jaxon ryder

[redstax15]

Jaxon Ryder on hotdadshotlads.com with drew sebastian.

 

[Stripe222]

Found it. He fucks some really older guy who has a bigger dick. Disappointing to know he's been around. Someone else mentioned it, too. Fortunately, he's not a favorite of mine...

 

[nobelegg]

Found it. He fucks some really older guy who has a bigger dick. Disappointing to know he's been around. Someone else mentioned it, too. Fortunately, he's not a favorite of mine...

Sorry, Stripe. While I was not the originator of Ryder's being in other "activities" and on other sites prior to Broke Straight Boys, I did happen to check it out, saw it, and expressed as much countless times before, which is one particular reason Ryder is hardly a favourite of mine as well.
Would you happen to have a link to that scene you found?
Spanks, Stripe.
Cheers.
Jack

 

[tampa24]

In fairness, Jaxon made no secret of the fact that he has done work on other sites. He alluded to that fact in his first video here.

 

[peterh6308]

First Chasen doing porn with older guys, now Jaxon!! Damn I might have a chance!!!!! lol

 

[nobelegg]

First Chasen doing porn with older guys, now Jaxon!! Damn I might have a chance!!!!! lol

Tampa: I do not prefer fancying a lad who pretends to be a novice at plying his trade when in truth he was never a novitiate on Broke Straight Boys, even though he "confessed" to the contrary. Instead, he is quite the postulant. Defend him all you want, it will not change the minds and opinions of those who feel duped, even manipulated by his complete deception.

Peter: You may not be old enough for Ryder; then again, you might! Best of luck riding that p(h)ony.

 

[tampa24]

Tampa: I do not prefer fancying a lad who pretends to be a novice at plying his trade when in truth he was never a novitiate on Broke Straight Boys, even though he "confessed" to the contrary. Instead, he is quite the postulant. Defend him all you want, it will not change the minds and opinions of those who feel duped, even manipulated by his complete deception.

Peter: You may not be old enough for Ryder; then again, you might! Best of luck riding that p(h)ony.

Well Noble,

He doesn't tickle my fancy either. He has a nice enough body and a handsome face, but I can't get past all the distracting tattoos. I'm merely saying that he did not try to dupe or deceive. He said in his first video that he had done some gay work prior to this. He played coy on the issue and was reticent with any details, but I saw no outright deception from him. So if anyone felt deceived, duped, etc, it's because they either didn't pick up on the part of the beginning interview where Jaxon alluded to past gay porn work...or because the viewers objected to a non amateur being hired on the site. Or both.

 

[JohnnyBlumedia]

We could have easily avoided the question of him doing other work in his past, as many companies will do, but we didn't. I try to keep the interviews 100% true and factual as possible...we are doing reality porn here...as real as it gets - even if its not 'perfect'....as it is in real sex itself. We asked him the question head on, fully knowing he has already done some scenes prior. He did not try to dupe you in any way as we wouldn't allow that...he admitted he has done it before. That's as far as I will go with the questioning on the subject- I do not want to promote other scenes from other companies...why would I? I won't even go into detail about things they have done of its for another site, again so as not to promote...but in no way did we ignore the truth- we brought it out in his first video- right off the bat. There is no reason for you to feel "duped"

 

[mikeyank]

We could have easily avoided the question of him doing other work in his past, as many companies will do, but we didn't. I try to keep the interviews 100% true and factual as possible...we are doing reality porn here...as real as it gets - even if its not 'perfect'....as it is in real sex itself. We asked him the question head on, fully knowing he has already done some scenes prior. He did not try to dupe you in any way as we wouldn't allow that...he admitted he has done it before. That's as far as I will go with the questioning on the subject- I do not want to promote other scenes from other companies...why would I? I won't even go into detail about things they have done of its for another site, again so as not to promote...but in no way did we ignore the truth- we brought it out in his first video- right off the bat. There is no reason for you to feel "duped"

I really appreciate that Johnny, as that is important to me for getting into "my fantasy". However quite honestly I would prefer if you could find guys who've never done gay porn before, as if I can believe that this might be their actual first time with another guy, that is what broke "straight" boys is all about to me in my fantasy.

 

[nobelegg]

Well Noble,

He doesn't tickle my fancy either. He has a nice enough body and a handsome face, but I can't get past all the distracting tattoos. I'm merely saying that he did not try to dupe or deceive. He said in his first video that he had done some gay work prior to this. He played coy on the issue and was reticent with any details, but I saw no outright deception from him. So if anyone felt deceived, duped, etc, it's because they either didn't pick up on the part of the beginning interview where Jaxon alluded to past gay porn work...or because the viewers objected to a non amateur being hired on the site. Or both.

Understood and sincerely respected, Tampa. Your assessment about his tattoos is most sensible and worthy of lauding. To my blessing, I shall never be a Ryder fan, no matter how much others come to his weak defense (sorry Johnny; not this time. I would never have him before my cameras. Even I have taste.)

 

[JohnnyBlumedia]

Understood and sincerely respected, Tampa. Your assessment about his tattoos is most sensible and worthy of lauding. To my blessing, I shall never be a Ryder fan, no matter how much others come to his weak defense (sorry Johnny; not this time. I would never have him before my cameras. Even I have taste.)

I'm not defending him...nor trying to make you attracted to him- ha ha...I'm simply stating that in no way were you "duped" - yes he's done work before (not much) and we did not try to hide that fact -as other companies may do. As far as his sexuality goes...he is both straight and quite broke...you'll have to take my word on that. I think a lot of people questioned his sexuality because he was so comfortable, doing gay acts on camera compared to what you may be used to in "newbies" to the site...as he has already been through that awkward phase.

 

[nobelegg]

I'm not defending him...nor trying to make you attracted to him- ha ha...I'm simply stating that in no way were you "duped" - yes he's done work before (not much) and we did not try to hide that fact -as other companies may do. As far as his sexuality goes...he is both straight and quite broke...you'll have to take my word on that. I think a lot of people questioned his sexuality because he was so comfortable, doing gay acts on camera compared to what you may be used to in "newbies" to the site...as he has already been through that awkward phase.

Johnny, we can debate this until the east meets the west, and still neither of us will alter our standpoints. Personally, I did not find my first 'gay' experience (or any other, for that matter) apart from my being hetero as an 'awkward' phase. Of course, this is just me. Along this same line, if he has been doing gay porn for so long, I have no question about his sexuality, much as I am unconvinced he does, either. He may very well have been "broke", or so he attests, but again, this is not easily fathomable. And I firmly believe he has dome far more 'gay' things before cumming to Broke Straight Boys he has not "confessed" about; that is the easiest thing to hide. What stands in my way the most, Johnny, is MOTIVE. You are a most qualified director/producer/whatever, and I always give you credit, even when others balk at doing so. I shall continue with this, for I have seen your work and am most impressed. However, we can agree to disagree, and I can let it be with that - Ryder is not my idea of a quality performer and never shall be, just as Thompson and Alexander fail to impress me to that extent.

 

[tampa24]

I applaud Broke Straight Boys for being honest and upfront about Jaxon's prior video work. If they had tried to cover it up it would only have made it worse when the truth came out. In this digital age it's hard to keep video work secret. haha

 

[johnny]

I applaud Broke Straight Boys for being honest and upfront about Jaxon's prior video work. If they had tried to cover it up it would only have made it worse when the truth came out. In this digital age it's hard to keep video work secret. haha

Tampa
You have got to be one of the nicest men. Just saying.
Johnny

 

[Stripe222]

Thanks, Tampa for really paying attention to Jaxon's solo! I just assumed that Broke Straight Boys was only hiring guys that had no porn experience. If they have messed around with a guy or two (off camera), it's no big deal.

Thanks also to Johnny for explaining. Can we expect more models with prior experience in porn? I don't have a big objection to that, if it's REALLY limited and made very clear in the solo interview, but I prefer true newbie's.

 

[betudidntknow]

In fairness, Jaxon made no secret of the fact that he has done work on other sites. He alluded to that fact in his first video here.

That's a great point Tampa. Not to mention the fact, he's not the ONLY model, nor the First model here that has or will in the future!

As far as I know, from what has been shared by professionals "in the business", a number of the models come in with a varying degree of "exploration of sexual curiosities" As for being "broke". Many of the even current models must seek employment to supplement their income! So, for those reasons, I have no problem with Jaxon's being presented as a model here. And, that's just my opinion.

 

[mikeyank]

That's a great point Tampa. Not to mention the fact, he's not the ONLY model, nor the First model here that has or will in the future!

As far as I know, from what has been shared by professionals "in the business", a number of the models come in with a varying degree of "exploration of sexual curiosities" As for being "broke". Many of the even current models must seek employment to supplement their income! So, for those reasons, I have no problem with Jaxon's being presented as a model here. And, that's just my opinion.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion Betu, but from my perspective the "broke" part matters little to my enjoyment, but the "straight" part is crucial to me, and in no way can I have any fantasy about a guy who has already done gay porn as being a straight guy stretching his boundaries. In fact I would most definitely choose a less attractive believably straight guy here over a more attractive guy who has "made the rounds" on gay porn sites.

 

[nobelegg]

You are certainly entitled to your opinion Betu, but from my perspective the "broke" part matters little to my enjoyment, but the "straight" part is crucial to me, and in no way can I have any fantasy about a guy who has already done gay porn as being a straight guy stretching his boundaries. In fact I would most definitely choose a less attractive believably straight guy here over a more attractive guy who has "made the rounds" on gay porn sites.

Well stated, Mikeyank. I still have reservations. For all we know, Ryder could easily have listed only cover-up information pertaining to his past porn excursions. When I am once bitten, I am more than twice shy, and the interview with Ryder caused me to be most disbelieving about his former endeavours and such. From what I understand, albeit he admitted he had done some in his ago, other forumites found more material involving Ryder he did not mention in his interview. It causes me to wonder just how much is "a little" in this disrespect?
I do not want to take from Tampa, Betu, or anyone else their enjoyment factor they receive from Ryder. But as you know from the first time I was in the forum, I hold a site to its name, and anything beyond that, fantasy or whatever, is deceptive, deliberate or otherwise. Ryder was indeed deceptive, even though he copped to having done other porn. This hardly makes him "straight," as you eloquently expressed it. Perhaps the only boundaries Ryder wants to expand are those between his lower cheeks, although this has also occurred before his coming to Broke Straight Boys That hardly leaves anything else to one's imagination.

 

[betudidntknow]

You are certainly entitled to your opinion Betu, but from my perspective the "broke" part matters little to my enjoyment, but the "straight" part is crucial to me, and in no way can I have any fantasy about a guy who has already done gay porn as being a straight guy stretching his boundaries. In fact I would most definitely choose a less attractive believably straight guy here over a more attractive guy who has "made the rounds" on gay porn sites.

And as always mikeyank, I appreciate and respectfully understand your criteria. In that regard, we will always enjoy our porn differently! But that's perfectly fine, this site still offers up a considerable diverse selection of guys, from past to present. There's probably enough here for everyone of us!

 

[nobelegg]

And as always mikeyank, I appreciate and respectfully understand your criteria. In that regard, we will always enjoy our porn differently! But that's perfectly fine, this site still offers up a considerable diverse selection of guys, from past to present. There's probably enough here for everyone of us!

Commendable, Betu. Most commendable post.

Stripe, check your PM.