• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

jake tipton

The owner of this site Mark told us this yesterday on another thread about "Jake Tipton"
It sucks with Jake. He told us he had never done anything with another guy and wasn't on any other sites. Come to find out he is on a ton of other sites. I wish people would just be honest. :(
The original producer/director of Broke Straight Boys David would tell us how some of the boys "whore themselves out" to every gay porn site, and apparently Jake has done that. Too bad, as he is a cute guy, but he has no creds left to re-appear on Broke Straight Boys now, (in my humble opinion). But apparently his fans can still find him all over the net on all of the sites mentioned, so far.
 
The owner of this site Mark told us this yesterday on another thread about "Jake Tipton"The original producer/director of Broke Straight Boys David would tell us how some of the boys "whore themselves out" to every gay porn site, and apparently Jake has done that. Too bad, as he is a cute guy, but he has no creds left to re-appear on Broke Straight Boys now, (in my humble opinion). But apparently his fans can still find him all over the net on all of the sites mentioned, so far.
I took a pole and we would rather have Jake come back then Jimmy lol
 
I took a pole and we would rather have Jake come back then Jimmy lol

Oh Peter, how you do push those buttons!:angel: I was just going to mention to mikeyank that I like whores. Matter of fact, some of the forumites might fall into that category...if their lucky enough!:welcome:
 
I took a pole and we would rather have Jake come back then Jimmy lol

Oh Peter, how you do push those buttons!:angel: I was just going to mention to mikeyank that I like whores. Matter of fact, some of the forumites might fall into that category...if their lucky enough!:welcome:
Indeed Beth, Peter knows just the right buttons to push, and yes for the right guy, I can be a whore too, taking care of his "manly needs" whenever he needs it, but I never went on a website proclaiming to be a straight virgin to man sex. :wtf:
 
Well ..Gotta say..He did a pretty good job on Bait Buddies...He is a pretty good actor. (Because he said he was straight there too)
Maybe he thinks he is ? lol.. Whatever.. he is a hot kid to look at.It is all up to Broke Straight Boys management now.The interest seems to grow.
 
Perhaps this will pave the way for others'? They could still be, straight, broke....and porn stars! As long as they're good looking and have all the "key anatomical attributes", right?
 
given the choice between a model who was less than straight forward and a model who was too straight forward, I would go for too much over less than.
 
First of all did we really need a new thread on this? Couldn't this have been in the original thread? I do try to be honest and I appreciate honesty but when it comes down to it, I don't think of the porn industry as being a hotbed of honesty.
 
First of all did we really need a new thread on this? Couldn't this have been in the original thread? I do try to be honest and I appreciate honesty but when it comes down to it, I don't think of the porn industry as being a hotbed of honesty.
On point one, yes I agree that a new thread was not necessary and the latest "Jake" siting could have been added to the original thread.

But on point two, if we are talking about honesty in the porn industry in general I might agree, but the whole premise of this site is to take a straight guy, find out what makes him tick in his initial interview and solo and then to watch his first time having gay sex. As the model in question has not only had gay sex in the past, but previously appeared on other gay porn sites, then yes it does matter, very much to me, and apparently to the owner of the site who was lied to. Jake's dishonesty has been referred to on the forum as a "little white lie", but I see it as a major breach of what the site is supposed to be all about.
 
Porn is fantasy, people. You can't publish a pornographic video without the persons' being filmed consent(s). I personally like the concept of gonzo/reality porn, and I love the fantasy of it. That's why I like Broke Straight Boys (and similar sites); I really dislike professional (appearing) porn, especially the ones that have music. Broke Straight Boys is the best at maintaining the fantasy of reality porn. I think that is why we are all here.
 
this thread was about jake using the name Zane Tate again. the first off-site sighting should be original jake sighting thread, if a beginning thread is sought. the way things seem to work is a person clicks submit and starts a thread.
choosing between Zane Tate and james (jake and jimmy) came up. whenever either one of them shows up, I expect more threads.
 
Porn is fantasy, people. You can't publish a pornographic video without the persons' being filmed consent(s). I personally like the concept of gonzo/reality porn, and I love the fantasy of it. That's why I like Broke Straight Boys (and similar sites); I really dislike professional (appearing) porn, especially the ones that have music. Broke Straight Boys is the best at maintaining the fantasy of reality porn. I think that is why we are all here.
I think I agree with you DrabBoiz. I also love the gonzo/reality aspect of Broke Straight Boys and loved it from the day's of David, not so much through the "Clay era", and Johnny is getting back to what appears to be reality based porn site.

But on the subject of this thread, you didn't offer an opinion on the subject at hand, Jake Tipton. As someone who reviews porn for a living, I'm curious as to your take on this question.
 
Well,

I've just seen a preview of "Jake" as "Zane Tate" in an upcoming three-way with Sebastian Young and Jack King, on "DallasReeves". (And DAMN that Dallas Reeves, anyway, poaching away so many good models from Broke Straight Boys!!! :-((( And when they go to D.R., they tend to stay gone. . . so I have a sense that, unless that video was "in the can", the Jake non-fans won't have Jake to kick around, anymore. *SIGH*)

My feelings about all this are well-known. While I appreciate the charter of the site as the "point of discovery" and "proving ground" for models with no previous experience, I will always maintain that a model's previous or concurrent escapades on other sites are only tenuously connected to his real-life identity as "straight or gay" (I am not a fan of Skinnerian behaviorist psychology); I believe that many of the BROKEST and STRAIGHTEST models are the MOST likely to farm themselves out to a variety of sites (because they are TRULY in it for the money, as opposed to personal experimentation); and, at the end of the day, a cute smile, a super physique, some increment of personal charm, and a flair for great performances, are enough to win ME over ;-)

I think Jake has done a fantastic job on Broke Straight Boys, and, if there is any chance of keeping him, or getting him back (as the case may be): I'm all for it. (A cute guy is a TERRIBLE thing to waste!)

"A" XOXOXOXOXO
 
Porn is fantasy, people. You can't publish a pornographic video without the persons' being filmed consent(s). I personally like the concept of gonzo/reality porn, and I love the fantasy of it. That's why I like Broke Straight Boys (and similar sites); I really dislike professional (appearing) porn, especially the ones that have music. Broke Straight Boys is the best at maintaining the fantasy of reality porn. I think that is why we are all here.

**********************************

Hey, DB ~

Much as I love music, I totally agree that most erotic video, with a score. . . becomes totally un-erotic. Partly because the music chosen is usually so BAD - but partly because it obscures the sounds of real passion, and distracts from the vitality of the moment. I have seen a couple of European productions in days of yore that were able to incorporate music in a chaste and muted way that complemented the performance. . . and a couple of movies by "The Black Spark", in which music was used in a really tantalizing, erotic, way. But these videos were definitely in the minority: and, moreover, tended to be more like little gems of performance- and editing-art: more akin to a painting or sculpture, than a full-on arc of complete sexual performance.

When it comes to that, I have to say - - - the sound of Jason Matthews KISSING, or Mr. Paul Canon giving a blowjob (or uttering his very deep moans when he's thrusting): is music, to MY ears ;-)

"A" ;-)))))
 
Well,

I've just seen a preview of "Jake" as "Zane Tate" in an upcoming three-way with Sebastian Young and Jack King, on "DallasReeves". (And DAMN that Dallas Reeves, anyway, poaching away so many good models from Broke Straight Boys!!! :-((( And when they go to D.R., they tend to stay gone. . . so I have a sense that, unless that video was "in the can", the Jake non-fans won't have Jake to kick around, anymore. *SIGH*)

Isn't Dallas Reeves the site where good models go to become irrelevant and just fade away? haha
 
On point one, yes I agree that a new thread was not necessary and the latest "Jake" siting could have been added to the original thread.

But on point two, if we are talking about honesty in the porn industry in general I might agree, but the whole premise of this site is to take a straight guy, find out what makes him tick in his initial interview and solo and then to watch his first time having gay sex. As the model in question has not only had gay sex in the past, but previously appeared on other gay porn sites, then yes it does matter, very much to me, and apparently to the owner of the site who was lied to. Jake's dishonesty has been referred to on the forum as a "little white lie", but I see it as a major breach of what the site is supposed to be all about.

Mike I can't disagree with you on anything. Like I said earlier, I don't have a problem with his lie but if the company does I totally understand it and would not argue or be angry if they chose not to use him again. I don't blame them for trusting him, he did betray a trust and that can be a difficult thing to get past. If he worked for me and I felt betrayed I wouldn't want him around anymore either. There have been other models in the past who lied and continued to make videos for awhile after being found out, of course I don't think they were as flagrant as Jake has been. All these sites are kind of making him look like a slut, but I've never had anything against sluts. There is still plenty of hot sexy eye candy here to keep me happy.
 
I think I agree with you DrabBoiz. I also love the gonzo/reality aspect of Broke Straight Boys and loved it from the day's of David, not so much through the "Clay era", and Johnny is getting back to what appears to be reality based porn site.

But on the subject of this thread, you didn't offer an opinion on the subject at hand, Jake Tipton. As someone who reviews porn for a living, I'm curious as to your take on this question.

Okay, what was the question again?
 
On point one, yes I agree that a new thread was not necessary and the latest "Jake" siting could have been added to the original thread.

But on point two, if we are talking about honesty in the porn industry in general I might agree, but the whole premise of this site is to take a straight guy, find out what makes him tick in his initial interview and solo and then to watch his first time having gay sex. As the model in question has not only had gay sex in the past, but previously appeared on other gay porn sites, then yes it does matter, very much to me, and apparently to the owner of the site who was lied to. Jake's dishonesty has been referred to on the forum as a "little white lie", but I see it as a major breach of what the site is supposed to be all about.

We need a moderator like Miss D
 
Top