mikeyank
Long time forumite
I've often referred to the Kinsey scale, which I believe it basically accurate in referencing our sexuality, but I found this rather amusing, visual version.
I was born in the 20th century, and am now in my sixth decade of life, but I've always been a "6" and can't see that it would be different if I was born thirty or forty years later, and so conversely I have to assume that there are still plenty of "0"'s even in this age of "pansexuality".I would be interested in where men fit on this scale, in the 21st century. I am thinking that 2's and 3's and 4's are where most males fit.
in my life, I have found that a guy says he is straight, but if you could loan him some money, he would have sex with you, nothing says forgive me, my debts like giving head too.
I was born in the 20th century, and am now in my sixth decade of life, but I've always been a "6" and can't see that it would be different if I was born thirty or forty years later, and so conversely I have to assume that there are still plenty of "0"'s even in this age of "pansexuality".
I think the difference is that guys today are able to express their inner feelings more openly than in the past, but I do believe that people are still people, as they've always been.
but I do believe that people are still people, as they've always been.
rafe59It's funny if you think about it....back in the day you were even defined by your job, a logger being masculine and rugged, and a store keeper not so masculine...didn't matter if the shop keeper was straight and the logger was gay....lolololol......times sure have changed....
It's funny if you think about it....back in the day you were even defined by your job, a logger being masculine and rugged, and a store keeper not so masculine...didn't matter if the shop keeper was straight and the logger was gay....lolololol......times sure have changed....
I was born in the 20th century, and am now in my sixth decade of life, but I've always been a "6" and can't see that it would be different if I was born thirty or forty years later, and so conversely I have to assume that there are still plenty of "0"'s even in this age of "pansexuality".
I think the difference is that guys today are able to express their inner feelings more openly than in the past, but I do believe that people are still people, as they've always been.
We agree 100% on this Ambi!**************************************
Mike, contra what some have said on this thread - there are PLENTY of "zero's" out there. Just as there are plenty of people all up and down the Kinsey-scale. Some of those zero's are friends of mine, and I respect them and love them just as they are - just as they respect and love me, just as I am. This kind of mutual respect has enabled me to enjoy some truly wonderful friendships, with totally straight guys - guys who would never appear on Broke Straight Boys, for love OR money. They would never experiment, and never play around with a guy, even if you put a whole bottle of Johnnie Walker down them, in half-an-hour.
These guys (lots of them sweet and kind and not at all homophobic) would honestly rather have someone put a Luger to their temple, than ever to let anyone suck them off. I KNOW and am friends with, guys like this. The idea that every guy's sexual preference or availability, is malleable in accordance with the cash or favours offered - is a product of: 1) The Internet; and, 2) Gay wishful thinking.
Because I have a lot of truly straight friends, when I read people saying things like, "Every straight guy is gay for an hour after nine tequilas - or a couple of Benjamins thrust into his palm" - it truly angers and disgusts me.
Because, look. As gay men (particularly for those of us who are "6's"): it took us hundreds of years, for people to accept us as men who can only love other men - physically, romantically, and emotionally. It is great that that day has finally come.
But I say, let's accord the same courtesy and kindness to our truly straight friends. Yeah, for sure, some of them are cute and sweet and HOT. But that doesn't mean they want to get sucked off by one of US. Some gay guys treat their straight friends and acquaintances that way, as bait to be lured and tempted into a tryst - - - and I have one word for gay guys like that: "JERKS".
Mike, I think you are also right that, in today's more tolerant world, guys who are more in the middle of the spectrum, don't feel the guilt or shame that used to attach, if they want to experiment with another guy. That's a very good thing, in my opinion - and I am glad that people now have more freedom to discover what they need in life - physically, sexually, emotionally, and romantically.
I'm VERY glad that there is a lot more openness, and tolerance, in today's society, than there was when I was growing up. But I think that ALL HUMAN BEINGS are INDIVIDUALS, and every person should be addressed, and respected, as an individual. Yes, there are guys in the middle of the spectrum who want to experiment, and that's cool - but the idea that just because a guy is cute, he wants you to suck his dick, is not just a fantasy - - - - it's a pathology, which unfortunately has been encouraged by gay erotica, and the over-active, fetid, imaginations of gay guys, who also believe in unicorns. I wish gay guys who think like that, would just get the hell OVER it, and treat their straight friends with a little RESPECT.
"A" XOXOXOXOXO
"The Unicorn Song" ~ The Irish Rovers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EPsuOEH1fY