• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Jamie

qscott86

Active Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2011
Posts
98
Reaction score
0
Mmmm yes keep the straight acting men coming.. keep the old tired gay men away.

Jamie is sexy. I love it when they show their asshole.
 
Now why would I want to see a supposed homeless person who even on camera admits women won't look at him?

I live in NYC and see homeless people all the time and all you need is to be stuck near one on a subway train and you'll be looking for fresh air pronto.

Jamie says he sleeps under a bridge in a box. Did Broke Straight Boys first offer him a shower, clean clothes and underwear and check him for crabs? I'm sorry but I just don't find anything sensual with a homeless person scenario.

The model playing Jamie might actually live in an art deco condo in South Beach for all I know so it's nothing personal, but this homeless person gimmick was a major turn off for me.

I see Jamie will be in a future episode too. What comes after that, a desparate straight dude from a pyschiatric ward?
 
Mmmm yes keep the straight acting men coming.. keep the old tired gay men away.

Jamie is sexy. I love it when they show their asshole.

you've got to be kidding! and he even looks older than most the old models!:thumbdown::thumbdown::thumbdown:
 
Giving Broke Straight Boys v2.0 a chance but...

I must admit, I was one of the ones that hated the changed at first. A few of the other members made some valid points. Not everyone is going to like every scene, and you have to give things a chance. I have decided to give BSBv2.0 a chance. That being said...Whom ever is coming up withe storylines needs to make them a bit more believeable. Jamie doesn't pull-off homeless. As someome else said, if he were homeless he would not look that good...LOL I understand the intention is to get back to Broke Straight Boys but we're not stupid...If the models are going to have a"story" beyond the fact that they are broke and need money, then please try for a more believeable "story" Agree or disagree, I for one want Broke Straight Boys to succeed. At one time I thought it was one of the better sites out there. I just want it to continue to be Thanks,
 
I have to agree Broke Straight Boys is one of the good sites to be on, but lets get real the person behind the camera SUCKS his voice is so monotone it reminds me of a that guy that does the eye commercial's and Jamie is a hot guy but far from being homeless it is an insult to the poor individuals that are less fortunate, Ive said enough
 
I have to agree Broke Straight Boys is one of the good sites to be on, but lets get real the person behind the camera SUCKS his voice is so monotone it reminds me of a that guy that does the eye commercial's and Jamie is a hot guy but far from being homeless it is an insult to the poor individuals that are less fortunate, Ive said enough

No.. Matthew has a sexy voice and it's not monotone. Don't tell others to get "real" just because you disagree with them... how rude.
 
And Matthew also said he did not believe Jamie's story that he would live in box...

Normally solo's bore me, not this one!
 
What a beautiful looking guy!

And the believability of the stories has never bothered me. They are simply that: stories. I never believed David turned his pizza delivery guy into a model, or that Aiden just happened to be at the car show.

Plus I'm really getting to like Matthew.

For a solo, this was a 5.
 
No.. Matthew has a sexy voice and it's not monotone. Don't tell others to get "real" just because you disagree with them... how rude.

Wow, isn't that interesting. When you disagreed with what I said, you told me to "go somewhere else," not to mention a number of other things you have said to or about others, in the short week you have been posting. Is that less rude, then Centex saying to get "real"?:confused1:

We are all aloud to give our opinions here at Broke Straight Boys, and there are people here that will agree with and support all of those opinions. There are also people that will disagree with all of those opinions. Just because someone thinks differently does not mean they don't belong here.

In the short week you have been part of this forum, there is no way that you can understand the workings, and relationships in play here. Please do not be so quick to jump on other people. Some of us have interacted for a long time, and we tease and play and get a little sarcastic with each other. Very little of what we say to each other is "rude," just giving our opinions and having a little fun, with our friends.:thumbup:
 
I think Matthew has a nice and somewhat sexy voice. But of course everyone is entitled their own opinion.
 
Hot!!!

I like Jamie. Yes, I agree that the homeless story is mostly unbelievable, and I think that he overact's, and I still wish that they would not focus on the cash on the couch. We get it, guys, and don't need that constant visual reminder.

But overall he is a very hot guy. I do believe that he is 19. He has a mature looking face, but his facial hair is indicative to me of a young guy transitioning from peach fuzz on a smooth post adolescent face into his manly facial hair that will come soon enough. His body is very toned and tight, and looks more muscular than a guy who never goes to a gym would have.

I again refer to the six preview clips on the non-members home page, and see that we will be seeing Jamie & my favorite new brokie, Rocco, soon, and they both suck dick, and apparently take each other's loads on their tongues. It looks hot, and I'm really looking forward to it. :001_tt2:

So far, I think that all of the new model's are hot. Thanks to Mark & "Matthew". :thumbup1:
 
Tampa,

I agree with you. I too like Matthews voice. The problem for me is, he doesn't know when to shut up! I said it in another post, he is a regular chatty Cathy. That delays the start of any real sex. IN the recent shoot with Rocco, Jimmy, and SLink, he talked for 8 minutes into the shoot, which only lasted a total of 16:58. For me, that is too much conversation.
But that is just me.
 
Tampa,

I agree with you. I too like Matthews voice.

In the recent shoot with Rocco, Jimmy, and SLink, he talked for 8 minutes into the shoot, which only lasted a total of 16:58. For me, that is too much conversation.
But that is just me.

Hey JLipps,

I think the message on the amount of time devoted to opening conversation in the scenes is getting through. I appreciated in this scene that Matthew asked him his age. That's always a nice bit of info to have. I don't want a scene with no intro at all. Where they are just stripping off clothes and getting to it. That's more like what you can see on free sites.

You want to learn something unique about each model. So that you feel a connection with him on some level. Whether it be his current living situation, his girlfriend situation, his current financial situation, etc. For instance I did enjoy Vinny's explanation of what he liked to do with women, the last time he came, his sexual prowess in being able to cum 3 times, etc. Age and relationship status are a nice place to start when introducing a model. If they are a college student that's a nice thing to know too. You just don't want the intro for the whole scene, even with multiple models to go on for very long. About 5 minutes or less, I'd say. Others are welcome to disagree of course.
 
I felt compelled to respond to this thread because of a predominant attitude about homeless people. There are many misconceptions people have about homeless people, not unlike those of some of the far-right with "get a job" attitudes.

Homeless people can look very normal. They can live in cars like those who lost their home in the real estate bubble; they can live under bridges in cardboard boxes because they don't want to sleep in a large room with others or endure proselytizing sermons/speeches; they can live in bivouac-like areas with shelter only from the rain (like some vets I've met who prefer being on their own instead of in a state-supported facility); they can migrate from one friend's sofa to the next, as some of the teens I've met at our youth center. They don't all stink (some do, as I've uncomfortably experienced on a downtown bus), they don't all wear ragged clothes; in fact, they make use of clothing donations so they can retain some semblance of normality.

One of the eye-opening programs I volunteered to support was a homeless/hunger awareness opportunity for teens. You would never know some of the teens we encountered were homeless--they had iPods, backpacks, funky clothes with the typical tears, piercings, tattoos, dyed hair... Some only sought support for meals at the local agencies geared to help teens, some willingly accepted bedding when temperatures dropped below freezing. Truth is, homelessness exists all over, even in middle America Minneapolis or Des Moines, or Edmonds, Washington. People don't like to recognize the truth because their towns/cities are progressive and not at all like deteriorating cities like Detroit.

Jamie may or may not be/have been homeless...I can't definitively judge that. He does look like one of the two kids I just took to Costco to pick up food for their house--an add-on cabin at a friend's grandmother's house that keeps them from being shelterless.

There are many who are borderline homeless because of the housing bubble, or because of major medical expenses that have eaten up their life savings, or because they're victim to the continual downsizing at many companies. I don't criticize those who have opinions of the less fortunate, because I had similar opinions about seven years ago.

Think of the food donation bins at the stores--what kind of food do you see? Top Ramen because it's cheap? Because 'those people' will eat anything because they're hungry and grateful to eat anything? Are those people not similarly deserving of good nutrition? Yet the attitude so many have, that I used to have, is that providing bulk cheap items is better than donating fewer higher-priced items. People without much discretionary income enjoy treats as well, whether it's an occasional ice cream bar, cake mix with frosting, or meat that isn't canned.

Next time you feel compelled to make statements about homeless people, consider volunteering with various programs that deal with this very issue. It may be eye-opening, because many are so close to needing assistance. That could be your neighbor, your coworker, the person that serves you at a fast food joint, your elderly person you see shopping at Goodwill Industries...

You just never know...
 
Why should Matthew shut up in solo? The solo is mend as the audition tape. I liked it the way it is.

Reality is often stranger than fiction.
 
Did I miss something.... I thought this thread was about Jamie... not Matthew.
 
Homeless, huh? Well, I wouldn't have believed it either until I volunteered to feed the homeless on Market Street in San Francisco on Tuesdays. I met young men like Jamie, nice personality, not stinky or filthy, clean, well-mannered and just plain friendly. Yes, there are those who fit the stereotype homeless but they are not the majority of them. I have met some very handsome - perfect tens - young men who are homeless and for whatever reason perferred to live on the streets. And yes, they would do anything for money even sell themselves for sex to anyone.
 
Tampa,

I agree with you. I too like Matthews voice. The problem for me is, he doesn't know when to shut up! I said it in another post, he is a regular chatty Cathy. That delays the start of any real sex. IN the recent shoot with Rocco, Jimmy, and SLink, he talked for 8 minutes into the shoot, which only lasted a total of 16:58. For me, that is too much conversation.
But that is just me.

With all due respect, I can't agree with that. David did far more talking than Matthew does. Matthew keeps it fairly minimal and after his initial introduction basically just tells the guy what to do. This was a solo jerk off.. did you want him to jerk off for 30 minutes?
 
Boring Jamie

I've really had it with Broke Straight Boys at this point. So far the episodes have involved completely unbelievable stories. It's only sexy if the amateurs are amateurs. Otherwise just advertise this as episodes of make believe with hot or not so hot boys. There are too many other sites that, in my opinion, are much hotter.
 
Top