Broke Straight Boys Cumming On Live Cams

[deeteedub]

I am confused deeteedub, by your frequent references to your displeasure of watching "models that won't do anything with guys".

I am confused as there are so many sites on the web, many offering free content featuring guys who "do it all" with guys. In fact, Broke Straight Boys has a companion site College Dudes, which Mark has shared some free videos of right here. I saw very handsome models who engage in gay sex apparently willingly and appear to love what they are doing.

Do you not realize that Broke Straight Boys is a fetish site for those who are turned on by watching straight guys engage in gay sex, and by it's very nature, the guys who appear here are portrayed as guys who do not want to willingly have gay sex? That's the whole premise of this site.

You are certainly as entitled as I am to voice your opinion, but I do find it contradictory. To me, that seems like someone who hates chocolate spending a lot of time shopping at "Godiva chocolate", and complaining about what they sell there.

You say all this as if you're the old man on the mountain looking down on all us unfortunate sods who don't know any better. The entire notion that Broke Straight Boys has always been a one minded fetish site is crap and you know it. "Amateur" and "straight" isn't a license for poor quality episodes with unprofessional models, and just because you have the puppy love hots for Jimmy doesn't excuse it either. Most importantly, "broke" is the quintessential reason not to be underperforming like some kind of second rate, hissy-fit throwing diva.

I've been a paying member of BOTH sites for years now, and if my dissatisfaction with Broke Straight Boys 2.0 irks you, too bad. No web site is 100% perfect. There are lots of things about College Dudes that I like a lot more than Broke Straight Boys, and vice versa. When Broke Straight Boys gets it right, as it has in the past (and sporadically lately), it's spot on and hot, but it's been dragging its feet for far too long now since the inception of 2.0 and too many of you have been letting it slide. I have said before that my criticisms aren't just for sake of ranting, they're because I want Broke Straight Boys to be the best that it can be. And we're never going to get there if we let it continue to plod along. As it any business, you cut loose the dead weight and shine forward with the best.

Lately, the models have gotten so much better. The cream of the crop right now that can be rightfully called the stars of the next generation Broke Straight Boys are the likes of Jason (1.0 and 2.0), Mark, Colin, Kevin, Jack, Mick and (even) Bobby. They come to each episode with the intent on giving 110%, which is the way it should ALWAYS be.

So forgive me for being critical for the right reasons, but I don't suffer any delusions that by getting on here every minute of the day and spouting compliments ad nauseum to even the lesser performers is gonna win me brownie points that I can trade in for an autographed poster to hang on my bedroom wall or a shout out in the forums or BTS scenes, because that ain't gonna happen ... and I could care less if it does. I want one thing: PERFORMANCE!

If I'm wrong for wanting only the best from Broke Straight Boys, then I'm guilty as charged ... but don't whitewash the "premise of the site" for me. I'm not stupid.

 

[mikeyank]

You say all this as if you're the old man on the mountain looking down on all us unfortunate sods who don't know any better. The entire notion that Broke Straight Boys has always been a one minded fetish site is crap and you know it. "Amateur" and "straight" isn't a license for poor quality episodes with unprofessional models, and just because you have the puppy love hots for Jimmy doesn't excuse it either. Most importantly, "broke" is the quintessential reason not to be underperforming like some kind of second rate, hissy-fit throwing diva.

I've been a paying member of BOTH sites for years now, and if my dissatisfaction with Broke Straight Boys 2.0 irks you, too bad. No web site is 100% perfect. There are lots of things about College Dudes that I like a lot more than Broke Straight Boys, and vice versa. When Broke Straight Boys gets it right, as it has in the past (and sporadically lately), it's spot on and hot, but it's been dragging its feet for far too long now since the inception of 2.0 and too many of you have been letting it slide. I have said before that my criticisms aren't just for sake of ranting, they're because I want Broke Straight Boys to be the best that it can be. And we're never going to get there if we let it continue to plod along. As it any business, you cut loose the dead weight and shine forward with the best.

Lately, the models have gotten so much better. The cream of the crop right now that can be rightfully called the stars of the next generation Broke Straight Boys are the likes of Jason (1.0 and 2.0), Mark, Colin, Kevin, Jack, Mick and (even) Bobby. They come to each episode with the intent on giving 110%, which is the way it should ALWAYS be.

So forgive me for being critical for the right reasons, but I don't suffer any delusions that by getting on here every minute of the day and spouting compliments ad nauseum to even the lesser performers is gonna win me brownie points that I can trade in for an autographed poster to hang on my bedroom wall or a shout out in the forums or BTS scenes, because that ain't gonna happen ... and I could care less if it does. I want one thing: PERFORMANCE!

If I'm wrong for wanting only the best from Broke Straight Boys, then I'm guilty as charged ... but don't whitewash the "premise of the site" for me. I'm not stupid.

I find it curious that you accuse me of being "the old man on the mountain looking down on all us unfortunate sods who don't know any better", whereas I don't think that my way of thinking is necessarily "correct", but only offering an alternate position to what you declare as being an "absolute truth". I consider myself "liberal" both in my politics, and the way I view people and situations. I try to keep an open mind, and realize that this is a great big world, with all kinds of people, who have all kinds of opinions, and I understand that if someone disagrees with me, they are not necessarily WRONG, they just have a different point of view.

In your post you declare that:

"The cream of the crop right now that can be rightfully called the stars of the next generation Broke Straight Boys are the likes of Jason (1.0 and 2.0), Mark, Colin, Kevin, Jack, Mick and (even) Bobby. They come to each episode with the intent on giving 110%, which is the way it should ALWAYS be."

Of the seven models that you mention, I very much enjoy three of them, Colin, Jack and Bobby, as well as several others that you don't mention, but again it is all subjective. There is no right or wrong in taste.

You also say that you are, "being critical for the right reasons", but again you are leaving out the words, "in my opinion".

Finally, I decided to click on your screen name and read some of your previous posts to the forum. I find it interesting to discover that your very first post on the forum was on June 30, 2010 where you accused David, (our iconic former director of Broke Straight Boys, who I consider to be the main reason that this site has been as popular as it has been) of being a racist, and back then I was the first poster to comment and said that I find David's somewhat clumsy, non politically correct sense of humor to be part of his charm, and you responded by asking me if I was a personal friend of his.

You continued to bash David for his "racism", and talking too much, and on January 19 of this year you said, speaking of David,:

"I can't wait for the new Broke Straight Boys site to launch. Hopefully he'll be gone, and the new one will be racist-free." But with the launch of Broke Straight Boys-2, you began to bash Clay, his models, his scenes and his way of directing too.

I have enjoyed Broke Straight Boys from my initial joining of the site. I have total respect for Mark, the site owner and I trust that he knows exactly what he is doing in having Clay as his director, in the type of model's that he employs, and having Jimmy as the "poster boy" or face of Broke Straight Boys He is above all a businessman, and does what he feels will please the largest segment of his audience, to make his project's lucrative.

And no, I am not a personal friend of Mark, Clay, nor was I a personal friend of David, and no I do not make my posts trying to gain "brownie points" from the models I enjoy like Jimmy, Jamie, Bobby, Jack or Colin to get "an autographed poster to hang on my bedroom wall or a shout out in the forums or BTS scenes".

I pride myself on being as honest as possible, speaking my mind, and saying exactly what I believe and enjoy watching. And I understand that everyone who is a member of this site and of this forum, does not have the exact same sensibilities as I do. And I respect all other points of view. I only state my own, and certainly do not declare my point of view as being necessarily the correect one, just my own honest opinion.

 

[deeteedub]

I find it curious that you accuse me of being "the old man on the mountain looking down on all us unfortunate sods who don't know any better", whereas I don't think that my way of thinking is necessarily "correct", but only offering an alternate position to what you declare as being an "absolute truth". I consider myself "liberal" both in my politics, and the way I view people and situations. I try to keep an open mind, and realize that this is a great big world, with all kinds of people, who have all kinds of opinions, and I understand that if someone disagrees with me, they are not necessarily WRONG, they just have a different point of view.

In your post you declare that:

"The cream of the crop right now that can be rightfully called the stars of the next generation Broke Straight Boys are the likes of Jason (1.0 and 2.0), Mark, Colin, Kevin, Jack, Mick and (even) Bobby. They come to each episode with the intent on giving 110%, which is the way it should ALWAYS be."

Of the seven models that you mention, I very much enjoy three of them, Colin, Jack and Bobby, as well as several others that you don't mention, but again it is all subjective. There is no right or wrong in taste.

You also say that you are, "being critical for the right reasons", but again you are leaving out the words, "in my opinion".

Finally, I decided to click on your screen name and read some of your previous posts to the forum. I find it interesting to discover that your very first post on the forum was on June 30, 2010 where you accused David, (our iconic former director of Broke Straight Boys, who I consider to be the main reason that this site has been as popular as it has been) of being a racist, and back then I was the first poster to comment and said that I find David's somewhat clumsy, non politically correct sense of humor to be part of his charm, and you responded by asking me if I was a personal friend of his.

You continued to bash David for his "racism", and talking too much, and on January 19 of this year you said, speaking of David,:

"I can't wait for the new Broke Straight Boys site to launch. Hopefully he'll be gone, and the new one will be racist-free." But with the launch of Broke Straight Boys-2, you began to bash Clay, his models, his scenes and his way of directing too.

I have enjoyed Broke Straight Boys from my initial joining of the site. I have total respect for Mark, the site owner and I trust that he knows exactly what he is doing in having Clay as his director, in the type of model's that he employs, and having Jimmy as the "poster boy" or face of Broke Straight Boys He is above all a businessman, and does what he feels will please the largest segment of his audience, to make his project's lucrative.

And no, I am not a personal friend of Mark, Clay, nor was I a personal friend of David, and no I do not make my posts trying to gain "brownie points" from the models I enjoy like Jimmy, Jamie, Bobby, Jack or Colin to get "an autographed poster to hang on my bedroom wall or a shout out in the forums or BTS scenes".

I pride myself on being as honest as possible, speaking my mind, and saying exactly what I believe and enjoy watching. And I understand that everyone who is a member of this site and of this forum, does not have the exact same sensibilities as I do. And I respect all other points of view. I only state my own, and certainly do not declare my point of view as being necessarily the correect one, just my own honest opinion.

It's true that my postings began in 2010, which coincided with the timing of when your "iconic" leader David went off the rails and his focus strayed from keeping the spotlight on sex between the models and instead became his own personal chat show. Every episode turned into one big blabfest, and the more and more he rambled on, the more and more he let slip his tongue that betrayed his real feelings that were mainly all racist tinged. And it wasn't just me who was offended by this but a multitude of other members stood up and began to take their complaints to the forums also. Of course, you and a lot of others jumped to his defense and excused his behaviour with statements like, "oh, that's just David's quirky sense of humour." The most offensive was when someone actually stated that David couldn't be racist because he's Jewish! A racist statement in itself.

Personally, I think that Mark has allowed Clay's on-the-job-training to go on too long at the expense of his clients, but I will admit that Clay has improved lately.

Meanwhile, your iconic leader isn't around anymore. Cut loose like dead weight ...

 

[Ms. Kianna]

It's true that my postings began in 2010, which coincided with the timing of when your "iconic" leader David went off the rails and his focus strayed from keeping the spotlight on sex between the models and instead became his own personal chat show. Every episode turned into one big blabfest, and the more and more he rambled on, the more and more he let slip his tongue that betrayed his real feelings that were mainly all racist tinged. And it wasn't just me who was offended by this but a multitude of other members stood up and began to take their complaints to the forums also. Of course, you and a lot of others jumped to his defense and excused his behaviour with statements like, "oh, that's just David's quirky sense of humour." The most offensive was when someone actually stated that David couldn't be racist because he's Jewish! A racist statement in itself.

Personally, I think that Mark has allowed Clay's on-the-job-training to go on too long at the expense of his clients, but I will admit that Clay has improved lately.

Meanwhile, your iconic leader isn't around anymore. Cut loose like dead weight ...

Mark is the leader of Broke Straight Boys He always has been, and hasn't gone anywhere.......

 

[deeteedub]

I agree Ms. K ... but those weren't my words ...

 

[Rob_Ryder]

We have some Broke Straight Boys coming on our live cams soon. We have a service set all this up so it isn't included in your membership but it is well worth it. You can take the models into a private show and get them to do all sorts of hot stuff. These cams are great btw and some are in high definition. Their regular guys are incredibly hot. You can check out the live cams at http://live.brokestraightboys.com or by clicking on live shows in the top right corner.

Hey Mark, out of curiosity, Is this different then the cam site that I am on?