannot keep perhaps a select few models out of a calendar year, who think of themselves as exclusive tops to remain that way to satisfy the few in the audience like me who "respects" the creds of a kid who tops only, as did some of the guys who appeared here previously, who I mentioned in my earlier post on this thread.

 

[betudidntknow]

I fully understand your perspective Betu as I understand OF's points as well. I just ask why they cannot keep perhaps a select few models out of a calendar year, who think of themselves as exclusive tops to remain that way to satisfy the few in the audience like me who "respects" the creds of a kid who tops only, as did some of the guys who appeared here previously, who I mentioned in my earlier post on this thread.

To use a description written by you at some point "....because this is a fantasy site".... In my own description: Broke Straight Boys supplies the models and the scenario's....."What's In Your Wallet"? LOL

 

[oldfart63]

I liked your point as, it's something I really hadn't given thought to. Many models who only top may lack the real understanding of what their partners may be experiencing sensation wise. Some may experience pain while some may experience something else. But I agree, it may help them be a bit more sensitive? I have my own selfish reasons though..... since I only top, when I watch porn, especially Gay porn, I want to see that "guy that may appeal to me" in the role of bottom, at least half the time. Other wise, I might as well watch him in Straight Porn only topping women, where at least I could imagine he is doing it for the pleasure. Again, that's my selfish reason....I watch gay porn to get the pleasure of the gay experience.

I share the same selfish reason you do, Betu. That's why I like to see Tanner and Ronan Kennedy bottom. But it helps that they stay hard and cum like a fountain when they bottom. If they stayed flaccid and/or had to finish themselves off by hand, I wouldn't find it stimulating at all. That's why I always rate a scene highly if I get the impression they both wanted to give and get the most out of each other (chemistry?), and the scenes that appear to be 'clock-in, fuck, clock-out" get lower ratings.

 

[betudidntknow]

Rusty, Colin, and Spencer had scenes with toys.

Rusty was by far the best solo toy play ever on this site!!!!

I was aware but forgot about the Spencer scene! I totally didn't see the Rusty scene though! Now that I'm in the mood to watch some toy play, I'll have to check it out! Thank you Another1 and Peter!

Since Peter and I often find intrigue in similar scenes (including Broke Straight Boys ones...LOL) I will definitely view the Rusty scene!

 

[oldfart63]

I fully understand your perspective Betu as I understand OF's points as well. I just ask why they cannot keep perhaps a select few models out of a calendar year, who think of themselves as exclusive tops to remain that way to satisfy the few in the audience like me who "respects" the creds of a kid who tops only, as did some of the guys who appeared here previously, who I mentioned in my earlier post on this thread.

I can see your point. In this case I think of Deisel. After all of the times he topped, I was excited when I saw that he was finally going to bottom. When I watched that episode, it was pretty clear that it would be the first, and definitely the last, time that he would bottom. After that, I didn't care if I saw him bottom again or not. Of course, it helped that he didn't get hard as a rock and shoot like a howitzer. Once a model does that, no matter how much I like to see them top, I always see them as versatile. I guess my advice to models would be, "If you want to be known strictly as a top, don't get hard and stay hard while you're getting fucked".

 

[betudidntknow]

Rusty, Colin, and Spencer had scenes with toys.

I share the same selfish reason you do, Betu. That's why I like to see Tanner and Ronan Kennedy bottom. But it helps that they stay hard and cum like a fountain when they bottom. If they stayed flaccid and/or had to finish themselves off by hand, I wouldn't find it stimulating at all. That's why I always rate a scene highly if I get the impression they both wanted to give and get the most out of each other (chemistry?), and the scenes that appear to be 'clock-in, fuck, clock-out" get lower ratings.

I so agree a big part is the OPTICS, the visuals, that help formulate in the mind and enhance the FANTASY of watching!

But, from a more personal experience or experiences.....my present partner gets Rock hard the moment I'm inserted which in turn, gives me even more pleasure when I see a bottom rock hard while being fucked in a porn scene! However, experience has also taught me that, not all guys I've been with respond that way. They definitely were feeling pleasure but, remained semi hard or sometimes flaccid. They could hold back the need to cum until they were ready!

So, in scenes in porn....I have to bring a certain amount of imagination to the party...LOL After All....It's a Fantasy Site! LOL