• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

BTS - Getting To Know Flip

I noticed the same thing Stowe!

Getting To Know Flip

1723-cover.jpg


Flip Jerks Off

1724-cover.jpg


By the way, they updated his model page info:

Age: 22
Height: 5.9 (175cm)
Weight: 182
Shoe: 11 US (45 EU)
Cock: 7.0 (18cm) Cut

By the way, I just checked out his jerk off scene and I think they may have shaved a year or two off his age, and perhaps added an inch or two to his cock size, but it's all okay as , "It's only porn". :001_rolleyes:

And while someone else may start a thread for his solo, I will comment here that I am still not impressed, but I can see from the comments on his BTS, that some forumites are more into his body type than I am, but I am still not impressed, but that's just me! :closedeyes:

I have to agree with you, Mike. Especially about the stats. I will be generous enough to say that I think he is really inexperienced. Like I said before, I saw that he has done two vids for Active Duty, one of which was a solo, so that hardly makes him a professional. I will have to see him with another model and getting some more experience, but generosity can only go so far. At least we have some of the "old timers" coming back. I'd love to see Ronan Kennedy and Tanner.:smiley-love021:
 
I noticed the same thing Stowe!

Getting To Know Flip

1723-cover.jpg


Flip Jerks Off

1724-cover.jpg


By the way, they updated his model page info:

Age: 22
Height: 5.9 (175cm)
Weight: 182
Shoe: 11 US (45 EU)
Cock: 7.0 (18cm) Cut

By the way, I just checked out his jerk off scene and I think they may have shaved a year or two off his age, and perhaps added an inch or two to his cock size, but it's all okay as , "It's only porn". :001_rolleyes:

And while someone else may start a thread for his solo, I will comment here that I am still not impressed, but I can see from the comments on his BTS, that some forumites are more into his body type than I am, but I am still not impressed, but that's just me! :closedeyes:


I agree mikey, He's not my type either but I'm sure there are members who will like him and appreciate that they have someone on site that is their fantasy. About his age, he could be an old looking 22, but if his cock is 7" then I want to know how they measured it, because I'd have 10" - lol!!! Hope that he gets paired with some of our top shelf models. And for me at least there is the saving grace that he's not nelly - lol !!!
 
By the way, they updated his model page info:

Age: 22
Height: 5.9 (175cm)
Weight: 182
Shoe: 11 US (45 EU)
Cock: 7.0 (18cm) Cut

By the way, I just checked out his jerk off scene and I think they may have shaved a year or two off his age, and perhaps added an inch or two to his cock size, but it's all okay as , "It's only porn". :001_rolleyes:

And while someone else may start a thread for his solo, I will comment here that I am still not impressed, but I can see from the comments on his BTS, that some forumites are more into his body type than I am, but I am still not impressed, but that's just me! :closedeyes:

Well, when he was over at ActiveDuty this last summer he was 26, so apparently someone has found the Fountain of Youth!

Without trying to be overly disparaging of the new models, Flip and Jacob Durham just don't fit the profile or fantasy of this site. Big muscle guys have never been overly popular here, from what I remember. It just is not a good fit. They are both attractive certainly, but it doesn't seem most members are attracted to that sort of model here. As I said a week or so ago, I'd go to Corbin Fisher if I wanted mid-20s muscle guys. Broke Straight Boys has always walked that fine line with their models somewhere between twinks and hunks, and have been successful more often than not. That's what membership seems to want to see here. That's why I originally joined (well, that and the whole "straight" thing which we have all mostly let go of by now).
 
Well, when he was over at ActiveDuty this last summer he was 26, so apparently someone has found the Fountain of Youth!

Without trying to be overly disparaging of the new models, Flip and Jacob Durham just don't fit the profile or fantasy of this site. Big muscle guys have never been overly popular here, from what I remember. It just is not a good fit. They are both attractive certainly, but it doesn't seem most members are attracted to that sort of model here. As I said a week or so ago, I'd go to Corbin Fisher if I wanted mid-20s muscle guys. Broke Straight Boys has always walked that fine line with their models somewhere between twinks and hunks, and have been successful more often than not. That's what membership seems to want to see here. That's why I originally joined (well, that and the whole "straight" thing which we have all mostly let go of by now).
Excellent point Scott when you say,

"Broke Straight Boys has always walked that fine line with their models somewhere between twinks and hunks, and have been successful more often than not. That's what membership seems to want to see here."

I see nothing wrong with a site going for a particular niche in their choices of models, so that the fan base has a good idea of what they will be seeing when a new model or scene is revealed. There are sites with gorgeous shaved down, buffed up muscle boys, and others with "Daddy Muggs" types too, and Broke Straight Boys has always featured models on the young side, thin to toned, masculine acting, and usually inexperienced to gay porn. There is so much porn and so many sites on the internet, and brand recognition and even "type casting" are not necessarily a negative, and in my mind are actually a positive on Broke Straight Boys, which was at one time, and hopefully will remain the greatest porn website that I ever knew of! :thumbup1:
 
Excellent point Scott when you say,

"Broke Straight Boys has always walked that fine line with their models somewhere between twinks and hunks, and have been successful more often than not. That's what membership seems to want to see here."

I see nothing wrong with a site going for a particular niche in their choices of models, so that the fan base has a good idea of what they will be seeing when a new model or scene is revealed. There are sites with gorgeous shaved down, buffed up muscle boys, and others with "Daddy Muggs" types too, and Broke Straight Boys has always featured models on the young side, thin to toned, masculine acting, and usually inexperienced to gay porn. There is so much porn and so many sites on the internet, and brand recognition and even "type casting" are not necessarily a negative, and in my mind are actually a positive on Broke Straight Boys, which was at one time, and hopefully will remain the greatest porn website that I ever knew of! :thumbup1:

Right. That was the point I was hoping to make -- that Broke Straight Boys's niche was, as you say, "models on the young side, thin to toned, masculine acting, and usually inexperienced to gay porn." That is what they built their site and reputation on. There are so very many online porn sites now that I think having a niche or "theme" and a specific target market is a good thing. There have been other sites with similar themes to Broke Straight Boys's, but those I have tried out have been pale imitations and usually not very good. When you are the very best at something, at the top of your game, it's important to strive to stay there while adapting to changing business and social trends in order to stay in business (the lack of real straight guys applying, etc.). I know it cannot be easy, and I know that sometimes they might have to just take what they can get, or as we've seen the past few weeks, pull in pros and ringers maybe just to be able to have enough available new content. A lot of us have expressed displeasure with the models over the past few months, but I don't believe it has been to be mean or hurtful to the models or to management but because some of us have viewed it as a decline in quality and not living up to the site's own standards. But I also think we all realize that much of it is out of management's control and that they are trying. We've gotten some old favorites back and have more coming in the near future, which membership seems to have been unanimously happy about. So, let's hope that things turn around in the new year.
 
Right. That was the point I was hoping to make -- that Broke Straight Boys's niche was, as you say, "models on the young side, thin to toned, masculine acting, and usually inexperienced to gay porn." That is what they built their site and reputation on. There are so very many online porn sites now that I think having a niche or "theme" and a specific target market is a good thing. There have been other sites with similar themes to Broke Straight Boys's, but those I have tried out have been pale imitations and usually not very good. When you are the very best at something, at the top of your game, it's important to strive to stay there while adapting to changing business and social trends in order to stay in business (the lack of real straight guys applying, etc.). I know it cannot be easy, and I know that sometimes they might have to just take what they can get, or as we've seen the past few weeks, pull in pros and ringers maybe just to be able to have enough available new content. A lot of us have expressed displeasure with the models over the past few months, but I don't believe it has been to be mean or hurtful to the models or to management but because some of us have viewed it as a decline in quality and not living up to the site's own standards. But I also think we all realize that much of it is out of management's control and that they are trying. We've gotten some old favorites back and have more coming in the near future, which membership seems to have been unanimously happy about. So, let's hope that things turn around in the new year.


I believe you are right on with your remarks, Scott. Especially about members not trying to be mean or hurtful to either the models or management. But there is one more thing in favor of this site that I have found since joining the forum. That is the interaction of the members between each other and with Broke Straight Boys For the most part it seems to be pretty good, and a few times it's been a bit contentious. But it is one thing that has set Broke Straight Boys apart from other porn sites. Now I haven't joined many other sites, or for very long, but I don't remember even this option being available. I've been trying to encourage everyone, including myself, to be patient because Broke Straight Boys turns out a pretty consistently good product, and I think this ability for us to interact (and occasionally seeing the models interacting) lends this site a sense of familiarity that we don't find anywhere else. I'm sure nobody wants to see that disappear, but just because there have been some changes doesn't mean that will happen. I'm willing to just hang in there and see what the future brings.
 
So here is my two cents worth regarding this thread. First, Skip is not an unattractive young man, maybe not to everyone's taste, but I doubt may of us would throw him out of bed for eating crackers on a cold winter's night. Do I think he is straight? Probably not, but certainly more masculine than Olive. The problem I see is not is he masculine or not but rather does he need to "sell" us on how masculine he is. Masculinity is a strange thing. There are guys who try like hell to sell us on how masculine they are and then there are those that are masculine and don't need to do anything to prove it. It also can be in the eye of the beholder. I suggest that maybe we give Skip the benefit of the doubt, pair him with Shawn, sit back and watch what happens. That will probably tell us everything we need to know. I suspect that it is almost impossible for management to find real straight guys willing to test the waters and pass muster with all of the membership. This is a great site and some leeway I am sure would be understandable and appreciated given the tasks at hand.
 
I agree mikey, He's not my type either but I'm sure there are members who will like him and appreciate that they have someone on site that is their fantasy. About his age, he could be an old looking 22, but if his cock is 7" then I want to know how they measured it, because I'd have 10" - lol!!! Hope that he gets paired with some of our top shelf models. And for me at least there is the saving grace that he's not nelly - lol !!!
Long Hard Day At Work...But this has to be the Best or at least funniest Post of the day. :thumbup:
 
Flip has shot his scenes for Broke Straight Boys as we've already seen some of the stills on twitter. There is quite a bit available to see on the BSB Twitter pages.

CycVeq9UUAIKnZL.jpg


Cyb16CsUoAADexT.jpg:large


CyYd1MVXgAE_amC.jpg:large


CyNEwC2WEAAD43r.jpg:large


CyZRlHcXEAc991O.jpg


CyZRlRgWgAAposL.jpg


Now the scenes will be presented and membership will vote on the scenes, and offer their commentary on the forum and on the scene pages. To me his sexuality is not the issue, as we have many current models who are obviously not straight, but it is a matter of if he is attractive and a good performer in the eyes of membership and that we shall see as his scenes are rolled out. Time will tell.
 
flip has shot his scenes for Broke Straight Boys as we've already seen some of the stills on twitter. There is quite a bit available to see on the BSB Twitter pages.

cycveq9uuaiknzl.jpg


cyb16csuoaadext.jpg:large


cyyd1mvxgae_amc.jpg:large


cynewc2weaad43r.jpg:large


cyzrlhcxeac991o.jpg


cyzrlrgwgaaposl.jpg


now the scenes will be presented and membership will vote on the scenes, and offer their commentary on the forum and on the scene pages. To me his sexuality is not the issue, as we have many current models who are obviously not straight, but it is a matter of if he is attractive and a good performer in the eyes of membership and that we shall see as his scenes are rolled out. Time will tell.
Gage Owens sure is cute...
 
Last edited:
Right. That was the point I was hoping to make -- that Broke Straight Boys's niche was, as you say, "models on the young side, thin to toned, masculine acting, and usually inexperienced to gay porn." That is what they built their site and reputation on. There are so very many online porn sites now that I think having a niche or "theme" and a specific target market is a good thing. There have been other sites with similar themes to Broke Straight Boys's, but those I have tried out have been pale imitations and usually not very good. When you are the very best at something, at the top of your game, it's important to strive to stay there while adapting to changing business and social trends in order to stay in business (the lack of real straight guys applying, etc.). I know it cannot be easy, and I know that sometimes they might have to just take what they can get, or as we've seen the past few weeks, pull in pros and ringers maybe just to be able to have enough available new content. A lot of us have expressed displeasure with the models over the past few months, but I don't believe it has been to be mean or hurtful to the models or to management but because some of us have viewed it as a decline in quality and not living up to the site's own standards. But I also think we all realize that much of it is out of management's control and that they are trying. We've gotten some old favorites back and have more coming in the near future, which membership seems to have been unanimously happy about. So, let's hope that things turn around in the new year.

I'm right there with you Scott. I try to never be mean or hurtful to the models themselves. As I've said before, some of these guys who I don't find attractive at all as a porn model I (hypothetically) would not rule out being in a committed relationship with them myself in real life. I'm aware of course that with the age difference that that is pie in the sky thinking. My point being though that while some models might make a great real life partner for any lucky guy out there, that when we are paying for the privilege of watching hot young guys have sex, our standards and expectations are much higher than in the real world.

I think you're quite right that the staff is always doing their best to find the best new talent out there. I'm sure also that sometimes the flow of promising new applications slows to a trickle. Then they are forced to make very quick but tough choices in order to keep the new content and new updates running. They don't always have the luxury of waiting 3 weeks or a month to see if the application pool picks up.
 
Last edited:
Age: 22
Height: 5.9 (175cm)
Weight: 182
Shoe: 11 US (45 EU)
Cock: 7.0 (18cm) Cut

By the way, I just checked out his jerk off scene and I think they may have shaved a year or two off his age, and perhaps added an inch or two to his cock size, but it's all okay as , "It's only porn". :001_rolleyes:

And while someone else may start a thread for his solo, I will comment here that I am still not impressed, but I can see from the comments on his BTS, that some forumites are more into his body type than I am, but I am still not impressed, but that's just me! :closedeyes:

I'm not even sure they got the "cut" part right Mikey. lol I'm pretty sure that he is uncut. It's a bit hard to tell. Some pictures you think definitely uncut. Others you're not sure.

1724-pic-13.jpg

1724-pic-23.jpg

1724-pic-28.jpg
 
Top