Chaz Does Ryan Right!

[Beth]

Damn, this was a true fuck scene...loved it! Both you guys put your all into this one; thank you so much for the passion, energy and hot talk! I also loved the "foot work," very nice. I want to see both these guys back...and front!

 

[betudidntknow]

Damn, this was a true fuck scene...loved it! Both you guys put your all into this one; thank you so much for the passion, energy and hot talk! very nice. I want to see both these guys back...and front!

Ditto!

 

[stowe1]

Boringly average at best. Even Ryan was off kilter for me. 3's all around. First we had Ronan Kennedy, then Dakota. Too much to hope for three five-star scenes in a row.

 

[peterh6308]

I liked it as well, good scene guys...

 

[oldfart63]

Boringly average at best. Even Ryan was off kilter for me. 3's all around. First we had Ronan Kennedy, then Dakota. Too much to hope for three five-star scenes in a row.

Watch it again. Broke Straight Boys didn't do a newbie like Chaz any favors by releasing this right after that ballbuster with Dakota and Chris. It really is good. I especially liked Chaz's "sweet talk" ("I want to taste your lips again"). He must have a romantic side. At least he sounds like he's doing more than jacking himself off with Ryan's ass for a paycheck. I agree that Ryan seemed a little off, but that's going to happen from time to time. I'll give this 4s. I'm anxious to see how Chaz does as he gains more experience. On a personal note, if I ever got the chance I think I'd try to suck Chaz's awesome nipples right off his chest.

 

[StudddAndy]

Chaz is a really sweet guy. He just doesn't fit on a site where "STRAIGHT" plays a part in the pornographic fantasy. He has a really big and thick dick which is usually very popular among other men. That usually counts. But it sure didn't work in this scene.

 

[admin]

Hey StudddAndy... I think your gaydar may be a little off, ha ha. Chaz really is straight. I have to sit there and watch him watch straight porn to get his dick up so he can jump in the scene hard. It was so much easier shooting College Dudes when you didn't have to watch female porn on set to get the guys up. It's destroying me slowly but surely, joke. -Bryce

 

[StudddAndy]

Hey StudddAndy... I think your gaydar may be a little off, ha ha. Chaz really is straight. I have to sit there and watch him watch straight porn to get his dick up so he can jump in the scene hard. It was so much easier shooting College Dudes when you didn't have to watch female porn on set to get the guys up. It's destroying me slowly but surely, joke. -Bryce[/QUOT

Sorry, Bryce. I don't mean to be argumentative or defensive. But I didn't mean to imply that he's gay. I don't think he is. I was just saying that I don't think he ever got into the scene very well, for whatever reason, and it didn't work for any of my fantasies.

I hate the remark now. Johnny has tried to teach me not to make negative implications on the forum. I'm still trying to learn it.

Physically, he's pretty enough and a very sweet and I think funny guy. I'd love to eat a hamburger with him. But I didn't feel like he brought the sex to the scene. I'm all over it now.

Plus. I think its best to NEVER pay any attention to my posts. They simply shouldn't be taken seriously. LOL

 

[oldfart63]

Thanks for the information, Bryce. I wondered if Chaz had much experience with guys. TBH, the first time I watched the video my first thought was that Chaz looked like he was making love to a woman. The Pointer Sisters' "Slow Hand" came to mind. I still think he did a pretty good job. It will be interesting to see if he can adapt with experience. If you all had to stop and watch straight porn for him to "fluff up", it might also explain why Ryan was a little "off" during this scene.

 

[admin]

"Physically, he's pretty enough and a very sweet and I think funny guy. I'd love to eat a hamburger with him." --haha!! I got a good laugh from that one Maybe you and I can go out for a burger the next time I'm back in NorthCentral Arkansas visiting my family.

 

[StudddAndy]

"Physically, he's pretty enough and a very sweet and I think funny guy. I'd love to eat a hamburger with him." --haha!! I got a good laugh from that one Maybe you and I can go out for a burger the next time I'm back in NorthCentral Arkansas visiting my family.

Dude. When you are going to be here, message me. I'll treat you like the KING you are.

 

[johnny]

I don't think it was a Bad scene. They just had a REAL HARD ACT TO FOLLOW..3-3-3....

 

[stowe1]

Boringly average at best. Even Ryan was off kilter for me. 3's all around. First we had Ronan Kennedy, then Dakota. Too much to hope for three five-star scenes in a row.

Watch it again. Broke Straight Boys didn't do a newbie like Chaz any favors by releasing this right after that ballbuster with Dakota and Chris. It really is good. I especially liked Chaz's "sweet talk" ("I want to taste your lips again"). He must have a romantic side. At least he sounds like he's doing more than jacking himself off with Ryan's ass for a paycheck. I agree that Ryan seemed a little off, but that's going to happen from time to time. I'll give this 4s. I'm anxious to see how Chaz does as he gains more experience. On a personal note, if I ever got the chance I think I'd try to suck Chaz's awesome nipples right off his chest.

Dear "old" - My post was made after I watched it a second time. I'm glad you enjoyed it as much as you did, but for me it was just average.

 

[stowe1]

Chaz is a really sweet guy. He just doesn't fit on a site where "STRAIGHT" plays a part in the pornographic fantasy. He has a really big and thick dick which is usually very popular among other men. That usually counts. But it sure didn't work in this scene.

Hey StudddAndy... I think your gaydar may be a little off, ha ha. Chaz really is straight. I have to sit there and watch him watch straight porn to get his dick up so he can jump in the scene hard. It was so much easier shooting College Dudes when you didn't have to watch female porn on set to get the guys up. It's destroying me slowly but surely, joke. -Bryce

Dear admin - I find it interesting that you responded to studd's post in this manner. There have been many, many, many comments over the years about whether a certain model is gay, bi, or straight, especially during this year alone with the new models we've been seeing. Yet you choose to comment only now. It is therefore logical for us to infer that speculation amongst forumites about a model's sexual orientation is accurate unless corrected by admin or someone else from management based on the precedent you have set in this situation.

 

[johnny]

Dear admin - I find it interesting that you responded to studd's post in this manner. There have been many, many, many comments over the years about whether a certain model is gay, bi, or straight, especially during this year alone with the new models we've been seeing. Yet you choose to comment only now. It is therefore logical for us to infer that speculation amongst forumites about a model's sexual orientation is accurate unless corrected by admin or someone else from management based on the precedent you have set in this situation.

That's real funny stowe1. Because I think they are all gay. Especially this year.
And I really thought Chaz was gay.Don't get nervous guys.That is just me.I just want to say stowe1.You got some big balls for asking about it.
And I do think it is the first time management addressed it? So maybe besides Dakota there is one more
Straight boy on Broke Straight Boys??? lol

 

[oldfart63]

Dear "old" - My post was made after I watched it a second time. I'm glad you enjoyed it as much as you did, but for me it was just average.

Hey, fair enough. I was just giving the newbie the benefit of the doubt. But having to stop the shoot so Chaz could watch straight porn would explain why Ryan was "off".

 

[Sha]

Dear admin - I find it interesting that you responded to studd's post in this manner. There have been many, many, many comments over the years about whether a certain model is gay, bi, or straight, especially during this year alone with the new models we've been seeing. Yet you choose to comment only now. It is therefore logical for us to infer that speculation amongst forumites about a model's sexual orientation is accurate unless corrected by admin or someone else from management based on the precedent you have set in this situation.

It is virtually impossible for one of us to answer every post on here as there are so many and frankly there just aren't enough hours in the day. We keep a pretty busy schedule and although we love being able to communicate with our members as often as we can, unfortunately we aren't able to directly reply to each and every message. I do feel that we are pretty open about most of the inner workings of our company and I certainly hope you appreciate our efforts.

 

[stowe1]

This is the "stock answer" you use whenever you don't want to directly answer a question. Within the last year or two we were told that all posts on the forum are read, albeit they can't all be answered.

The posts in question here have to do with forumites' speculation as to the sexual orientation of a specific model. And while they have been frequently asked or speculated upon, they are but a minuscule part of the total overall posts; and I would suggest would stand out given the subject matter. Thus they could be addressed in you chose to do so.

My guess, and I emphasize that, is that "admin" in this instance made a boo-boo by addressing speculation about Chaz's sexual orientation especially in light of your admonition, sha, made several times in the past that this issue should not be addressed, privacy concerns and all that.

I have suggested several times in the past when this issue has arisen that mgmnt should not raise the issue by asking the question in the openings of scenes and it seemed to have been the case until now and that is why 'admin's" post addressing Chaz's sexual orientation stood out so starkly and lead to this discussion.

Again, I will make the same suggestion, to wit: unless mgmnt is willing to address the model's sexual orientation when it is raised in all cases, then it should not be addressed at all, either in opening comments or in answer to speculative posts on the manner raised by forumites. That way it is a blanket procedure applicable to all model's and no exception's have to be made and explained.

 

[admin]

Again, I will make the same suggestion, to wit: unless mgmnt is willing to address the model's sexual orientation when it is raised in all cases, then it should not be addressed at all, either in opening comments or in answer to speculative posts on the manner raised by forumites. That way it is a blanket procedure applicable to all model's and no exception's have to be made and explained.

Sometimes I have some extra time or am feeling especially verbose, but I'll tow the party line if that is the will of the people. The fact is that the vast majority of these guys identify as straight to me. Some are certainly better actors than others. We all feel our gaydar is infallible it seems so I was just sharing some insight. No harm was intended, I just felt comfortable giving a peak behind the curtain in this instance. As the cameraman, I often know what kind of porn the boys watch to get off to and once you extrapolate the cinimagic out of it.. I have insight that I sometimes feel comfortable sharing such was the case here. But Shannon is absolutely correct when he says we respond as time permits.

If the expectation is that we should refrain from speaking on subjects unless that subject can be addressed every single time it is raised, then that would mean we should never participate here unless answering a specific technical issue. If someone is straight but we shouldn't discuss it unless it is discussed for every single model in every post, we can do that. But does the same thing apply to all topics or only this one. If I reply in one thread asking if Ronan Kennedy is coming back and answer that he is currently here filming now... but then someone else asks if Oliver is coming back and I don't see it so don't respond does that mean its now a forbidden topic and I should stay hush since I missed one?

Was there really harm done here? If so, surely it is only a minor infraction of the delicate decorum.

 

[stowe1]

Sometimes I have some extra time or am feeling especially verbose, but I'll tow the party line if that is the will of the people. The fact is that the vast majority of these guys identify as straight to me. Some are certainly better actors than others. We all feel our gaydar is infallible it seems so I was just sharing some insight. No harm was intended, I just felt comfortable giving a peak behind the curtain in this instance. As the cameraman, I often know what kind of porn the boys watch to get off to and once you extrapolate the cinimagic out of it.. I have insight that I sometimes feel comfortable sharing such was the case here. But Shannon is absolutely correct when he says we respond as time permits.

If the expectation is that we should refrain from speaking on subjects unless that subject can be addressed every single time it is raised, then that would mean we should never participate here unless answering a specific technical issue. If someone is straight but we shouldn't discuss it unless it is discussed for every single model in every post, we can do that. But does the same thing apply to all topics or only this one. If I reply in one thread asking if Ronan Kennedy is coming back and answer that he is currently here filming now... but then someone else asks if Oliver is coming back and I don't see it so don't respond does that mean its now a forbidden topic and I should stay hush since I missed one?

Was there really harm done here? If so, surely it is only a minor infraction of the delicate decorum.

Re: Your last sentence: You need much more practice in attempting sarcastic rejoinders.

Will of the people? - who are you kidding?

I was simply repeating things that we have been told over the last few years by mgmnt. as to how it interfaces with the forum regarding models' personal lives and info.

There have been plenty of guys over the years and currently who might tell you they are straight but they present themselves as anything but; or are good actors; or can "pass" as straight, e.g. no lispy voice as Antonio mentioned about himself; no nelly mannerisms (there are too many to mention); they might be in the midst of self-discovery; and the reasons could go on and on.

Insofar as using straight porn to get aroused, that is not foolproof; First, I get aroused by a lot of straight porn because of my particular psycho-sexual fetishes and fantasies; so some of these guys could too. Secondly, these guys are all young and horny - my guess they could get aroused by almost any type of porn that has a dick in it (if they're gay).

As far as I'm concerned, I could care less whether or not you tell us a model's sexual orientation or not. We will all have our opinions no matter what you tell us anyway.

And finally, your comparing discussing a model's sexual orientation to discussing whether or not a particular model is filming currently or not is absurd.