• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

"Cumming Attractions" - Rocco Fuck's Bobby

"not have jumped Bobby right into anal, unless he was just begging to try it."

You think Bobby is an virgin, and never got fucked before?
 
I am sure this is going to be a great shoot. The models are certainly wonderful. However, I would rather they not have jumped Bobby right into anal, unless he was just begging to try it. I would have enjoyed seeing him do an oral scene first, then the anal.For me,personally, I don't feel that EVERY straight boy has to do anal, and certainly not pushed into it immediately, unless, and i repeat myself, the model is begging to try it.
Unlike some of my bud here on the forum, I don't have to witness an anal scene to enjoy a shoot. In fact, two straight buds jerking each other to orgasm, if done correctly, can be extremely hot and erotic.
And again, that is just my opinion. Oh if only I could direct the shoots myself, lol.
I agree completely!!!:001_tongue:
 
What is good for goose is good for the gander!

I agree completely!!!:001_tongue:

Dear Mikeyank,

I agree that a mutual j/o scene done well can be very erotic. Likewise, I agree that a poorly done anal scene where the bottom has not douched or lubed up adequately, or has a pain filled facial expression from the word go, or is begging for it to stop when the top tries to prove how rough and painful he can make it. Any one these scenarios should bring the whole scene to a rapid halt!

More than full anal, for those uncomfortable to go all the way, I really get off seeing models make a deliberate effort to bring the prostate into play, whether in a solo, a mutual j/o, an oral scene, or even for rimming. To little strategic attention is given to the benefits of prostate stimulation. If the proper touch can increase the amount of cum shot into the air upon reaching orgasm, then count me in. I vote for that rather than "anal for the sake of anal" without both guys enjoying the experience!

I will agree that anal should not be required of all Broke Straight Boys models - gay or straight, but if the only way they know how to fuck is to be unnecessarily rough to the bottom, then I feel they deserve a little of their own medicine for being so "thoughtless and inconsiderate of their partner". I am not suggesting that the overly rough top be "raped". But, they should be banned as a top on Broke Straight Boys unless they voluntarily agree to be a bottom getting to know how the same rough treatment felt that they gave their last bottom. Showing dominance doesn't require that you have to purposely hurt your partner in the process. This is not pleasurable to watch someone in real pain, unless you are a sadist.

Sincerely,



Stimpy
 
I will agree that anal should not be required of all Broke Straight Boys models - gay or straight, but if the only way they know how to fuck is to be unnecessarily rough to the bottom, then I feel they deserve a little of their own medicine for being so "thoughtless and inconsiderate of their partner". I am not suggesting that the overly rough top be "raped". But, they should be banned as a top on Broke Straight Boys unless they voluntarily agree to be a bottom getting to know how the same rough treatment felt that they gave their last bottom. Showing dominance doesn't require that you have to purposely hurt your partner in the process. This is not pleasurable to watch someone in real pain, unless you are a sadist.

Sincerely,



Stimpy

I agree. In fact, your last comment really strikes home. Being DOMINANT is not necessarily the right of Tops only. In fact, I believe we here on the forum in days long gone, spoke fondly of at least two boys we proudly referred to as "Power Bottoms". It was they, in fact, who directed the top as to what to do in the scene. Good sex, unlike good football, can occur without unecessary roughness. (With a wink to my fellow football fan[atics]) And, if I wish to view rough sex, there are several sites set up to provide access to same. And, while on this bent, I am all for more rimming and prostate action.
 
I agree. In fact, your last comment really strikes home. Being DOMINANT is not necessarily the right of Tops only. In fact, I believe we here on the forum in days long gone, spoke fondly of at least two boys we proudly referred to as "Power Bottoms". It was they, in fact, who directed the top as to what to do in the scene. Good sex, unlike good football, can occur without unecessary roughness. (With a wink to my fellow football fan[atics]) And, if I wish to view rough sex, there are several sites set up to provide access to same. And, while on this bent, I am all for more rimming and prostate action.

You are quite right M&M. Your royal highness, your august presence has been sorely missed among your devoted subjects in the Land of Forum. We beseech thee to spend more time among your most humble and faithful servants. :wink:
 
Robert,

I don't know any of these boys personally, and I would not be so arrogant as to assume that every boy who tries anal, or even oral, is not a virgin to man-to-man sex. Perhaps you have some inside knowledge about Bobby that you would want to share with us?

I don't know about you, but i have known many straight young men for whom I was privileged to provide their first anal experience. Most of them took it rather well, a few did not, and an even smaller number found it too painful and refused to try again. So for me, to see a young man preform anal, specially for $$, I can totally see them taking it well. And, as many people know, once you try it, you find it is not so bad and can even be quite enjoyable.

That brings me to another type of straight man, who for reasons unknown to me, I have met and they very specifically wanted to be topped. They may not kiss, or want oral, or show any kind of emotion or passion other than to cum while being topped. I've even known guys who would cum before me as I topped them, and they would make me stop because they were done! I was not particularly pleased with the situation, but that was all they wanted, to cum while being topped, with no regard for what I wanted or needed.
And you know what? I didn't care either. I pretty much got what I wanted and I for one don't require a partner to reciprocate to enjoy myself.
 
That brings me to another type of straight man, who for reasons unknown to me, I have met and they very specifically wanted to be topped. They may not kiss, or want oral, or show any kind of emotion or passion other than to cum while being topped. I've even known guys who would cum before me as I topped them, and they would make me stop because they were done! I was not particularly pleased with the situation, but that was all they wanted, to cum while being topped, with no regard for what I wanted or needed.

And you know what? I didn't care either. I pretty much got what I wanted and I for one don't require a partner to reciprocate to enjoy myself.
That's really interesting Jlipps that you bring up this type of straight young man. One evening in the early 1980's I went into a gay bar on Christopher Street in Greenwich Village. I began talking to a very straight appearing young man, who was wearing jeans and work books, and did not appear to fit in at all with the crowd there. He told me that he was a truck driver, who was straight, and occasionally went into such a bar when he was in the city.

I took him back home to my apartment, but on the way as I tried to grope his crotch in my car, he explained that the only thing he wants to do with a man is get fucked. He does not kiss, suck dick, or want his dick sucked or touched. Yes there are all levels of straight guys who want to indulge in their own particular form of gay sex.

And yes, yes, yes, I totally agree with your point that you "don't require a partner to reciprocate to enjoy myself". That is why I object when members of the forum say it is unfair or selfish of a model to only participate in one-sided sex. Some even say that a model does not earn his salary, by not reciprocating.

While I still advocate a variety of types of "straight" guys to appear on this site to appease all of the variations of enjoyment that we member's have, one must recognize that there is a segment of the Broke Straight Boys audience, myself included, who prefer models who do not reciprocate, and who enjoy what one may perceive to be selfish one-sided sex. Those are the scenes that I enjoy and go back to watch over and over.

Thank you JLipps, for bringing up both of those points.
 
After watching Bobby get rimmed, my Gaydar told me we would get to see Bobby bottom soon. And I happen to be a real fan of bottom boys...

What does your intuition say?
 
After watching Bobby get rimmed, my Gaydar told me we would get to see Bobby bottom soon. And I happen to be a real fan of bottom boys...

What does your intuition say?
It's way more than intuition Robert. My own eyes have watched the preview clip of Rocco's rather large, fully erect cock sheathed in a condom, invading Bobby's hole as he makes inhuman sounds as he lays back and accepts Rocco's manhood plunging up his butt hole. It looks to be a very hot scene, that I believe will receive the top ratings yet on V-2. :tongue_smilie:
 
Thank you Mikeyank! I guess we truly are birds of a feather! LOL

You know, I do also enjoy watching a straight young man EVOLVE. SLowly over time realizing that man-to-man sex isn't so bad, and actually pretty damned good. I love it when they drop their defenses and relax and really begin to participate in the act. It is such a special moment when you see a guy who refused to kiss, finally, and of their own accord, pucker up! That's when I give it a "5"!

The point is, that sex should be something of pleasure. An act when one person wishes to share an intimate moment with another person. And those moments are rare among straight men, but, when they do occur, it is worth the wait to witness. It is so much more meaningful to watch someone give themselves to the moment on their own terms and in their own time. Its okay to watch when someone does it for the $$, but it is so much more pleasurable to witness someone reach that level of comfort on their own.

I say leave the boys alone, and let them become comfortable with themselves and decide for themselves if that is what THEY want to do. It should not be forced for the sake of helping some lascivious gay man getting their jollies off. Let nature take its course! For me, it is so much more erotic to see someone surrender to passion if and when they want to, although I'll watch them do it for $$ and probably enjoy watching it anyway, just not as much.
 
still waiting

Well, we did not actually get the "Rocco Fuck's Bobby" scene today, but we did get the opposite. While I thoroughly enjoyed watching Bobby get such pleasure from fucking Rocco, I have a feeling that the reciprocal scene will be even hotter, as Bobby has shown us how he loves something in his ass, and Rocco from his body and dick appears to be a natural top...........so I will wait patiently for what I still believe will be a Broke Straight Boys Classic episode.

I was a bit surprised that Clay did not comment on Rocco's new look, sans his beautiful long hair, or perhaps that discussion will take place in another episode that we have not yet seen.
 
Top